Name: Solar Panels Made With a Particle Accelerator?!
Uploaded: 2021-10-08T18:00:43.000Z
Duration: 3 min 42 s
Description: Thousands of YouTube videos with English-Chinese subtitles! Now you can learn to understand native speakers, expand your vocabulary, and improve your pronunciation...

When I first heard about using particle accelerators to create solar panels, I thought… what?!

I must not understand how solar panels are made. Or how particle accelerators work? And

yes, there's a key, unglamorous step that – unless you're fairly familiar with solar

manufacturing technology (which I'm not) – you probably wouldn't think of, and

it's in this step where a particle accelerator turns out to be useful: cutting silicon into

the really thin wafers that are the key component of a solar panel.

However, even this wasn't at all what I first thought, which was something like slicing

through the crystal with a super powerful particle beam. That sounds awesome, but the

actual technique is much less insane and much more clever.

Ok, so a typical solar panel cell begins as a carefully grown cylinder of silicon atoms

arranged in a regular crystal lattice, which are then trimmed and cut into wafer-thin…wafers.

Some of which retain curved corners as hallmarks of the original cylindrical crystal.

Then the wafers get covered with other metals, anti-reflective coatings and electrodes, and

so on, to be able to capture the sun's energy – but the part we want to focus on is the

cutting. Because when you cut something with a saw, like silicon wafers normally are, there

are two problems: one, you can't cut a slice too thin otherwise it might get broken – typical

solar panel wafers are cut to about 0.15 millimeters. And two, unlike a knife which cuts by separating

and wedging two pieces of material apart, a saw cuts with teeth that gouge and eat away

at the material, turning it into saw-dust and leaving a gap called a kerf. In the case

of silicon wafers, the gap is roughly the same width as the wafers themselves, which

means about half of the original material goes to waste!

This is where particle accelerators come in: not as a high powered ablative cutting particle

beam, but by taking advantage of the physics of crystals. If instead you shoot protons

with a certain energy at the flat face of the silicon cylinder, those protons will embed

themselves into the silicon. The depth depends on how much energy they have, and the thinner

you want, the less energy they take, so you can easily pick something super thin. But

whatever thickness you choose, once inside the silicon crystal lattice, the protons kind

of push it apart and create stress; if you heat the whole thing up, a wafer will break

right off, cleanly cleaving along the crystal lattice lines where the protons were. So,

if after the protons are embedded, but before the heating, you glue this proto-wafer onto

a piece of glass or plastic, and then heat it up, you end up with a nice thin wafer of

silicon attached to a durable (and possibly flexible) material, with no waste silicon

whatsoever. To me, this is clever physics engineering!

Of course, a particle accelerator is much more expensive than a saw, so there must be

some upsides to it – the biggest is that, by using significantly less silicon per wafer

and not losing any silicon in the cutting process, it's possible to justify using

much more expensive silicon that's better at capturing sunlight, meaning the resultant

solar panels for a given power output are smaller and need less other material to make

them and hold them up, hence they're cheaper. Hopefully enough cheaper to make up for the

extra costs of using a particle accelerator to part silicon!

The company that's trying to use the particle-accelerator technology I talked about in this video to

make solar cells on a commercial scale, this company is called Rayton Solar. This is a

challenging and expensive endeavor and they're looking for investors, so they sponsored this

video to get the word out - startengine.com/startup/rayton-solar. I'm not going to make any endorsement – I

mean, I'm neither an investment expert, nor a solar industry expert – but I do believe

strongly that we need both political and technological solutions to secure our planet's energy

future, so I'm happy to help Rayton reach a broader audience to help give them a chance

for this clever idea to succeed, and I'm making a small investment myself. Hopefully

they'll end up being one of the many many pieces that come together to provide a civilized