Placeholder Image

Subtitles section Play video

  • [ Silence ]

  • >> -- and get good at recognizing

  • and identifying the multiplets

  • and extracting a couplet in constants.

  • So the things that we are talking about and the question

  • that was raised: Is that coupling is really 700 Hertz?

  • What makes it 700 Hertz?

  • So let's talk about factors that J depends upon.

  • And I've tried to sort of group out maybe five factors

  • and give us some points.

  • So let's say one is the magnetogyric ratios

  • of the nuclei involved.

  • [ Writing On Board ]

  • And - so remember how when we started talking

  • about magnetogyric ratio, I gave you two examples?

  • We talked about the C13 satellites of chloroform

  • and protiochloroform, right?

  • So when you see the H1 anomer of CDCl3,

  • of course you don't see any of the deuterium chloroform that's

  • in there; but you see that 0.2% or 0.1% of protiochloroform.

  • And you see a peak that's very big at 7.26.

  • But then, symmetrically disposed about it,

  • you see these two satellites.

  • And so this is your CHCl3,

  • or more specifically your C12HCl3 peak.

  • But then your satellites come from your 1% --

  • 1.1% -- of C13 CDCl3 - CHCl3.

  • And the spacing of those two lines, the distance here

  • between these two, is 208 Hertz.

  • And that distance happens to be 1.6.

  • Is 1.6 the - is 1 over 6.6 the distance that we see

  • in the C13 anomer of CDCl3, right.

  • In CDCl3, you do, indeed, see the C13, the 1% C13.

  • And you see this one-to-one-to-one triplet

  • centered at 77 ppm.

  • And the distance between the lines here is 32 Hertz.

  • And that ratio of 208 to 32 is equal to 1 over 6.5,

  • which is the magnetogyric ratio of proton

  • over the magnetogyric ratio of a deuteron --

  • meaning that when everything else is equal,

  • if you have a magnetogyric ratio nucleus

  • with a magnetogyric ratio that's big, you get big coupling.

  • If you have a nucleus with a magnetogyric ratio that's small,

  • you get small coupling.

  • For heteronuclei, we said that fluorine, for example,

  • has a big magnetogyric ratio.

  • So fluorine is going to have big coupling.

  • We said that carbon has a relatively small magnetogyric

  • ratio, so carbon in general is going to have small coupling.

  • So the gamma of the nucleis [phonetic] is important.

  • The number of bonds: So generally --

  • generally, generally -- we see coupling through one or two

  • or three bonds, sometimes four or five;

  • that's called long-range coupling.

  • So if we have some system w, x, y, z --

  • and we look at it if we are talking about coupling

  • through one bond, coupling through two bonds,

  • or coupling through three bonds --

  • and I need to make some wildly general generalizations,

  • I could say our J1's are on the order.

  • And I - you can just sort of look

  • at the appendix I handed out.

  • And if you want to keep a number in your head, I'd say -

  • let's say 30 to 300 Hertz.

  • Kind of one-bond couplings are big.

  • They are on the order of 100 Hertz give or take, you know,

  • a factor of half a log unit.

  • We saw you can have a 700-Hertz coupling in the phosphorus.

  • But generally, yeah, like 100 Hertz would be a good number

  • to keep in mind.

  • J2's are generally on the order of 0 to 20 Hertz.

  • And again, I'll give you examples that fall out of there.

  • But if you want to keep a number in mind, you know, 10 Hertz,

  • 20 Hertz, something like that.

  • And J3's are generally on the order of 0 to 20 Hertz.

  • So in other words, one-bond coupling is huge;

  • two-bond coupling, three-bond coupling is smaller.

  • All right, other factors involved: geometry, particularly

  • in three-bond couplings

  • where good overlap leads to big coupling.

  • [ Writing On Board ]

  • Remember, coupling is carried by electrons in bonds,

  • where a nucleus feels it - another nucleus

  • through polarizing the pair of electrons making up the bonds

  • so that the one with its spin up is near the one with its -

  • nearer to the nucleus that spin down and so

  • that travels along the line.

  • And if you have good orbit overlap --

  • for example, an anti-periplanar relationship

  • or a syn-periplanar relationship --

  • you'll have a big coupling constant.

  • If you have bad overlap --

  • for example, a 90-degree dihedral angle --

  • you'll have essentially no coupling constants, no -

  • zero-coupling constant.

  • And if you are sort of at a low angle like a gauche angle --

  • you know, something close to 90 degrees, 60 or 120 --

  • you have still relatively poor overlap;

  • so your coupling constants are small.

  • That was what we were talking about the other day

  • with cyclohexane, where I said, "Yeah, for a tran -

  • for an axial coupling on the order

  • of 10 Hertz, 8 to 10 Hertz."

  • For axial equators, that's axial-axial.

  • For axial equatorial, or equatorial-equatorial

  • where your dihedral angle is

  • about 60 degrees, yeah, 2 or 3 Hertz.

  • All right.

  • So geometry also matters.

  • Hybridization.

  • [ Writing On Board ]

  • And a general rule is, more S character leads to bigger J's.

  • [ Writing On Board ]

  • And other factors: electronegativity.

  • [ Writing On Board ]

  • You know, hybridization is like Y in trans-alkenes.

  • We see a J of 17 Hertz, typically, versus in a one -

  • in a diaxial interaction on a 1-A axial-axial coupling

  • on a cyclohexane, which also has 180-degree dihedral angle just

  • like a trans-alkene; we only see a coupling constant

  • on the order of 10 Hertz.

  • In other words, you have more S character in an sp2 bond

  • and in a bond involving an sp2 carbon

  • and a bond involving an sp3 carbon.

  • So you have a bigger coupling constant.

  • So the other - another factor, let's say -

  • I'll just say other factors such as electronegativity.

  • [ Writing On Board ]

  • So for example, a hydrogen that's next to an oxygen that's

  • on a carbon with an oxygen will have slightly smaller J values,

  • particularly if there are two oxygens on there.

  • All right.

  • Let's - let me give you some typical J values,

  • and then we'll look at some examples.

  • And I don't want --

  • [ Erasing Board ]

  • And I want us to have a - you - I mean these sort

  • of generalizations that I just put up are pretty useful.

  • But unless you are doing a project with particular nuclei,

  • you may not end up keeping all the numbers in your head.

  • But let's just look at sort of some typical examples,

  • and these are actually in the appendix here.

  • So let's take a look at a four-O alkane.

  • So your J2HF -- and this is all in the appendix --

  • is really, really big.

  • It's, like, 44 to 81 Hertz, so even bigger than a sort

  • of generic two-bonds coupling that I talked about.

  • Fluorine has a large magnetogyric ratio,

  • so you have got very big coupling.

  • Your three-bond HF, your three-bond coupling,

  • is on the order of 3 to 25 Hertz.

  • [ Writing On Board ]

  • And fluorine is so, so good at coupling, right?

  • So this is two-bond coupling.

  • This is three-bond coupling.

  • Fluorine is so good at coupling

  • that you can even sometimes see a little four-bond coupling:

  • J4HF is on the order of, let's say, 0 to 4 Hertz.

  • [ Writing On Board ]

  • [ Inaudible Class Question ]

  • Part of it's the polarization, but part of it is the orbitals

  • that fluorine is used - using in bonding.

  • So if you have a hydrogen, right, we talked about two-bond

  • and three-bond H-ings [phonetic] coupling.

  • Right? So a typical two-bond H-H coupling might be -- I said --

  • 14 Hertz, sort of, in an unperturbed system.

  • And a typical three-bond H-H coupling I said,

  • "Let's use 7 Hertz as a typical number."

  • So that hydrogen is contributing a 1s orbital.

  • But the fluorine is going to be contributing orbitals

  • that are going out further,

  • because it's using the second shell in coupling.

  • So we are in the 2 - you know, sp3 technically.

  • So your coupling is going to be bigger with fluorine.

  • So I don't think it's just -

  • and it probably involves some electric.

  • Yeah, actually, you know, it would involve electronegativity

  • as well, because it is going to be pulling those electrons

  • in really tight and that's going to give more interaction

  • of the nuclei with the electrons.

  • So yeah, I guess it's both of those.

  • Other questions or thoughts on this?

  • [ Inaudible Class Question ]

  • Of one over the other?

  • >> Yes.

  • >> No. I mean think about your Newman projection

  • of a perfect chair cyclohexane.

  • If I draw it as a Newman projection --

  • [ Writing On Board ]

  • -- I'll just draw half of the cyclohexane.

  • So this is axial.

  • This is axial.

  • This is equatorial.

  • This is equatorial.

  • And in a perfect chair cyclohexane,

  • this dihedral angle is 60 degrees;

  • this dihedral angle is 60 degrees;

  • and this dihedral is 60 degrees.

  • So it really should be about the same unless you flatten the ring

  • out or do something to perturb it.

  • [ Inaudible Class Question ]

  • Ah, OK. Do you ever see coupling that's essentially

  • through space?

  • One can, so outside of the realm

  • of covalent chemistry that we are seeing.

  • You can, for example, see coupling or cross-hydrogen bonds

  • and other situations where things are held

  • into close proximity with each other.

  • So for example, you can do ing-15 [phonetic] coupling

  • across DNA, for example, from one nuclear base to another

  • through the hydrogen bonds.

  • But just for a normal ordinary organic molecule where,

  • you know, it was in some confirmation,

  • not that I know of any examples.

  • [ Inaudible Class Question ]

  • Nothing where the molecules aren't locked together.

  • I mean I suppose you could come up with some example

  • where you take some poor molecule

  • and bang two methyl groups into it so hard that they are banging

  • in at van der Walls radius.

  • And you might.

  • I don't know the answer.

  • That's the sort of thing that one would try experimentally.

  • Other questions?

  • Benzenes are interesting with fluorobenzenes.

  • And you will have -- I think it's

  • on this coming Monday's homework set --

  • you'll have some fluorobenzenes.

  • And it's a little bit counterintuitive.

  • The problems are pretty easy.

  • They are out of Chapter -- what is it?

  • -- 5? 4? What's the one that I gave you to read that -

  • the coupling involving other nuclei?

  • Six. OK. Anyway, so keep this in mind.

  • So your ortho coupling, your J3HF,

  • is on the order of 6 to 10 Hertz.

  • And so that's kind of what you'd expect.

  • And what's sort of surprising: I mean in the case of hydrogens,

  • you have meta coupling, but it's usually on the order of a couple

  • of Hertz -- you know, 2 or 3 Hertz, 1 to 3 Hertz.

  • In the case of fluorine, your meta coupling is bigger

  • than you might otherwise expect.

  • It's on the order of 5 to 6 Hertz.

  • And then because we know that fluorine is very good

  • at coupling, you even see some para coupling,

  • and it's on the order of 2 Hertz.

  • And these are all kind of approximate.

  • [ Pause ]

  • Yeah, I mean the good news on all of this --

  • that Appendix F is just such --

  • [ Pause ]

  • -- such a treasure trove.

  • And so the good news is Appendix F puts a lot

  • of these data right at your fingertips.

  • And the only reason I'm talking about this is

  • because I think hearing it once is sort of helping you see

  • where to look it up and so forth.

  • Let me just point out also the numbers

  • that I had given you before and just put this into some context.

  • So when we started talking about NMR and spin-active nuclei,

  • I mentioned the magnetogyric ratios.

  • And just let me put these up here again.

  • Magnetogyric ratio for a proton is big.

  • Magnetogyric ratio for fluorine is big.

  • Magnetogyric ratio for phosphorus: 30 - 31.

  • I guess I'll even put up F19 and H1 -- is 10,840.

  • And the magnetogyric ratio for C13 is 6-7 - 6,728.

  • So let me tell you what I was talking

  • about when I was saying you can correlate things roughly

  • with magnetogyric ratios.

  • So for example, JCF - J1CF is pretty darn big.

  • It's at the high end of what you would typically expect

  • for couplings.

  • It's on the order of 200 to 300 Hertz.

  • J2CF is also pretty big.

  • It's at the order of 20 to 40 Hertz.

  • And J3CF is on the order of 10 Hertz.

  • And then phosphorus: As was already pointed out,

  • one-bond phosphorus-hydrogen coupling is huge.

  • It's on the order of 700 Hertz.

  • Two-bond PH coupling is on the order of 10 Hertz.

  • And three-bond PH coupling is on the order of 20 Hertz.

  • Certainly these aren't numbers to keep in your head.

  • These aren't numbers to keep in your head.

  • These are just, sort of, numbers that have seen once.

  • [ Pause ]

  • [ Inaudible Class Question ]

  • Often J3'sds are bigger than J2's.

  • In carbon-hydrogen coupling, often J3 to hydrogen,

  • often three-bond coupling, is a little bigger than J2.

  • Sometimes J2 is bigger.

  • Remember, of course, one case you can actually have an

  • anti-periplanar relationship: So if you think about it, in --

  • [ Writing On Board ]

  • In J2 you can - in J3 you can get a nice zigzag relationship.

  • In J2 you have got, you know, a different relationship.

  • These electrons aren't as directly overlapped.

  • And J2 often depends on hybridization in geometry.

  • I mean a striking example: So you look at alkenes, right?

  • And this coupling is on the order of 0

  • to 2 Hertz, the geminal coupling.

  • And then you look at your vicinal couplings,

  • and it's on the order of 17 Hertz.

  • And even the cis coupling is on the order of 10 Hertz.

  • So here is another example where J2 is much - is smaller than J3.

  • [ Pause ]

  • [ Inaudible Class Question ]

  • These ones.

  • Yeah, carbon fluorine.

  • So we have now just had this tremendous traipse through all

  • of these weird and wild couplings --

  • and sort of in the abstract in the sense

  • that I've listed some numbers.

  • So let's now look at some real compounds.

  • And these are just compounds that I pulled out of Aldrich,

  • and for that matter compounds that you might well -

  • or types of groups that you might well encounter.

  • And the first thing I'll start with is triethyl phosphites.

  • And you would encounter this - last night we talked

  • about Horner-Wadsworth-Emmons type reagent.

  • So if you made a Horner-Wadsworth-Emmons reagent,

  • you will encounter - or a Wittig reagent,

  • or a phosphonium precursor to a Wittig reagent,

  • you will suddenly find yourself encountering fluorine protons

  • and fluorine-carbon coupling as get to know your molecule.

  • So let's take a look at an example.

  • And I love these Aldrich spectra

  • because you can just pull all sorts of spectra out and say,

  • "All right, what would I get?"

  • So I pulled this out of www.sial.com,

  • and then I just blew things up.

  • OK, so let's start with -

  • we have a 300-megahertz proton spectrum.

  • All the Aldrich spectra are 300 megahertz H1,

  • and 75 megahertz C13 spectra.

  • So triethyl phosphite, we see something that looks

  • like a triplet for the methyl group and then something

  • that looks a little more complicated over here.

  • How do we describe this pattern?

  • [ Inaudible Class Comment ]

  • "Quintet" would be a good place.

  • And so we could call this a quintet or - what was that?

  • [ Inaudible Class Comment ]

  • Quintet, I like that -- so, quintet.

  • I like even better "apparent."

  • [ Writing On Board ]

  • Because I have taken this peak, and I have picked it

  • up and blown it up here.

  • And what do we see?

  • [ Inaudible Class Comment ]

  • Low shoulders.

  • So we know it's not a perfect quintet.

  • We don't have five - four couplings

  • that are exactly the same.

  • Can we recognize a pattern hiding under here?

  • [ Inaudible Class Comment ]

  • Triplet - a triplet.

  • Now that --

  • [ Inaudible Class Comment ]

  • Doublet of quartets.

  • Watch this.

  • So doublet of quartets is a pair of quartets: 1, 3, 3,

  • one for this shoulder.

  • And then for this shoulder 1, 3, 3, 1.

  • Do you see that?

  • 1, 3, 3, 1; 1, 3, 3, 1.

  • So it's a doublet of quintets.

  • [ Writing On Board ]

  • >> Quartets.

  • >> Quartets -- I'm sorry.

  • [ Writing On Board ]

  • So if we want, we could extract both J's.

  • The smallest J -- the small J, the J associated

  • with the quartet -- is going to be the distance

  • from the last line to the next to the last line,

  • or the first line to the second line.

  • And I handily put a scale on here.

  • And I read that distance as 7 Hertz.

  • [ Writing On Board ]

  • And the big J is going to be the distance from this line to the -

  • from the first line - the second from the last line

  • to the last line, or from the first line to the third line.

  • And I can't exactly read where that line is, but it looks

  • like it's about a Hertz more than here.

  • So let's call that 8 Hertz.

  • [ Writing On Board ]

  • So we could characterize this as a DQ --

  • use Q for quartet, quint for quintet.

  • J equals 8, 7 Hertz.

  • [ Pause ]

  • So at 7 Hertz, that's just our - and a quartet,

  • that's just our coupling to the methyl group, right,

  • because we have P-O-C-H-H-C-H-H-H.

  • So 7 Hertz is just our J3HH.

  • [ Writing On Board ]

  • And 8 Hertz is our J3PH through one, two, three bonds.

  • [ Writing On Board ]

  • [ Inaudible Class Question ]

  • Those are just approximations.

  • I - yeah - trying to give you sort

  • of general numbers to ballpark it.

  • So one-bond couplings?

  • On the order of 100 Hertz.

  • Two-bond, three-bond couplings?

  • Yeah, on the order of 10 Hertz.

  • You know, sometimes bigger, sometimes smaller.

  • It depends on gamma; it depends on other factors;

  • it depends on hybridization.

  • We can do the same thing with carbon here.

  • And even though our two peaks

  • in the C13 anomer are really small here,

  • they conveniently give us a peak printout up over here.

  • So those two constitute a pair, and those two constitute a pair.

  • Each of them is a doublet.

  • The doublet for this carbon we can deal with as 63.64 --

  • I want to calculate the coupling constant --

  • minus 63.56; those are just the two values in the top

  • of the table in ppm -- is 0.08 ppm.

  • And we have 0.08 ppm times 75 Hertz per ppm is equal

  • to 6 Hertz.

  • So that's our J1P - that's our J2PC.

  • [ Writing On Board ]

  • [ Pause ]

  • And we can figure out our J3PC from this other one.

  • So we have 16.19 in the up left-hand - upper - your -

  • right-hand corner and 16.10 as the position of the two lines.

  • And that difference is 0.00 - 0.09,

  • times 75 is equal to 7 Hertz.

  • And so that's our J3PC.

  • [ Writing On Board ]

  • [ Pause ]

  • Thoughts? Questions?

  • [ Silence ]

  • [ Inaudible Class Question ]

  • Ah. In the carbon anomer.

  • So in the upper right-hand corner,

  • they list the two line positions.

  • There is --

  • [ Inaudible Class Question ]

  • In the proton anomer.

  • You mean how we see the doublet?

  • >> Yes.

  • >> So OK. I can't do this well with my hands

  • because my hands aren't in 1-to-3 to 3-to-1 ratio.

  • But OK, imagine my hand is a quartet.

  • And if we have - so the distance between my hands is the big J.

  • And if the distance was one finger's worth,

  • we would see a perfect quintet.

  • If it - this is a bad - oh.

  • I got a thumb there.

  • OK. If it were 1 - I got to get rid of my thumbs, chop 'em off.

  • OK. If it were one finger's worth,

  • we would have 7 Hertz spacing between the fingers;

  • and then it would be split into five lines,

  • all equally spaced, at 7 Hertz apart.

  • But they are a little bit further apart,

  • so we see a quartet and another quartet.

  • And the distance between lines 1 and 2 is the J of the quartet;

  • and the distance between lines 1 and 3 -- or in this case,

  • 1 and 2, and 1 and 3 -- is the distance of the doublet.

  • [ Inaudible Class Question ]

  • Interesting question.

  • So do you notice these little jaggies right

  • on the edge of the peak?

  • Do you see how the peaks aren't smooth?

  • So remember I was talking about digital resolution?

  • So you take a spectrum that's, let's say, 16,000-point slide.

  • And you have those 16,000 points over a spectral width that's,

  • let's say, 4,000 Hertz here.

  • And so your digital resolution is 1/4 Hertz.

  • So you think of your spectrum as a smooth curve.

  • But what it really is, is a series of points that been -

  • have been splined together.

  • And because we may be missing a point right on top of the peak,

  • you end up with something not looking completely symmetrical.

  • [ Inaudible Class Question ]

  • That's just an artifact of this.

  • As a matter of fact, I would say if I went

  • and told the spectrometer by increasing the acquisition time,

  • told it to have more digital resolution,

  • we would probably see something that was better resolved.

  • [ Inaudible Class Question ]

  • You just type in - there are two ways.

  • So you'd type in number of points,

  • and you make the number bigger.

  • Or you make the acquisition time longer.

  • And the number of points in the acquisition time

  • in the spectral width are all intimately linked.

  • So you can basically collect data for 5 seconds instead

  • of 3 seconds to increase your number of points,

  • or you can tell it more points.

  • [ Inaudible Class Question ]

  • So that would be the J between the methylene

  • and the methyl group.

  • >> Oh, OK.

  • OK.

  • >> So let's take a look at a fluorine anomer or a - rather,

  • a fluorinated compound.

  • And maybe I'll just show you some highlights.

  • So I grabbed from Aldrich the spectrum of fluoropentane.

  • And so let me write out the structure here,

  • just so you can see it.

  • All right.

  • What do we call that?

  • [ Inaudible Class Comment ]

  • It's a doublet of triplets.

  • [ Writing On Board ]

  • And what's doing the splitting?

  • What's giving the doublet part of the splitting?

  • Which proton is it, first of all?

  • Which protons are?

  • [ Inaudible Class Comment ]

  • One alpha to the fluorine.

  • [ Writing On Board ]

  • And so this is giving a two-bond JHF.

  • And we can - and what else is giving the splitting?

  • [ Inaudible Class Comment ]

  • The methylene.

  • So we have this methylene is coupled

  • to the adjacent methylene.

  • And so that's giving the triplet part of the splitting.

  • And you can read off the two-bond JHF.

  • What value do we get here?

  • [ Inaudible Class Comment ]

  • Yeah, somewhere around 48, 47.

  • So your two-bond coupling, I think I got 47.

  • [ Writing On Board ]

  • You notice this multiplet over here?

  • It's not so neat.

  • Remember I talked about non-first-order coupling,

  • when you've got things lumped on top

  • of each other you've got virtual coupling?

  • So the next couple of methylenes are lumped on top of each other,

  • and you've got coupling here and coupling to the fluorine.

  • So it's not so pretty.

  • But if you pull it out and you expand it, you can pick

  • out your J3HF even if you can't quite pick

  • out what the multiplet is.

  • If it's just sort a generic multiplet,

  • you can measure that distance there.

  • Here it looks like it's about 24 Hertz.

  • So our J3HF is 24 Hertz.

  • [ Inaudible Class Comment ]

  • What's that?

  • [ Inaudible Class Comment ]

  • And that fits into the model.

  • You can do the same thing with the carbons.

  • And if you look at the carbon spectrum here,

  • you'll notice a big, big,

  • bigly [phonetic] separated doublet over here.

  • What does that correspond to?

  • >> J1.

  • >> J1, you see.

  • Yeah. So that's the carbon that's directly alpha

  • to the fluorine.

  • And you have got a J1CF.

  • And if I want to calculate the J1CF, what do I do?

  • [ Pause ]

  • [ Inaudible Class Comment ]

  • And what numbers do I subtract to multiply?

  • [ Inaudible Class Comment ]

  • 85 minus 83 -- or more specifically, 85.26 minus 83.09,

  • times 75; and that gives us 167 Hertz.

  • So that's a J1CF coupling.

  • And I won't work through it, but you'll notice

  • that your next peak here is split into a doublet.

  • You can see the pair of lines over here,

  • and that corresponds to these two.

  • That's our J2CF.

  • And then the next one is split,

  • and that corresponds to our J3CF coupling.

  • So you could pull all of this data out of your spectra.

  • [ Inaudible Class Question ]

  • Answer on that blackboard.

  • Take your carbon anomer and go ahead and run it at 75.

  • Or I guess for our department we have carbon at 100,

  • carbon at 125, and carbon at 150.

  • So you could just go ahead, run it at 200,

  • and see if the two lines are now at the same ppm.

  • If each line is at the same ppm, their distance

  • in Hertz has changed and they correspond to two singlets.

  • If, on the other hand, their positions in ppm have changed

  • and they have moved toward each other

  • but they are still centered at the same position in ppm

  • and their distance in Hertz apart is the same,

  • then they correspond into a doublet.

  • [ Pause ]

  • All right.

  • Let's have some fun with carbon-carbon

  • and carbon-hydrogen coupling now.

  • [ Erasing board ]

  • All right: CH coupling.

  • [ Writing On Board ]

  • So sp3 - so I'm talking right now about one-bond coupling;

  • we'll start with one bond, CH coupling.

  • One-bond CH coupling is important because all

  • of your heteronuclear techniques and your DEPT technique rely

  • on carbon-hydrogen coupling, one-bond

  • or in some cases two-bond and three-bond coupling.

  • So a typical S - remember I said how hybridization matters,

  • and the more S character you have

  • for everything else being equal, the bigger the J

  • if everything else is equal.

  • All right.

  • So typical J1CH for an sp3 carbon is about 125 Hertz.

  • So for example, if you look at ethylene -

  • if you look at ethane, your value is 124.9 Hertz.

  • If you look at cyclohexane --

  • and these are all in your appendix table

  • as well -- it's 123.0 Hertz.

  • I'm just pulling out some highlights from one

  • of the appendices I've handed you.

  • sp2: more S character -- 25% S character in sp3, 33% in sp2.

  • And so your J1CH goes

  • up proportionately; it's about 160 Hertz.

  • So you look at ethylene, and it's 156 Hertz - 156.2 Hertz.

  • And these are all in one of the appendices

  • that I've passed out to you.

  • You look at benzene, it's 159.0 Hertz.

  • All right.

  • Now where does this - where else does this become interesting?

  • Where else does it become important?

  • Yeah.

  • [ Inaudible Class Comment ]

  • Beautiful.

  • Yes. So C13 anomer: You will invariably run it

  • proton decoupled.

  • So you won't see proton coupling.

  • And yet you will still see people use the term to refer

  • to a DEPT spectrum where methylene is referred

  • to as T for a triplet.

  • And there's history there.

  • And the history is that before they had DEPT

  • and other techniques, they would run what's called off-resonance

  • decoupling -- partial decoupling.

  • And so you would get a methylene.

  • And you would see it as a triplet

  • because it would be falling out most of the couplings

  • so you wouldn't see the two- and three-bond coupling --

  • which is really horrendous because it peaks - when you talk

  • about two- and three-bond coupling, you can imagine how -

  • what your carbons are like.

  • The methyl group in ethanol is spilt into a triplet of -

  • into a quartet of triplets.

  • And the methylene group in ethanol is split

  • into a triplet of quartets.

  • So these are - you know, you'll have huge, huge splittings

  • in full-link [phonetic] or proton-decoupled carbon.

  • But you will still see a methylene referred

  • as parentheses T from that old, old thing.

  • So yeah. All the carbon anomer we are going

  • to run is proton decoupled.

  • You do see - remember I said in your C13 satellites

  • of course you see the reverse

  • because you are not carbon decoupling

  • when you are running a proton anomer.

  • And for the most part it doesn't matter because 99%

  • of your carbon is Carbon 12.

  • But if you look closely in your methyl groups,

  • you can see little satellites and another short singlet.

  • [ Inaudible Class Question ]

  • You could, indeed.

  • One of - the problem with X nucleus - so the question was,

  • could you decouple fluorine

  • so you didn't get fluorine coupling.

  • And the short answer is yes.

  • One of the problems is the amount of power you put in has

  • to - depends on your spectral width.

  • And so if you have the width of fluorine -- which is very wide;

  • it's 200 or 300 ppm -- you've got to put in a huge amount

  • of power to irradiate all of the fluorines.

  • And basically that turns your anomer into a giant microwave,

  • and so you'll cook your sample.

  • So it actually isn't so simple.

  • It's easy.

  • Protons have a narrow spectral range; it's only 12 ppm.

  • Carbons, on the other hand, have about 200, 240 ppm.

  • So you would have to put in a lot of power to carbon decouple.

  • You could do specific decoupling experiments where you irradiate

  • at one specific frequency,

  • and that's another way you could do it.

  • But it's hard to blast an entire wide spectral width.

  • [ Inaudible Class Comment ]

  • Yeah, but normally it's proton decoupling.

  • It's - proton is the easy one.

  • [ Inaudible Class Question ]

  • Negative - OK.

  • Negative and positive, for the most part, don't mean anything

  • in terms of what you will observe except

  • in the phase-sensitive [phonetic] spectrum.

  • But a positive J value means that if one nucleus is spin up,

  • the other feels a stronger magnetic field.

  • The other - but because you are going through electrons

  • and you are polarizing the electrons in the first bond,

  • which are polarizing the electrons in the second bond,

  • you may end up with polarization so that if one proton is -

  • one nucleus is spin up, you end

  • up with the other feeling a weaker magnetic field.

  • So that's what a negative J value means.

  • But in terms of the doublet, you'll see the same doublet.

  • All right.

  • Let's try a little bit more; and then I want

  • to show you one really, really, really cool example.

  • All right.

  • It kind of makes sense that if you start to change the amount

  • of S character in the PH bonds, you are going to end

  • up changing the coupling constant.

  • So for example, if you go to cyclobutane,

  • you use more p orbitals

  • in making the carbon-carbon bond framework,

  • you use more P character,

  • so you have more S character for the CH bonds.

  • So your J1CH is bigger.

  • So your J1CH for cyclobutane is 134 Hertz instead of 125 Hertz.

  • For cyclopropane, your J1CH is 161 Hertz.

  • All right.

  • So this is sp3 and sp2.

  • Now you come to sp, though, and things end

  • up really, really tricky.

  • So sp, your J1CH, now you have twice as much S character -

  • your J1CH is twice as big as an sp3.

  • It's 250 Hertz.

  • Now that's tricky, because a lot

  • of the experiments you do depend upon using an average value.

  • So when you do a DEPT experiment, there is a delay

  • in there that corresponds to 1 over the J1CH coupling.

  • That's how it ends up working and picking

  • out whether something is a methylene or a methine.

  • We'll talk more about it when we talk

  • about complex pulse sequences.

  • But if the J value is twice as big,

  • everything can get mixed up.

  • The practical implications are that acetylene in DEPT.

  • So for example, anything where you have a methine

  • on the acetylene may be completely messed up.

  • [ Writing On Board ]

  • Opposite, I'll say, of what is expected.

  • [ Writing On Board ]

  • So I'll say DEPT.

  • And later on we are going to talk about HMQC.

  • And so because your J's are opposite, you may see things

  • that you do not expect there.

  • All right.

  • So last example I want to give is incredibly wild,

  • and I pulled this out because I thought, "This is fun."

  • And I thought, "This is fun, and this is cool."

  • [ Pause ]

  • Because it gives us every sort

  • of heteronuclear coupling you could imagine,

  • and all sorts of bonds coupling.

  • And I found this in that Aldrich collection of spectra,

  • and I thought, "Hey, we got to take a look at this,

  • because it's fun and it's cool."

  • All right.

  • So this is nice, a topically labeled Horner-Wadsworth-Emmons

  • reagent.

  • It would be something that if you wanted

  • to do an isotopic labeling experiment and put C13

  • into your molecule in specific places, you could put it in.

  • But it's got an absolutely funky proton and carbon spectra.

  • So just to orient ourself:

  • Remember the Horner-Wadsworth-Emmons reagent

  • is a phosphonate ester, and you have a regular ester

  • in typical Horner-Wadsworth-Emmons ester.

  • Both of them have ethyls.

  • And we won't worry about the ethyl groups other

  • than to say this is OCH2, CH3 from both parts

  • of the molecules, and this is the OCH2, CH3.

  • But what I would like to worry

  • about is what we see here in the middle.

  • Now what we see here in the middle is that CH2.

  • [ Writing On Board ]

  • Let's think about what's going on here.

  • So that CH2 is being split.

  • It's being split by the carbons

  • to which the hydrogens are attached, which are C13.

  • It's being split by the phosphorus

  • through a two-bond PH coupling, and it's being split by the C13

  • of the carbonyl by a two-bond CH coupling.

  • So what pattern do you observe

  • with three distinct coupling constants?

  • [ Inaudible Class Comment ]

  • Doublet of doublet of doublets.

  • And that's exactly what you'd see over here.

  • It's a DDD.

  • You can pick out your smallest coupling at this distance.

  • Your next coupling is this distance.

  • And your biggest coupling is this distance over here.

  • So I get that this distance is 7 Hertz.

  • This distance is 22 Hertz.

  • And this distance, which corresponds to the biggest J,

  • is either the distance between 1 and 4 or 1 and 5;

  • but here it's clearly the distance between 1 and 5.

  • I get that it's 130 Hertz.

  • So it's a DDD.

  • J equals 130, 22, and 7 Hertz.

  • And that corresponds to a J1P.

  • J1CH equals 130 Hertz.

  • J2PH equals 22 Hertz.

  • And J2CH is equal to 7 Hertz.

  • And that's pretty cool.

  • [ Pause ]

  • Now there's even more cool stuff embedded in this

  • if you look the C13 anomer.

  • And if you remember, this thing is isotopically labeled.

  • So most of the carbons are present only at 1% abundance,

  • but then that central methylene and carbonyl are present at 100%

  • or 99% isotopic abundance.

  • So you get to see something that you never,

  • never see in regular carbon anomers except

  • in what's called an inadequate experiment, which we'll talk

  • about at the very end of this - the quarter --

  • which is carbon-carbon coupling.

  • And if you look at the spectrum, now we see some neat stuff.

  • So this is the proton decouple.

  • Wrap your head around it.

  • This is a proton-decoupled carbon anomer.

  • But of course you still see carbon-carbon coupling

  • and carbon-phosphorus coupling.

  • So you look at this peak over here, and you look at the lines

  • over here, and that peak is ADD.

  • That's your carbonyl.

  • So that's your carbonyl.

  • It's a doublet of doublets.

  • And doing the same thing we did before of taking 1 minus 2

  • and 1 minus 3, we can extract our J values.

  • So our DD here for the carbonyl ends up being J is equal to -

  • let's see, I get 59 Hertz.

  • And I get 6 Hertz for analyzing that DD.

  • And if I do the same thing for this carbon here,

  • and I look at this carbon --

  • and we can see it over here as this very, very, very,

  • very nice, very pretty doublet of doublets with this CH2.

  • And I do the same thing here, and I get 134 Hertz.

  • And I get 59 Hertz.

  • [ Writing On Board ]

  • All right.

  • So let's figure this out,

  • because now we have a puzzle problem.

  • We have three different J's,

  • and we have three different relationships here.

  • What does the 59 Hertz have to, have to, have to, correspond to?

  • [ Inaudible Class Comment ]

  • It has to correspond to the carbon-carbon coupling,

  • because carbon - because coupling is mutual.

  • So your J1CC is equal to 59 Hertz.

  • Now this guy is a doublet of doublets

  • with 59 Hertz and 6 Hertz.

  • So what does the 6 Hertz correspond to?

  • [ Inaudible Class Comment ]

  • Two-bond phosphorus-carbon coupling.

  • So your J2PC is equal to 6 Hertz.

  • And the last coupling we observe is 134 Hertz.

  • What's the 100 - for the methylene here,

  • what's that coupling?

  • [ Inaudible Class Comment ]

  • 130 - it must be 134, yeah.

  • [ Inaudible Class Comment ]

  • That's your one-bond carbon-phosphorus coupling.

  • That's your - right.

  • One bond, J1 - whoops.

  • Did - yeah, right.

  • That's your J1PC is equal to 134 Hertz.

  • All right.

  • Last thing -- stretch your imagination.

  • I don't have a phosphorus anomer.

  • But imagine I had a proton-decoupled P31

  • anomer spectrum.

  • What would the peak for phosphorus look like?

  • One peak? Everyone agree?

  • [ Inaudible Class Comments ]

  • Splitting pattern.

  • What would its splitting pattern be?

  • [ Inaudible Class Comment ]

  • A doublet of doublets.

  • And what would the J's be?

  • [ Inaudible Class Comment ]

  • Six and 134.

  • So if we took a proton-decoupled phosphorus anomer, you'd expect

  • to see a pattern that looks --

  • what is this, Richard Nixon here?

  • --

  • [ Laughter ]

  • -- pattern that looks like this: a doublet of doublets

  • with a really big J for the one-bond coupling

  • and a much smaller cut pattern

  • for the two-bond - the CPPP coupling.

  • All right.

  • Well I think I've taken enough of your time today.

  • So that sort of wraps up, and that'll set you in good stead

  • to attack this next homework set that has all sorts

  • of cool coupling sets.

  • You had a question?

  • >> Yes. ------------------------------0be8e63a723f--

[ Silence ]

Subtitles and vocabulary

Click the word to look it up Click the word to find further inforamtion about it