B1 Intermediate 1352 Folder Collection
After playing the video, you can click or select the word to look it up in the dictionary.
Loading...
Report Subtitle Errors
It was midnight when Bernice got off work.
She was exhausted after a long and terrible day, and just wanted to get home to a hot bath.
She was driving down the street, flipping through radio stations, when she pulled up
to a stop sign, and saw something weird. A shadowy figure ran up to an idling fruit truck,
pushed the delivery man down, grabbed a crate of bananas, and ran off around the corner.
Bernice was pretty shaken up,
but she made sure the driver was okay, and then called the police, describing the thief as a pale,
lanky man, wearing a dark jacket and a baseball cap. She gave the cops her information, and
then she went home. A couple days later the police asked her to
come down to the station to identify a potential thief--a guy who more or less matched her
description, and was found eating a banana early that morning, near the scene of the crime.
Although the guy professed innocence,
Bernice said it was him, and they locked him up. But at the trial, the defense called a memory
expert to the stand, and soon after that, the suspect walked.
Today’s lesson may not quite make you an expert worthy of the witness stand, but by
the time we’re done, you’ll understand a lot more about how we retrieve memories
we think we’ve stored, and why the accused banana thief was set free.
[INTRO]
We’re all constantly retrieving memories throughout the day-- you’re remembering
where you parked your car, or if you fed the cat, or called your mom ‘cause it’s her birthday.
You’ll remember from last week that while
our implicit memories--like how to talk and ride a bike--are dealt with on a mostly automatic
and non-conscious level, our explicit memories--the chronicles of our personal experiences and
general knowledge -- often require conscious, effortful work.
Bernice had to notice, encode, store, and later consciously retrieve details about the
crime she witnessed--what color was the guy’s jacket, what did he look like, what did he
steal, and where did he run? It takes a lot of work to retrieve memories
from long-term storage, and the truth is, a lot can go wrong along the way.
In order to understand all of the many fascinating ways you forget things, we need to talk more
about how we remember. Our memories are not like books in the library
of your mind. You don’t just pluck a neatly-packaged memory -- about where you left your phone
or the hair color of a fruit thief. Instead your memories are more like the spider
webs in the dank catacombs of your mind--a series of interconnected associations that
link all sorts of diverse things, as bits of information get stuck to other bits of
information. Like, maybe Bernice remembers that the night
of the crime was chilly with a full moon, and that Beyonce was on the radio, and the
fruit truck had plates from California, which is where her grandfather lives.
All those bits of information in the web of memory--the weather, the song, the plates--can
serve as retrieval cues, kind of like a trail of breadcrumbs leading back to a particular
memory. The more retrieval cues you inadvertently,
or intentionally, build along the way, the better you can backtrack and find the memory
you’re looking for. This way of activating associations non-consciously
is called priming, sometimes called “memoryless memory”. It’s how “invisible memories”
that you didn’t know you had can awaken old associations.
Priming is how you often jog your memory. This kind of recall is sometimes referred
to as context-dependent memory. Say you’re reading in bed, and you want
to underline a quote, but you don’t have a pen. You get up and go into the other room
to find your special light-up Hello Kitty pen, but you get distracted and suddenly you
find yourself in the kitchen; you’re like “Why? Why, mind? Why am I in the kitchen?
What is here? Why am- there was a rea- and I don’t know but I’m here now and agh!”
It’s only when you retrace your steps and return to bed, to the initial context where
you read that quote and encoded that first thought of wanting that pen, that the memory
comes back. And then you’re like ‘oh, I need to go get the pen. Ugh’
If some memories are context-dependent, others are state-dependent, and also mood-congruent.
This just means that our states and our emotions can also serve as retrieval cues.
If I had a throbbing headache and a super bad day, I’m more likely to start recalling
bad memories, because I’m priming negative associations. But of course if I’m relaxed
and jolly, I’m prone to remember happy times, which are prolonging my good mood.
Another funny memory-retrieval quirk speaks not to our location or emotions, but to the
order in which we receive new information. So, say you make a grocery list in the morning,
but a few hours later, you’re at the store, you realize you left it at home.
You’d be more likely to recall the first items on the list--bananas and bread--and
the last items--pickles and cheese--than anything in the middle. This is known as the serial
position effect. This might be because the early words benefitted from what’s known
as the primacy effect, and made it into your long-term memory because they were rehearsed
more. Meanwhile, the last words lingered in the working memory through the recency effect.
But those poor middle words, they didn’t benefit from either effect and therefore escaped
your brain, which is why you now have no toilet paper, dog food, toothpaste, or cookies. Who
forgets cookies? But even with all these tricks and associations,
things still go wrong--memory can fail or become distorted, and of course we forget
things. Forgetfulness can be as minor as those frustrating
moments where you’re like ‘Ah, it’s on the tip of my tongue. It’s the guy, the
guy’s got hair, and a face, and, like, shoulders.’ Or as major as Clive Wearing, whose neurological
damage made it impossible for him to recall the past or create new memories.
Of course, we all forget things, and typically we do it in one of three different ways: We
fail to encode it, we fail to retrieve it, or we experience what psychologists call storage
decay. Sometimes forgetting something just means
it never really got through your encoding process in the first place. I mean, think
of all the stuff that’s going around you at any given moment. We only actually notice
a fraction of what we sense, and we can only consciously hold so many bits of information
in our minds at any given time, so what we fail to notice, we tend to not encode, and
thus don't remember. Bernice noticed a dark jacket, Beyonce, and
bananas, but she didn’t encode much about the driver, or the color of the thief’s
shoes. Then again, even memories that have been encoded
are still vulnerable to storage decay, or natural forgetting over time.
Interestingly, even though we can forget things pretty quickly, the amount of data that we
forget can actually levels off after a while. This means that Bernice would have forgotten
about half of what she first noticed from the crime scene a couple days later, but what
she still remembered, she’d likely hang on to, because the rate at which we forget
tends to plateau. A lot of times forgetting doesn’t mean our
memory just faded to black, it means we can’t call it up on demand because of retrieval
failure. We all know the common tip-of-the-tongue phenomenon
where you feel like you know the name of that weird-looking hard-backed animal that rolls
up into ball. It’s kind of cute and weird and I think they get leprosy or something…what
is it?! This is where retrieval cues can come in handy. If I say is starts with the letter
A, you may suddenly unlock the information--Armadillo!
Sometimes these retrieval problems stem from interference from other memories getting in
the way, essentially cluttering the brain. Sometimes, old stuff that you’ve learned
keeps you from recalling new stuff -- like, if you change one of your passwords, but keep
recalling your old one every time you try to log in. That’s called proactive, or forward-acting,
interference. The flip side is retroactive, or backward-acting,
interference, which happens when new learning gets in the way of recalling old information,
like if you start studying Spanish, it may interfere with the French that you’ve already
learned. There’s a lot of reconstruction and inferring
involved when you try to flesh out a memory, and every time you replay it in your mind,
or relate it to a friend, it changes, just a little. So in a way, we’re all sort of
perpetually re-writing our pasts. While this is an inevitable part of human
nature, it can prove dangerous at times. Misleading information can get incorporated
into a memory, and twist the truth - and yes there is an effect for this; it’s called
the misinformation effect. American psychologist and memory expert Elizabeth
Loftus has spent decades showing how eyewitnesses inadvertently tweak and reconstruct their
memories after accidents or crimes. In one experiment, two groups watched a film
of a car accident. Those asked how fast the cars were going when they smashed into each
other estimated much higher speeds than those who were asked about the cars hitting each
other. Smash is the leading word that essentially
altered the witnesses’ memories -- so much so that a week later, when both groups were
asked if they saw any broken glass, those who heard the word smash were twice as likely
to report seeing bits of glass, when in fact, the original film didn’t show any.
In Bernice’s case, chances are her memory of the robbery would be altered if the prosecution
said the thief assaulted, rather than pushed the driver.
This sort of interfering or misleading information may also manifest itself as source misattribution,
like when we forget or misrecall the source of a memory.
In the case of Bernice, when she saw the suspect in the courtroom, she thought she recognized
him from the night of the crime, when in reality, he’d just served her coffee earlier that
day. But her memory of the event had probably already
been tweaked several times before she even made it into the courtroom. Like she re-lived
the tale multiple times, in her own mind or when she told other people about it, and every
time she introduced errors, filling in memory gaps with reasonable guesses.
Not only that, but we know Bernice was already tired and stressed when she witnessed the
event, and we know our emotions can influence both what we remember and what we forget.
Because memory is both a reconstruction and a reproduction of past events, we can’t
ever really be sure if a memory is real just because it feels real.
Elizabeth Loftus knows this. She’s frequently called in to testify against the accuracy
of eyewitnesses. In fact, of all the U.S. prisoners who have been exonerated based on
DNA evidence presented by Innocence Project, a non-profit legal group, 75 percent of them
were convicted by mistaken eyewitnesses. That is a lot of innocent people.
Bernice meant well of course, she’s an honest enough lady, but all these factors--the emotion,
the retelling, the suggestions of outside sources-- combined with the darkness, the
quick glimpse, the passing of time, maybe even the Beyonce, ended up leading to a mistake
in the thief’s identification. Turns out the human memory is actually a very
fragile thing. We’re all largely the product of the stories that we tell ourselves.
If you haven’t forgotten already, today you learned about how our memories are stored
in webs of association, aided by retrieval cues and priming, and influenced by context
and mood. You also learned how we forget information, how our memories are susceptible to interference
and misinformation, and why eyewitnesses are often not as reliable as you might think.
Thanks for watching, especially to all of our Subbable subscribers, who make this whole
channel possible. To learn how you can keep these lessons coming while earning awesome
perks, just go to subbable.com.
This episode was written by Kathleen Yale, edited by Blake de Pastino, and our consultant
is Dr. Ranjit Bhagwat. Our director and editor is Nicholas Jenkins, the script supervisor
is Michael Aranda, who’s also our sound designer, and the graphics team is Thought
Café.
    You must  Log in  to get the function.
Tip: Click on the article or the word in the subtitle to get translation quickly!

Loading…

Remembering and Forgetting - Crash Course Psychology #14

1352 Folder Collection
Elma Kung published on November 13, 2015
More Recommended Videos
  1. 1. Search word

    Select word on the caption to look it up in the dictionary!

  2. 2. Repeat single sentence

    Repeat the same sentence to enhance listening ability

  3. 3. Shortcut

    Shortcut!

  4. 4. Close caption

    Close the English caption

  5. 5. Embed

    Embed the video to your blog

  6. 6. Unfold

    Hide right panel

  1. Listening Quiz

    Listening Quiz!

  1. Click to open your notebook

  1. UrbanDictionary 俚語字典整合查詢。一般字典查詢不到你滿意的解譯,不妨使用「俚語字典」,或許會讓你有滿意的答案喔