Name: What "defund the police" really means
Uploaded: 2020-09-03T18:05:04.000Z
Duration: 10 min 47 s
Description: Thousands of YouTube videos with English-Chinese subtitles! Now you can learn to understand native speakers, expand your vocabulary, and improve your pronunciation...

On June 5th, the Washington DC mayor unveiled a statement, painted down the street leading

Within 24 hours, Black Lives Matter activists responded with their own message:

This slogan caught on rapidly among tens of thousands of people protesting police brutality

But what does it really mean to defund the police? And what if it's not as radical

A city budget, a county budget, a state budget, a national budget are all markers of what

our societies are prioritizing. The US spends $100 billion every year

on policing. Most of which comes from local municipalities.

New York City, for example, appropriated $5.9 billion last year to the police department.

For comparison, here's what the city allocated for homeless services, health, housing, youth

and community development, and jobs programs. The disparities are huge, and they echo in

cities across the country. Like in Chicago, where the policing budget

is $1.7 billion. Nearly twice the budget of the Fire Department, Department

of Transportation, Public Library, and Public Health combined.

If you look at these budgets in the United States

What you'll see is that we have deeply de-prioritized providing people their basic needs. And instead,

we over prioritize punishing human beings.

The emphasis on policing in the US has led to over-policing and underpolicing all at

once. The police arrests over 10 million people

in a year. And the vast majority of those arrests, especially in black and poor neighborhoods,

are for minor offenses, like drug possession or drinking in public. That heavy-handed approach

But when it comes to violent crime, the rate of police arrests is incredibly low. And

that's under-policing, which leaves communities of color underserved.

People believe that the police are deterring violence.

Clearly they're enacting violence, but are they also deterring violence.

A lot of research suggests they are having no influence whatsoever

So if they're having no influence whatsoever on the phenomena that they're supposed to

be influencing and they're doing violence, what purpose are they supposed to serve?

The repercussions of prioritizing the police

over other services can also be seen at schools in the US.

1.7 million students are in schools with police, but no counselors. And 3 million

have police in schools, but no nurses. And when it comes to 911 calls, in many

cases, police officers are the first responders to mental health related emergencies.

That's important because one in every four deaths from police shootings are people with

I can literally imagine you just replace someone with a weapon, with someone who will actually

sit down on the ground with them and talk. Not throw them on the ground and sit on top

of them or lay on top of them. But someone

who will take them wherever they are, listen to their situations and

then try to figure out, diagnose their problem.

Police are doing the jobs of what other groups of people and workers can be doing.

Being tasked with jobs they're not trained to do, is an idea some police officers acknowledge

The need to rethink police budgets has become even more glaring in the middle of the coronavirus

pandemic. Many have called attention to the fact that

hospital workers struggle to get personal protective equipment. While thousands of

police officers have riot gear at the ready for protests.

Even in response to the pandemic, while many agencies grapple with coronavirus budget cuts,

police budgets have largely remained intact. New York City's proposal for the coming

fiscal year cuts only 5 percent of the NYPD budget.

But that same proposal, calls for a 12 percent cut to the Department of Health.

This is where the movement to defund the police comes in. It's a push to take the billions

of dollars cities spend on police, and move that funding to other services, like education,

housing, jobs or mental healthcare. At its core, the idea is to rethink public

safety because the current form of policing isn't built to serve everyone equally.

We live in an economy of punishment. We as in black people, as poor people, as in marginal

people, police are not used to keep us safe.

What we've seen over the last seven years is black people being killed, humiliated,

violated, sexually assaulted, maimed by law enforcement. We haven't seen it get any better.

Reimagining public safety in this moment is a matter of life or death.

For years, reforms like introducing police body cameras, have been proposed across

the country as a response to police brutality. But these reforms have only added more money

to police budgets, even when, as studies like this one in DC show, they have “no

detectable effect on police use of force”.

We absolutely need to try and hold law enforcement accountable. But what we've recognized is

all of our accountability measures, up until now have not worked.

In  the case of Minneapolis, since 2016 their

police officers have received body cameras, bias training

and have a duty-to-intervene policy where other police officers

must step in if they see force applied inappropriately.

Yet, a Minneapolis police officer killed George Floyd as three officers looked on.

So this idea that we could reform an institution

that has a blue code of silence, that we can reform an institution

that is one of the most powerful unions, that is no longer the conversation.

But the calls to defund the police have been polarizing and have led

to some fears about how it might affect personal and public safety.

How do you defund or dismantle and keep people safe?

When we all dial 911, we need to know there's someone coming.

If you defund the police or diminish their ability to police their communities,

I think we often hear issues of safety for mostly white, affluent people. And I have

to remind those folks that their safety is predicated on the unsafety of black people.

Opponents of defunding the police have cautioned that after cities

like Memphis had to downsize their police force,

But proponents point to a major difference between defunding the police then, and now.

Today, it's not just about cutting police budgets. A key part of defunding is to

redistribute those resources and create better responses to crime.

That redistribution would still fund first responders, but could force cities to rethink

what kinds of responders would make communities safer for everyone.

Whether it's investing in a new crisis intervention team.

Or social workers. In some cities, like Eugene, Oregon and Austin,

Texas, alternative models for safety have already been put in place to dispatch

Subtitles ListPlay Video

What "defund the police" really means

stuff

mental

pandemic

prioritize