Placeholder Image

Subtitles section Play video

  • Pearson: This is the Friday, October 14, 2016

  • version of the Market Plus segment.

  • Joining me now is Walt Hackney and Elaine Kub.

  • Guys, welcome back.

  • Thank you, thank you, Mike.

  • Pearson: Now, Walt, our first question goes to you

  • and it is an issue that I'm sure you're very

  • familiar with.

  • This is from Lee Reichmuth in Nebraska from Twitter.

  • Lee wants to know, what does the cattle industry

  • need to do at this point because anyone unhedged

  • for the last two years is close to bankruptcy?

  • What can producers, what should producers be doing

  • from today going forward to stave off bankruptcy

  • for these independent producers?

  • Hackney: Many of them cannot and bankruptcy is

  • going to be a way of life as we approach the deep

  • fall of this year.

  • There's a syndrome out there right now among

  • cattle feeders that the feeder cattle, if you

  • will, are unhedgeable, there's nothing they can

  • do, they're paralyzed and they are a victim of the

  • marketing process that's going to take them into

  • bankruptcy.

  • And I know how that sounds but it is a basic fact

  • that there's too often these producers have an

  • opportunity to get away from that attitude but

  • they've got to go now finally to a professional

  • trader that can give them the proper techniques to

  • get their hedging program done.

  • I've got a customer in Saginaw, Texas and he's a

  • huge operator, he is so big that you would think

  • that he cannot, his exposure has got to be

  • phenomenal in regard to his cash flow needs and

  • his risk protection.

  • He called me last night and we had a long visit.

  • Every hoof of cattle he buys, which is annually

  • about 35,000, maybe 40,000 head of cattle a year,

  • every hoof of cattle he buys he hedges and is

  • easily done and he hooks a $60 a head tag to their

  • tail and quits.

  • He doesn't go for the big money, he's not going for

  • the gold ring off the carousel.

  • He's going for $60 a head and that's all he wants to

  • make on them.

  • He made it when the other cattle feeders were losing

  • $400.

  • He made it last year when they were losing $400 to

  • $500.

  • This year they're losing anywhere from not quite

  • break even to a couple hundred bucks a head.

  • He has made money all the way through this.

  • And there he is, hedgeability of these

  • feeder cattle if they'll take advantage of a

  • professional marketer in the commodity end of it.

  • Pearson: Elaine?

  • Kub: I'll weigh in on this because there may be some

  • scenarios where the size of the contract it might

  • be easier to do it if you're at a large scale,

  • in some cases, than it is at a small scale, but in

  • that case I would suggest that people go talk to

  • their crop insurance agent about the livestock risk,

  • the LRP, there's livestock crop insurance, it's not

  • really crop insurance but it is a risk protection.

  • It is effectively a put of any size.

  • And the details of it, you should speak to your

  • agent, but I just wanted to point that out that it

  • can be done at any size.

  • Pearson: It is out there at any size operation and

  • it's effectively a subsidized put.

  • That's what it is.

  • Hackney: Elaine, since this is part of your

  • business, do you understand, which I do

  • not, but do you understand what Pete Bond was telling

  • me in regard to his techniques of putting

  • these -- he's got a daughter your age and she

  • does 100% of that by herself in his business.

  • Kub: Sounds like you guys need to get a new analyst

  • on here, yeah.

  • Hackney: She has designed a hedge program that is

  • phenomenal and that's what they use and it's unlike,

  • he'll explain it to me every time I talk to him

  • and when we get done I couldn't repeat him.

  • Do you see the potential of a hedge in cattle

  • through the techniques you're aware of?

  • Kub: Sure.

  • You would lock in your selling price through a

  • put or a short futures that can be done.

  • And in the cattle industry, and I don't know

  • exactly what your friend is doing in Texas, but if

  • he's feeding in that instance he has also got

  • to lock in his input costs, which is primarily

  • feed, that's the easy part especially now when corn

  • is $3.

  • This is a no brainer.

  • Pearson: How far ahead are you locking in feed costs

  • here at $3 cash corn?

  • Kub: Twelve months or more.

  • You look to December 2017, those futures are $3.90 so

  • that is an opportunity for everybody to look at this

  • and say, if I'm going to be producing corn in 2017

  • at $3.90 that doesn't sound so bad and if I need

  • to be feeding cattle for the next year and I can

  • buy it now for $3, that sounds pretty darn good.

  • So there's opportunities here.

  • Pearson: I didn't mean to interrupt.

  • He's locking in inputs, locking in his selling

  • price, but there have been times over this past year

  • with the incredible volatility where there is

  • no place you can hedge and find a $60 profit, but

  • there are other options you could use.

  • Kub: Well, and what I'm suspecting he's doing or

  • his daughter is doing is that, you're right, not

  • every day you can go to the market and find your

  • $60 but the days that you can find it he's not

  • getting greedy and waiting for $75, he's locking it

  • in.

  • Hackney: He catalogues an inventory of cattle, as

  • you suggest, cannot be worked into that program

  • and as that market moves he takes portions or all

  • of those catalogue inventory and he puts them

  • into that $60 a head program.

  • That's what he does.

  • Kub: That would be a minimum size.

  • Hackney: Possibly, I'm sorry I brought that into

  • your program here, Mike.

  • Pearson: That's helpful news for a lot of us.

  • Hackney: I get an incessant parade of cattle

  • feeders calling me asking me how they can, if there

  • is a hedge potential.

  • I'm not smart enough in the marketing in regard to

  • commodity to be able to give them any advice.

  • Kub: Well and like you say, Mike, some days

  • there's not and you wouldn't make money.

  • Pearson: Well now, Elaine, next question to you and

  • this one you kind of talked about on the show.

  • This is from Ben on Twitter in Jesup, Iowa.

  • He wants to know, where do you see the low in these

  • markets?

  • Kub: Well, I'm on Twitter so I saw Ben's question in

  • advance and I knew I was kind of spoiling it in the

  • show.

  • And to be honest the numbers that are the dates

  • that I said in the show are just me looking at a

  • chart.

  • What he's referring to is earlier in the summer I

  • did this statistical analysis of what date of

  • the year would you be most likely to see a corn

  • market high and it was June 18th and that worked

  • out great this year which was fantastically lucky

  • and I feel fantastic.

  • And I haven't done the full statistics about what

  • date of the year would you be most likely to see a

  • low.

  • But in these normally abundant years it looks

  • like there have been some lows in very late August

  • and then the crop size gets trimmed and then that

  • was the low, which that may very well be what

  • happened this year.

  • And some years there's kind of a low in November

  • if perhaps the crop gets bigger and bigger through

  • harvest, which is not the case this year.

  • Pearson: Right, but we're seeing a divergence where

  • corn that August low, we hit that $3.18 or $3.17

  • and change and the crop gets smaller.

  • Beans, we did hit a low or kind of a low in August,

  • now the crop has grown so do you expect that

  • November low or are we going to grow this bean

  • crop all the way through January?

  • Kub: I think beans are going to continue to have

  • some good news with continued buying.

  • There's going to be commercial business

  • actually going in there and buying those beans on

  • the futures.

  • Anyway, so I'm not too worried about beans.

  • Pearson: Okay.

  • But you're not yet reowning?

  • Kub: Oh no, I'm not - Pearson: If I'm selling

  • cash off the combine I just let those sales go.

  • Kub: Yeah.

  • Well, I haven't followed my own advice in that

  • matter but I'm just saying I'm not real optimistic,

  • but I'm not real pessimistic.

  • I'm neutral.

  • $9.60 is I think maybe the best we can expect but I

  • haven't sold my beans.

  • Pearson: Alright.

  • Put our money where our mouth is.

  • Hackney: Mike, I can't help but sit here and

  • think if I'm a producer and one of the fans of

  • Iowa Public TV and Market to Market how valuable

  • this conversation is to me.

  • I'm learning more sitting here than I came to the

  • party with.

  • I am.

  • Kub: I think Walt is being sarcastic.

  • I just said, I don't know, sell your beans, maybe,

  • maybe not, I don't know.

  • Pearson: You haven't though.

  • Kub: I have not.

  • Pearson: So Elaine is holding her beans, that's

  • her market advice for everybody.

  • Kub: But I'm not holding them for very long.

  • I've paid 5 cents for this month of storage but I'm

  • not doing that for very long.

  • Pearson: So harvest is done in your part of the

  • world?

  • Kub: In my acres it is.

  • Hackney: On the beans.

  • Pearson: On the beans.

  • Corn in progress?

  • Kub: Corn, nationwide we are going to hit the

  • halfway mark right about now.

  • More or less we're at halfway.

  • Pearson: Okay, in corn harvest.

  • Final question, and this is a big one.

  • We're delving into all sorts of issues with this

  • question was emailed to us.

  • We invite you to email us questions too.

  • MarkettoMarket@iptv.org I think is our email.

  • This one is from Brian.

  • He wants to know, what do we have to do to make the

  • consumer, our legislative bodies and the feds

  • understand the dire circumstances our

  • independent beef producers are in?

  • What if anything do we have to do?

  • Do we need to make the consumer or the feds

  • understand the potential road to bankruptcy for a

  • lot of cattle feeders in particular?

  • Hackney: Very briefly in my case I don't think that

  • it's necessary to have a formal effort to educate

  • the consumer in regard to using the agricultural

  • products.

  • They've got to eat and they've got to be able to

  • pay the price.

  • If you're going to the dance you pay for the

  • fiddler.

  • And that is what they've got to do.

  • What I'm trying to say is, we have every kind of an

  • educational process in effect as we speak that

  • will cause your friend there on the email to do

  • what he's, he wants someone to spoon feed him.

  • That's not out there.

  • You've got to get busy with the evidence that is

  • available and take advantage of the programs

  • that are already out there.

  • Pearson: Utilize the Farm Bill, utilize the

  • livestock risk marketing program.

  • Kub: Which is still kind of a raw deal compared to

  • crop insurance.

  • There's no death loss coverage.

  • It's not the same.

  • Pearson: Is there opportunity in the policy

  • realm here?

  • We're in an election year, Elaine, let's get

  • political.

  • Kub: I do have a couple of thoughts, not really

  • political, but in terms of policy realm for the

  • livestock sector beef is better off than sheep

  • right now.

  • Think of the poor sheep, they're not even going to

  • be able to use their over the counter medicated

  • feeds when the New Year starts.

  • Beef at least has some crazy overregulated system

  • to get their antibiotics, but at least they have a

  • system.

  • Last I heard you can't even get, you cannot get a

  • feed directive for any of those -- Hackney: And

  • they have no subsidy for the wool.

  • The government has quit that.

  • Pearson: And you're stuck working with sheep.

  • Just kidding.

  • Bless you sheep producers.

  • I do respect them.

  • Kub: One more thing about the consumer education.

  • I think you're right that people should just be

  • smart but I will point out that there is a story that

  • we should be telling or at least a myth that we

  • should be somehow busting because I was just

  • listening to some podcast about global warming, the

  • best way an individual person can fight global

  • warming is by changing what you eat and eating

  • less meat and specifically if you're going to eat

  • meat, eat chicken or something, don't eat beef

  • because it's bad for global warming.

  • Well, I think that people, consumers apparently don't

  • realize how much conservation of American

  • grassland depends on the beef industry.

  • Chicken industry, not to pick on, I like the

  • chicken industry too, they buy corn and soybean meal,

  • but there's a conservation story about the beef

  • industry that consumers are apparently not aware

  • of.

  • Pearson: You don't have chicken on open range in

  • Idaho.

  • Kub: No, that's not, yeah so there is a nice

  • environmentally friendly feel good story about beef

  • that people apparently don't know and they're

  • more worried about methane farts, which is silly.

  • Pearson: Did California ever do anything with

  • their methane regulation?

  • They were going to tamp down on cow farts but I

  • haven't followed up on it.

  • Hackney: Jack Harris has made a glorified effort in

  • his nutritional input to the cattle to lessen the

  • amount of methane but there's no visible

  • potential in it.

  • He's able to lose a lot of money if he wants to.

  • Kub: Yeah, who would pay for that?

  • I wouldn't pay for that.

  • Pearson: Are you going to go in and buy global

  • warming friendly beef specifically labeled at

  • the store?

  • Kub: Me?

  • No.

  • Hackney: You go to Gelson's in LA and that's

  • a higher level than Whole Foods and all of those

  • outfits and you can sit there like I was stupid

  • enough to do here two weeks ago and my

  • son-in-law is a tree hugger and so it my

  • daughter and I said I'll buy the beef for this

  • party we're going to have in their home.

  • My son-in-law went down there and I didn't go with

  • him and he came home and he had a rib, a 16 pound

  • standing rib roast and so I said, okay, Larry, how

  • much do I owe you here, I'm buying.

  • And it was $285.

  • Pearson: Wow.

  • Hackney: Now, how many people are going to do

  • that?

  • If I'd have gone I wouldn't have done it.

  • I'd have went over here to Vaughn's and I'd sit down

  • and bought the same damn thing for $100.

  • Kub: Maybe it was fed with flax.

  • Pearson: Maybe, flax fed beef.

  • That's a potential market.

  • But, ladies and gentlemen, Walt and Elaine, we're

  • going to let you go.

  • We're going to let our audience go.

  • But I want to thank you both so much for taking

  • the time to share your wisdom.

  • Kub: It's been a pleasure.

  • Hackney: I'm not sure how much wisdom but --

  • Pearson: We learned a lot.

  • Thanks to all of you for sending in questions via

  • Twitter and Facebook.

  • Please continue to do so and we will get profound

  • answers for you every week.

  • Thanks for watching and have a great one.

Pearson: This is the Friday, October 14, 2016

Subtitles and vocabulary

Click the word to look it up Click the word to find further inforamtion about it