US /ˈhɪrseɪ/
・UK /ˈhɪəseɪ/
And second, there's a thing that I've started to notice now, having done Idea Channel for a little while, which is that these types of comments where we get accused of making things up, relying on hearsay, or inventing stuff really only happen in very specific situations.
accused of making things up, relying on hearsay,
So it's not just hearsay.
So it's not just hearsay.
It's hearsay from 26 years ago.
Not to mention, without the prostitute, it's hearsay from 26 years ago.
If there's something that's releasable and it's credible and it doesn't hurt any survivors and it doesn't implicate people on second and third order hearsay.
Number two, it looked to me like today the president was sending a signal, like, OK, fine, if there's something that's releasable and it's credible and it doesn't hurt any survivors and it doesn't implicate people on, you know, second and third order hearsay.
You know, if you go to some small town in some less developed country, you can ask around, "Who owns this property?" And they'll tell you, "You know, that's been in such and such a family for a long time." But if you want solid knowledge of that, how do you you know, if you're going to base financial transactions on it, you can't base it just on hearsay, right?
transactions on it, you can't base it just on hearsay.
Hearsay! Bailiff! Brief case!
Hearsay!
That wasn't in the initial Washington Post article, which claimed that following, by hearsay, somebody claimed to have heard Hegseth say, "We have to kill everybody, therefore the admiral gave the second hit." So I just want to clear that up.
That wasn't in the initial Washington Post article which claimed that, following by hearsay, somebody claimed to have heard Hegseth say, we have to kill everybody.
Some people are calling this pure hearsay and guessing, zero factual evidence,
Some people calling this pure hearsay and guessing, zero factual evidence.
It's just, you know, it's all hearsay.