Placeholder Image

Subtitles section Play video

  • - This is probably the beginning

  • of a really long, challenging time

  • for both Uber, Lyft, Postmates, DoorDash,

  • and a lot of companies in the sharing economy space.

  • - It almost seems to me like they're digging

  • their heels into a business model

  • that is, in and of itself, never going to work.

  • - You're alone (chuckles) in your car,

  • and this massive technological operation

  • is just sucking the revenue out of you and leaves you

  • to deal with all the rest of it by yourself.

  • - This notion of, "I wanna be paid really high salaries,

  • "I wanna be guaranteed all of my income,

  • "whether the demand is there or not,"

  • that's not how capitalism works!

  • (cars honking)

  • - [Narrator] The gig economy, the sharing economy,

  • the future of work, whatever you call it,

  • contract work may be changing, for both the workers

  • and the tech companies that rely on it.

  • California just passed Assembly Bill 5,

  • a law that could completely abandon the gig economy

  • by reclassifying many independent contractors as employees,

  • a huge step towards a new labor model across the country.

  • Hundreds of thousands of contract workers

  • in California are set to become employees,

  • threatening the business models of ride-hailing companies

  • like Uber and Lyft, and a host of other companies.

  • Veena Dubal is a labor law professor

  • at the University of California, Hastings

  • who's studied the taxi industry

  • and the gig economy for over a decade.

  • - In the first years of the gig economy,

  • things were okay, but over the last five years,

  • they've lowered income for drivers.

  • These companies unilaterally set prices,

  • and they unilaterally drop prices,

  • and they unilaterally decide that drivers are gonna

  • make even less of the fare that they were before.

  • - [Narrator] Under the new law, drivers could be entitled

  • to benefits like a minimum hourly wage

  • and workers' compensation,

  • but the question for workers is,

  • will those benefits come at the cost of flexibility?

  • Will part-time jobbers be forced to become employees

  • and start working scheduled shifts?

  • While some Uber and Lyft drivers fear

  • they could lose flexibility as an employee,

  • others like Edan Alva welcome the protections.

  • Alva moved to the U.S. from Israel almost 20 years ago

  • and worked as a corporate security manager in the Bay Area.

  • He started driving for Lyft part time 4 1/2 years ago

  • to make a little extra money on his long commute.

  • Then he lost his job and was forced to start driving

  • full time to support himself and his son.

  • He currently drives for Lyft and Zum, a rideshare

  • specifically to take children to and from school.

  • - My rates today are about half

  • of what they were when I started four years ago.

  • Every day feels like a Russian roulette, (chuckles)

  • because the chances of something happening,

  • maybe something small and annoying, like another flat tire,

  • maybe something bigger like a car accident,

  • maybe something devastating like getting injured,

  • in a way that I cannot work, it's all there.

  • And if that happens, I have no safety network!

  • - [Narrator] AB5 will require companies that want to treat

  • a worker as a contractor to prove three things,

  • that the worker isn't controlled by the company,

  • that the work isn't part of the company's core business,

  • and that the worker has their own independent enterprise.

  • Uber and Lyft told us this could force them

  • to raise costs and wait times for riders

  • and significantly reduce the amount of drivers they employ.

  • Lyft also told drivers in a message

  • that they may soon be required to drive

  • specific shifts, stick to specific areas,

  • and drive for only a single platform.

  • Uber said it plans a legal challenge,

  • arguing that drivers are not part of their core business.

  • Bradley Tusk was an early investor

  • and consultant for Uber who helped the company

  • successfully oppose the minimum pay

  • and other ride-hailing rules in New York.

  • - When I was investing in and working with Uber

  • back in the early days, it was envisioned

  • as something that people would do

  • in their spare time to make a few extra bucks,

  • not as their full-time living.

  • There are a subset of drivers in some really big cities

  • where it very much is their full-time job,

  • and so it's problematic 'cause it's expensive,

  • it's problematic because fundamentally,

  • the business wasn't designed for that.

  • - [Narrator] The two companies say they have more

  • than half a million combined drivers in California,

  • and that the majority of them drive

  • less than 20 hours a week.

  • They say that drivers take home more than 70% of fares,

  • but economists have estimated,

  • Uber and Lyft drivers earn on average between nine

  • and $16 an hour, after accounting for gas, maintenance,

  • and other expenses the contractors are responsible for.

  • Many part-time drivers fear AB5 could make it worse,

  • and by forcing them to drive scheduled shifts,

  • it would wipe out the flexibility they need.

  • Alva recently started organizing Lyft and Uber drivers,

  • has been active at demonstrations in support of AB5.

  • He often talks to drivers while waiting for rides

  • in the parking lots at the airport.

  • - Currently, in the San Francisco Airport,

  • there are 216 drivers who are just waiting

  • in their car for a ride.

  • All these drivers are waiting here.

  • Nobody is paying them for their time, and they will wait

  • until they will get a ride from the airport.

  • Sometimes it can take 15 minutes,

  • sometimes it can take 30, an hour, or more.

  • - [Narrator] It's unclear how the bill will be enforced

  • once it's enacted in January, but Uber, Lyft,

  • and DoorDash have already pledged to combine $90 million

  • for a ballot measure campaign to alter the law.

  • - Just a few months from now, in January 2020,

  • most state legislative sessions will begin again,

  • and it will be hard to not see 10 to 15 states

  • take this issue up, so it's a domino effect,

  • and one thing Uber and Lyft and the others

  • really need to do is try to overturn

  • the California legislation as quickly as possible.

  • - The reason that it's so incredibly important

  • is because if we hadn't put the brakes

  • on this business model,

  • what is to have prevented all other service work

  • from going down this road?

  • - When you look at the broader picture,

  • any industry can be put on an app,

  • and the question is,

  • is that a real reason

  • for people to not have workers' rights?

  • (subdued music)

- This is probably the beginning

Subtitles and vocabulary

Click the word to look it up Click the word to find further inforamtion about it

B1 US WSJ uber california gig economy narrator

How Uber, Lyft and Others Could Be Upended By California's New Law | WSJ

  • 11 0
    王語萱 posted on 2019/09/26
Video vocabulary

Keywords

specific

US /spɪˈsɪfɪk/

UK /spəˈsɪfɪk/

  • adjective
  • Relating to a particular species, structure, etc.
  • Precise; particular; just about that thing
  • Relating to a particular thing.
  • Clearly defined or identified.
  • Stated clearly and in detail, leaving no room for confusion or doubt.
  • Concerning one particular thing or kind of thing
devastating

US

UK

  • adjective
  • Destroying everything; very shocking
  • Causing great emotional pain and suffering.
  • Causing great emotional pain or shock.
  • Causing great damage or destruction.
  • Causing great damage or suffering.
  • Causing someone to feel extreme emotional pain.
  • Causing someone to feel great shock or distress.
  • verb
  • To cause extensive destruction or ruin utterly
  • other
  • To destroy or ruin something.
  • Past participle of devastate: To cause great destruction or damage to.
force

US /fɔrs, fors/

UK /fɔ:s/

  • other
  • To break open (something) using force.
  • To compel (someone) to do something.
  • To cause (a plant or crop) to develop or mature prematurely in a greenhouse or under artificial conditions.
  • To cause (a plant or flower) to grow or develop at an increased rate.
  • To use physical strength to break open or move (something).
  • other
  • Coercion or compulsion; strength or power exerted to cause motion or change.
  • Strength or energy as an attribute of physical action or movement.
  • other
  • Coercion or compulsion; strength or power exerted to cause or affect.
  • An influence or effect.
  • Physical strength or energy as an attribute of physical action or movement.
  • Strength or energy as an attribute of physical action or movement.
  • noun
  • Coercion or compulsion, especially with the use or threat of violence.
  • Group of persons trained for military action; army
  • A body of people employed and trained for a particular task or purpose.
  • An influence or effect.
  • A body of people employed and trained for law enforcement.
  • A body of soldiers or police.
  • An influence that can cause a body to accelerate.
  • Pressure; attraction
  • Strength or energy as an attribute of physical action or movement.
  • The use of physical strength/violence to persuade
  • Strength or power of expression or argument.
  • verb
  • To use physical strength or violence to persuade
fear

US /fɪr/

UK /fɪə(r)/

  • noun
  • Unpleasant feeling caused by being aware of danger
  • verb
  • To be afraid of or nervous about something
  • other
  • A concern or worry.
  • other
  • An unpleasant emotion caused by the perception of danger, pain, or threat.
  • A feeling of reverence and respect for someone or something.
  • other
  • To be afraid of (someone or something) as likely to be dangerous, painful, or threatening.
spare

US /spɛr/

UK /speə(r)/

  • verb
  • To make (money or time) available for
  • To save from being hurt or punished
  • To allow someone not to do something unpleasant
  • adjective
  • Being extra or in reserve
  • noun
  • Extra part; something in reserve for replacements
notion

US /ˈnoʃən/

UK /ˈnəuʃən/

  • noun
  • Sudden idea or desire to do something
prevent

US /prɪˈvɛnt/

UK /prɪ'vent/

  • verb
  • To stop something from happening or existing
  • other
  • To stop something from happening or someone from doing something.
contract

US /'kɑ:ntrækt/

UK /'kɒntrækt/

  • verb
  • To become ill as a result of getting a disease
  • To make an agreement for doing work for money
  • To reduce in size, length due to heat loss
  • To reduce the amount of
  • Decrease in size, number, or range.
  • noun
  • A written or spoken agreement, especially one concerning employment, sales, or tenancy, that is intended to be enforceable by law
  • Legal agreement, e.g. for doing work for money
  • Agreement to pay someone to kill a person
  • other
  • To enter into a formal and legally binding agreement
  • To catch or develop (a disease or infectious agent)
  • To shorten (a word or words) by omitting or combining some of the sounds or letters
  • other
  • To decrease in size, number, or range
industry

US /ˈɪndəstri/

UK /'ɪndəstrɪ/

  • other
  • The production of goods or related services within an economy.
  • other
  • The production of goods or services within a country or region.
  • Hard work and dedication to a task or purpose.
  • noun
  • Hard work; being busy working
  • Factories or businesses that make certain products
  • A group of businesses that provide a particular product or service.
  • other
  • A group of businesses that provide similar products or services.
suck

US /sʌk/

UK /sʌk/

  • verb
  • To be very bad, undesirable or unpleasant
  • To pull or remove something with great power
  • To attract someone; make someone interested
  • To draw into your mouth through a small hole
  • noun
  • Drawing of liquid into a tube or hole
  • phrasal verb
  • To trick or deceive someone into doing something