Name: Why Good People Do Terrible Things
Uploaded: 2025-10-08T18:13:42.000Z
Duration: 6 min 22 s
Description: Thousands of YouTube videos with English-Chinese subtitles! Now you can learn to understand native speakers, expand your vocabulary, and improve your pronunciation...

The second conditional

If you had the chance to harm someone and get away with it, would you?

Basic passive voice

History is full of chilling examples that make us question whether people are born evil or made evil.

We'd like to believe we're good people, but

the truth is we can justify far more than we realize, even when others see our actions as cruel.

So the real question is, is evil something we're born with or something that our environment shapes in us?

Let's find out, starting with one of psychology's most famous and disturbing experiments, the Stanford Prison Experiment.

In the pursuit of greater insight into the effects of authoritarianism on morals.

One of the most sickening studies that researchers conducted was the Stanford Prison experiment in the 1970s.

Controversial psychologist Philip Zimbardo, working with Stanford University, split a group of volunteers into two prisoners and guards.

The guards were dressed in uniforms that took away their individuality and therefore their culpability as individuals going forward.

Their actions weren't reflective of their own morals, but the morals of the group.

The prisoners, on the other hand, were given prison uniforms and addressed by the guards as numbers instead of names.

This already created a dangerous divide between prisoners and guards.

One group is freed from responsibility and the other is dehumanized.

Guards took every opportunity to make things worse for the prisoners, disrupting their sleep and referring to them as dangerous inmates, despite them just being ordinary people who volunteered as part of an experiment.

As tensions rose, the prisoners beds were taken from them.

They grew increasingly distressed and suspicious of one another.

They were forced to wear bags over their heads.

They were forced to do push ups whenever the guards told them to, and

were subjected to all kinds of humiliation.

The experiment ended after only six days instead of the planned two weeks due to ethical concerns and things growing rapidly out of hand.

This experiment is widely debated on its validity, both scientifically and ethically.

What is the likelihood that every guard was born with that cruelty in them?

Instead, it was more likely that opportunity and amenity and perceived duty and a power imbalance all contributed to their behavior.

There was a 5050 chance that by signing up, you would be a prisoner or a guard.

No one had actually committed a crime, but

the role you are given, the identity others prescribe to you, can make you act evil.

If the results of this experiment are to be believed, circumstances definitely play a role in your moral behavior.

If someone can be born evil, surely we would see them performing evil deeds from a young age.

Children have murdered before cruelty in children is a well documented phenomenon.

The world's youngest serial killer was an eight year old boy, Amarjeet Sada, from India.

Too young to be prosecuted, but his crimes were shockingly sophisticated.

He took the time to lure his victims and hide the bodies.

This suggests that he knew that he was doing something wrong.

In a study examining the biological perspective of the minds of serial killers, researchers suggest that he could have been biologically wired to be more violent.

The researchers specifically suggested that he could have an extra Y chromosome, which is a condition that affects behavior and increases the likelihood of the individual committing violent crimes.

Although this evidence is speculative, it does show that people can biologically be predisposed to evil.

But if you spend any time looking into serial killers, you'll likely know that the psychological factors that influence their crimes are often brought out by their upbringing or environment.

So without all of the information on Amarjeet Sadha, we can't know his environment influenced him.

After getting walked over, your heartbroken or suffering great betrayal, you probably felt like you might snap.

But the truth is, as bad as you felt, those things didn't make you turn evil.

Despite abuse being a factor in many serial killers childhoods, not all abuse victims go down that path.

If it were so easy to make someone evil, a lot more people would be.

But our environments definitely do influence us.

Our biological makeup also influences us.

Amarjeet Sadhguru why don't more abuse victims become evil?

Because the way we behave is also up to us.

We can be genetically predisposed to aggression.

We can be taught by our parents that violence is valid.

But while some people truly don't have any alternatives, most of us do.

Athens writes that the question of nature versus nurture is meaningless because the relationship between these two factors as it plays out for the individual is too complex to put a definitive claim on.

So to answer the question, people are born evil, people are also made evil, but

evil people ultimately decide to do evil things.

It can be tempting to dismiss people like Amarjeet Sadha as an 8 year old who didn't know he was doing something wrong.

But if that were true, there would be a lot more cases like this.

So why do you think people are or become evil?

What do you think is the biggest influence on morality?

Let us know your theories in the comments below.

If you enjoyed this video, let us know by leaving a like and subscribe to Psych 2.