Placeholder Image

Subtitles section Play video

  • In this video, we are going to do a deep dive into a DCS

  • and discuss some of the why's and how's associated with a DCS.

  • before we get started on today's video

  • if you love our videos,be sure to click the like button below.

  • then make sure to click subscribe

  • and the little bell to receive notifications of new RealPars videos.

  • This way you never miss another one!

  • Let's first clarify, for the purpose of this lesson, what we mean by DCS.

  • Over the years, the term DCS has evolved from the original description

  • for the acronym as a Distributed Control System to the use of the term Decentralized Control System

  • and they seem to be somewhat interchangeable nowadays.

  • Regardless of which description is used,

  • we are discussing a structure that,at the high-level view,

  • is a system that coordinates and supervises an entire plant of many varying processes.

  • Briefly, as a point of the historical review, when PLC's were invented,

  • they were really good at handling single processes

  • and were primarily used for repetitive, discrete control.

  • The advent of the DCS was for controlling many autonomous controllers

  • that handled many continuous operations, mainly using analog control.

  • Through time and innovation,the lines have blurred a bit between the two systems

  • but each, in the current day, has some principal differences.

  • PLCs, traditionally, were used for single batch or high-speed control,

  • have a relatively simple, low-cost design, and are the core of the system.

  • Their design is flexible and generic but completely customizable.

  • Processing time for tasks are typically very fast,

  • operators usually interact and control the system using some sort of graphical display such as SCADA.

  • A DCS is used for continuous, complex controls,

  • they have an integrated control center much like a SCADA,

  • which is the core of the system versus the processors in a PLC system.

  • The DCS has a number of predefined functions that come ready to customize

  • and deploy for various applications.

  • Processing times are somewhat slower.

  • Operators interact with the control system via an integrated graphical display.

  • DCS's also have a claim that when safety is a top priority, the DCS is the most reliable system.

  • The reason for this is because the manufacturer supplies both the control and supervisory equipment

  • as an integrated package, the risks of integration errors are greatly reduced.

  • There are indeed scenarios in which a PLC system would be the best option such as smaller sized processes

  • where you could employ redundant components to negate the possibility of process shutdowns.

  • Without redundancy, you risk production halts due to the nature of a single processor controlling an entire plant.

  • Redundancy may be deployed in either the PLC or DCS applications.

  • We will talk more about redundancy in a future video.

  • Just as there are circumstances for a PLC system, the use of DCS would be for larger,more complex processes

  • that require a lot of interaction between many processors.

  • Now that we've touched on some of the differences in the systems,

  • let's focus on the DCS and some of its components.

  • The DCS is a process-oriented system that uses closed-loop control.

  • A typical plant starts with a centralized operator control center typically called Operator Stations.

  • Operator Stations, in a DCS, are the heart of the system.

  • This is where the operator can observe the operations of the plant,

  • view process warnings and alarms, monitor production, and more.

  • The next level of components may contain servers, archiving computers, and engineering stations.

  • Communications with the Operator Station level is typically Industrial Ethernet.

  • Servers are used for the collection of data at the processor level.

  • They are responsible for the data that moves between the Operator Station and the processors on the plant floor.

  • Archiving computers are used for storing historical data that may be used for trends or compliance.

  • Engineering stations are used for creating the projects on which the processes run.

  • This includes hardware configurations, logic for tasks, graphical displays for operator interaction,

  • and the administration of all of those tasks through installed software packages.

  • This is the station that is used to download the projects to the processors and the graphical displays.

  • At the next level, you have the master controllers that supervise the individual processors as well as I/O modules.

  • These controllers are also responsible for providing the data to the servers,

  • which in turn, supply the data for the graphical interface.

  • Industrial Ethernet is typically used for communication with the previous level.

  • Fiber Optic may be used here when Ethernet cabling runs would be too long.

  • At this level, the processor executes the logic and does what it needs to do in order to control the process.

  • The next level is the field device level.

  • Communications between this level and the processor level

  • can be nearly any type that may be compatible with the components.

  • Those include Industrial Ethernet, Profibus DP, EtherCAT,

  • Fiber Optic, or other proprietary communication protocols.

  • Components at this level would be devices

  • such as transmitters, switches, valves, motors, remote or distributed I/O, etc.

  • In short, both PLCs and a DCS have their place in the market today.

  • PLCs would work best in a small production environment

  • where component failure if no redundant system is deployed, is a small risk for the application,

  • the budget is restricted, or the tasks and I/O count are minimal.

  • A DCS would be better used in an environment where there are large I/O counts

  • with many continuous processes,

  • a processor failure in one section of the plant is not a problem for production,

  • or risk assessment has determined that an integrated package would be the best option.

  • The line between the two systems is nearly invisible nowadays

  • and it may not be long before there is no differentiation at all.

  • In future videos, we are going to discuss SCADA and contrast DCS and SCADA systems so stay tuned!

  • Want to learn PLC programming in an easy to understand format

  • and take your career to the next level?

  • Head on over to realpars.com

In this video, we are going to do a deep dive into a DCS

Subtitles and vocabulary

Click the word to look it up Click the word to find further inforamtion about it

B1 US system plc level operator graphical processor

What is DCS? (Distributed Control System)

  • 5 0
    蔡育德 posted on 2019/11/16
Video vocabulary

Keywords

entire

US /ɛnˈtaɪr/

UK /ɪn'taɪə(r)/

  • adjective
  • Complete or full; with no part left out; whole
  • (Botany) Having a smooth edge, without teeth or divisions.
  • Undivided; not shared or distributed.
  • Whole; complete; with nothing left out.
process

US /ˈprɑsˌɛs, ˈproˌsɛs/

UK /prə'ses/

  • verb
  • To organize and use data in a computer
  • To deal with official forms in the way required
  • To prepare by treating something in a certain way
  • To adopt a set of actions that produce a result
  • To convert by putting something through a machine
  • noun
  • A series of actions or steps taken in order to achieve a particular end.
  • A summons or writ to appear in court or before a judicial officer.
  • A systematic series of actions directed to some end
  • Dealing with official forms in the way required
  • Set of changes that occur slowly and naturally
  • A series of actions or steps taken in order to achieve a particular end.
  • other
  • To perform a series of operations on (data) by a computer.
  • To deal with (something) according to a particular procedure.
  • Deal with (something) according to a set procedure.
  • To perform a series of mechanical or chemical operations on (something) in order to change or preserve it.
  • To perform a series of mechanical or chemical operations on (something) in order to change or preserve it.
  • Take (something) into the mind and understand it fully.
  • other
  • Deal with (something, especially unpleasant or difficult) psychologically in order to come to terms with it.
description

US /dɪˈskrɪpʃən/

UK /dɪˈskrɪpʃn/

  • noun
  • Explanation of what something is like, looks like
  • A spoken or written account of a person, object, or event.
  • A summary of a computer program or file.
  • The act or method of describing
  • A summary of the qualities and features of a product or service
  • The type or nature of someone or something.
term

US /tɚm/

UK /tɜ:m/

  • noun
  • A condition under which an agreement is made.
  • Conditions applying to an agreement, contract
  • A fixed period for which something lasts, especially a period of study at a school or college.
  • Each of the quantities in a ratio, series, or mathematical expression.
  • A limited period of time during which someone holds an office or position.
  • Length of time something is expected to happen
  • The normal period of gestation.
  • A way in which a person or thing is related to another.
  • Fixed period of weeks for learning at school
  • The (precise) name given to something
  • A word or phrase used to describe a thing or express a concept, especially in a particular kind of language or subject.
  • other
  • Give a specified name or description to.
  • verb
  • To call; give a name to
typically

US /ˈtɪpɪklɪ/

UK /ˈtɪpɪkli/

  • adverb
  • In a normal or usual way
  • In a way that is usual or expected.
  • In a way that is usual or expected.
interact

US /ˌɪntɚˈækt/

UK /ˌɪntər'ækt/

  • verb
  • To talk or do things with each other
  • other
  • To communicate or work together.
integrate

US /ˈɪntɪˌɡret/

UK /ˈɪntɪgreɪt/

  • verb
  • To combine together; make into one thing
  • other
  • To combine or blend into a functioning or unified whole.
  • other
  • To combine (one thing) with another so that they become a whole.
  • To bring (people or groups with particular characteristics or needs) into equal participation in or membership of a social group or institution.
  • Find the integral of a function or equation.
  • To bring (people or groups with particular characteristics or needs) into equal participation in or membership of a social group or institution.
failure

US /'feɪljər/

UK /ˈfeɪljə(r)/

  • noun
  • Lack of success.
  • When things go wrong; lack of function
  • Act or result of not achieving your goals
  • other
  • A breakdown or collapse, especially of a structure or mechanism.
  • The act of failing to reach the required standard in an exam or test.
  • The inability of an organ to function properly.
  • Lack of success; the inability to meet an objective or desired outcome.
  • The state or condition of not functioning or operating.
  • An omission or neglect of an expected or required action.
  • other
  • An instance of failing or not functioning correctly.
  • A person who has not succeeded; someone who has failed.
environment

US /ɛnˈvaɪrənmənt, -ˈvaɪən-/

UK /ɪn'vaɪrənmənt/

  • noun
  • A set of hardware or software parameters that define the characteristics of a computer system.
  • The natural world, as a whole or in a particular geographical area, especially as affected by human activity.
  • Natural world in which plants and animals live
  • The people and things that are around you that affect how you behave and develop.
  • The entire surrounding conditions of something
complex

US /kəmˈplɛks, ˈkɑmˌplɛks/

UK /'kɒmpleks/

  • noun
  • Group of buildings all used for the same purpose
  • Psychological issue regarding self-image
  • adjective
  • Not being simple; having many parts or aspects