Subtitles section Play video
- [Instructor] Multiple videos and exercises
we cover the various techniques
for finding limits.
But sometimes, it's helpful to think about strategies
for determining which technique to use.
And that's what we're going to cover in this video.
What you see here is a flowchart
developed by the team at Khan Academy,
and I'm essentially going to work through that flowchart.
It looks a little bit complicated at first,
but hopefully it will make sense
as we talk it through.
So the goal is, hey,
we want to find the limit of f of x
as x approaches a.
So what this is telling us to do is,
well the first thing,
just try to substitute what happens when x equals a.
Let's evaluate f of a.
And this flowchart says,
if f of a is equal to a real number,
it's saying we're done.
But then there's this little caveat here.
Probably.
And the reason why is that the limit is a different thing
than the value of the function.
Sometimes they happen to be the same.
In fact, that's the definition of a continuous function
which we talk about in previous videos,
but sometimes, they aren't the same.
This will not necessarily be true
if you're dealing with some function
that has a
point
discontinuity like that
or a jump discontinuity,
or a function that looks like this.
This would not necessarily be the case.
But if at that point
you're trying to find the limit towards,
as you approach this point right over here,
the function is continuous,
it's behaving somewhat normally,
then this is a good thing to keep in mind.
You could just say, hey,
can I just evaluate the function
at that
at that
a over there?
So in general, if you're dealing with
pretty plain vanilla functions like an x squared
or if you're dealing with rational expressions like this
or trigonometric expressions,
and if you're able to just evaluate the function
and it gives you a real number,
you are probably done.
If you're dealing with some type of a function
that has all sorts of special cases
and it's piecewise defined
as we've seen in previous other videos,
I would be a little bit more skeptical.
Or if you know visually around that point,
there's some type of jump
or some type of discontinuity,
you've got to be a little bit more careful.
But in general,
this is a pretty good rule of thumb.
If you're dealing with plain vanilla functions
that are continuous,
if you evaluate at x equals a
and you got a real number,
that's probably going to be the limit.
But I always think about the other scenarios.
What happens if you evaluate it
and you get some number divided by zero?
Well, that case,
you are probably dealing with a vertical asymptote.
And what do we mean by vertical asymptote?
Well, look at this example right over here.
Where we just say the limit
put that in a darker color.
So if we're talking about
the limit
as x approaches one
of one over
x minus one,
if you just try to evaluate this expression
at x equals one,
you would get one over one minus one
which is equal to one over zero.
It says, okay,
I'm throwing it,
I'm falling into this vertical asymptote case.
And at that point,
if you wanted to just understand what was going on there
or even verify that it's a vertical asymptote,
well then you can try out some numbers,
you can try to plot it,
you can say, alright,
I probably have a vertical asymptote here
at x equals one.
So that's my vertical asymptote.
And you can try out some values.
Well, let's see.
If x is greater than one,
the denominator is going to be positive,
and so, my graph
and you would get this from trying out a bunch of values.
Might look something like this
and then for values less than negative one
or less than one I should say,
you're gonna get negative values
and so, your graph might look
like something like that
until you have this vertical asymptote.
That's probably what you have.
Now, there are cases,
very special cases,
where you won't necessarily have the vertical asymptote.
One example of that would be something like
one over x
minus x.
This one here is actually undefined for any x you give it.
So, it would be very,
you will not have a vertical asymptote.
But this is a very special case.
Most times,
you do have a vertical asymptote there.
But let's say we don't fall into either of those situations.
What if when we evaluate the function,
we get zero over zero?
And here is an example of that.
Limit is x approaches negative one
of this rational expression.
Let's try to evaluate it.
You get negative one squared which is one
minus negative one which is plus one
minus two.
So you get zero the numerator.
And the denominator you have negative one squared
which is one
minus two times negative one
so plus two
minus three which is equal to zero.
Now this is known as indeterminate form.
And so on our flowchart,
we then continue to the right side of it
and so here's a bunch of techniques
for trying to tackle something in indeterminate form.
And
likely in a few weeks
you will learn another technique
that involves a little more calculus
called L'hospital's Rule that we don't tackle here
because that involves calculus
while all of these techniques can be done
with things before calculus.
Some algebraic techniques
and some trigonometric techniques.
So the first thing that you might want to
try to do
especially if you're dealing with a rational expression
like this
and you're getting indeterminate form,
is try to factor it.
Try to see
if you can simplify this expression.
And this expression here,
you can factor it.
This is the same thing as
x
x minus two
times x plus one
over
x
this would be x minus three
times x plus one
if what I just did seems completely foreign to you
I encourage you to watch the videos on factoring
factoring polynomials