US /p'leɪbʊk/
・UK /p'leɪbʊk/
Trump and PewDiePie are using the same playbook.
*trump and Pewdiepie are using the same playbook*
Solar provided us with a playbook for how to do that for other technologies.
All it is, is the Republicans—certain Republicans—got duped by the Democrats, and they're following a Democrat, uh, playbook.
The Democrats have never had a playbook.
Union and it sees the US tariff policy as a disrupted factor but the on the other hand it also sees this tense transatlantic relation as a great opportunity to kind of woo the European Union to its side. So basically Beijing entered this meeting, this summit, with an emboldened attitude. They decided to you know stand their ground. They are not going to make compromises. And why is that? Because that's what China did with the US. You know like they went with the US when Donald Trump has imposed a lot of tariffs on Chinese goods and they see it as a success to you know stay stand their ground when it comes to the US. So they would use this same playbook because they think it works and they will use it and apply it when they trying to make a deal with the
So they would use this same playbook because they think it works,
I got to study my playbook.
I got to study my playbook.
And I can imagine that they are refreshing that playbook.
And I can imagine that they are refreshing that playbook.
Many of these threats originate from state-based actors following a common playbook: seeking to expand influence by dividing, destabilizing,
Many of these threats originate from state based actors following a common playbook seeking to expand influence by dividing, destabilizing and discrediting democratic systems.
You got to read a playbook though, right?
I got to read the playbook.
So I mean, I think the ImageNet example actually sort of sets a playbook for how we can try to approach a problem.
sort of sets a playbook for how we
This is Apple's playbook, right?
This is Apple's playbook, right?