There is much talk about it now, especially in connection with the events that happened in the States during the election campaign.

On those air, not just some economic giants.

Now, in some fields, they de facto compete with nations.

Their audience includes billions of users who spend a significant part of their lives on those ecosystems because they're crucial.

Was the word these on from those companies point of view.

Their monopoly status is optimal for technological on business processes.

Maybe it is.

But there is a question.

How does this monopolist, um, serve the interests of society?

Where is the divide between a successful global business, high demand services and big data consolidation onto rudely try to rule society at their own discretion but to step in for legitimate democratic institutions, in fact, to usurp or restrict the natural human right to decide how to live?

What to choose which position to express freely?

We just saw all of these in the states on.