US /pɑ:rˈtɪsɪpl/
・UK /pɑ:ˈtɪsɪpl/
The expression uses 'have', an object and the action which is done to the object - and the action is always in past participle form.
In the if clause, we use the past perfect and in the result clause, we use would plus have plus a past participle.
and in the result clause, we use would plus have plus a past participle.
Then you take your verb and you put it into the past participle.
Then you take your verb and you put it into the past participle.
The structure we use for the present perfect is: subject plus have/has plus past participle plus object.
plus past participle plus object.
and "made" - we have a past participle.
So, you have the object, the "be" verb, and the past participle.
I told you with would, we use the present tense of the verb or the base verb, but if we're going to use had, it's going to be the past participle.
PP in my brain means past participle.
It basically means "who are aged 18-25". So this is a participle, now, a reduced adjective
So this is a participle now, a reduced adjective clause, okay?
For the present perfect, we use the auxiliary verb to have and the past participle.
For the regular verbs, we make a past participle by adding -ed to the infinitive form of the verb.
beat". The past participle of "beat" is "beaten", so you have to say, "Chelsea were beaten by
Here we have: "Arsenal beat Chelsea." And in the passive sense, you can say, "Chelsea were beaten by Arsenal." So we don't say "were beat." The past participle of "beat" is "beaten." So you have to say, "Chelsea were beaten by Arsenal." "They were beaten 2-1." Okay?
plus "has" or "have", plus the past participle. So if it's regular, you're going to be doing
Subject plus "has" or "have" plus the past participle.