Placeholder Image

Subtitles section Play video

  • [BATGAP theme music playing]

  • Darryl Anka (Bashar) July 14, 2014

  • Buddha at the Gas Pump Interview

  • Welcome to Buddha at the Gas Pump.

  • My name is Rick Archer and my guest today is Darryl Anka, who channels an entity known

  • as Bashar.

  • Well first of all, welcome Darryl thanks for doing this.

  • Thank you Rick, my pleasure.

  • Thank you for having me, I really appreciate it.

  • Yeah well this is gonna be fun.

  • Those who have been watching this show for some time know that I have a fairly eclectic

  • understanding, or orientation, towards spirituality.

  • I feel that the universe is far more vast and diverse, and complex and mysterious than

  • most of us realize, and that it's all pervaded by Divine intelligence, and that Divine intelligence

  • has a lot of tricks up it's sleeve [chuckles].

  • You know, a lot of different ways of enabling people to more fully realize that deep reality.

  • So I don't rule out much of anything as a valid spiritual path, and I think that people

  • choose the paths which they feel the most resonance or affinity, and that's cool with

  • me.

  • So I feel that the purpose of this show is to expose people to a variety of teachers

  • and teachings and paths and spiritual orientations, and let them use their own judgment as to

  • what works for them.

  • So I say that as, you know, a little bit of an introduction because I know that some of

  • my audience will think, “Oh, channeling, aliens and all this stuff.

  • What does this have to do?– I'm into Vedanta.”

  • And so I'd say, great.

  • Enjoy Vedanta but Vedanta isn't the only game in town.

  • And if you happen to resonate with what we're going to talk about today, and I'm sure

  • many of you will, then that's good.

  • And if you don't, then I'll do another one next week on a different topic [both laughing].

  • So Darryl, one thing that when I was listening to your various recordings of Bashar, there's

  • one in which he distinguished between, I believe it was, skepticism and cynicism.

  • Yes.

  • Yeah, I like that one, and correct me if I'm wrong, but he defined skepticism as a sort

  • of a healthy, open-minded inquisitiveness, which you're free to ask questions that

  • may arise, but you keep an open mind and you're willing to revise your perspective if new

  • evidence is presented.

  • Whereas cynicism is more like a rigidity, or a closed-mindedness, where you feel like

  • you've got it all figured out, and you reject evidence that clashes with your world-view

  • as being kooky or erroneous, or fallacious, or whatever.

  • Yes.

  • So by that definition, I would consider myself a skeptic - and it's sort of a complimentary

  • term - and I'll probably be asking some questions that may seem skeptical, but they're

  • asked in all respect and appreciation for what you do.

  • Yeah, that's fine.

  • Yeah, they may be questions that people we're talking to have in their own minds, so we

  • want to cover them.

  • So with that introduction, I think this interview will probably breakdown into two main sections,

  • and there may be sort of, inter-mixture between the two sections, but one will be about your

  • life.

  • You know, who you are and how you got into this, and how that whole thing unfolded.

  • And the other is about Bashar himself and the knowledge that he is bringing forth.

  • And so those two are intertwined but somewhat separate.

  • So let's start with the first one first.

  • As I understand it, you've been doing this for decades now.

  • 30 years.

  • 30 years, yeah, long time.

  • I know you've covered this in other interviews; there was a great interview on something called

  • 'Waking Universe'.

  • I really appreciated that one, that guy did a good job.

  • But since the people listening to this will probably not have listened to that, let's

  • cover some of the same ground, and maybe I'll ask some different questions.

  • Sure, absolutely.

  • So let's start by just, how did this whole thing start?

  • Well, for me it began back in 1973.

  • I actually had two, very close, broad daylight UFO sightings here in Los Angeles.

  • First time, about 150 feet away, the second time, only about 70 feet away.

  • Both times it was an equilateral, black, triangular ship - about 20 or 30 feet on each side.

  • Now fortunately I had witnesses with me both times, so I knew I had some collaboration

  • and some corroboration in that experiencein both those experiences.

  • But it was those UFO experiences that started me investigating what's this all about?

  • Because now I'd seen something like that, I knew that the world wasn't exactly as

  • I had been taught it was, and I needed to find out what was going on.

  • So in that investigation in the following yearsof course back then there weren't

  • a lot of books on a lot of metaphysical subjects.

  • So you kind of walk into a bookstore looking for UFO books and books on psychic functioning

  • or channeling, or things like that, would all be on the same one shelf in the back of

  • the store.

  • So I just kind of went down the line and picked up on these different books, and tried to

  • ascertain if one had anything to do with another.

  • I became familiar with channeling through the Seth material from Jane Roberts, and I

  • found it to be

  • Hang on just one second before you proceed.

  • About the UFOs, Los Angeles is a populous place.

  • I mean, was this broad daylight, did you say?

  • Both of them were in broad daylight, yes.

  • I was on the freeway the first time.

  • We were actually looking around to see if anyone else in any of the other cars, while

  • we were driving, were looking up at this thing.

  • Everyone in my car saw it, but I couldn't tell if anyone else was looking up and seeing

  • this thing.

  • It was hovering just above and outside of this hotel, which was maybe about 12 stories

  • tall.

  • And it didn't make the news or anything?

  • Well not that I was aware of, although I have subsequently seen more and more reports of

  • triangular UFOs since that time.

  • But I think it took about 2 or 3 years after my sighting before I actually heard of another

  • report of a triangular UFO.

  • They seem to be pretty rare back then; now they seem to be more and more common.

  • Ok.

  • Did you have any spiritual or esoteric tendencies before this, or was that the catalyst that

  • got you going?

  • Not really.

  • That was the really the catalyst.

  • I mean my family had raised me Catholic.

  • You know, I didn't really resonate with the idea of

  • religion in that sense; it was just kind of surreal to me.

  • And so no, I didn't really have any leanings in any particular spiritual direction, but

  • this really ignited my curiosity about what was going on.

  • Ok, good.

  • And so later on we'll talk a lot more about the UFO phenomenon and all that.

  • Sure.

  • But you were about to talk about your exploration and you mentioned you stumbled upon the Seth

  • materialJane Roberts.

  • Yes, yes, and so that gave me some degree of introduction to the idea of channeling.

  • And 10 years after the UFO sighting, I was actually introduced to a channel who was holding

  • seminars at the time.

  • And I went to listen to the information coming through that channel, and after a few months

  • I thought, it's interesting information, it seems to be constructive, it seems to have

  • the capacity to help people make positive and constructive choices in their lives.

  • Now eventually, that entity offered to teach a channeling class.

  • I went into the class, not because I thought I was going to become a channel; I was just

  • trying to further my research, 'cause I didn't understand how channeling could be

  • taught to someone.

  • My understanding at that point, was that it was just sort of something that happened to

  • you out of the blue.

  • But in the class, which was basically a series of guided meditations to put you in touch

  • with whatever you wanted to get in touch with, be it more creativity, your own higher mind,

  • or you know, whatever, I received what I can only describe as a telepathic hit.

  • And in that one instant, an actual memory came back of having made an agreement of doing

  • this channeling with Bashar, in this life.

  • In that instant I understood the UFO had been shown to me on purpose, to get me to start

  • doing the research I was doing so I would be ready by the time it came time to do the

  • channeling.

  • And the information in my head was, “Now that you know you made this agreement, now

  • you know it's time to begin.

  • Is this something you would still like to do?”

  • So this is an agreement that you made before your birth?

  • Yes.

  • And so maybe that's why the other people on the freeway didn't see the UFO, because

  • it was really meant for you.

  • And maybe they couldn't isolate out the other people in your car [chuckling].

  • And I've heard this happen many times from other people who've reported UFOs.

  • Sometimes they'll be standing around a group of people, and only 1 or 2 people in the group

  • will actually be able to see the UFO.

  • So they may have a way of tuning the frequency to a particular person and making themselves

  • essentially invisible to anyone who's not on that wavelength.

  • Hmm.

  • Maybe the people in your car were somewhat like-minded, you know, more open-minded, higher

  • consciousness kind of people, or something.

  • Somewhat, …Sure, well you know, like attracts like.

  • They were my brother, my sister, a very, very close friend of mine and her brother.

  • So in a sense we were all family.

  • Ok good.

  • So you got this hit.

  • You realized, “Ooh, I had made an agreement to do this,” and continue.

  • Yeah, so for a little bit I thought, “Ok, maybe I'm hallucinating here.

  • Maybe this is just my imagination.

  • It's a side effect of the meditation we're doing, I don't know.”

  • But, the instant this actually happened in my head, the entity coming through the teacher

  • stopped talking to the class and turned to me and said, “There's an entity here for

  • you, now, if you're ready to begin.”

  • And at the same moment, I glanced over and noticed that one of the other classmates was

  • actually, had also, somehow, picked up on this peripherally, what was going on, and

  • was actually sketching an image of Bashar that I had seen in my head.

  • So I already had 2 external validations that this wasn't just going on inside me.

  • So for that reason I decided, “Ok, let's explore this and see what it's all about.”

  • Ok.

  • So I went further in the class.

  • I did well enough that the teacher actually asked me to co-channel the next class with

  • him.

  • And after that class, I was introduced to a woman who was doing the first doctoral thesis

  • on the connection between psychology and channeling, and I became one of her subjects and started

  • channeling at her house for her friends, while she wrote notes to write her paper.

  • But the first week you know, it was like 5 friends, and then the second week was 20,

  • then the third week was 40.

  • And then we had to start doing it like twice a week, and then renting auditoriums, and

  • then people would pass the recording around.

  • And before you know it, I was being invited to different cities, different countries,

  • and it just took on a life of its own, and here I am 30 years later.

  • Now I heard you say that you pretty much don't remember, or while it's happening you're

  • not very cognizant of what's going on.

  • It's like you're off in some daydream or something.

  • Yeah, I don't hear the words so much.

  • It's kind of like if you're really lost in a daydream, and somebody walks in the room

  • and tries to get your attention.

  • And they have to call your name 3 times before you actually hear them?

  • Happens all the time with my wife [laughing].

  • Exactly!

  • So it's like that.

  • It's like the conversation might as well be in the house next door; it's so secondary

  • and so far away.

  • I'm paying attention to what I'm experiencing, which is a lot of energy, a lot of imagery,

  • a lot of feeling, but I'm having my own experience.

  • And whatever's going on with the translation in my brain, for the person sitting in front

  • of me, really in a sense is none of my business, so I just don't pay attention to it.

  • Hmm.

  • Seems that happens to different degrees with different channels.

  • Like Edgar Cayce, as I understand it, was really checked out, you k now?

  • Yes.

  • Some other channels, if their house was on fire, you'd say, “Hey, your house is on

  • fire,” they'd get up and jump.

  • I don't know, maybe you're just wired in different ways.

  • Yeah but I've also noticed in talked to other channels, observing other channels,

  • I've noticed a progression, let's say generationally.

  • I think we, those who choose to channel in this way, are becoming more and more involved.

  • So it's like, I'm conscious, I know there's something going on, and I could probably stop

  • it if I wanted to, but I just don't choose to stop it.

  • But I'm more conscious and more aware than I think like people like you're mentioning,

  • like Edgar Cayce or Jane Roberts.

  • Because I think it's important for the channel to now knowat least to some degreeto

  • participate to some degree in what's happening, because the information coming through is

  • also to be applied to yourself as well as to the people that you're talking to.

  • So I think that you're going to see more and more and more involvement in a conscious

  • way.

  • And as I become, let's say, more my own version of Bashar, by just simply using the

  • information that he brings through, then I can tap into my own higher mind, and I don't

  • have to go into the altered state at all; to bring a lot of the information through,

  • myself, at this point.

  • So I think that's part of the idea, is that we become more conscious, and still are capable

  • of tapping into that level of reality and bringing through what we need.

  • Seems like some channelers, well you in particular, you adopt a very different voice while you're

  • doing it.

  • I do a pretty good imitation of it actually [laughing]

  • Here's the irony: I actually can't imitate that voice.

  • I have trouble imitating it, but something that absolutely happens naturally.

  • The breathing that you hear happens naturally, by going into the altered state.

  • The voice changes and the energy changes happen just as a side effect of going into that state

  • and allowing his personality to be translated through me.

  • One of the things – I don't know, we can touch on this laterbut right now we're

  • actually in the middle ofmy other life is [that] I'm in the film business.

  • And right now we're making a documentary about how I became a channel and who Bashar

  • is.

  • One of the things I'm most excited about in this documentary is, I actually did a channeling

  • session with my head wired to an EEG machine.

  • So for the first time we're actually going to be able to demonstrate physically, what

  • are the differences going on in the human brain in the normal waking state, and in the

  • channeling state.

  • And without giving a lot of stuff away right now, I will definitely say people are going

  • to see, for the first time, that there are profound differences between the two states.

  • And for the first time, I think we're going to be showing some scientific

  • evidence that this is truly, a real altered state.

  • Not that anyone has to believe that Bashar is real, but the channeling state is a true

  • altered state that we all actually have the ability to get into, and that a lot of us

  • actually do get into from time to time, when we're in that zone, or doing what we love

  • to do - where we're just doing it, we're not thinking about it, we don't notice the

  • passage of time.

  • That's a channeling state and we all do that.

  • So for the first time, I think, the documentary is actually going to show the scientific side

  • of what's happing in the brain, in that state.

  • So we're really excited about that.

  • Yeah, it's interesting.

  • And of course, a lot of that kind of research has been done with meditation.

  • And they've identified that meditation evokes a really distinct state that you can't beit's

  • not just some minor modification of waking state; it's a major state, as waking, sleeping,

  • dreaming are distinct from one another.

  • Yes, there's some similarities we discovered to the meditation state, but there are also

  • some profound differences that are in addition to the meditation state.

  • When you say we all channel from time to time, perhaps without even knowing it, I'm wondering

  • if likewell like, you're channeling someone whom you say is actually a future version

  • of yourselfBashar is some future version of yourself.

  • Yes, that's the way he presents himself.

  • And that's something we can get into later in more detail also, is time is not so linear

  • as we think, and we'll get into that.

  • But then how about great geniuses like Mozart, Beethoven, Einstein, do you think they were

  • channeling?

  • Yes.

  • They're in the channeling state.

  • It's really just expressing more of yourself, more connectivity, more accessibility to knowledge

  • which exists throughout creation.

  • It's just knowing that everything exists in the moment and tapping into that present

  • moment so strongly, that you can bring through what you need to bring through without really

  • thinking about it.

  • Yeah, and there's the ancient idea of a muse, you know, who inspires a great musician,

  • or artist, or something.

  • So do you think that these guys like Einstein and so on, were just tapping into a deeper

  • aspect of their own creativity, or do you think that some higher being or power said,

  • Ok, it's time for humanity to know about relativity and here's a good candidate.

  • This guy's smart enough, let's bring it in through him”?

  • Well it could be both.

  • It could be both, and in a sense I feel it has to be both.

  • Information permeates existence itself, and whether another entity is involved in helping

  • deliver it, the person receiving it still has to be on the right wavelength, still has

  • to be in the right state of being, or the right vibrational frequency to receive it.

  • So I think it's gotta be a two-way street.

  • You gotta be able to tap in and be open to receiving whatever it is that's available

  • to be received.

  • Whether someone is intentionally sending it to you or not, or whether you're reaching

  • out and getting it, to me is just sort of an issue of what mechanism is being used,

  • but you still have to be in the right state to be able to translate it through.

  • Not only the right state, but you also have to have the right education.

  • I mean, Mozart knew about music and so therefore he could channel all these beautiful things.

  • Einstein knew about mathematics and so on.

  • Exactly, but one of the things that I've noticed in my life early on, and one of the

  • things that people often say when they hear the channeling is that, I have, I guess [chuckling],

  • a relatively large vocabulary, so that Bashar can really translate a lot of what he's

  • saying into the necessary words.

  • And I noticed that in my life, growing up, it was kind of one of the things that happened

  • for me automaticallymy parents said that I was reading magazines when I was a year

  • and a half old.

  • And English in school for me was never a problem.

  • I never understood why people could't understand punctuation, grammar, vocabulary, you know

  • things like that.

  • And so I think it was now, in hindsight, I needed to program myself with a large enough

  • vocabulary so that very esoteric concepts and ideas could translate through me into

  • language we would understand.

  • And so yeah, I think there's a lot of preparation involved in these things, but a lot of times

  • it just happens in your life where you gravitate to that thing, to give you the tools you need

  • to be able to function on that level, or translate those concepts at some point in the future.

  • Yeah.

  • Yeah, and obviously you wouldn't be a very useful channel in Brazil or speaking in Afrikaans

  • of something [chuckling].

  • That Bashar, if he wanted to talk to those people, is probably going to have to go through

  • somebody who speaks Portuguese, or something.

  • Yeah, because that's a common misunderstanding that people have about the idea of channeling.

  • Is, it's not that it's impossible for an entity to sort ofoverridethe consciousness

  • of the channel's programming and sometimes by actually capable of pulling another language

  • through, but it's really not what's easiest for the channel's brain.

  • Because the channel has been programmed with a particular language, and therefore yes,

  • you're right, in some sense it's easier for the entity to actually go through a person

  • whose already programmed with a different language.

  • And I've actually seen that happen with Bashar.

  • At one point, many, many years ago, while he was helping someone else learn how to channel;

  • he was acting as a mentor for them temporarily, and allowing them to bring him through just

  • temporarily, until they could get a handle on what channeling was and then channel their

  • own entity, he actually came through a woman in Japan!

  • And therefore he was speaking through a female, in Japanese, but it was still distinctly his

  • personality, his cadence, his style, his mannerisms.

  • So that was kind of a very odd thing for me to experience, personally.

  • But yeah, most people have a misunderstandingbecause see he's not speaking anything

  • at all; he's just sending thoughts.

  • The thoughts are being translated by the biological translator that we happen to be, and I'm

  • programmed with English, so that's what you get.

  • Yeah, how about on the dark side?

  • I mean, were guys like Hitler, Pol Pod, Idi Amin, and Charles Manson channeling something?

  • Well [chuckling], I suppose you could say they were channeling their negative egos,

  • or their fear-based egos.

  • But the idea of channeling is something that, by definition integrative, and connective

  • and expansive.

  • And things that are perceived more negatively are segregative and disconnective, and reductive

  • and destructive.

  • So the idea is not so much to say that they might have been, quote on quote, “channeling

  • in the sense of an integrated, positive, expanding, mechanical concept, but that perhaps they

  • were experiencing so much disconnection and fearbased belief systems, that they were simply

  • bringing through more and more of their own negative ego, without actually really being

  • able to express a connection to a higher source.

  • Well I guess maybe to rephrase the question, are there negative forces in the universe

  • who would like to use men like them, as means or channels to bring about negative impacts

  • on humanity?

  • It's possible.

  • You know, the universe is both positive and negative, and I'm sure that there are entities

  • out there somewhere that don't necessarily have everyone's best intention at heart,

  • but the thing I'm saying is, the person has to already be kind of be gravitating towards

  • that wavelength to attract something like that.

  • And the idea again is that, negative energy, by definition, is segregative instead of connective,

  • so even though they might be aligning with a negative entity, or a negative entity may

  • be aligning with someone on Earth that is negatively oriented, there's not much connection,

  • because connection by definition is positive.

  • So to align with something like that is probably very difficult.

  • And I think when people talk about things like

  • possession,” you know, andis a negative entity taking over,” to me it's really

  • simply more a matter of - in terms of speaking of it as if it were physicsit's more

  • a matter of the person, based on their own negative belief systems, is putting themselves

  • in a negative vibrational frequency.

  • And by doing so, they may be emulating another negative frequency that might have a similar

  • negative intention.

  • But it's not like they can really be controlled or possessed; it's simply that for whatever

  • reason, their belief system is getting them to agree to function on that same low vibration

  • or wavelength.

  • And so they're emulating or mirroring what another negative entity might also want to

  • do, but they're doing it themselves.

  • They're totally in control of that.

  • And if they change their mind about being on that wavelength, they would sever that

  • experience in an instant, but their belief system doesn't allow them to do so.

  • Okay.

  • So you're saying that a negative person like Hitler, for instance, is not the polar

  • opposite of somebody who's channeling a lot of positivity and wisdom and knowledge,

  • and so on; he's more mired in his egotism and has just assumed some kind of role, and

  • has some kind of charismatic personality that enables a lot of people to get all enthusiastic.

  • Yeah, it's a fear-based belief system.

  • It's a belief system based on limitation, on lack, on fearthe negative definitions

  • that you're somehow disconnected from Source.

  • And if you feel like you're disconnected from Source, then the ego sort of goes into

  • this negative space where it feels like it has to now control everything, and manipulate

  • everything in order to feel the power that it doesn't allow itself to feel, because

  • it believes it's disconnected.

  • People that feel connected to Source, that know that they are connectedit's not

  • that anyone can actually be disconnected, but you can have a belief that you're disconnected.

  • And if you believe you are, it's like being abandoned, it's like being isolated.

  • Well, you're going to try to do everything in your power to try and find that connection

  • again.

  • But if you don't understand that the power is within you, you're gonna assume that

  • it's out there, and you're going to manipulate your reality and manipulate other people,

  • and force yourself on them in order to construct a reality that you feel is making you feel

  • powerful or comfortable.

  • But really, anytime anyone forces something on anyone else, it's just a sign that they

  • don't feel their power at all and they're trying to make up for it in some sort of artificial

  • way.

  • Great power, as Bashar said, really requires the very gentlest touch.

  • So anytime anyone is forcing something on anyone, what they're actually saying is

  • that they don't believe they have self-empowerment.

  • Just to belabor this point a little bit more, from what I'm gathering, you would probably

  • say that what we see in terms of humanity - all the dramas that have played out over

  • the hundreds and thousands of yearsis not necessarily a surface manifestation of

  • a tug-of-war between positive and negative forces, sort of like Star Wars.

  • No.

  • The negative forces, at least in the examples I've mentioned, are just the manifestations

  • of human ignorance and ego, but the positive forces, you seem to be saying, could actually

  • be a channeling of some higher intelligences which…?

  • Well what I'm saying is that, creation has both positive and negative energy in it.

  • And so in that sense you can say, yes, there's both positive and negative forces, based on

  • what beings choose to align themselves with.

  • But what I'm saying is the expression of positive or negative, has to do with what

  • an individual, based on their belief systems, chooses to align with.

  • Sure.

  • So if they are in fear-based belief systems, they're going to align with a negative side

  • of reality and express it through themselves.

  • If they're in positive-based belief systems, they're going to align with the positive

  • side of reality and express that.

  • So basically what I'm saying is that, it still comes down to the fact that individuals

  • have a choice as to what to align with, and it's not necessarily even that the so-called

  • positive and negative forces, on a very basic physics level, even necessarily have an agenda,

  • it's just that this is what positive energy is, this is what negative energy is.

  • And if you align with one or the other, you're going to express what is relevant and reflective

  • of that energy, through yourself.

  • So the real battle is really just taking place within yourself, more than the idea that the

  • battle is taking placeout theresomewhere.

  • Because creation contains both sides, and it's not that it's battling with itself,

  • but depending on what you lock into, the expression of love, or the expression of fear, can be

  • personified through any particular individual, based on what they align with.

  • Okay.

  • Yeah I mean, just in mythology and scriptural accounts, especially in the East, there's

  • so many accounts of the gods and demons battling it out, you know.

  • Sure, sure, but I think that's symbolic of what's going on within us.

  • It doesn't mean that consciousness can't express itself archetypally in a seemingly

  • external, autonomous beingit can.

  • But I think that we only perceive that and experience that when we're on that vibrational

  • wavelength first.

  • Right, yeah, that's good enough.

  • And we align ourselves with one or another's tendencies in creation according to our proclivities

  • according to choice, according to our makeup, and our karma, whatever.

  • Sure, sure.

  • So you'll get the experience you're on the wavelength of.

  • So you know, anyone who's in that fear-based belief system is going to experience an archetypal,

  • autonomous, demonic reflection thatbecause everything is conscious and made of consciousness,

  • of course will have its own consciousness, and will present itself as an external entity

  • with this agenda.

  • But it's actually activated by someone choosing to be on that wavelength, and then seeing

  • the reality, and experiencing the reality that they're on the wavelength of.

  • Okay, good.

  • One other thing, just looping back a little bit, I get the impression that some channelers

  • are very drained, and it even takes a toll on their health to do it.

  • I think Jane Roberts might have been a case-in-point.

  • Whereas in your case, you've found it nothing but energizing and enlivening, and it's

  • enriched and enhanced your personal life as Darryl.

  • Yes, yes, for the first couple of years it was tiring.

  • But I think what happens is it takes a while for a person to get used to the level of energy

  • that is coming through when you make a connection like that, to a higher-plane entity.

  • And so at first there might be resistance within the person and that resistance to that

  • energy is, I think, what causes the exhaustion.

  • But if you open up, eventually, ideally, I think the idea is to relax and trust it, and

  • open up enough so that when you really let that energy through without resistance, then

  • you find that it actually does start to sustain, support and energize you.

  • So if people are only experiencing the idea of exhaustion and being drained by it, that

  • might be an indication – I'm not going to say in every case, because I can't speak

  • for everyone, 'cause everyone has their own path, butit might in general be an

  • indication, that perhaps more work needs to be done internally, to let go of any negative

  • belief in there that might be causing a resistance to that higher frequency.

  • And therefore, the channel working on themselves a little more might ease the resistance to

  • that energy and allow them to experience it in a much more positive and sustaining and

  • uplifting way.

  • And perhaps not even just belief, but neuro-physiological wiring might need to be kind of rearranged

  • a bit before you can really do it without obstruction.

  • Sure, well it goes hand in hand.

  • I think that anytime you change your belief system you actually do change your neurological

  • wiring, and it becomes more reflective of the fact you can handle more energy.

  • That's one of the reasons again, why you see me go into the altered state and you hear

  • the breathing and things like that change, because I think you're actually seeing a

  • physiological reflection of the different neurological state that the body is going

  • into to be able to sustain that energy, without causing a detriment to me.

  • Yeah.

  • You're probably familiar with some people who have been on television like Teresa Kaputo,

  • you know, the Long Island Medium and James Von Prague, and 3 or 4 others.

  • Sure, and John Edwards

  • John Edwards.

  • Do you consider what they are doing channeling?

  • 'Cause they don't really seem to check out at all; they seem to be all there and

  • they just say, “Oh, I'm just picking up something here,” and “I'm talking to

  • your mother.”

  • Yes, yes, and that's typically the form of channeling that's referred to asmediumship.”

  • They're acting as a conscious medium.

  • They're sort of hearing or picking up on symbols in their own consciousness that are

  • translations of what a spirit entity might be sending, and they're just translating

  • it through, to you, as a medium.

  • In a sense it is a form of channeling, just maybe a different form of channeling.

  • But I think also they do represent what I was saying earlier, as kind of where channeling

  • might be heading in general.

  • Because the idea is not necessarily TO check out; the idea is to participate, but do so

  • in a way where you know you're not, let's say, filtering or interfering with the information.

  • So I think we're going to see more and more examples of people remaining relatively conscious,

  • while at the same time developing the ability to tap into those things, and still participate

  • while they're delivering the information, without really putting their own filters on

  • it.

  • So yeah, it's a form of channeling.

  • And I guess you could say channeling is a form of mediumship.

  • It's just kind of different styles of the same idea.

  • Might it be the case that if someone like Teresa Kaputo is connecting with somebody's

  • mother, that that entityher motheris not so dissimilar from her or the people she's

  • conveying it to, that she doesn't really have to go into a deep kind of disassociated

  • state?

  • Whereas if you're channeling some kind of alien from the future, maybe that life form

  • is so different, that you really, gotta, sort of

  • Maybe, maybe, I mean it could be the case for me personally.

  • Again, based on maybe the belief system I was raised in, it just might be easier for

  • me to go into a state that way, to allow something that I consider to be so different to come

  • through more easily.

  • I don't think it has to be done that way, but that's just maybe the way it works for

  • me.

  • Okay.

  • I bet you some people have asked youand I'll ask you this in case it's on some

  • people's mindswhen you first began dealing with this stuff you thought, “Whoa,

  • what's going on?”

  • And you began reading a lot of spiritual books, and you probably immersed yourself and read

  • a ton of themdoes Bashar say stuff that you couldn't have learned and didn't learn

  • in reading?

  • I mean, does he surprise you with things he comes out with, which you never even heard

  • of before and all of a sudden this thing is coming out?

  • Yes, all the time.

  • There are people who have spoken to him who are very well-trained psychologists, people

  • who have spoken to him who are physicists, and they've walked away happy with the information

  • that he's given them, that I wouldn't have a clue how to give them.

  • So yes, there are definitely perspectives, ideas, concepts, that he's come through

  • with that are beyond anything that I've ever studied.

  • Yeah, that does happen.

  • Okay.

  • You eluded earlier to the fact that you say [that] Bashar is actually a future you, in

  • the future!

  • How far in the future are we talking here?

  • Well, here's where we get into some bizarre temporal mechanics, because from Bashar's

  • perspective everything really does exist at the same time.

  • But he understands we're perceiving things a little more linearly, so he's expressing

  • things in a more linear fashion.

  • In the way we think of time, he's saying that he would be considered about 300 years

  • in our future however, however, he's also saying that because he exists in a parallel

  • realityanother alternate dimensionhis reality vibrates - for lack of a better term

  • – 10 times faster than ours.

  • So evolutionarily, they're actually 3,000 years ahead of us.

  • Oh I see. … in their civilization.

  • But in terms of how we would relate to them, in our linear sense, he says we would think

  • of them as about 300 years in the future.

  • Yeah.

  • Even if he weren't you, there are civilizations, I believe, that are functioning on different

  • levels or dimensions that we would consider to be thousands of years ahead of ours.

  • Yes, absolutely.

  • I mean, does he ever tell you how things have turned out?

  • What's happening with the climate change?

  • Well, that's when things get odd with temporal mechanics.

  • Because he's saying there's no such thing as a prediction ofthefuture.

  • There are an infinite number of probable future realities, and depending on the decisions

  • we make in the present, then it determines which future probable reality we will choose

  • to experience.

  • But they all exist at the same time.

  • Now, he can sometimes look at the energy that exists right now, which is basically what

  • he's saying a prediction is - it's not a prediction of the future; it's a sensing

  • of the energy that exists at the moment the prediction is madeand if that energy

  • doesn't change course, then it might have a high degree of probability of coming to

  • pass.

  • If it does change course, then of course, another probability will come up.

  • So, that's always in fluctuation.

  • He has, from time to time on very rare occasions said, “Alright, I'm sensing right now

  • that there's something going on in your collective society, that has so much energy

  • and so much momentum behind it, for one reason or another, that it seems unlikely that it's

  • going to change,” but this happens very rarely and it has to have A LOT of energy

  • and A LOT of momentum behind it.

  • One of the ones I can point to is, I know that there's actually a recording that exists

  • that was made at a session, I think in 1998, where he did say that somewhere around the

  • year 2001 there would be a terrorist attack in New York City.

  • That came to pass.

  • So, the only reason that that was possible to be made by him as a prediction is, for

  • some reason when he scanned all the probable timelines, it seemed relatively inevitable

  • that we were heading down that path, somehow.

  • And so he felt it was unlikely to go into any other probable future reality.

  • So that's kind of how it works for them.

  • There are some other generalities that he said, “Yes, I can see this has a high degree

  • of probability of coming to pass,” but he'll never say, “This is an absolute.”

  • Because once you actually let someone know where the energy is going, we could decide

  • to change it.

  • So in a sense, a prediction can actually make itself obsolete just by becoming known.

  • Yeah, and there's all those sci-fi movies about going back and changing something in

  • the past.

  • And you know, your parents aren't born [chuckling] as a result, and so that kind of thing.

  • Yeah, and from Bashar's perspective it doesn't really work like that.

  • It's more along the lines, I think now he's saying of, what physicists are saying when

  • they talk about themany worldstheoryquantum mechanics.

  • Everything exists as a parallel reality and you can't actually go back in your own past.

  • You might shift over into a parallel reality that LOOKS like your past, and meet a VERSION

  • of yourself that looks like your younger self, but whatever it is you're doing in that

  • reality is another reality and has nothing to do with your timeline.

  • Hmm.

  • So would it be true to say, based on that point, that you and I are living parallel

  • lives in other parallel universes, that are similar to the ones we're living, or a little

  • bit different in certain respects?

  • Yes, or very different.

  • It can run the entire gamut according to Bashar.

  • You can experience or perceive a parallel reality version of yourself that is almost

  • indistinguishable from what you're experiencing, and you can perceive a parallel reality version

  • that's so different you almost probably wouldn't recognize itand everything in-between.

  • Hmm, interesting.

  • So maybe one parallel universe I'm just wearing a different shirt, in another realm

  • I'm a professional baseball player or something.?

  • Right, and in another, you may be a different life form altogether.

  • [phone ringing in background] Interesting, okay, so before we lose the point

  • you were just talking aboutsounds like you're saying that there are all these probabilities

  • and the future is malleable, the present is malleable, and that there are certain probabilities

  • which have a lot more momentum behind them, and others which are probably less probable.

  • Yes.

  • But it's not cut in stone and it's not predetermined, and there is, you would say

  • I suppose, that we do have free will.

  • I mean, some spiritual teachers say that we don't have free will.

  • Well, I think it's a combination.

  • I mean, you can look at it really, paradoxically, from almost any point of view and be correct.

  • Bashar's recently talked about the fact thatokay, here's one level of it: you

  • can say that linearly speaking, before this life, yoursouldecided to experience

  • a certain thing, to explore a certain theme.

  • You could say that's your destiny, you will live this life.

  • Yeah, like you signed up to do the Bashar thing.

  • Yeah, but how you do it, how you get there, how you experience it, the way you go about

  • it, that's up to your free will.

  • It's up to what you prefer, how you feel best doing it.

  • So it's like saying well, you'll walk down this hallway - that you can't avoid.

  • But you can run down the hall, you can walk backwards, upside-down, left, right, slow,

  • fast, wearing this, wearing that, singing a song, being upsethow you do it is your

  • free will, up to you, but you will walk down that hallway.

  • So he's saying from that perspective, there's a combination of the idea of destiny and free

  • will working hand in hand to create your experience.

  • On another level, he's saying you could look at it and say well, you are your destiny.

  • In this particular theme you can't be anything but you, therefore that's your destiny.

  • How you choose to express who you are, again can come into the idea of free will, but it's

  • still always going to be YOU expressing that.

  • And therefore, you could say now you are fuzzing the borders between free will and destiny,

  • because you can't express yourself as anything other than you, so now they become a little

  • more blended.

  • On the third level he's saying, you could also look at it as the idea of, well, let's

  • say for example you come to a crossroads and you go, “Well, I can have a choice of turning

  • left or I have a choice of turning right.”

  • Now you say, “Okay, my destiny is to come to this crossroad, but my free will is to

  • choose to turn right or to choose to turn left.”

  • Well, he's also saying, well how do you really know that?

  • You could choose right and how do you know that wasn't your destiny?

  • And then you could change your mind and say, “No, no, no, I'm not going to go here,

  • I'm going to choose left,” well how do you know that wasn't your destiny?

  • So ultimately what he's saying is, it's kind of a moot point, because from this level

  • you can't really tell whether it's free will or destiny.

  • So it can be either, it can be both, and it can be neither.

  • It's really just about the experience that you are, and that experience informs you,

  • and you do what you do.

  • And it almost doesn't matter whether it's free will or destiny, because the ultimate

  • outcome is the same: you're having an experience that adds to the expansion of who and what

  • you are as a conscious being, and that's really the bottom line, and it doesn't really

  • matter what mechanism you're usingdestiny or free willto achieve that.

  • Would it be true to say then that, we have a certain destiny but most of us perceive

  • ourselves as having some wiggle room, some latitude in which we can choose this or that,

  • and it may be that from some ultimate perspective it is all predetermined, and there isn't

  • any free will.

  • But as long as you PERCEIVE yourself as having free will, then it's not helpful to sort

  • of philosophically play with the notion that it's all predetermined, because you perceive

  • yourself as having free will and you're responsible to exercise it intelligently,

  • as best as you can.

  • Yes, and that's the experience your're having.

  • See, I think what Bashar is actually saying is, the structure of existence never changes;

  • that's predetermined.

  • But your experience of the structure is what changes, and that's the idea of your free

  • will, is that you can experience the structure, the destiny, from any perspective you want

  • to.

  • And as an experience, it's real, but it may not necessarily be representative of the

  • fact that the structure already exists and never changes.

  • So you're using a structure to create differentrealexperiences of that structure,

  • and it's the experience that matters because that's what creates change, that's what

  • creates growth, that's what creates a difference of perspective, whereas the structure never

  • changes.

  • So, it's kind of both-in-one, and it's the experience that really matters; it's

  • the process that's the point.

  • Yeah, good.

  • At this point I want to interject a few questions that people sent in.

  • They're kind of related to what we've been talking about.

  • One person asked, “I'd like to know if Darryl activated his Merkaba,” – and you're

  • going to have to define that, 'cause I don't even know what it is [chuckling] – “before

  • he became a channel, after, or if it was always activated?

  • Bashar comes to and through him to give channeled information.

  • Does he ever travel to Bashar?

  • And if so, what happens?”

  • Is that all one question?

  • [laughing] I guess that's 2 questions from the same

  • person, so maybe the Merkaba one first.

  • Okay, a Merkaba, in general by a lot of people is sort of considered an energy matrix, that

  • is representative of a certain state of alignment that allows one to express more of your full

  • being into this reality.

  • How to answer that question?

  • I think looking at it from that perspective, because in a sense a Merkaba is just a translation

  • of an idea, it's a permission slip as Bashar says, it's a way of looking at a process.

  • Not necessarily an absolute description of the structure of existence, but it may be

  • a way of interpreting the structure of creation or existence.

  • And in that sense, yes, of course I think the so-called configuration of my themeif

  • you want to refer to that as a Merkabawas always there from birth, but certainly it

  • was activated by several incidents in my life.

  • And one of them of course - one of the strongest ones - being the UFO incident itself, that

  • may have activated my ability to bring through what was relevant to that particular matrix

  • or structure you're calling a Merkaba.

  • I have had experiences with Bashar in dreamtime directly.

  • The only thing I've ever experienced directly in physical reality is his ship, twicehis

  • ship.

  • But I've had about four dream experiences where I've either gone to his reality, or

  • we've had conversations all night long in some sort of other alternate dimension that

  • I know are not just normal dreams, because that's all that's happening, because I'm

  • talking to him like I'm talking to you right now, and certain things happen in that dream

  • state that are very unusual.

  • So I guess in that sense, yes, you could say there are times when I've gone to him, but

  • it usually happens when I'm asleep, at least so far.

  • Okay, so that I'd say answered both questions.

  • So that ship you saw back in Los Angeles many years ago, that was Bashar's ship?

  • Yes.

  • Okay, and was it just sort of an interdimensional kind of ship that came up from some other

  • dimension, or did it come from another physical planet someplace that we can see through a

  • telescope?

  • Well, it can do both.

  • It can do both.

  • Does he have a home planet?

  • Yes, yes, they have a home planet, but like I said, it's in an alternate reality.

  • So we can't actually see it unless we shift to that dimension, in the same way that they

  • can't really perceive our reality as physical unless they shift into our dimension.

  • But if we were to overlap our reality with their reality, his star system would be about

  • 500 light years in the direction of the Orion Constellation.

  • But again, it's invisible to us unless we shift into their physical reality.

  • But yes, they do have a home planet.

  • That's interesting.

  • So the universe that we see through the Hubble telescope or whatever, we're just seeing

  • a layer of the cake, it's just one dimension.

  • And if we had a telescope that could not only see far away but could shift dimensions, we

  • would see whole different configurations of stars and galaxies and planets on those other

  • dimensions...?

  • Yeah, in much the same way that here we have a visible spectrum of light.

  • And we can't really with our eyes perceive infrared or ultraviolet light, but we have

  • instruments that can do that for us and allow us to peer at something that our senses can't

  • naturally pick up.

  • So yes, Bashar's people have the ability to do that naturally.

  • They've developed and evolved to the point where they can perceive other dimensions with

  • their own actual senses, and that's one of the reasons why he can make connections

  • to his past self, which is me, because for them, time and space is not as rigid or fixed

  • as it is at this point for us.

  • But we're evolving to a point where we're gaining the same kind of flexibility that

  • his civilization already experiences.

  • You know how astrophysicists talk about that maybe 96% of the apparent matter and energy

  • in the universe is invisibledark energy, dark matterand they can't account for

  • the way the universe behaves based upon what we can see with our eyes; there's all this

  • mass that somehow causes gravitational effectsthey call dark matter.

  • So is that mass actually related to these other dimensions of the universe that you're

  • just referring to?

  • Maybe, but what I'm actually referring to is something that looks similar to our own

  • universal reality - perhaps with its own matter, its own dark matter, its own dark energy - but

  • it's just in a different vibrational state.

  • Perhaps a better analogy would be the idea that Bashar often uses, which is like our

  • TV programs.

  • When you're watching a particular program on TV, you know there are hundreds of other

  • programs that are playing at the same time, but you don't perceive them because you're

  • not on that channel.

  • But if you switch channels then you're perceiving a completely different program, in much the

  • same way as the program you were just watching, but now you're no longer perceiving the

  • one you were looking at before, but it's still going on, so it's more like that.

  • Each is its own real reality, its own real universe, but they're on different frequencies

  • and so they interpenetrate and overlap, but we only see the universe that we happen to

  • be tuned to.

  • Yeah, and all the channels that you're getting on your satellite dish or your cable, they're

  • actually all coming in at once, and they're not conflicting with each other.

  • It's just that your tuner is selecting a particular one or another.

  • Right, so I think how dimensions function.

  • They're all real, they're all existing at the same time, they're all overlapping

  • all at once, but we have a very, very fine-tuned frequency that is relevant for this particular

  • reality experience.

  • And we need to expand our ability and become a broader spectrum antenna so to speak, before

  • we can really start picking up on these other realities.

  • Now I think that we do that sometimes, from time to time inadvertently, and this is where

  • people have experiences of other dimensions, of another reality, the spirit realm, what

  • have youis that sometimes our antenna might get a little bit more broad-based for

  • one reason or another, and we start perceiving things that are going on at the same time,

  • and we get kind of a double exposure of the 2 different, or 3 or 4 different realties

  • that do exist simultaneously.

  • So it does happen from time to time, but for the most part, let's say 99% of the time,

  • we're focused in basically one particular frequency of a reality, because that's what

  • we wanted to experience.

  • And so would it be kind of simplistic or misguided to try to map the topography of one reality

  • to another; to let's say that if you could shift to a different dimension, there might

  • be another planet between here and the moon, or something, or are they really so much in

  • their own realms that it's not sensible or practical or meaningful to try to match

  • up or compare?

  • It depends.

  • It depends on whether or not that's relevant for the person doing that kind of exploration,

  • or that kind of researchit might be very relevant for certain people.

  • And maybe this in some sense is what -to use a general term - is what some shamans or enlightened

  • masters are able to do, is it's more relevant for themthey've made it more relevant

  • in their livesto be able to perceive things that in general, others don't.

  • And therefore they can give you thatit's like: if you tune this way, you'll see this.

  • This is what I'm seeing.

  • But it may not be relevant for everyone again, because most people have a particular theme

  • they're exploring and certain things may not be completely relevant for them to explore

  • in that life.

  • But it may be very relevant for other people.

  • I have a few friendsseveral close friendswho do perceive these other realities

  • routinely.

  • They see angels and stuff like that all the time, and they see them attending to people.

  • Like you know, you might be at a restaurant and see, okay, these subtle beings are attending

  • to that table or something.

  • So there does seem to be, in the case of those beings, there does seem to be an interface

  • or interconnection between their reality and ours, and they're serving some function

  • in our reality.

  • Yeah, and I think this is happening more and more.

  • I mean, I think this is actually part of what this transformational age is all about.

  • We're developing more ability to perceive what we heretofore could not perceive, and

  • that's a reflection of the expansion of our consciousness.

  • And I think that's one of the things that's going on in this age of transformation.

  • Good.

  • Here is another question that somebody else sent in.

  • We kind of covered this but I think there's something new here: “Darryl has said that

  • Bashar is him in the future and Bashar lives on another planet.

  • Does Darryl feel that he a starseed, in that he usually carries out his incarnations on

  • other planets and comes to Earth for specific tasks, at specific times?”

  • [silence pause] That's the question [laughter].

  • You can pass some of these questions if you feel like that's okay.

  • No, well I suppose that I could say that from a specific perspective, the answer to all

  • of that could beyes,” but again because Bashar has explained that time is not really

  • linear, that everything exists all at once, I wouldn't necessarily put it in the same

  • framework.

  • Let's just say I know that like a lot of people, there are probably incarnations going

  • on simultaneously in other civilizations that I'm connected to.

  • There are probably other incarnations going on on Earth in different timeframes, that

  • I'm connected to.

  • And some of those lives in both areas probably serve certain functions that have to do with

  • the transformations going on here, on the planet, and some of them probably don't.

  • So I would say maybe the best answer isall of the above.”

  • Okay, good, there's another one: “I'm in a similar boat, or perhaps spaceship is

  • a better term,” someone wrote this, “I found that experiencing life on different

  • dimensions, including knowing something about the jobs I do elsewhere, has completely erased

  • any of the doubt about what happens after we leave this incarnation, not to mention,

  • it puts this incarnation in perspective.”

  • That's more of a statement than a question.

  • Yes, I would agree with it.

  • Some peoplethat works for some people.

  • Some people don't need to do that, and I'm not saying that one is better than the other.

  • It's just again; it comes down to what theme someone is exploring.

  • There are people that don't want to know anything about their connections to other

  • realities, other lives, what have you.

  • They get along just fine because they need that focus, other people, it's part of the

  • expansion to be aware of those things, and I agree that it can put this experience in

  • a different perspective that can be very expanding and very helpful for people.

  • So that is sort of the same spaceship that I'm in, and so in that sense I

  • find a lot of familiarity with that statement, sure.

  • Yeah, personally I find it very - even if I'm not experiencing all that stuff – I

  • find it very gratifying to realize that there's far more to the universe than what meets our

  • mundane senses.

  • You know it's thrilling, it's exciting.

  • It is.

  • It's a much bigger reality than we think.

  • Yeah, and perhaps it also roots out the tendency to think, to say, “It's only this.”

  • Whenever anyone uses the wordjustoronlyabout reality, you realize they're

  • kind of locked into a ridged view.

  • Sure, yeah, and that's okay if that's what they need, but there is more to it than

  • that.

  • There's a line from The Incredible String Band, whom you're probably too young to

  • remember, but it was, “Whatever you think, it's more than that.”

  • [chuckling] I may be older than you think.

  • Can't tell with that bald head, you know?

  • [laughing] Okay let's shift a little bit more.

  • We've sort of been weaving around here, but let's shift from the Darryl story to

  • the essence and some of the details of what Bashar actually teaches.

  • If you had to sum it up in a nutshell, you know, the elevator ride version of what Bashar

  • is actually here to convey, what would it be?

  • Basically, the thing that I love about Bashar's information is, he takes a lot of [sound of

  • dog barking in background] metaphysical concepts and he reallyno pun intendedbrings

  • them down to Earth, with very pragmatic and practical understandings based on physics,

  • as to why they work.

  • And the one that I think is one of the most important things, is he talks about what everyone

  • has now been hearing for years: follow your passion, follow your bliss, act on your highest

  • excitement.

  • The reason why he says that is so critical is because, the sensation that we experience

  • as passion, as excitement, as joy, as creativity, as love, that sensation is your body's physical

  • translation of the vibrational frequency of your true, natural, core being.

  • And so anytime you act on something that contains or expresses or reflects that energy of excitement,

  • that energy of passion, that energy of living-your-dreams kind of idea, or bliss, you are in alignment

  • with who you truly are.

  • The thing, as he explains it, about excitement, is that it is a complete kit.

  • And what he means by that is, excitement and acting on it is the driving engine of your

  • life.

  • It is the organizing principle of your life, it's the path of least resistance in your

  • life, it's the thread that leads to all other expressions of your excitement, and

  • it's the reflective mirror that points out to you anything within your belief system

  • that might be out of alignment with your excitement, so you can identify it, integrate it, and

  • bring it back into alignment with your excitement.

  • So the formula that he's talking about when he says, “Yes, act on your highest excitement,”

  • is fundamentally 3 parts: Act on your highest excitement, to the BEST of your ability, without

  • any insistence or any assumption as to what the outcome of that action ought to be.

  • Following that formula allows you to take advantage of the fact that excitement is a

  • complete kit, and that it will bring you, synchronistically, everything you need, at

  • the right place at the right time, to allow you to continue to expand your experience

  • of living your excitement, and will support you however you need to be supported.

  • But you must use the tool in the way the tool was designed to be used, in order to get that

  • effect.

  • People are still, in many ways, “practicingthe idea of really acting on your excitement

  • and what that means, because a lot of times they will forget parts of the formula, parts

  • of the equation, such as letting go of what the outcome needs to be.

  • And thus they are in this state where they are learning what the physics of that idea

  • of following your bliss is all about, and allowing their actions to really use that

  • tool in the most precise way possible.

  • But I can guarantee that when you do, because I've experienced it myself over and over

  • again, it does work!

  • But you have to really use it precisely for it to work.

  • But I like that Bashar is capable of explaining WHY it works as an energy tool, and I think

  • that's probably one of the most important thing she has to say and has delivered to

  • us.

  • Hmm.

  • Jim Carrey gave the commencement address here at the University in my town.

  • I saw that.

  • Did you see that, on YouTube or something?

  • It is very Bashar-like.

  • Oh cool.

  • Or Bashar is very Jim Carrey-like.

  • [laugter] I think the idea really is that when you tap

  • into that understanding, truth is truth.

  • You get the idea, and just about everything he expressed in that commencement speech was

  • very much in alignment with what Bashar has been talking about for 30 years.

  • Yeah, he talked about how his father wanted to be a comedian, I believe.

  • He said, but he chose a job as an accountant so he could support his family.

  • And he ended up losing his job and the family had to struggle.

  • And so Jim Carrey said, “You can fail at what you don't love, so you might as well

  • take a shot at what you love.”

  • Exactly!

  • Exactly, so why not?

  • Because at least you'll be doing something you love to do, you'll be experiencing joy

  • and happiness no matter what happens, because it is something that is more in alignment

  • with who you are.

  • And really, just by doing that, you haven't failed.

  • In some sense if you want to say there's any failure at all, it's being something

  • that you're not, or not being who you really are, so why not take the leap?

  • Because it really isn't an idea of a leap of faith; it's really knowing that this

  • is you, and getting the reflection that that's true.

  • And what would you say to a guy that, let's say, has a family and several kids and he's

  • working a job that he doesn't particularly like, but he doesn't have a lot of financial

  • buffer and he has to take care of his family, and he really wants to be a professional musician,

  • but he hasn't even begun to start moving in that direction?

  • I mean, it could be very irresponsible for him to just drop his job and become a musician.

  • Absolutely, and my response would be the same as Bashar's response.

  • And that is: as long as you're holding on to a belief system that says that your excitement

  • cannot support you as well as what it is that you're already doing, even if it's not

  • what you love to do, you have to honor your belief system.

  • Because it doesn't serve you to jump off a cliff if you don't believe you have a

  • parachute.

  • [Chuckling] So by all means, you must hold on to whatever belief system you BELIEVE you

  • need to hold on to, so you can feel comfortable and safe and supported.

  • But what Bashar is encouraging us to do is, at least you have the ability, sometime, to

  • start taking action on your excitement, to the best of your ability, without any insistence

  • on what the outcome ought to look like.

  • And the more you are willing to at least take some steps in that direction, the more you

  • are able to prove to yourself, eventually, that your excitement can support you, and

  • that at whatever rate you are comfortable changing, you can let go of the things you

  • don't prefer to do, and only start doing the things that you do prefer to do, and see

  • that those things can support you.

  • Maybe even better than the things that you didn't prefer to do!

  • But it does not do anyone any good to just jump off that cliff if they don't really

  • believe that there is a pillow down there that they're going to land on.

  • So honor your belief system, be honest with yourself, really honest with yourself about

  • whether you believe your excitement can support you or not.

  • Hold on to the things that will support you until you know for a fact, for yourself, that

  • what you're really truly all about is also capable of supporting you, as I said, maybe

  • even better than what it is you're doing now that you don't prefer.

  • But it's gotta be a balancing act.

  • Yeah, and the transition doesn't have to be abrupt, necessarily.

  • It can be, but it doesn't have to be.

  • Absolutely not.

  • And you might actually suck as a musician [laughter] – you have delusions of grandeur,

  • you know?

  • Exactly, that's where the honesty comes in and you need to drop the expectation about

  • what you think is going to happen.

  • Because sometimes things that excite you don't necessarily excite you because the thing itself

  • has to come to fruition; sometimes you're lured by your excitement simply because you

  • need to move in that direction, and that's the only carrot that would get you moving.

  • Yeah, maybe something else will unfold.

  • Something else WILL unfold and may look absolutely nothing like the thing that initially lured

  • you in that direction.

  • That's why it's important to be very open about what the end result really needs to

  • be, because the physical mind doesn't really have the capacity to know how something actually

  • needs to happen.

  • Only the higher mind has that ability.

  • But the physical mind is designed to experience what's happening now, in the present.

  • And if you're open to the idea that the higher mind will bring you exactly what you

  • need in some way, shape, or form, even if it looks nothing like you expected it to look,

  • if you go along with that and align with that, you will see that whatever comes does actually

  • serve you, and does actually get you where you need to go, even though it might be in

  • a completely unexpected route.

  • But that's the surprise of life, is not to be so rigid that you think you have all

  • the answers about how you're going to get somewhere, and let life show you, and let

  • your higher mind show you the truly unexpected and surprising route that you actually will

  • take.

  • Look at myself for example.

  • If somebody had told me 30 years ago I was going to wind up being a channel, and going

  • all around the world and channeling for thousands of people, something that presents itself

  • as an extraterrestrial entity, I would have said they're completely out of their mind.

  • [Laughter] But just by following my excitement, with no assumption how things were going to

  • turn out, I've had a pretty unusual life and it's brought me some pretty extraordinary

  • experiences that I wouldn't necessarily have had any other ways.

  • So you have to really leave yourself open for those surprises because that's the joy

  • of life, that's the delight in life, is to find something about yourself that you

  • didn't even think was possible, can actually happen.

  • Yes, it's a great point.

  • In my own case, very often I've wanted and expected and pushed to have things happen

  • in a particular way, and it's not working out, and what actually ends up happening is

  • far better than what I was trying for.

  • Exactly, exactly, the higher mind knows what's really best for you and what will really light

  • you up.

  • And when the physical mind insists that it knows better, very often it falls quite short

  • of what your higher mind could actually bring you, that could be many times, many times

  • more enjoyable than what you thought you could ever attract.

  • Someone defined humility asnot insisting that things happen in any particular way.”

  • Yeah.

  • There's a great verse from the Bhagavad Gita too.

  • It says, “You have control over action alone, never over its fruits.

  • Live not for the fruits of action, nor attach yourself to inaction.”

  • Exactly, it's exactly what Bashar says.

  • When you act on the thing that excites you, you have to act on that thing for its own

  • sake, not because of what you think its connected to, not because of where you think it'll

  • lead, not because of what you think it will get you.

  • Because very often, doing what excites you takes you down a very different path, but

  • that path will always truly be in the most alignment with who you are, and it will allow

  • you to experience the most joy in your life.

  • Mm-hmm.

  • Here's a note that I wrote down when I was listening to one of your things.

  • It was, “Everything is God experiencing Itself as everything.”

  • Wanna comment on that?

  • Mm-hm.

  • Yeah, I agree.

  • I mean it's very similar, again, to what Bashar said.

  • It's like, we're made of God, we're made of all that is.

  • There is nothing else but all that is.

  • And you can say, from a certain perspective, that we are all the ways that God has of experiencing

  • itself, in all the ways that It can - all the different perspectives, all the points

  • of view, all the kinds of experiences that creation can have of Itself.

  • It doesn't take away from what we are as individual autonomous beings, but simultaneously,

  • we are all the different perspectives that creation has of Itself.

  • So, I would agree with this statement.

  • Hmm, here's another one: “Aligning with the vibration of who you actually are…”

  • let me tag a question onto that.

  • Would you say that each of us, all 7 billion of us, ultimately, fundamentally, we're

  • all the same person - we just referred to that when we were talking about Godwe're

  • all the same thing.

  • But in terms of our individuality, would you say that there's a core, unique quality,

  • or entity or seed of what we actually are, and we're all aligned or misaligned to varying

  • degrees with that, and that life is really all about getting aligned with thatwith

  • that unique expression?

  • Yes.

  • In addition to the universal consciousness, there's also a sort of unique dharma or

  • individual channel or flow through one's lifethe Tao for one's own life that

  • needs to be attuned to?

  • Yes, I mean that's the point of having the experience.

  • It's the theme that you're exploring, is rediscovering yourself from a different

  • point of view.

  • That's in a sense why we forget who we are.

  • Because if we don't forget who we are, we can't remember who we are from another point

  • of view.

  • We can't rediscover ourselves in a unique way if we retain all the knowledge of what

  • we are.

  • So we limit ourselves on purpose, in a sense, in order to have a unique experience of rediscovering

  • ourselves in a new way.

  • And that's what adds to the expansion of creation - is that new perspective of ourselves,

  • that new discovery of who and what we truly are.

  • Kind of a cosmic game of hide and seek.

  • Yeah, kinda, but we're just playing it with ourselves.

  • [Laughter] A lot of the people listening to this show

  • usually focus on such concepts and terms such as enlightenment, liberation, self-realization,

  • God-realizationthat's their whole orientation.

  • They don't usually think much about UFOs or entities form the future and all that,

  • but how does Bashar's teaching segway with that whole…?

  • Well, his teachings are all about enlightenment.

  • His teachings are all about understanding and knowing the self - the true being, and

  • knowing that you are always connected to Source, always connected to all that is, and that

  • what you're experiencing is just a self-created experience to rediscover yourself from a new

  • point of view.

  • To me that is enlightenment, so his teachings are very much in alignment with that.

  • And you of all people should have realized the self even more so than people to whom

  • you speak, since you live and breathe Bashar.

  • Maybe.

  • [laughter] So what is your experience in terms of that

  • kind of thing; self-realization, enlightenment, Godrealization?

  • Oh, it's definitely changed my life profoundly.

  • I mean, I'm a very, very different person today than if you knew me 30, 35 years ago.

  • I feel much more that I am the creator of my reality, I feel much more transparent,

  • I feel much more in tune with existence itself.

  • I see the structure more transparently every day -the underlying structure of existence

  • itself, and things become kind of - I guess for lack of a better termthey

  • become kind of obvious.

  • It's sort of like Bashar said one time, if you're holding a red rose and somebody

  • asks you what color the rose is, you sayred.”

  • Well, is that an opinion?

  • No, it's an observation.

  • So many of the things that people look at as opinions or theories, from Bashar's perspective,

  • the information he's delivering is not an opinion; it's actually an observation because

  • he can SEE the underlying structure of existence, and that's rubbed off on me more and more

  • and more, everyday.

  • So, certainly I feel that life is more joyful, less effort is expended, things happen much

  • more synchronistically, much more magicallyif you want to use that word.

  • Sometimes the synchronicities that happen are absolutely ridiculous, one thing after

  • another.

  • You'll think of one thing and moments later, suddenly you'll get that thing, or see that

  • thing, or it will just appear with absolutely no idea how it got there!

  • These things are really what the way life, in a sense, can be, when you allow it to be

  • that way.

  • And I'm experiencing more and more and more of that, everyday.

  • Of course, again, I was born here, I was raised with similar belief systems to a lot of people,

  • similar limitations, but again, that's MY journey, is to transform those limitations

  • in ways that are reflective of who I chose to be.

  • But I do feel that certainly after 30 years of channeling Bashar, I'm doing that with

  • far more ease, and far more joy, and far more understanding.

  • Cool.

  • In other words, you feel like you're a work in progress, to some extent?

  • Of course!

  • I certainly feel like everybody is.

  • If you're breathing, you're still evolving [chuckling], or even if you're not breathing.

  • Yeah absolutely, because you know, the idea of progress and expansion still goes on even

  • on other levels, beyond this one.

  • And each level has its own idea of what that expansion contains, what kind of experiences

  • are relevant to the idea of expansion.

  • But of course, I think everything is always a work in progress.

  • I don't think that really every ends.

  • But I have people who say to me, “Well if you're really awakened, then you're settled

  • in some sort of ground state of existencesome unbounded awareness, and you're

  • just not seeking experiences anymore.

  • There's just this sort of complete peace and folding back into the self, from which

  • you have no inclination to emerge, to explore different things here and there.”

  • I don't know that I agree but I'm just throwing that out, you know?

  • Yeah, well I think what we get caught in is this idea of dichotomy; of things are either

  • this, or they're that.

  • And really, from the perspective that Bashar comes from, things are this and that.

  • So therefore yes, you can get into a state of perfect peace, perfect bliss, perfect centeredness

  • AND, I would say that when you are in that state, you actually start experiencing an

  • unbridled curiosity to explore even more.

  • [Rick chuckles] Because when you're in that state you become more aware that there IS

  • more to explore, and that exploration doesn't have to feel the same as it did from the other

  • level you were just in.

  • But I still don't think it stops.

  • It may not feel like an effort anymore, but I think that's just because you become more

  • aligned with it.

  • It's more representative of who you truly are, and so you don't feel the resistance

  • to it anymore, so there's not as much difference between you and what you're exploring, but

  • I don't think you stop exploring.

  • Because I think BECOMING is also the essence of being; I think it's one and the same

  • thing.

  • Hmm.

  • I think there's actually a Zen saying which is, “Always being, always becoming.”

  • That is the same thing.

  • It's this, and that.

  • Being your true self is always becoming something more, and becoming something more happens

  • more strongly from a state of centered beingness.

  • Very beautifully put.

  • It's inspiring to hear you say that.

  • It resonates withmy orientation anyway.

  • And wouldn't you say that established in being, as we've been saying, further exploration

  • doesn't imply that you're lacking in fulfillment and you need this, that, or the other thing

  • in order to complete yourself; it's more that, from a state of completion there is

  • plenty of icing to add to the cake, plenty of interesting things yet to understand?

  • Sure, because you could, in a sense - and I'll use the word you used, “completion

  • in a sense you will never be complete, but you can be complete in the idea you are

  • at that moment.

  • In other words, right now, you are the absolute perfect version of whatever you are at this

  • moment.

  • That doesn't mean you won't become something else.

  • And in that moment you'll be the absolute perfect version of whatever that is, that

  • doesn't mean you won't become something else.

  • So one does not contradict the other, one doesn't exclude the other.

  • You can be absolutely centered and absolutely perfect for whatever you are at this moment

  • of experiencing yourself, and it has absolutely nothing to do with the fact that you can become

  • something else that will be equally perfect for what it is in the next moment.

  • Yeah, and that way of putting it has an individual connotation, but to put it slightly differently:

  • you are the absolute, you are the ground state of the universe, but you are also an individual

  • expression.

  • And that individual expression has certain capabilities, and certain proclivities and

  • inclinations, and those can be enjoyed and exercised.

  • Yes, because that's the point of the individual perspective.

  • So it's like yes, every individual being is all that is, experiencing itself as a part

  • of all that is.

  • It's one and the same, but it's 2 different perspectives on the spectrum.

  • Yeah, okay, good!

  • [Chuckling] Did that one.

  • [Laughing] Moving on.

  • Here's one: “Bashar was talking about parallel realities during one of his talks,”

  • and you and I have talked about it during this interview – “is there a Hiroshima

  • on which the bomb didn't drop?”

  • Of course.

  • Really?

  • Anything you can imagine, somewhere, somehow, it's playing out.

  • Now whether it's in the same kind of reality as ours, who's to say?

  • But, Bashar has basically said, “You can't imagine nonexistence.

  • So anything that comes in your imagination is part of creation, in some form or expression.”

  • So I would say that the example you just gave, has got a higher degree of being more literal,

  • in the sense of another physical parallel reality, because it's so similar to the

  • one we're experiencing, but sure.

  • I mean, science fiction has explored this idea for a long time, where you've got things

  • that happen in one reality can have a completely different history in another parallel reality,

  • and still seem to be a very similar kind of Earth.

  • So yeah, absolutely, there are parallel realities where that didn't happen, parallel realities

  • where the Nazis won World War Two, parallel realities where John Kennedy is still alive,

  • and all of the above.

  • Because there's an infinite number of those experiences so, sure.

  • Seems like they would diverge quite dramatically over time, if certain things didn't happen,

  • you know?

  • Yeah, right, exactly, so that's the whole point of having an infinite creation, is you

  • can experience every single possible variation that there is to experience, and it is being

  • experienced by some aspect of all that is.

  • And just as real to them as we feel we are real.

  • Okay, here's another one sent in by somebody: “Bashar talked about time and space in our

  • reality is created frame by frame,” and I know this guy, he's a friend of ours who

  • has computer expertise, so he says, “that would take an unbelievably amount of computing

  • power, processing power, especially at very high frame rates.”

  • [Laughter] Well, yes but, we are that powerful.

  • Creation is that powerful, but at the same time it's also exceedingly economical.

  • In essence again, this is a case of not 'this or that,' but 'this and that.'

  • Yes, the idea that there are billions of frames per second that are creating the illusion

  • of our movement and our physical reality, and that time and space are side effects of

  • our consciousness shifting through those billions of frames per second, like a projector light

  • projecting through different frames on a film strip to project an ILLUSION of movement on

  • a screen, you could say yes, that's one way to look at how the idea of physical reality

  • is created.

  • At the same time, no pun intended, there is only one moment in existence.

  • Everything is always now, but it's the same moment from a different perspective.

  • So in a sense it's this, and it's also that.

  • So the fact that there's only one moment means that there doesn't have to be an incredible

  • amount of computing power, because there really is only one moment being looked at from a

  • number of different perspectives, at a very high frame rate.

  • But the frame rate is a perspective of a particular reality, so it creates the illusion of a need

  • for a lot of computing power, which may not actually really be necessary.

  • But you're looking at it from 2 different perspectives, so you're using the terminology

  • and the language of 2 different perspectives.

  • It's true to say there's a high degree of frame rate and a high degree of computing

  • power from this perspective, but from the other perspective, where there's only a

  • single moment in existence, no computing power is needed.

  • So it's just again on that sliding scale of how you want to look at the idea, that

  • determines the terminology and the process that you believe is necessary to understand

  • that perspective, if that makes sense.

  • But yes, looking at it linearly Bashar has said, “Time is a side effect of our consciousness

  • shifting through billions of parallel reality frames per second, and that's what creates

  • the illusion of time, space, movement, and change.”

  • In fact, everything is just all happening at once.

  • It's all just one big frozen moment in which everything exists holographically, but we

  • are capable of creating an experience of looking at it from different perspectives in a linear

  • sequence.

  • But that's just an illusionary perspective.

  • So we're like movie projectors which take the film that's going in many frames through,

  • and turn it into an intelligible movie.

  • Yes, yes, and all frames exist at the same time, as the projectionist knows.

  • So using the movie metaphor with a movie filmin fact I watched a thing on CNN last

  • night about the Kennedy assassination.

  • And they took a prover film and you could see frame by frame [speaking slowly] by frame

  • what was happening.

  • So if you take a single frame of this billions of frames per second that you say is the nature

  • of our reality – I don't know if this is a meaningful question butwhat would

  • that frame consist of?

  • It would consist of a potential that has no experience and is timeless.

  • There is no experience, no change, no variation in that; it's a frozen snapshot.

  • Is it like trillions of atoms in my fingertip, all with their electrons just poised at a

  • certain point, and then the next frame is that the electrons have shifted slightly to

  • their next point?

  • You can look at it from an animation point of view and you say that is true as well.

  • At the same time, you have to also realize that the atoms you're talking about are

  • also frames.

  • Because there really aren't different atoms; it's all one thing expressing itself as

  • different atoms.

  • So it depends on the perspective you're looking at it from as to whether it looks

  • like millions of different atoms, or whether it just looks like one concept of potentiality.

  • It's really just about perspective.

  • And you can frame it, you can describe it with any kind of terminology you want, as

  • long as you understand that that terminology is just where you are on the sliding scale

  • of 'everything exists now' to 'there's

  • an infinite experience of time and space'.

  • It's just different perspectives of the same thing.

  • So yes, you can describe it the way you described it and that's perfectly valid, from “a”

  • point of view.

  • It doesn't discount any other way of describing it, on that timeline.

  • One other thing to throw into the mix here and perhaps you can comment on it is that,

  • physicists tell us that we shouldn't stop at atoms in our analysis of the universe,

  • if we keep going deeper we get down to sub-atomic particles, or get more and more to the point

  • where there's nothing of any material nature.

  • And you know, if String Theory is correct we eventually get down to these vibrating

  • strings, which are just potentialities with no physical components whatsoever, and that's

  • really what the universe isis this nonphysical field of potentiality, or it appears to be

  • physical….

  • Or even something more simple than that.

  • One of the things that Bashar has talked about from his perspectiveif you want to say,

  • it's a simpler version than thatis what he calls thePrime Radiant.”

  • That's how it translates into our language.

  • And basically he's saying, alright, he still needs to - for the purpose of the conversation

  • - talk about this as if it is either a wave or a particle, so he's clear about the fact

  • that he's simply using analogous terms.

  • But what he's describing is a thought experiment, and basically he's saying this - imagine

  • this, this isn't necessarily, absolutely representative of what the reality is, but

  • it's an analogy that can help us.

  • So he's saying, “If you imagine that there's only a single particle in an infinite void

  • of emptiness.

  • And there's nothing else in that void, just that single particle.

  • Well, there are no laws of physics here.

  • The particle is not beholdent to do anything, because it's just hanging in an infinite

  • void and there are no limitations on it.

  • So if there are no limitations on it, that particle could actually move at infinite speed.

  • There's no speed of light law going on here.

  • So if a particle can move at infinite speed, that means it can actually be everywhere at

  • once, in that infinite void.

  • And that would create the illusion, by being so fast that it can actually appear everywhere,

  • it would create the illusion that there are a number of different particles, when in fact

  • it's all the same particle appearing next to itself, over and over again so quickly,

  • that you can't tell it's the same, single particle.”

  • Bashar is basically saying that's a better analogy, and it actually is a physical analogy

  • of how we actually are all one.

  • Because he's basically saying, if you want to even think about it as a particle, you're

  • actually all made out of the same, one particle.

  • Not the same KIND of particle; but literally, the same, one particle, in the ultimate timesharing

  • framework.

  • Where every single particle in me, is literally the same particle you are made of.

  • So that's the way they choose to look at it, as an analogy in the physics context,

  • in the quantum context, if you will.

  • I've actually heard physicists, as I understood them, say that very same things too.

  • So it's not like an unheard of notion.

  • Right.

  • I know you've talked about this in other Bashar sessions, but we introduced this interview

  • talking about the fact that you saw spaceships.

  • And there are some people who say, “Oh, that wouldn't be possible because it's,

  • you know, so many light years,” andHow could they get here?” and all that business,

  • so maybe just dispel that.

  • Yeah, I think that's really kinda an idea that's on its way out at this point.

  • I think that there are even now physicists who are coming up with an understanding, and

  • formulas [of] how there are ways around that idea.

  • There are ways of contracting space, warping space, and so on, that don't violate the

  • speed of light, they just get around it.

  • Because space itself can actually expand at any rate it wants to.

  • It's not subject to the speed of light, because light exists within that space.

  • But in a sense, the idea of space-time is above and beyond that, so it really has no

  • limitation on it in terms of how fast it can expand.

  • I think there are civilizations that have learned this trick, and although Bashar, in

  • describing how their spaceships get here from another dimension, or travel light years in

  • the blink of an eye, has actually expressed a very unique and very different kind of understanding

  • about how that works.

  • He's basically saying that we think of an object as existing in a location.

  • His perspective is that location is actually one of the variables of the object.

  • So in other words, if you have an object here, and then it moves to here, this represents

  • two completely different, let's say, vibrational equations.

  • They may be very subtly different, but they're different.

  • If you could isolate the locational x, y, z variable in the object here, and impose

  • on it, somehow, the locational variable of here, then the object has to stop existing

  • here and just instantaneously start existing here, without actually having travelled inbetween.

  • That's how their spaceships work.

  • So if they're in one location in their solar system, and they simply impose upon the ship

  • and everyone in it an overwhelming energy frequency, that is representative of the locational

  • variable in the equation of our solar system, their ship just pops out of existence in their

  • system, and pops into existence in ours.

  • They haven't violated the speed of light because they actually haven't travelled

  • in normal space-time; they just redefined the locational variable.

  • Because again, if everything actually exists all at once, then that means it exists, potentially,

  • everywhere at once.

  • So what they're doing is they're taking advantage of redefining that variable, to

  • stop existing here, and just start existing here.

  • That's how their ships travel.

  • And again, I think a lot of physicists on our planet are beginning to get the idea that

  • 'you can't get there from here,' or 'you can't get here from there,' is

  • a very outmoded idea.

  • And we're actually learning now, even in our own science, that that is possible, and

  • how to do that.

  • Let's say they're 300 light years away, so how did they know how to fine tune the

  • locational variables so precisely, that they don't accidentally end up manifesting in

  • the middle of the sun, or something like that [Laughter].

  • Well, the basic idea is practice!

  • [Laughter] Practice could be rather disastrous [Laughter].

  • Well yeah, they actually have had a long time to get used to this idea, like any technology.

  • Bashar has actually, at one point I remember, did talk about the fact that in the beginning,

  • when they were learning this technology, they did lose people.

  • Like our airplanes you know - the Wright brothers in the early days, a lot of airplanes crashed.

  • Exactly.

  • So they have had to have their tests and perfect this technology for themselves, but they've

  • also had thousands of years to do that.

  • So at this point, it's not impossible that they still might go astray now and then, but

  • I think they've probably reduced that probability to a very small fraction of a percentage,

  • at this time.

  • They understand how to chart the universe as a series of vibrational equations, and

  • so basically now, I think it's just relatively formulaic for them to do this.

  • So if they wanted to chart a particular galaxy which they hadn't visited yet, they'd

  • have a way of charting that remotely, before actually teleporting themselves to it?

  • Yeah, they can extrapolate from the map they already have as to what the likely frequencies

  • are to be, over there.

  • At least to enough of a degree that they could probably get close, then perhaps refine it

  • from that point forward.

  • A friend overheard me yesterday at the grocery store, talking about the fact that I was going

  • to interview you, and he got very excited and sent in a question here, that's related

  • to the topic we're talking about, which is going to seem pretty far out to some people,

  • but whatever.

  • [Laughter] Take it or leave it.

  • He said, “I am already teleporting in my sports car.”

  • In other words he says, I can jump 40 or 50 miles.

  • And I say, “You sure you're not just spacing out?”

  • But he said, “I'm wondering if there's a similarity in teleporting in a spaceship

  • as the Ya-Yey do?”- [Rick trying to pronounce it correctly] whoever they are? [Chuckling]

  • Yes, Yaya.

  • It's another civilization Bashar has talked about, but yes.

  • I would actually say yes, it's identical.

  • If that is actually happening, it's identical.

  • In fact, again based on what we were talking about before, it's actually what we're

  • doing all the time when we even experience any movement at all, because in a sense we're

  • jumping from one frame to another.

  • There's no intervening travelling, we're just jumping from one frame to another.

  • All that Bashar's people are doing is doing it over a larger number of frames.

  • So you don't have any problem with believing that he actually may be teleporting in his

  • sports car?

  • You knew people who actually do that sort of thing?

  • I actually do know people who have done it.

  • It's not something that happens regularly.

  • I've experienced it in my life once.

  • I know someone else who did experience it more than once.

  • They werelet's see, how can I describe what happened to them?

  • They were in an apartment with a roommate.

  • They were standing in the bathroom brushing their hair, in the mirror.

  • It was a small apartment.

  • There is no way to get from the bathroom to the kitchen without going through the living

  • room.

  • The roommate was in the kitchen.

  • Walked into the living room and into the bathroom to talk to her roommate.

  • When she got to the bathroom, the roommate wasn't there.

  • The roommate suddenly realized that they were standing in front of the fridge, in the kitchen,

  • with the hairbrush in her hand, staring at the fridge, wondering how she got into the

  • kitchen [Rick chuckling].

  • And the roommate came back into the kitchen and said, “How the hell did you get past

  • me and into the kitchen?”

  • She said, “I don't know.”

  • So I know that's one strong example where there was corroboration, that the person actually

  • popped from the bathroom to the kitchen with no intervening travelling.

  • I experienced this once in my life where I was with a friend, up near San Francisco.

  • And they were supposed to meet mepick me upand we were going to lunch in a

  • nearby small town.

  • Now neither of us knew anything about this area.

  • I'd never been there before; she had never been there before.

  • So when she came to the hotel, picked me up, went to the front desk and said, “How do

  • we get to this town?”

  • The person at the front desk gave us very simple, very direct instructions how to get

  • to this town to have lunch.

  • We followed the directions to a T, got to the town, had lunch.

  • On the way back, we reversed the directions and suddenly realized we were several miles

  • north of where we should be, and it didn't make any sense.

  • So we turned around, got back on, went back to the hotel and said, “Now wait a minute.

  • How did that happen?”

  • So we followed the directions again to retrace our steps to see what had happened, and we

  • realized that the person at the front desk had given us the wrong directions.

  • There was absolutely no way we could have followed those directions and gotten to that

  • town, but we did.

  • So in that instance we knew, by proving it to ourselves, that somehow we had just believed

  • her directions so strongly, that it didn't matter that they were wrong, we still got

  • where we needed to be.

  • And the directions were just too simple to have made a mistake; it was literally just

  • one off-ramp away.

  • So I had the experience myself of that whole slippage of space and time, that is possible

  • when you're in the proper altered state.

  • I'm sure that cynics, as we defined them in the beginning, would feel that there were

  • a lot of alternative explanations for what you just described, but I would encourage

  • cynics to keep an open mind.

  • Oh of course, but that's why we were skeptical, because we couldn't believe that that had

  • actually happened.

  • That's why we actually followed the directions again, but we absolutely proved to ourselves

  • that there was no way we could have gotten to the town by actually following her directions,

  • now that we knew the layout of the land.

  • It was only because we had no clue whether her directions were right or wrong, that we

  • actually wound up getting to the town following her directions.

  • But her directions were wrong, and it was absolutely too simple to have made a mistake.

  • This fellow further asks, “I'm wondering if the ability to teleport in a car, opens

  • an energy in the collective consciousness of the planet, that will allow teleporting

  • of the Ya-yey here, in their spaceships?”

  • Yes, because anytime anyone exhibits any example that stretches the boundaries of what we think

  • is possible, I think that adds something to the collective energy that makes it more possible

  • for other people.

  • I think this is what people generally refer to as the “100th monkey syndrome”.

  • So there is a collective consciousness, I believe, and when you do something in that,

  • when you do break a barrier, I do think you actually kind of set up, let's say, an energetic

  • lubricant that makes it easier for people to slide along that same path again, and again,

  • and again.

  • Yeah.

  • Another question he has: “Do you have any more information about teleportation that

  • you have not put in your previous YouTube posts?”

  • Anything new?

  • Um, no, it's really just about state of being.

  • It's really about letting go of preconceptions.

  • It's really about expanding your understanding that you actually are already, in a sense,

  • everywhere all at once, and just sort of reidentifying your perspective from another point of view.

  • Okay.

  • So, is Bashar an optimist?

  • [Laughter] I know there are a lot of dire situations right now on the planet, and it

  • almost seems to be heating up.

  • You know, getting more and more dire.

  • And the heating up, literally with the global warming thing, and also geez, I mean, what's

  • going on in Syria and Iraq right now, and all kinds of things.

  • I mean, he's notyou say he's an optimistyes, I could say he's an optimist because

  • he's always looking at how can this situation, regardless of how it looks, deliver a positive

  • outcome for you, a positive point of view, a positive experience?

  • He will always look at it from a positive point of view.

  • At the same time, that doesn't mean he's in denial about recognizing that many of these

  • situations have been created from a negative point of view.

  • But just because he observes that we may have created things from a negative perspective,

  • doesn't mean we still can't reverse them and turn it around, and get a positive result

  • from this.

  • So, he's encouraging us to redefine these things in a positive way.

  • So, for example, he understands that there's a lot of struggle and strife, and war and

  • conflict, and so on, but he says, “Here's another way to look at it: you're accelerating

  • these things on your planet, you're bringing more and more and more and more out into the

  • open, so that you can decide that you don't prefer this anymore.

  • You're giving yourself more examples of negativity to make yourselves so sick and

  • tired of it, that you finally start choosing only positivity.”

  • So from his perspective, that's a positive way to look at the negativity we've created,

  • is we're getting it all out on the table.

  • Where now able to see all in front of us, and have a dialogue between all of us, “Is

  • this really the direction we want to go in?

  • Is this what we prefer?”

  • Yes or no?

  • And if it's no, how can we do something about it?

  • How can we really change this?

  • How can we make a difference in a positive direction?

  • So, he's basically saying that all the negativity coming up, bubbling up to the surface now,

  • is us getting all our fears on the table, really examining our fears, and finally deciding

  • to let those fears go, so we can actually have a reality like we say we prefer to have.

  • So he's looking at it as an opportunity to be more in control, more responsible, more

  • self-empowered, and make decisions that are more in alignment with who we really prefer

  • to be.

  • Okay.

  • This question is related to what you just said and perhaps will bring out another flavor

  • of it: “Does Bashar concur with the notion that the planet, as a conscious entity, Gaia,

  • is waking up, and all the beings on it are waking up.

  • And that it's kind of like when a dog wakes up and starts scratching its fleas, and it

  • starts to get a little turbulent for the fleas?

  • You know, things were kind of peaceful when the dog was asleep.

  • But now things are beginning to really shake…”

  • Sure, we're shaking ourselves awake.

  • Yeah, there's certain things which really don't belong on the planet, which need to

  • be somehow removed or purged, and the purging process is not necessarily going to be smooth

  • for those who are committed to those things.

  • It may seem things are really getting crazy but it's actually something good happening,

  • if you zoom out to see a big enough picture.

  • Yes, and another way again, is to go back to the idea of infinite parallel versions

  • of Earth.

  • Because Bashar is basically saying, “It's not that you're changing the world you're

  • on, it's that you're changing yourself, and shifting to a parallel version of Earth

  • that is already more reflective of the change you made within yourself.”

  • Ahhh!

  • So the people that are staying, let's say, locked into the idea of resistance and negativity,

  • are simply shifting to versions of Earth that are more and more reflective of struggle,

  • strife and negativity, and may experience disastrous transformations.

  • People that are shifting in a positive way are more in alignment with themselves, are

  • going to experience themselves shifting to versions of Earth that are already more reflective

  • of that idea.

  • And so the people, ultimately, who are no longer vibrationally compatible with being

  • in alignment with yourself, may start to disappear from our lives and vice versa, over time.

  • And as we shift to more and more and more diverse versions of the Earth, that already

  • existit's more like that - rather than changing the world you're on.

  • Because that version of Earth will always exist, because everything always exists, it's

  • just a matter of what neighborhood do you want to live in.

  • What Earth do you want to live on, and changing yourself so that you shift to a reality that

  • is more representative of that change within you.

  • Yeah, I can see two interpretations of what you just said.

  • One is that, one might be feeling undergoing a spiritual awakening, upwelling of more bliss,

  • consciousness, all that, and might be feeling like, “Wow, life is really getting good

  • for me,” and yet at the same time, all hell could be breaking loose in various places

  • around the world.

  • The economies could be collapsing and so on, but from one's own perspective, life is

  • really getting quite heavenly.

  • That's one interpretation.

  • Another is that, as we finish these lifetimes in these bodies, are you saying that perhaps

  • people who are really attached to one version of Earth will take rebirth in a version of

  • Earth that's more in tune with their proclivities, whereas those who are going the other way

  • will take birth in a different version, much more positive, heavenly version?

  • Yes.

  • Okay.

  • And everything in-between.

  • Yeah, so there's like any number of varieties that one could choose to dwell on according

  • to which way you want to stir the boat.

  • An infinite number of experiences on an infinite number of realities, it's really what it

  • comes down to.

  • It's: choose what works for you.

  • Do you yourself do some kind of spiritual exercise other than channeling Bashar?

  • No, not so much, because the channeling process; the experience of being in that altered state,

  • for me, is extremely intense, and extremely capable of delivering a lot of information,

  • a lot of perspectives, a lot of concepts.

  • And I find that that's really what works for me.

  • Now I guess you could say that in making films, that's my way of expressing my excitement,

  • that's my way of putting myself as myself, into that state of acting on my bliss and

  • then expressing what Bashar is talking about in my reality.

  • So I suppose you could say film-making is my other way of being in the state of being

  • where I'm expressing these things in my life, as the person that I am.

  • Does Bashar offer practices that other people can do on a daily basis?

  • He does, he does, but he refers to all such practices aspermission slips”.

  • Basically what he's saying is: all tools, all techniques, all rituals, all formats,

  • and all objects, are basically permission slips that we're using.

  • We're attracting ourselves to these tools, these techniques, these rituals, because they

  • happen to be in alignment with the belief system that we have.

  • And for some reason in our belief system, we believe we need to use this tool to give

  • ourselves permission to be more of who we are.

  • It's not that the permission slip itselfthe ritual, the practice, the objectis

  • really doing it; we're doing it, but for some reason, our belief system says we need

  • this thing in order to give ourselves permission to be more of who we are.

  • And that's fine.

  • But basically what that means is, any permission slip can work!

  • They're all valid.

  • If you think that religion is your permission slip, that's fine.

  • If you think Tarot cards is your permission slip, that's fine.

  • If you think crystals is your permission slip, that's fine.

  • If you think nothing is your permission slip, that's fine.

  • But they're all permission slips because they're all representative of what your

  • belief system is in alignment with that will allow you to relax a limitation, and give

  • yourself permission to be more of who you are.

  • So anything will work, and if you're attracted to it, you're attracted to it for a reason.

  • It's probably indicative of where you are in your belief system and what ritual will

  • work best for you, at that moment, that's why you're attracted to it.

  • And if you change your mind tomorrow and are attracted to something else, that's because

  • you've changed and now you're attracted to a different permission slip.

  • But ultimately the idea is to understand that they are just permission slips, and you don't

  • need any of them, to just give yourself permission to be more of who you are.

  • It can just be a decision; that can be a sufficient permission slip.

  • Yeah, so in a way that subtly dismissive of the value of practices and techniques, but

  • at the same time it also endorses them, if you feel attracted to them.

  • He's not saying, “Well, go ahead and do it if you feel attracted, but you really don't

  • it.”

  • No.

  • No, no, no, he's not dismissing it because he's valuing the belief system that believes

  • that that's what will work, that that's the process, because again, the experience

  • and the process IS the point.

  • So it's not dismissive, it's just saying it's okay to use those things, because that's

  • the process you've decided you require to have this experience of yourself, and that's

  • absolutely valid.

  • He's just looking also at simultaneously, at the underlying mechanism that creates that

  • experience.

  • So he's revealing the simplicity of the mechanism, without invalidating the experience,

  • and at the same time simply saying that, when you achieve a higher level of understanding,

  • you realize, as part of your valid process, that you don't necessarily need that permission

  • slip anymore.

  • In the same way that as an adult, you don't need the same kind of things you needed as

  • a kid, but that doesn't invalidate the fact that you needed them as a kid.

  • It doesn't dismiss them; it's what got you to where you are, to the point where you

  • realize you don't need those things anymore.

  • Yeah, if you're crossing a river in a boat, [Darryl sayingExactlyin the background]

  • you kind of need the boat when you're in the middle of the river, but when you get

  • to the other shore, the boat is not needed anymore.

  • In fact, if you keep clinging to the boat, you're kind of not able to enjoy the shore,

  • right?

  • [Chuckling] Yeah, so it's not a dismissive thing; it's

  • simply: right place, right time, this is what you need now.

  • And then you get to a point where you don't need that anymore, BECAUSE this is how it

  • works.

  • Yeah, okay, that's good.

  • So, we've been going on for almost two hours.

  • This is great.

  • I really appreciate this discussion.

  • [Chuckling] Time flies!

  • Yeah, is there anything else that you feel is important that I haven't thought to ask

  • you that, you know, you want people to hear?

  • You know the idea of what I do, like I said, on my own as a film-maker.

  • Like I said, we're in the middle now of doing a Bashar documentary.

  • My production company, Zia Films, has done another film called 'Dearly Departed',

  • which is an exploration of the idea of the afterlife.

  • So this is what excites me, it's what gives me joy, gets me acting on my bliss, to my

  • highest ability.

  • And as an example in that sense, I would absolutely, certainly encourage, at whatever rate you're

  • comfortable with, everyone to act on their highest joy, because it is exceedingly rewarding.

  • Yes there are going to be challenges, yes absolutely there are going to be things that

  • might turn you inside out, but if you always know that whatever is happening can be used

  • in a positive way and you always give it a positive reason, from personal experience

  • in making the movies that we've made, I can guarantee you that by staying in that

  • state, you will always get a positive outcome that's many times better than you imagined.

  • It just does always work that way.

  • So, in following my own bliss, I can definitely say that Bashar's principles do work when

  • you apply them.

  • And I would encourage everyone, to the best of their ability to act on your highest dreams,

  • because that's really what you're all about.

  • Will these movies be available in theaters?

  • On YouTube?

  • On Netflix?

  • 'Dearly Departed' is now available on Gaiam TV and through Fast Spring.

  • They can go to our Ziafilms.com website and order 'Dearly Departed'

  • if they're interested in that.

  • Of course they can also go to Bashar.org to order any of the recordings that have been

  • made of Bashar events.

  • We are planning to present the Bashar documentary, which is called 'First Contact' to film

  • festivals, to see if we can actually get a distributor to put it into theaters first,

  • before we go to DVD.

  • And Zia Films, as its own production company, has many projects that we're creating and

  • developing that will get out there, on TV or theaters, or in some way, shape, or form.

  • But yes, they can find out what we've already done on Ziafilms.com or Bashar.org.

  • And I'll link to this stuff from your page on BATGAP.com.

  • Okay, thank you.

  • So people won't have to know how to spell it or anything.

  • They can follow those links.

  • [Chuckling] Thank you.

  • The friend who was asking me about teleporting in his car was also asking whether you do

  • private sessions - Bashar does private sessions - that you can get together with people somehow,

  • either in person or over Skype, or whatever.

  • No, I only do them in person at this point because the way my schedule is, in terms of

  • the film production.

  • But all of that information, as to how to set up a private session, is just based on

  • availability on my schedule, and that can all be found out through the Bashar.org website.

  • Okay, so they'd come to L.A. or wherever you're gonna be?

  • They would have to; they would have to be in L.A. I actually don't usually have time

  • when we go to other nearby cities to do private sessions.

  • And because of my production schedule at the moment, we're not actually travelling to

  • cities that are farther away from L.A. than I can fly up in the morning, do the session,

  • and fly back the same night.

  • At this point, film production is keeping me as close to L.A. as possible.

  • But we are doing things in San Francisco, we're doing things in Orange County, we

  • sometimes go as far as perhaps Arizona.

  • So they can, again, find our schedule on Bashar.org, where Bashar events will be, but private sessions

  • will need to be in Los Angeles, yes.

  • Do you mind my asking how much the private sessions cost?

  • Private sessions are $300 for an hour, for 1, 2, or 3 people.

  • Okay, good.

  • When you do travel places, wellthey'll get it all on Bashar[.org].

  • If they want to find out your schedule, if you happen to be speaking in New York or something.

  • Yes, it's all on the website.

  • Do you have some kind of newsletter people can sign up for to be notified of things like

  • that?

  • Yes, again that's all through the Bashar website.

  • Good, well we'll link to all that.

  • Well thanks, this has been great.

  • Yes, this has, it's been fun.

  • Let me make a few concluding remarks of a general nature, that I always make.

  • I've been speaking with Darryl Anka who channels Bashar; you know that by now, [chuckling]

  • if you've been watching this.

  • And we'll be linking to all his things - his films, Bashar.org, anything else he wants

  • to have linked to - you'll find it on his page at BATGAP.com.

  • B-A-T-G-A-P.

  • So if you happen to be listening to this in an audio file that someone sent you, or seeing

  • it on YouTube, if you go to BATGAP.com you'll find sort of a mothership of all these interviews

  • that I've been doing.

  • There are about 230 of them so far.

  • There's a place there to sign up to be notified by email every time a new one is posted.

  • There's a discussion group that is set up for each interview, specific to that interview.

  • There is a link to an audio podcast, so you could subscribe on iTunes and listen to it

  • on an iPod, so some such device.

  • There is a donate button, which I appreciate people clicking if they have the wherewithal.

  • That's the sole means of support for this whole enterprise.

  • Thanks again Darryl.

  • Thank you very much.

  • I really appreciate you having me on the show.

  • And thank you for the work you do, so that information like this can get out to people.

  • I really appreciate that.

  • Yeah, next week I'll be interviewing Richard Lang, who is a protégé of Douglas Harding,

  • who had a teaching calledThe Headless Way”.

  • And I believe the week after that is Peter Russell, a scientist who's written all kinds

  • of great books that I've been a fan of over the years.

  • So thanks for listening or watching and we'll see you next time.

  • {BATGAP theme music playing}

[BATGAP theme music playing]

Subtitles and vocabulary

Click the word to look it up Click the word to find further inforamtion about it