Placeholder Image

Subtitles section Play video

  • Military History Visualized recently made a video on the impact that Stalin’s Purge

  • had on the Red Army in WW2, very good video, much shorter than this one, highly recommend

  • it as an introduction to this topic.

  • Today, were going to go more in-depth and take it to the next step.

  • It’s time to talk about the historiography - what different historians think about the

  • Purge.

  • Because, since the opening of the Soviet archives in the early 1990’s, historians have been

  • able to get a hold of new primary sources that challenge the old views of the impact

  • of the Purges.

  • The question we need to ask is this - did the Purge have a massive impact on the Red

  • Army’s ability to fight World War 2? Or not? And why?

  • In this video, were going to look at the Purge itself, see what the traditional view

  • of the Purge was, see what the post-opening of the Soviet archive view of the Purge is,

  • and then take a look at another factor you may not have considered.

  • Yes, the Red Army during Stalin’s Purge.

  • This is their story.

  • The Soviet Union had fought and won the Russian Civil War.

  • This impacted their policies going forwards, as their army at the time had been a peasant

  • and cavalry force, with commissars ensuring everyone remained loyal to the revolution.

  • The Civil War ends in 1922, with victory for the Soviets.

  • In the 1920’s and early 1930’s though, there wereScaresabout a possible breakout

  • of war with the capitalist powers.

  • We have fallen behind the advanced countries by fifty to a hundred years. We must close

  • that gap in ten years. Either we do this or well be crushed.” Stalin 1931.

  • Stalin and the Bolshevik party were dragging the Soviet Union into the modern age.

  • The Five Year Plans see a rapid expansion of Soviet industry and agriculture, at the

  • expense of millions of lives.

  • It was during this time that Tukhachevsky takes command of the Red Army.

  • Tukhachevsky creates a modern warfare doctrine, a concept calledDeep Battle”, which

  • was quite similar to the GermanBlitzkrieg” (and I use that term reluctantly because it

  • wasn’t called that).

  • As a result, Tukhachevsky envisions mass numbers of tanks and aircraft that would maneuver

  • around the battlefield, and therefore starts building up the army’s numbers of tanks

  • and aircraft.

  • He’s trying to turn the Red Army from the peasant and cavalry force it was during the

  • Civil War into a modern military machine.

  • In this process, Red Army’s commissars are removed, and in a lot of ways Tukhachevsky

  • succeeds in his reforms - building the largest tank force, and air force, in the world.

  • In 1941, the Soviets actually have more tanks than the rest of the world combined, and the

  • same could be said about the number of aircraft.

  • It’s worth noting though that the Red Army was still mainly a peasant-army even

  • in the 1930’s, and the other equipment besides tanks and aircraft, were seriously lacking.

  • For example, in 1941 at the Battle of Dubno, Soviet motorized infantry marched into battle

  • on foot, because they had no trucks.

  • In fact, the regular Rifle Divisions had more mobility because they were at least supplied

  • with horses and wagons to move their artillery and equipment.

  • But still, with the amount of tanks and aircraft, the Red Army wasn’t quite the same it had

  • been during the Civil War.

  • And the Red Army wasn’t just gathering equipment, it was also growing in riflemen - it was mobilizing

  • for war.

  • In fact, it was the speed of German rearmament, the creation of the Luftwaffe, Italian aggression

  • in Abyssinia, inaction by the League of Nations, the Spanish Civil War, and Hitler’s known

  • desire to expand eastward, that gave the Soviet Union reason to worry about the pace of German

  • rearmament and the unwillingness of the Western powers to react to that.

  • With the threat of attack, and in the midst of rearmament and a rapid expansion of the

  • size of the Red Army - that is when the Purges struck.

  • What made Stalin’s terror different was not merely the scale of arrests and executions

  • - by 1939 there were, in recent estimates, approximately 3.5 million prisoners in the

  • various categories of camps - but the fact that this fearful and vindictive man turned

  • the terror on the very heart of the Soviet system, the Party and the armed forces, even

  • on the NKVD, itself the apparatus of terror.” Overy, Russia’s War P24

  • According to Robert Service, Stalin was definitely the man responsible for the Purge of the Red

  • Army.

  • He was concerned about a ‘fifth columnemerging in the Soviet Union to support a

  • foreign power in the event of war.

  • This had happened in the Spanish Civil War when Franco gained followers in July of 1936,

  • and Stalin wanted to prevent this from happening in the USSR.

  • And he might have been concerned about the view that the rest of the world had on the

  • Red Army.

  • Stalin’s suspicious mind may have been sufficiently aroused by the flimsy rumours

  • of army unreliability currently circulating abroad to take the story of the conspiracy

  • seriously.” Overy. Russia’s War. P26

  • Rumours of the army being unreliable may have been one of the reasons for the Purge, although

  • Tukhachevsky had clashed with Voroshilov, and had crossed Stalin over the issue of political

  • propaganda in the armed forces, which Tukhachevsky wanted to reduce.

  • Kliment Voroshilov the current People’s Commissar for Defence and the guy the KV tanks

  • were named after, played an active role in the Purges.

  • He had a personal grudge against Tukhachevsky, who favoured tanks over Voroshilov’s cavalry.

  • Voroshilov had been in 1st Cavalry Army in the Civil War, and in Poland in 1920.

  • Tukhachevsky’s days were numbered.

  • The Soviet armed forces appeared to be the only major area of state to avoid the

  • terror, until on the morning of 11 June 1937 Voroshilov announced the sudden arrest of

  • the country’s top generals and the unearthing of a treacherous plot whose tentacles reached

  • out to Germany.” Overy. Russia’s War. P25-26

  • Tukhachevsky was accused of leading a plot to overthrow the state at the head of a German

  • invasion - which was completely false.

  • He was arrested, tortured until he revealed the names of other conspirators, his family

  • sent to the Gulags or died in captivity, and he was subsequently shot.

  • And once Tukhachevsky was Purged, the dominoes started falling.

  • Each victim dragged in friends and colleagues to try to end their own maltreatment, and

  • the list of names grew with every beating. (Overy. Russia’s War. P28)

  • Two Marshals are shot, and one died in captivity, out of a grand total of five Marshals in 1936.

  • The other two Marshals were Voroshilov himself and Budennii, which is no surprise as to why

  • they survived, after all, both were cavalrymen from the civil war days, and friends with

  • Stalin at this time.

  • But it only got worse the further down the ranks the purge went.

  • “A week later, on June 1 [1937], Stalin staged a remarkable two-week long conference

  • in which he sat with Voroshilov and Yezhov listening to soldiers who had been invited

  • to the Kremlin profess loyalty to Stalin and a forceful rejection of the conspirators.

  • Each of them was searched at the door for arms and then given a blue folder containing

  • details of the charges, drawn up by Vyshinsky as news of each fresh crime was rushed hot

  • from the interrogation room. As they read, some of them found their own names on the

  • list of accomplices. At intervals NKVD men would make their way through the crowd, taking

  • officers away with them. The following day another group of conspirators was detailed

  • on the testimony of the hapless victims of the day before.” Overy. Russia’s War.

  • P28

  • Of 474 brigade-level command positions in 1936 there had been 201 executions, fifteen

  • deaths in captivity and a single suicide.

  • Overall, 45 per cent of the senior officers and political officials of the army and navy

  • were executed or sacked

  • This included 720 out of the 837 commanders, from colonel to marshal, appointed under the

  • new table of ranks established in 1935.

  • Of eighty-five senior officers on the Military Council, seventy-one were dead by 1941 - and

  • seven of the nine that avoided the purges had served in the 1st Cavalry Army - coincidence?

  • Many were killed, imprisoned or forced to flee the country.

  • But not all.

  • Some would survive and be reinstated later.

  • And, in addition to the executions and sackings, the Purges also gave the politicians the chance

  • to send their cronies into the ranks of the army.

  • Political Commissars were reintroduced, and a dual-command was established, which meant,

  • in a climate of suspicion of the Great Purges, the commander of each unit now had to get

  • permission to issue orders.

  • Dual command would once more be introduced at regimental level and above on the 10th

  • of May 1937.

  • As supporting materials noted, the military commissar, as equal to the commander, now

  • shared responsibility for not onlythe political-moral state of a unit’, but also

  • for ensuring military discipline and forcombat, operational and mobilisational preparedness’,

  • the condition of weaponsand day-[to-]day management of units.” Hill. The Red Army

  • and the Second World War.

  • “...[every] order [had] to be signed by the military commander, head of the headquarters

  • and one of the members of the military Soviet, even if orders were still given in the name

  • of the military commander.” Hill. The Red Army and the Second World War.

  • And this, amongst other things, has caused a historical debate.

  • The debate revolves around the impact that the Purges had on the Officer Corps’s experience

  • and talent, and it’s overall ability to fight when war broke out with Germany in 1941.

  • So let’s take a look at the historical debate and the impact that the Purges had, first

  • from the traditional point of view.

  • There is certainly widespread acknowledgement in both memoirs and the secondary literature

  • that the Great Purges had a negative impact on Red Army capabilities and performance.”

  • Hill. The Red Army and the Second World War.

  • Historians, especially those before the opening of the Soviet archives in the early 1990’s,

  • believed that the Purges had a detrimental impact on the Red Army’s Officer Corps,

  • which was one of the reasons the Red Army performed so poorly in the first years of

  • the Second World War.

  • There were two main aspects to this -

  • The first being the loss of experience of the Officer Corps, and the second being the

  • loss of morale that accompanied it.

  • Both meant that the Red Army entered the Great Patriotic War with an officer corps that was

  • incapable of dealing with a modern war.

  • Let’s look at both of these aspects in detail. First, the loss of experience.

  • Perhaps the most obvious impact to start with is the significance of the loss of those

  • killed from the point of view of losing their skills and knowledge, and particularly where

  • replacements were often not as capable or experienced.” Hill. The Red Army and the

  • Second World War.

  • It stands to reason that with so many experienced officers killed or imprisoned, that this was

  • the most significant impact of the purges on the Red Army.

  • Worse, Red Army educational institutions struggled to keep pace with the educational requirements

  • of a growing army, even before the purges.

  • In March 1938 the Frunze Military Academy had only 106 teaching staff out 167 positions.

  • 15 of these had already been stated for removal.

  • 61 were under investigation.

  • And 18 more were being considered for removal.

  • By May 1939, there were only 358 teaching staff out of 544 positions at the Frunze Military