B1 Intermediate UK 512 Folder Collection
After playing the video, you can click or select the word to look it up in the dictionary.
Loading...
Report Subtitle Errors
The human being
that emerges from psychoanalysis
is not a human being
that is at peace with itself.
It is a human being that is
divided,
split,
that is in conflict with itself,
and that doesn't know itself completely.
There is a kind of, in a way,
a new vision of what it is to be human
that emerges through psychoanalysis
which recognises conflict as fundamental.
Freud's fundamental view of humans
is that they are incessantly at war
with themselves, inside their own mind.
So that model of conflict
and of division within,
of a sort of fractured self,
is fundamentally important.
Freud has two models of the mind.
In the first model he distinguishes between
perception-consciousness,
what he calls the preconscious,
and the unconscious.
In the second model he distinguishes between
the ego, the id, and superego.
The id refers to the cluster of drives,
that push for immediate satisfaction.
It's governed by the pleasure principle.
It wants things here and now,
regardless of the consequences,
and if it doesn't get it then it screams
or has a tantrum.
So if the id's associated with the drives
and with getting satisfaction
however, in whatever form,
then the ego has to deal with that
and say: 'You can't do it that way,
but maybe you can do it this way'.
It's a negotiating agency.
And then you've got the superego
on the other side, which is to do with
conscience and law, which says:
'No, you can't try and do anything ever.
You've got to be perfect.
You've got to be all right.'
And so the ego's got to
mediate that too.
It's about how to makes these two,
the law and the drives,
how to make that liveable.
One of the difficulties in the later model
of ego, id, and superego,
and one off the reason why it doesn't just
map onto the earlier model
of conscious, unconscious, preconscious,
is that Freud thought that a part of the ego
was also unconscious to itself.
So there could be, as it were,
something going on in the ego
that's repressing thoughts
and yet that very fact, or that very process,
might be unconscious within the ego.
He thought of the ego as split
between a conscious and an unconscious part.
And then he also realised that
when, as a result of identifications
with our parents, we form ideals
that we want to match, ideals of ourselves,
these agencies are not all conscious.
So that the unconscious is actually spread
over the whole area of the mind.
Sometimes I think we can oversimplify it
by thinking about these
three little figures
running about in our minds.
The id represents normal, childish desires
and pleasures,
and to demonise those by calling it a devil,
I don't think is a good idea.
And with the superego as an angel,
I think that is even more problematic
because many of the demands of the superego
are quite tyrannical and nonsensical.
People talk about it as conscience,
a kind of, internalised version of conscience,
but that makes it sound rather sanitised.
So one of the features of the superego
is that is seems to be the voice of
conscience and morality,
but it's actually a passionately sadistic
and hating
voice in my ear, telling me what to do.
You know, the idea of the superego being
something quite, potentially perverse.
That it's an agency that can even get
enjoyment from making the person suffer,
from watching them fail
to live up to an ideal, for instance.
What Freud was saying was that
people fall ill of their moral ideals.
And we ought to question their moral ideals.
But the superego is
built out of the orders,
and the instructions and the diktats
and the words of your primary carers:
and 'you should' and 'you shouldn't',
and 'you must' and 'you mustn't', et cetera.
And so the exact words and beliefs
and ideals of your parents
are what your superego is built out of.
Let's take an example:
Take a person who,
a man who,
whose job was outside, in the street,
say he was a merchant at a market stall.
He developed panic attacks
when going into work,
and only in the summer,
and in the end he couldn't go into work
at all in the summer.
What emerged in the analysis was that
he was told as a young boy,
when he became interested in girls
and used to look,
'You mustn't stare at a woman.'
Now, in the summer, lots of slightly clad,
very pretty young women, girls
came to his market stall,
and he found it impossible not to look.
So to fulfil this moral demand of the superego
of which he wasn't aware, not initially,
all he could do in the end was to
avoid the situation completely.
So he was unable to work
because of his strict superego.
If people have a moral ideal,
that doesn't enable them to live,
then they're going to suffer.
In a way any symptom.
any psychological symptom,
would be an example of the ego breaking down,
so, you know, whether it's a phobia,
or an obsession with handwashing,
or an inability to go to work,
or depression.
All those things are signs
that the ego just isn't coping
and isn't managing to find a suitable compromise.
The second model of the mind
that Freud came up with,
the one that distinguishes between
the ego, the id, and the superego,
which also became the most popular one,
has advantages and disadvantages.
The disadvantage is,
and I think Freud himself noticed that
towards the end of his life, is that
it gives pride of place to the ego.
Freud draws the analogy between
a horse and a rider
and the ego and the id.
The id is a horse: a strong animal,
full of energy,
and the rider tries to rein in the horse,
to direct it along a pathway
that the rider chooses.
and, more often than not, that works.
However, sometimes
the horse has a mind of its own
and it chooses its own way,
and the ego, the rider, just follows
and pretends that it's going where it wants to go
where it's the horse that's making the decision.
And this gives us a bit of a problem
with the ego
because our egos are often giving us
a false idea about who we are
and what we can see.
The ego is always a bit of a
hokey construction. It's always a bit silly.
It's always just trying to make everything ok
and make everything look good.
It's a bit like politicians saying:
'We don't want to be seen to da da da da.'
They don't mind actually doing it
but they don't want to be seen to do it.
The ego is something a bit like that.
So, some of the things the ego might bring
when someone comes
is a story about themselves.
A typical one would be:
'I had a very happy childhood.
My mother and father got on very well.'
It's a story that, with a question,
may prove to not be the whole story.
And it's the ego,
it's job has been to censor
some of these darker aspects of people's lives.
There's no idea of propping up the ego.
It's just: stop the ego being so silly,
stop it being such a politician
and be a bit more realistic about the fact that
you might want to do bad things,
you might fail to live up to your ideals,
it might be very difficult to be human,
but try with that
and stop trying to be a robot.
    You must  Log in  to get the function.
Tip: Click on the article or the word in the subtitle to get translation quickly!

Loading…

What is Psychoanalysis? Part 4: The Ego, the Id and the Superego

512 Folder Collection
Christina Yang published on July 26, 2018
More Recommended Videos
  1. 1. Search word

    Select word on the caption to look it up in the dictionary!

  2. 2. Repeat single sentence

    Repeat the same sentence to enhance listening ability

  3. 3. Shortcut

    Shortcut!

  4. 4. Close caption

    Close the English caption

  5. 5. Embed

    Embed the video to your blog

  6. 6. Unfold

    Hide right panel

  1. Listening Quiz

    Listening Quiz!

  1. Click to open your notebook

  1. UrbanDictionary 俚語字典整合查詢。一般字典查詢不到你滿意的解譯,不妨使用「俚語字典」,或許會讓你有滿意的答案喔