Subtitles section Play video Print subtitles The following content is provided under a Creative Commons license. Your support will help MIT OpenCourseWare continue to offer high quality educational resources for free. To make a donation or view additional materials from hundreds of MIT courses, visit MIT OpenCourseWare at ocw.mit.edu. JOANNE STUBBE: What I want to do today is finish up module 7 on reactive oxygen species and then move on into the last module, which we are obviously not going to get completely through. We're going to be focused mostly on purines and maybe some pyrimidines. And I'll give you a big overview of what I think the things are you need to think about in nucleotide and deoxynucleotide metabolism as a starting point. OK. So we've been talking about module 7 and, in this section, how you control reactive oxygen species for signaling. We were going through the generic overview. And at the end of the last lecture, this is the system we were talking about using epidermal growth factor receptor, which we've now looked at quite a bit as an example. But what I wanted to point out is that it's not limited to epidermal growth factor receptor. So you have insulin growth factor receptor, nerve growth factor signaling, VEGF, IL-1, IL-4, et cetera. And all of these things are all distinct. They all have different signaling cascades. But the generic approach that we've been looking at in the Kate Carroll paper is also, I think, applicable to these other systems. And so what I wanted to do was just make one more point with this, and then what I'm going to do is summarize the general principles of post-translational modification by anything-- we're using post-translational modification by sulfenylation and then briefly come back to the methods used. But we spent a lot of time in recitations in 11 and 12 focused on methods, so I'm not going to spend very much time on that. It's also in your PowerPoint handouts. So the key thing here is the general-- is we have EGF, OK, so that's Epidermal Growth Factor in the membrane. We have epidermal growth factor receptor, which you all know has to dimerize and you all know, at this stage, is a tyrosine kinase. And the key thing we're going to be focused on is if we modify these proteins, what is the biological consequence, OK? Do you have any biological consequence? And if you don't, it's probably just an artifact of the fact that cysteines react rapidly with hydrogen-- not rapidly, but they react with hydrogen peroxide at some level to give you modification. So this is all, I'm just going to say, tyrosine kinase activity. We've already gone through that. And what happens is you activate the NOX proteins. And in this case, it's the NOX2 isozymes. And this is outside, and this is inside the cell. And NOX2 can generate superoxide-- OK, so let's just put this in parentheses-- which can rapidly generate hydrogen peroxide. And so the issue is that the superoxide and all of the hydrogen peroxide needs to come from the outside of the cell to the inside of the cell. OK. So we have hydrogen peroxide. And what is hydrogen peroxide doing? So the model is-- and this is what we've been focusing on-- that the hydrogen peroxide can modify the cysteine by sulfenylation, OK? So we can go from SH to SOH. And in the case of the tyrosine kinase and in the paper you had to read, it turns out that tyrosine kinase by activity assays was more active. So it's phosphorylated. It's sulfenylated. That leads to higher activity. That means it's potentially biologically interesting. And we also, in the Kate Carroll paper, looked not only at the activity, but we looked downstream at the signaling pathways, and we saw signaling as defined by phosphorylation events. We saw more signaling. So those are the kinds of peak criteria people are looking at for being biologically interesting. Now, what we also have is a key control, and, in these cascades, like over there, we also have PTP. And that's Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase. And these proteins all have a cysteine at the active site. We talked about this before. And the cysteine at the active site, what can it do? It can really sort of dephosphorylate the tyrosine kinase. And if you remove the phosphate, the activity is lowered. OK. So again, you have something that activates, something that removes it. But what we also know-- so this is the active form, and this is the key in all these signaling events. And so what we also have-- so let me go over here, since I didn't leave quite enough room. So we have PTP that can also react with hydrogen peroxide to become sulfenylated. That's the inactive form. So when it's in this state, basically, you put a roadblock in this pathway. So this is inactive. OK. And the Carroll paper spent a lot of time trying to define-- there are lots of protein tyrosine phosphatases inside the cell-- not anywhere near as many as kinases. So one protein tyrosine phosphatase services many proteins. But both of these guys are regulated by sulfenylation. And there's one third thing, and so this is just giving us the big picture now. If you have hydrogen peroxide in the cell, I've already told you that there are enzymes that can degrade hydrogen peroxide-- peroxiredoxins. And so that removes the hydrogen peroxide, which then prevents these things from happening. So you have peroxiredoxins, which I already talked about. And so the hydrogen peroxide concentration goes down. So that's another mechanism of control. OK. So the take-home message is shown in this slide. It's shown in the papers you had to read. And there are many proteins that have some variation on this theme, and this is a really active area of research to look at this in more detail. OK. Yeah? AUDIENCE: The tyrosine kinase activity, [INAUDIBLE] 160% or something. I was just wondering how they actually classified that as [INAUDIBLE]. JOANNE STUBBE: Active? So, I mean, in biology, that's a huge effect. AUDIENCE: OK. JOANNE STUBBE: So, I mean, to somebody that's doing something in the test tube, a factor of two is nothing. In biology, that's all it takes. So the question is, is it enough? And you should always ask that question. And then you've got to look at the consequences, and you do more experiments. If you hadn't seen any effect, well, maybe you didn't have the right proteins in there, and you need five more proteins to assay, which would give you a bigger effect. OK. So that's the issue with all of these problems. That particular experiment, if you go back and look at it, was done in crude extracts, OK. And the activity is extremely low. They had to use a luciferase assay to be able to measure this and amplify the signal, OK, which probably has a lot of issues with-- can have a lot of issues. So if you're not happy with that, then you're going to have trouble in biology.