Subtitles section Play video Print subtitles On the subject of small and big revolutions in the schools we call to the stage Ricardo Semler. Ricardo is CEO and major stakeholder of SEMCO SA and director of FIESP (Industry Federation of SĂ£o Paulo) He has a bachalor degree in laws from USP (University of SĂ£o Paulo) and a degree in Business from Harward He is author of international best-sellers like Turning the tables (Mavericks) and Seven Days Weekend. in 1990 created the Ralston/Semler Foundation with the goal to research and contribute to find solutions for innovation in the education of Brazil. He is also the cretor of the Project Lumiar Sinapses. With the word, Ricardo Semler. First I need to complain with Positivo because it's not fair to put me after NicolĂ©lis. I didn't invent anything, nothing will be walking around because of me But... when I think about our current moment in education it reminds me the story of the guy that will do skydive and they tell him that he only needs three things first to open that parachutes he should press the green button if it doesn't open... then press the red button and when you land don't start to walk around because a Van will come to pick you up. The man jumps, press the first button nothing happens he thinks, keep calm, keep calm, you have the second button. He press the second button and nothing happens and then he thinks... Now, I hope the Van is still waiting for me. The feeling I have is that we came from the greek education approach, with a tutor. From the concept that education is something for few people. Then we passed through a moment of middle age where a lot was lost and restarted again with the Iluminism idea the you have to train the brain. And education is basically about the brain. And the brain is naturally taken, like we heard here already, to a perspective where you can measure, and things you can understand and also the market and employment... and that we are trying to create people to power the current market and work force but we don't understand the current market even less the future one. And in a second moment, and what I think is the second button in the parachute Henry Ford's idea that it's not doable. To educate everybody... you have to create an assembly line. The schools we have today are the result of that. Well, simplifying: I have millions of kids I need to to prepare for the market. How can I do that? Let's see They asked the University of Chicago, in 1908, also the same year of the assembly line from Ford, How can I dod that? And the answer was... What is the attention span of a kid? Around 53 minutes was the answer, at that time. How many kids I can put in the same room? Considering the louder a teacher can communicate and not stress himself toi much and also keep the order ... around 35 kids And how can I share the knowledge? Don't know, ask the biologist, the mathematician, and everyone comes up with their plan So, mr. biologist, what's the deal? Hum, first we start with amoeba, and then that, and then the division, so on and so forth. What about Math? First addition, then subtraction, some numbers here, sine and cosine... got it? Then you think, well, I'm gonna create something called Curriculum. I put everything side by side and I'm gonna create people who passed through everything but is absolutely schizophrenic, necessarily schizophrenic. They passed through all that because the student takes a Trigonometry 2 class then goes to history of Japan, to cell division, and then he has to find a way to put everything together. It is absolutely impossible e nobody ever did that. With time, the University of Chicago started to measure that And concluded that the american curriculum (with 1552 pages at the moment) detailing what should be taught in which year and age and concluded that the retention of knowledge of the students who went through that system was 6.7%. Which means you are in a business that 92, 93% of failure and that's what we do. Then you think, who is going to find a better approach for us? Maybe consultants could be a good idea and academic researches, And now we are talking about the Van, that... will never arrive. Or the entrepreneur that comes from outside, no, everything is wrong. let me explain to you: management change the principal and the director and recycle the teachers Got it? But that man who is teaching you has also almost the same rate of failure. 91% of the companies doesn't last more than 20 years. 91.1% of the companies... The man who learned that 91% of what he does fail, is teaching someone with a 93% rate of failure. There is something wrong. The notion of making marginal improvements in a system that is obsolete by definition, by design is nuts and we are doing that more and more because we are getting anxious to realize that it is not working. And I'm not talking about Brazil only. There's no exception in the world. There's no place in the world, not even in Finland, or any place where people are completely happy with their education system. But we are making it work based on a rules somebody invented. The OECD came up with the Pisa exam that tests Portuguese (or English) and Math wait?! But 4 of the 5th best places in the world accordingly to that, are dictatorships Have you ever stopped to think about? That's what we are trying to mimic The best placed in the Pisa exam is the communist dictatorship of Shanghai. The other is Korea, where the student spend 12 hours per day in class, including Saturdays and still have home-work. And we are saying that this is the formula to generate happy people No! That a formula to generate a lot of people that learn to memorize 12 hours a day and then take a an exam of language and math and goes well. Will that approach generate people capable for the market on a new world? No way! When you entered in this profession did you get in thinking I'm gonna learn the rules learn the right ways and control those kids or did you have an ideal? That idea was lost long ago. Your lost ideal mixed with kids that don't want to be in class. And people discuss why schools more and more looks like Febens (brazilian reformatory) It's because the Febens improved. Am I wrong? Febens doesn't have watchtowers anymore and other things. And the schools have metal detectors and high walls So it's getting closer. The question is why we are doing that? Because they don't want to be there. If you let they will runway so you can't allow that. Now that the kids are here, we have them for 13 years at our availability And what we'll do with them? Well let's give them all the curriculum for math, biology, history and etc. And then we'll commit a fraud that we all agreed to. I'm gonna give an exam because the parents, the mayor, etc are all asking if you are doing well. I'm gonna give you an exam of a content that if it's compared with the internet, on average, would be a tiny fraction of what is available on Google about the same subject I'm gonna cover just that tiny fraction and I teach you that way: I write, you copy, I write, you copy, I write, you copy... and at the end I say done, the exam will be just about these things because if I don't say what's gonna be covered the grades would miserable. So, I'm gonna make a deal with you, I tell you what I'm gonna cover I'm ok with cheating and everything else that helps and when it is a Prova Brazil (national exam to evaluate schools), I let the worst students get "sick", strangely in the exam's day. Am I wrong? Just a coincidence.