Placeholder Image

Subtitles section Play video

  • The following content is provided under a Creative

  • Commons license.

  • Your support will help MIT OpenCourseWare

  • continue to offer high- quality educational resources for free.

  • To make a donation or view additional materials

  • from hundreds of MIT courses, visit MIT OpenCourseWare

  • at ocw.mit.edu.

  • ELIZABETH NOLAN: OK, so we're going to get started.

  • And we're going to continue on with folding.

  • So we had some introduction last time

  • about this module and thinking about in vitro

  • versus in vivo studies.

  • And where we're going to move on today

  • is discussing molecular chaperones.

  • And effectively, there'll be three case studies

  • over the next two to two and a half

  • lectures-- so trigger factor, GroEL/GroES, and DnaK/DnaJ.

  • And so first is some background.

  • We need to talk about what are molecular chaperones.

  • And so effectively, these are proteins

  • that influence protein folding within the cell.

  • And they can do this by a variety of ways.

  • So they can help to prevent aggregation and intermolecular

  • interactions between polypeptides.

  • They can facilitate folding by limiting conformational space

  • and preventing side reactions.

  • An important point to keep in mind throughout this

  • is that these chaperone proteins bind to proteins transiently

  • here.

  • What are the types of processes they can assist in?

  • A variety are listed here.

  • And we see that it's quite broad.

  • So they can help in de novo folding, so for instance,

  • folding of a nascent polypeptide chain emerging

  • from the ribosome.

  • They can assist in refolding.

  • So for instance, if proteins have unfolded or become

  • aggregated because of stress, they can help here.

  • They can assist in the assembly of oligomeric proteins

  • in protein transport, and they also

  • assist in proteolytic degradation here.

  • And so we can classify these chaperones

  • into three main groups depending on how they act,

  • and those are listed here.

  • So we can have holdases, foldases, and unfoldases.

  • So something you might want to ask yourself

  • as you see these different chaperone systems is to ask,

  • what is the role?

  • Is it one or multiple?

  • So holdases help to stabilize non-native confirmations.

  • So effectively, the chaperone will

  • bind a polypeptide and a non-native confirmation

  • and stabilize that for some period of time.

  • Foldases assist in folding of a polypeptide

  • to its native state.

  • And unfoldases, as the name indicates,

  • can help with unfolding proteins, so for instance,

  • if a protein has misfolded and that needs to be undone,

  • or maybe a protein needs to be extracted

  • from some aggregate that's formed in in multiple proteins

  • that's a problem.

  • And so we're going to think about the chaperones

  • in the cytoplasm in two main groups for the ones

  • that interact with newly synthesized polypeptides.

  • So first, we can think about trigger factor, which

  • is a chaperone that's associated with the ribosome,

  • as we'll see.

  • So trigger factor is involved in co-translational folding,

  • meaning the polypeptide is still associated with the ribosome

  • and de novo folding.

  • And then we'll examine some downstream cytosolic

  • chaperones.

  • So these are chaperones that do not bind to ribosome--

  • GroEL/GroES, DnaK/DnaJ.

  • And just as a general overview of this molecular

  • chaperone concept here--

  • so this is taken from the required reading--

  • effectively, what's shown in this scheme

  • is a variety of different states a polypeptide

  • can find itself in.

  • So here we see a partially folded protein.

  • This protein may form from an unfolded protein or maybe

  • a native protein.

  • We have an aggregate.

  • And if we look down here, we're seeing the effect

  • of some generalized chaperone.

  • OK, so one important point to make from this

  • is that the chaperone's not part of this final structure.

  • It's just helping the polypeptide

  • get to its native state.

  • OK, and we can think about different rate constants,

  • whether it be for folding or aggregation,

  • chaperone binding Kon, chaperone dissociation Koff.

  • So for instance, if we look here,

  • we have a partially folded polypeptide.

  • And imagine the chaperone binds that.

  • Or maybe the chaperone binds an unfolded polypeptide.

  • OK, it's going to act as a holdase or a foldase.

  • And what can we see down here--

  • or an unfoldase-- what we see down here

  • is an indication of an event that's

  • driven by ATP hydrolysis.

  • And so what we'll see and what's known

  • is that many of these chaperones switch

  • between low and high affinity states

  • for some substrate polypeptide.

  • And these low and high affinity states

  • are somehow regulated by the ATP binding and hydrolysis.

  • So here, for instance, we see that step.

  • And imagine a Koff getting us back into this direction

  • here, right?

  • So you can begin to ask yourself questions like,

  • under what conditions and terms of these rate constants

  • is folding efficient?

  • When would a chaperone act as a holdase?

  • When would aggregation occur?

  • So aggregation would occur if this Kagg

  • is much greater than, say, for instance, Kon here

  • to work systematically through this scheme.

  • And here are just some points and words

  • related to that scheme and things

  • to think about from a broader picture.

  • So in terms of the systems we're going

  • to examine in the cytoplasm, this is the overview slide.

  • And where we're going to begin in this overview

  • is with the ribosome.

  • And we see that in red here we have a nascent polypeptide

  • chain emerging.

  • OK, so what does this scheme indicate?

  • What we see is that here is the player trigger

  • factor, which is involved in co-translational folding.

  • And we see that about 70% of nascent polypeptides

  • interact with trigger factor.

  • And these can arrive in a native conformation.

  • We see there's two other systems here.

  • So on the right, we have GroES and GroEL.

  • So GroEL provides post-translational folding.

  • We look and see about 10% to 15% of peptides in the cell

  • interact with GroEL/GroES.

  • And as we'll see, it provides this folding chamber

  • on a protected space.

  • We also see here that this system uses ATP.

  • OK, and here we have another two players, DnaK

  • and its co-chaperone DnaJ.

  • And we see they're binding to some sort of polypeptide

  • in a manner that's different than GroEL/GroES.

  • OK, about 5% to 18% of polypeptides

  • come into contact with these two players.

  • We also see this system as ATP-dependent,

  • and there's another player, GrpE,

  • which we'll see is the nucleotide exchange

  • factor needed here.

  • OK, so we see that maybe there's some crosstalk here.

  • And here we have some needed native polypeptides.

  • So just some things to keep in mind--

  • it's important to think about concentrations

  • and some approximate concentrations are listed here.

  • If we're thinking about the ribosome

  • DnaK/DnaJ, GroEL, and trigger factor.

  • Just to note that many chaperones are also

  • called Heat Shock Proteins, and this

  • is because their expression increases with increased

  • temperature or stress.

  • So Hsp70, Hsp60, that's for heat shock protein.

  • So where we're going to begin is with an overview

  • of trigger factor.

  • Yes?

  • AUDIENCE: I wanted to ask.

  • What do you mean by native and this protein

  • exist in several conformations in this slide?

  • ELIZABETH NOLAN: So proteins are dynamic, right?

  • We know that.

  • So native means a native fold, so a native state

  • of this protein as opposed to the protein being unfolded

  • if it's supposed to be globular or being