Name: Storing dead people at -196°C
Uploaded: 2026-01-13T16:54:44.000Z
Duration: 5 min 36 s
Description: Thousands of YouTube videos with English-Chinese subtitles! Now you can learn to understand native speakers, expand your vocabulary, and improve your pronunciation...

Adverbs of degree

I'm not a philosopher, so I'm going to dodge the many complicated ethical questions about cryonics, about freezing someone's body after they die in the hope that future science will not just unfreeze them, but

also cure them of whatever ended their life.

The philosophical side of this is way outside what I'm qualified to talk about.

And honestly, my opinion would not be helpful.

I will say that I think death is a bad thing and that humanity should be trying to defeat it the same way we've defeated smallpox.

The questions I do have for the folks that run this actual cryonics facility are practical and legal as ever.

I just got invited to see a place where the dead are being stored in the hope of resurrection.

Currently, there are still very few patients stored here.

It's more than zero, but you can count it on a very few hands.

The exact number we only release once we have a few more to not have any potential privacy problems.

The company's official website describes the bodies in there as patients, but

what's being stored are legally and medically corpses, not people.

The people have been declared legally dead and their assets have passed to their descendants.

The cryo process cannot start until the person is declared dead, because otherwise it's murder.

So if someone who signed up is close to death, the company will dispatch a very non standard ambulance.

There needs to be the least possible delay between the heart stops and the cooldown procedure being started, and

of course only if the patient has given informed consent before dying.

And then we start practically three procedures at the same time.

One is we start cooling down as quick as possible.

There's a saying in medicine that says you're only dead if you're warm and dead.

The metabolic rate of the cell goes down and the cell dies slower.

What is similar to cpr, chest compressions, giving oxygen and so on to give some amount of metabolic support.

Then before you cross zero degrees Celsius, you want to replace all the blood and the rest of the water against a medical grade antifreeze.

It's very important to say we don't freeze anything, though of course the headline always says this organization is freezing people and so on.

In more technical terms, we vitrify them, which is like a glass like amorphous state, which allows tissue to be stored without any further damage in a state where potentially future technology might be able to, well, resuscitate the cryoprocess causes massive, probably unrecoverable damage to the body.

There is no technology now or even vaguely on the horizon that could reverse that damage.

But whatever is left patient corpse assembly of frozen stuff gets stacked up in stainless steel containers here, submerged in liquid nitrogen until, well, until it's possible to recover them, which could very well be never so obvious.

Question how does a dead person pay for a service that if all goes to plan, will continue indefinitely while someone is alive?

There's a small membership fee with us and then at the time of death it's around €200,000.

The largest part is given to a non profit organization.

They invest that money with around 1 to 2% above inflation in return expectation sufficient then to maintain cryopreservation.

And you have that money that you put aside inflation adjusted in the future for, well, whatever medical procedure might be necessary to pay for reintegration, for retraining, you know, to get used to the future again.

One of the goals of our organization is to over time not only make the cryopreservation procedures better, but

also make it significantly more affordable.

Somewhere in the, you know, mid five figure range maybe should be possible over time.

A reminder, that's the CEO of the company.

one of the reasons I was comfortable filming here is that he was very candid about the chances of this working.

We would never state that there is any x percent that this works.

Cryopreservation is not a medical procedure, it's a research procedure.

No one in the world can say if and when cryopreservation might work.

Long term storage is always done with foundations.

We have bylaws and statutes that make the foundation from day to day perspective very slow, very sluggish, and

there's a lot of inertia to change stuff.

All of that is there to maximize for longevity.

I would like to live on as long as I can, as long as I want to.

I don't only want that for me, but I think that should be everybody's right.

I would like to do whatever treatment there will be when I'm 95 and whatever medication I need to take when I'm 60 to then make that happen.

Should I die at 60 of a heart attack or something like that, then I'd much rather be cryopreserved than I'm being cremated or buried.

But the alternative has as close to zero a chance as you can ever have.

This right now is an option for a tiny minority of rich people, and it probably won't work.

But I do think that humanity should be trying to defeat death.

So I find it difficult to argue against someone who'd take this option when I know what the alternative is.

Subtitles ListPlay Video

Storing dead people at -196°C

stuff

alternative

controversial

aggressive