Placeholder Image

Subtitles section Play video

  • hello and welcome to this online section of introduction to philosophy

  • this series of videos is recorded for my HUP 101 course

  • a class that I teach at laguardia community college

  • my name is doctor richard brown and i will be the instructor of this course

  • uh... this series of videos is, um, uh,

  • primarily intended for classes

  • uh... my online classes at laguardia colleges as I just mentioned uh... but

  • i've taught this course of for many years i taught it at brooklyn college

  • before i came to laguardia

  • and so uh... these slides these powerpoint slides also accompany

  • the Chaffee book

  • uh...the philosopher's way which is the book that students

  • in this course will be using

  • and so, um

  • uh... these slides then

  • represent what I kind of drew on the board, or whatever

  • a complete course in philosophy

  • and um...

  • in order to do that

  • the first question that we've got to start with

  • just by way of introducing the topic uh...is well, what is philosophy?

  • what is it that we're going to be studying in this series of lectures?

  • and answering this question is very difficult because if you ask

  • a hundred different philosophers what it is they do you're liable to get a hundred

  • different answers

  • um so it's not a very easy question to answer. Different people think

  • of philosophy as different things.

  • now, typically

  • uh...

  • sometimes people conceive of philosophy as asking certain kinds of questions

  • well you know very deep questions about the meaning of life and

  • what's real and those kinds of things and it's true that philosophers do ask those questions

  • and so one way of talking about philosophy is talking about those kinds

  • of questions that philosophers deal with and the kinds of answers that they give

  • and so we'll talk about that at the very end this lecture, talk about the

  • various branches philosophy

  • uh... another way of thinking about philosophy is

  • looking, well, sort of

  • what the word means and how people have thought about it historically

  • and so that's what I want to turn to first uh... i want to actually spend a little bit of

  • time

  • talking about what i call the pre philosophical way of thinking

  • uh... or

  • uh... the way that people thought about reality

  • before philosophy

  • uh... was discovered

  • and there was some characteristic differences

  • in this historical way and so one thing you'll notice uh... in these lectures is

  • that

  • I'm very historically orientated

  • and i think that it's very important

  • for us to put

  • the questions were interested in in this kind of historical perspective so we

  • will be going uh... historically in order

  • all right so

  • to start with then at the beginning

  • let's give a very brief introduction to the origins of society and all of this

  • should be taken with a grain of salt, of course

  • because when we're looking back on history we're doing our best to

  • reconstruct events

  • uh... that

  • uh... only uh... fragmentary evidence of which survives so we must always remember

  • that we're doing the best that we can

  • so we'll be referring to this timeline here

  • over the course of the class

  • and so here I'll mark where we are now the present-day CE

  • and those of you probably know that we used to use 'BC' and 'AD'

  • 'BC' for 'before christ' and 'AD' for 'Anno Domini'

  • which uh... means in latin 'the year of our lord' uh... and year one here is supposed to

  • mark the historical birth of uh... jesus of nazareth

  • not everybody is a christian and so having these christian-centric dates

  • uh...there is a movement away from naming them that way so we changed it to

  • 'CE' for

  • 'common era'

  • and 'BCE' for 'before the common era' and i use those prefixes here suffixes here (whatever)

  • but the turnaround date is still year one there where historically

  • many have thought

  • jesus was actually born. There is some debate about that, as i said earlier,

  • all of this is sort of piecemeal knowledge that we have

  • but there are...some scholars think well maybe he was born slightly earlier than year one

  • or slightly later than year one, by which I mean the actual historical jesus

  • uh...

  • uh... so we're not sure but that's the date that year one is set

  • uh... and that's why it's set at year one

  • now of course there are many cultures that don't

  • have uh...

  • their dating system this way so

  • there are cultures that don't start over when they think that jesus was born and so for

  • them

  • uh... they will number the year not 2011, like us, but five thousand something

  • but so roughly speaking then if this timeline were to extend

  • all the way to the left

  • a good space using this same kind of rough metric that I've had here

  • you'd have to go another

  • seven

  • to 10 thousand years in the past

  • uh... to find human beings

  • as we

  • think of ourselves now settling down

  • uh... so this is the invention of farming you may not think of farming

  • as an invention but it is an invention

  • there are certain technologies which are required

  • in order to farm; you need to be able to irrigate, you need to be able to

  • control water

  • um, by having

  • buckets for instance or uh...

  • irrigation channels, you need to be able to use a hoe

  • planting seeds in nice orderly rows, etc

  • so we have evidence and again none of this is hard and fast um

  • ten thousand

  • roughly or so

  • uh... years before year one

  • people started farming

  • so then for roughly seven thousand years people lived in this way

  • farming, settling down, domesticating animals no longer living

  • hunter-gatherer lifestyles

  • no longer being nomads

  • but nothing like a city developing there are still these tribal associations, it's still

  • very

  • family oriented, extended family

  • and etc

  • but around three thousand

  • five hundred years before year one

  • we find city life as we know it so what we call civilization

  • civilized life

  • developing

  • and cities back then of course would've been much smaller

  • a large city would comprise about a thousand, two thousand people

  • something that we don't consider to be very large but of course the population back then

  • would've been much smaller so there

  • would have been very large cities with a thousand to two thousand people

  • and of course

  • what corresponds with the origins of civilization are

  • the invention of writing

  • and human beings around this time

  • seemed to have developed

  • writing in various places

  • around the world so it's not just in the western world

  • that we find writing,

  • cuneiform tablets, etc, being developed uh... but also of course everyone knows about Egypt

  • and the hieroglyphs

  • and

  • lesser-known perhaps in the americas they were also developing forms of writing and in china and the east

  • as well

  • people are developing writing around this time and it's interesting to look back at some of

  • these

  • earliest

  • kinds of writings...um...they give us some kind evidence of what the people thought

  • at the time

  • and the way they viewed themselves in the in the grander scheme so I want to take a look at

  • that

  • but first i want to focus on the places that we're going to talk about so

  • here's some pictures this is the map of ancient Mesopotamia

  • uh... over on the right over there is where we're going to be focusing on

  • uh... babylon and sumer. Babylon is where the tigris and euphrates rivers meet

  • and those of you uh... who are aware of current...uh...

  • ...um...

  • nations and politics

  • will recognize

  • what is babylon there as modern day Iraq. So, there's Egypt there,

  • the Sinai peninsula

  • and of course the out of africa theory

  • which uh...

  • uh...

  • some scientists think describes the way

  • uh... we

  • human beings evolved

  • has it that human beings evolved in Africa

  • and then

  • migrated nomadically up and across the the peninsula there and then settled down

  • uh... started farming in babylon

  • uh... in areas in Egypt and so on where these cities later developed, and so,

  • uh...

  • what we find from these early areas are actually pieces of writing

  • which are very

  • illustrative so i want to look at one in particular

  • and this is, um...

  • famously known as the Epic of

  • Gilgamesh.

  • Now

  • if you haven't read the Epic of Gilgamesh you probably should

  • it's a great story and it used to be read n English 101 classes, I don't

  • know if they still do or not, or in English 102 or something like that

  • uh... but it's an epic in the sense of an epic adventure

  • and it tells the story of a king

  • named Gligamesh who was a great king of one of these ancient cities

  • and Gilgamesh wants to know

  • why people die, what the meaning of life is and how we can be immortal.

  • So, he really wants to know the answer to this question

  • and he decides that the way he's going to answer it is to

  • go on a journey

  • to where the gods live

  • and to demand of the gods that they tell him, Gilgamesh, the answers to these questions.

  • and so he does.

  • A lot of adventures ensue.

  • uh... and I won't rehash all of the stuff that happens

  • He eventually gets to the gods and asks them this question

  • and they set him a bunch of tasks. They say 'Gilgamesh, if you complete these tasks

  • we'll answer your questions, tell you everything you want to know'.

  • the tasks are very much like

  • the kinds of things you find in greek mythology, um he has to kill a certain beast, he has to climb a certain mountain, he has to divert a certain

  • river

  • uh... and etc. So, he does all of that stuff.

  • and finally he comes to the last task the gods

  • the gods tell Gilgamesh 'you must stay awake for three days and three nights'

  • and if he does this

  • they will tell him the answer

  • So he says 'no problem'

  • but of course he doesn't have red Bull

  • or caffeine or any of the other luxuries, No-Doze, that modern people use to do all nighters

  • so he stays awake for three days

  • and two nights

  • and on the third night

  • he falls asleep.

  • So, poor Gilgamesh wakes up in the morning

  • to see the gods saying,

  • 'oh well, you were so close but now you'll never know.'

  • they just...he does not complete the tasks and he does not get to know the answer

  • he becomes very angry

  • and then he finds out, uh, comes to a realization

  • that the way to be a immortal for a human

  • is to have your name remembered by doing great things. By building a great city, by being a fair ruler and so on

  • an so forth

  • this story, this very brief synopsis, a butchering, of a story

  • uh... illustrates two points that I want to make.

  • So, the first point is

  • that it's sort f wrong to think of philosophy as simply a group of questions

  • because notice the kind of question that Gilgamesh is asking here

  • are very deep questions

  • why do we die? What's the meaning of life? How do we

  • become immortal?

  • What's the right way to live?

  • It is not as though

  • only philosophers are interested in those questions

  • human beings are interested in

  • those kinds of questions

  • That seems to be

  • something

  • that afflicts us in a certain way. We want to know the answer to these questions

  • but of course there are different ways of answering

  • those questions

  • and gilgamesh

  • embodies a particular way of answering those questions

  • Notice he never once

  • entertains the idea

  • that he himself could figure out

  • the answer to these questions on his own.

  • Immediately from the beginning

  • the proposed solution to the problem is to fid out those who know, the gods

  • and to ask them

  • and this is the general theme of the pre philosophical way thinking

  • that human beings are

  • not capable knowing

  • the way the word is...only

  • ...they are like children

  • who can't understand the most simplest things

  • the world is filled with the supernatural personalities who really know.

  • The world of the gods

  • as you might be familiar

  • from uh...

  • retellings of these stories. Zeus, Athena and so on

  • um, that's who controls reality

  • and if you want to know

  • then you've got to ask. Now of course

  • uh... these would have been different gods for

  • Gilgamesh

  • and people like him

  • but the idea that this roughly the same

  • so there's a conception of human beings as supplicants

  • as not being able to know as uh...

  • having to be told by

  • divine revelation

  • the way reality really is

  • now there's another story that illustrates this point as well and this is

  • something that we can see from the Code of Hammurabi.

  • Now, the Code of Hammurabi is famous because it is one of the earliest

  • written

  • laws we have

  • and you can actually go to the website of the Louvre and read a translation of the

  • Code of Hammurabi. It's there on their website. It's extremely interesting

  • i recommend that you do it if you have the opportunity

  • if you do this you'll be struck by two things. So, one is

  • the thing I was mentioning earlier, namely that

  • they're dealing with the same kind of questions that

  • and problems that we deal with so their lives

  • are roughly

  • very similar to our lives. They live in a city. They're around people they don't know and

  • aren't related to

  • and there are various questions of how

  • you ought to interact with them. What obligations they owe to you, what obligations you owe to

  • them

  • and ways of coordinating behavior

  • such that

  • you can discourage certain kinds of behavior and

  • encourage other kinds of behavior. Very ordinary kinds of problems. So, that'll be the first thing you're struck by.

  • Now, of course

  • the way they discouraged behaviors was by a very eye for an eye type of justice

  • and uh... that will be something which is kind of a shock to modern people their

  • system of punishment was very, very, eye for an eye, very

  • brutal I guess we might say

  • but, uh,

  • So, I don't want to dwell on that, that's not really the main point.

  • so the other point is

  • the source of the justification of these laws

  • So, the laws were

  • written on a giant

  • pole

  • ascribed around it

  • which was

  • smack dead in the center of the

  • entering gate of the city that

  • Hammurabi controlled

  • so that any person who walked into the city would be faced first

  • with this inscription of all the laws. So that there was no excuse and everybody knew what the laws were

  • they were right there

  • you could check them.

  • But why should you obey those laws? Who was Hammurabi

  • to tell you these are the right laws? Why these ones as opposed to some other set?

  • or no set at all?

  • Well, the answer is contained in the

  • preamble

  • of the Code of Hammurabi and the answer is roughly this:

  • Hammurabi is the son of god

  • He is the slayer of Tiamat, the great dragon, the orderer of chaos etc, etc, blah, blah, blah

  • he built this, he did that, god is his father, etc, etc, and so who else

  • better to know

  • than Hammurabi?

  • so again we see this appeal to divine

  • intervention

  • divine revelation

  • as the only

  • real way of knowing

  • what these laws are

  • so notice that nowhere in that

  • preamble is there anything like

  • well

  • we've thought about it carefully and these

  • appear to be the best way

  • to

  • achieve the goals that we've set for ourselves uh... Goal One:

  • Coordinated behavior, Goal 2

  • Commerce, etc

  • so nothing about

  • us discovering the truth but

  • a lot about

  • the truth being revealed by a greater source and that really is

  • what's contrasted with

  • the origin

  • of western philosophy

  • so, now, again, just before we move on I want to take a second to emphasize

  • that, um,

  • I'm talking here about western philosophy and

  • we could tell a different story talking about the origins of eastern philosophy

  • or american philosophy

  • so since we're talking about the sort of society of the west which has its

  • origins in

  • Ancient Greece

  • uh... that's where we're going to be focusing but that's not the say there's

  • anything overly specifically special

  • about the greek people at this time

  • uh... people

  • have been interested in these questions and people around the world

  • have developed answers to them

  • although people n Ancient Greece

  • uh, have one

  • really definitively

  • western ways of dealing with these problems

  • and questions which has influenced uh... the spread of our culture so we'll be

  • taking a look at that

  • so again here's our timeline

  • uh... now there remember farming invented about ten thousand years before

  • year one

  • civilization begins the invention of writing

  • uh... uh... about thirty five hundred years roughly again debatable but

  • roughly around that area

  • uh... before year one

  • and so when does philosophy start? Well

  • we date the origins of western philosophy to about six hundred years

  • before year one

  • notice that's roughly

  • three thousand years from the beginning of writing

  • to the origins of philosophy so during that time period

  • the pre philosophical way of thinking as i have characterized it

  • dominates

  • and we can think right around twelve hundred BCE

  • so that's right around the mark there where it says '1000'

  • uh... was where many scholars think that moses lived and of courses moses

  • gave us the ten commandments and that's prototypical of this pre philosophical way of

  • thinking

  • what's the right way to live your life? Well you can'y answer that question

  • moses goes to mountain, god reveals to him directly

  • the correct rules

  • for living

  • a good life and then moses comes back and says god told me this is the right way

  • to do it

  • so that's the uh... another way of thinking about and of course if you

  • don't do it god intervenes and punishes you

  • So these are kind of the twin ideas

  • of the pre philosophical way of thinking

  • when there's an earthquake god's punishing you for breaking some rule

  • when there's a nice bountiful harvest god's rewarding you for following the rules

  • and so it's important for us to know what the rules are and the way the world

  • works but we can't know for ourselves so we're dependent on

  • somebody else, the gods,

  • handing that down and then them handing that down to us

  • so that's roughly the pre philosophical way of thinking

  • and the philosophical way of thinking begins around six hundred years before year one

  • and i should caution um... just so that there's no misunderstanding

  • it's not as though once philosophy is discovered

  • this older way of thinking goes out of date. People still subscribe to this

  • view and people did at that time as well

  • it's just that

  • this is the earliest

  • that we know of where people start advocating

  • some other way of thinking about human beings

  • and our relation to

  • reality

  • so let's take a look

  • so this is where we're going to be spending uh... roughly one third of the

  • class is spent in ancient greece

  • almost uh...

  • over a third of the class actually so it's good to get familiar with it so

  • just look at the map for second you can see the aegean sea there

  • separating Greece on the left from Ionia

  • on the right

  • 'Ionia' was the ancient name for that land mass nowadays we

  • would call that that's where turkey is

  • uh... buts this is a

  • map of ancient greece

  • so the isle of crete down there at the bottom

  • the Cretans who lived on the Isle of Crete, even in the ancient period had a

  • reputation for being liars aristotle

  • famously wrote

  • that he was perplexed by the sentence 'all cretans are liars'

  • so i don't know what those ancient cretans were up to but uh...

  • they seem to have developed a bad rep

  • so then moving on up you can see

  • uh, Corinth there and Corinth is famous from the letters from the

  • Corinthians and to the Corinthians which are included in the Bible

  • Then up top there's the oracle at delphi

  • and delphi and the oracle will play an important part of the story of the life

  • of socrates and we'll talk about that

  • but you must know the oracle from

  • uh... delphi from

  • other sources

  • uh... more than likely you'd know it as the source of

  • the prophecy

  • uh... that a certain person would mary their mother

  • and killer father

  • and uh... I'll leave you to fill in the name of that famous person

  • but i'm sure you know who I'm talking about

  • uh... ok and then there's athens which is where a lot of the action will take place

  • because there is where socrates and plato and aristotle

  • socrates was an Athenian

  • uh... plato was the student of socrates and starts the Academy there and Aristotle

  • goes to study there so

  • with plato at the academy and then starts his own school

  • and so athens has always been an important part of

  • ancient philosophy

  • but actually the story starts over in Ionia in a city called 'Miletus'

  • and the earliest philosophers as far as we know and again remember history is

  • mostly a guessing game because we're always trying to figure out what

  • happened on the basis of incomplete evidence

  • so we don't really really know what happened

  • six hundred years before the birth

  • uh... jesus but we have some ideas and most of them come from historical

  • writers

  • uh...like aristotle

  • at for instance and Theophrastus and there are others

  • who are writing about this period and we have those writings

  • so a lot of it is pieced

  • together

  • and so we're not saying that no one ever had these ideas before it's quite

  • possible that there was a person

  • before this period of time who had a lot of similar ideas

  • but we don't have anything

  • written down which have survived

  • which indicate that this is so what we have now the best evidence suggests

  • what we're going to call philosophy

  • um... originated in Miletus

  • roughly six hundred years before year one

  • and in particular with a

  • individual named Thales and Thales

  • uh... was roughly born in this 620's

  • a six hundred and twenty

  • years before year one we don't really know

  • because the ancients didn't really

  • keep birth records they weren't interested in when someone was born

  • uh... there were more interested in when someone dies so we have really complete

  • death records

  • we know that he died in five forty six

  • now notice that these dates go backwards and that's because of course

  • we're counting down

  • to year one

  • whereas where we are now in the year two thousand eleven we're counting away from

  • year one so

  • uh... it's not weird to be born in six twenty and die in five forty six

  • uh... that's the way we date things back then

  • and thales is a real interesting person uh... there's a lot that can be said

  • about him

  • and i'll spend some time talking about thales

  • and the people around him other uh... greeks, Anaximander and

  • uh

  • Anaximenes

  • uh... those are the hard to say, wait until you see how there're spelled

  • okay so

  • And these are collectively are known as the 'pre-Socratic philosophers'

  • and there're some other ones we'll talk about

  • there is a whole section on pre socratic philosophy

  • don't worry about why it's called that for now but that's what

  • we'll talk about that later but that is what it's called

  • so these

  • thales for instance was interested in

  • questions about the makeup of

  • the physical world he wanted to know

  • whether or not there were some fundamental stuff

  • some thing out of which all of the other stuff

  • was made

  • and he also rejected

  • any kind of supernatural explanations for the things he was interested in

  • and these kinds of twin

  • interests and ideas here

  • came to dominate a lot what happened in early

  • Miletus uh... these...uh, excuse me

  • in early Miletus in other words

  • uh... the philosophers who were

  • uh... the earliest philosophers who came before Socrates plato

  • and aristotle

  • So let me give you some example of the kinds of things

  • thales was interested in

  • he was interested in the shape of the earth and this has been something that

  • people had been interested in for a very long time

  • and there were various theories about the shape of the earth

  • uh...but

  • the reasons given

  • for believing in the shape being this or that

  • were usually

  • uh...

  • uh...

  • related to religion or being revealed by a god or being revealed in a trance so

  • what thales did was to try to give arguments

  • that we could figure out what the shape of the earth was ourselves if we paid close

  • attention to our environment so for instance

  • he famously claimed that you would have different experiences of a ship

  • coming in from sea or going out to sea

  • depending on the shape of the earth so if the earth were round

  • you would expect the ship the disappeared gradually part by part

  • whereas if the ship were excuse me, if the earth were flat you would expect

  • the ship to just disappear altogether all at once as it faded away

  • uh... gradually

  • and that experience bore out the first claim that you would see the

  • first part, the lower parts of it disappear first and higher parts of it disappeared

  • later

  • because it's going around

  • a bend or a curve

  • so secondly also it had been known for a thousand years at least the babylonians

  • kept very, very

  • meticulous records of eclipses and the activities of the uh... stars and

  • planets and so on

  • and it had been known or thought that

  • uh... what happened during an eclipse was that the shadow of the earth was

  • being cast

  • on the thing being eclipsed, so when the moon is eclipsed that's earth's shadow that

  • you see

  • and thales argued that since this the

  • shape of the shadow of the earth

  • would give you some evidence to the shape of the actual earth itself since

  • that was the thing that was casting its shadow

  • and that the shape of the earth was circular

  • perhaps spherical

  • uh... and so that would give you some good reason to believe that that was the

  • shape that the earth actually had

  • so now notice again what's important, the point that's being made here is

  • that

  • thales is not the first person to ever suggest that the earth is round or spherical

  • people had suggested that before

  • for instance there are people who claim that the earth is the shape of an egg

  • and this is because

  • it was revealed to them that way. There was some mystical

  • divine source

  • to the idea. Whereas what thales is arguing is that

  • well even if that

  • is revealed to you

  • and so he is not particularly criticizing belief in gods here

  • even if that is the case we still ourselves

  • can determine it

  • so that we can tell what the shape of the earth is by by thinking about it by

  • looking carefully

  • now thales also thought that he had an answer to this idea

  • uh... the question was everything fundamentally unified some how

  • and though people debate about exactly what he meant by this

  • but he's famous for, or at least aristotle cites him as saying

  • that the fundamental principle of reality is water somehow

  • that the...that's taken to mean that the original state of the universe was water

  • or that things are somehow still composed of water so that

  • a piece of wood would be like

  • ice really really compactified

  • but the basic idea that thales had and that other pre socratic

  • Miletian

  • philosophers

  • these earliest philosophers had

  • was that there was some

  • fundamental stuff

  • which existed

  • sort of un formed and contained within it the essences of everything else and somehow

  • that stuff

  • was transformed into the many things

  • that we see around us

  • and that was a basic idea

  • that these guys had. That there was some basic fundamental stuff

  • out of which other things came and then they would debate about well,

  • what the fundamental stuff

  • uh... and they would give arguments so for instance some people would claim that, uh,

  • water is a better candidate than

  • uh... say for instance fire

  • because water uh... is frozen and turns into ice and can be in

  • uh... also

  • evaporated into

  • gas forms and so we can see already how it occupies different states

  • and then people would debate so that's just...

  • now to get into these debates, we'll touch on some of the pre socratic debates

  • in that section but just to give you a flavor

  • of the kinds of things that these guys were interested in and also

  • uh...

  • to try to show you that they weren't merely

  • saying that this was revealed to them

  • but we're trying to discover the fundamental nature of reality

  • on their own

  • okay and also

  • they give naturalistic answers

  • so whereas earlier

  • for instance an earthquake might have been thought of

  • as uh...

  • an expression of the wrath of god for not following some rule of theirs

  • thales argues

  • that these are not appropriate explanations

  • that the world around us is an orderly

  • system

  • which is constructed according to certain kinds of

  • rational principles

  • and that we as rational human beings can kind of try to figure out what those

  • rational principles are

  • for instance thales argued that what an earthquake was was on analogy to a

  • boat

  • in the water when the boat is floating and the wind blows the boat rocks back-and-forth

  • and someone on the boat would think of that as a quaking

  • and so an earthquake, thales hypothesized

  • must mean that the earth is floating on water

  • and rocking back-and-forth like a boat would

  • now of course we know that that's wrong

  • uh... we talk about

  • tectonic plates and pressures

  • um, causing earthquakes we don't talk about earth floating

  • on water in fact we don't think that islands technically

  • uh... float on water

  • so

  • uh... we know that thales is wrong in these instances but

  • notice the approach that he is taking

  • uh... is radically different

  • we can figure out what an earthquake is

  • and there's kind of evidence that it might be something like this given that there's a

  • similar phenomena

  • so thales is here thinking that we

  • ourselves

  • have the abilities

  • to figure out the way the world works and

  • uh... he's not necessarily criticizing religion

  • there can still be gods and there can still be divine revelation

  • uh... that can be one way of knowing

  • but thales is advocating another way of knowing

  • one that involves

  • use of human reason

  • so let's take a second to sum up the things that i've been talking about in

  • this first

  • part of the lecture

  • I've been trying to...

  • one theme I've been trying to emphasize

  • is that

  • philosophy isn't really distinguished

  • by the questions that it asks because

  • people've asked those questions all the time they've always ask them

  • really what makes uh...

  • so those questions are just common to human beings

  • what makes something philosophical is rather the approach one takes

  • to the questions themselves

  • rather than

  • the actual asking of the questions because i want to say that

  • Gilgamesh was asking the same question

  • about the meaning of life

  • and immortality that a philosopher might ask

  • but that he

  • his way of answering it is very different

  • whereas he wants to appeal the divine revelation

  • the philosopher says

  • that

  • we don't appeal to divine revelation

  • so the pre philosophical way of thinking

  • is really characterized by those

  • two claims there on the bullet points

  • the first is that

  • divine revelation is the only source of knowledge. Human beings

  • aren't capable of knowing

  • on their own

  • and secondly

  • that the physical world around us

  • is controlled by these supernatural personalities

  • and they can intervene at any point that they want to enforce their will

  • so it's up to to us to try to figure out

  • what they want

  • and uh...

  • make them favor us as opposed to disfavor us so that's what i'm calling the pre

  • philosophical way of thinking

  • thales and his

  • contemporaries

  • deny

  • both of these claims

  • so rather then divine revelation thales says reason

  • argument and observation are

  • sources of knowledge about the world

  • so now notice combined in there are things we would call science, things

  • that we would call philosophy

  • uh... and part of the history of this is the

  • gradual separation of things which we called science

  • and things which we call philosophy

  • but at this time they're all wrapped up into one and people don't really

  • recognize

  • a distinction

  • between philosophy and science

  • except for

  • that they're different kinds of philosophy so natural philosophy would have been

  • the philosophical study of the natural world as opposed to...uh,

  • so the way that physical objects move

  • would have been thought of as a branch of philosophy and indeed

  • newton

  • who...who writes his book on gravity etc...publishes it

  • under the title

  • 'the mathematical principles of natural philosophy' so newton call, referred to what

  • he was doing as natural philosophy

  • so we'll see a distinction get made eventually but doing it historically

  • these ideas are all wrapped up so reason argument and observation

  • are sources of knowledge

  • and that's a denial that revelation

  • is necessary for knowledge but again be careful

  • it's not a denial that revelation

  • can be a source of knowledge

  • so there is no conflict with religion

  • in the definition

  • of philosophy that we're talking about here

  • you can be a religious philosopher, you could be someone who thinks that reason and argument are sources of knowledge

  • and also someone who thinks that

  • God can reveal knowledge to us if

  • he, she, it so chooses

  • so there's no conflict between religion and philosophy

  • the only conflict here is between

  • views on which human beings are incapable of finding

  • answers to these questions on their own

  • and views on which they are capable of finding answers to these questions on their own.

  • Now of course

  • this doesn't mean that we'll like the answers that we find

  • we may find out the answers to be contrary to what we thought

  • hoped etc

  • but the idea is that by reason

  • observation and

  • careful reflection

  • we'll be able to discover the way things are and that was really what thales

  • and the other pre socratic philosophers

  • thought

  • distinguished them

  • from the other way of thinking about the world

  • where human beings are

  • supplicants always asking to be told but never

  • taking action

  • never figuring it out on their own

  • and what this amounts to for thales really is an emphasis on mathematics

  • and at this point in time in history of the universe

  • geometry in particular

  • so I want to stop for a second and say something about geometry because it

  • really is important for understanding

  • this whole period in

  • ancient philosophy

  • so it's hard for us modern contemporary people to think about geometry in the right way

  • geometry seems to us to be something you learn in 7th grade, some very basic, simple math

  • uh... something you memorize some formulas for squares and circles and area and

  • blah blah

  • and then later on you learn more interesting and important things like trigonometry

  • and

  • calculus

  • but of course

  • that's not the way the ancient

  • people thought about geometry

  • Geometry actually originated not in Greece

  • but in Egypt

  • for a very practical purpose

  • so if you think about the word 'geometry' you actually see its original purpose

  • encoded

  • so the words comes from 'geo metria'

  • 'geo' meaning Earth and 'metria' meaning measurement

  • and so 'geo metria' is literally the measurement of the earth

  • and the Egyptians needed this

  • very practical ability to measure areas on the ground

  • because of the flooding of the nile which was a regularly

  • scheduled event so to speak in Egypt

  • even to this day

  • so the ancient egyptians would set their calendar

  • by the flooding of the nile

  • they would say 'that's day one right there, when the nile floods, that new year's, that's month 1'

  • uh... so

  • but uh...this is a very reliably reoccurring

  • disastrous event

  • and of course if you own property

  • and you have a fence up

  • and the nile floods and your fence goes away then you

  • need a way to reestablish where the fence went

  • so you need a way to say how

  • wide five

  • hectares of land, five square hectares of land really is

  • you need a way to say

  • where that fence actually gets

  • reestablished

  • um, now thales gets the credit um for

  • introducing

  • geometry into greece

  • the story goes that he went to egypt, as was common

  • for greek men in their education to spend uh... the last year of it abroad

  • So thales goes to egypt and studies with egyptians

  • and sees them doing this, measuring the earth

  • and he brings geo metria back to greece

  • but instead of using it for this practical applied

  • purpose

  • thales becomes interested in proving theorems about geometry

  • he becomes interested shown for instance that

  • if you take two right triangles

  • who have a certain area and combine them you can always make them into a square

  • and the area of the square will have exactly the same area as the sum of both of the right right triangles

  • so, very basic facts about geometry...these are

  • things which are known by

  • reason

  • and this method

  • becomes something that the

  • ancient philosophers really become transfixed by and the history of philosophy is a

  • struggling with

  • whether this is really true or not

  • but its one of the very earliest ideas

  • uh... philosophical ideas that

  • people had

  • and that was that

  • there seems to be some things which can be known directly by reason

  • and that reason is a special sense in a way kind of like seeing

  • uh... but in a different way

  • it gives us access to the way things have to be the way things must be

  • and this becomes a very important theme

  • uh... at and it's all analogized to this idea that the in

  • geometry what do you is

  • you start of the set of axioms

  • which are indisputable

  • which are known directly by reason

  • and then you expand from those and prove

  • various other truths

  • about

  • reality

  • the way reality must be

  • which you didn't know before hand

  • so for instance

  • one of the axioms of geometry is the parallel postulate the idea that two

  • parallel lines will never meet

  • so if you look at these two lines of text on the bullet points here

  • those two lines are parallel to each other

  • and you don't need to walk the lines

  • and make sure they never cross you can kind of just tell by thinking about it

  • they'll never cross

  • the definition of a line on which all of geometry is founded in some sense

  • simply a line, a straight line

  • is the shortest distance between two points

  • you can't really prove that

  • there's no way that you can say

  • ah here's the argument for why that's the case it's just something that you

  • can kind of

  • see has to be true

  • but not see with your eyes

  • seeing with reason

  • this idea becomes extremely influential

  • that the way that

  • mathematics works is kind of a a guide

  • for how we'll discover the way reality works

  • by using reason to

  • reverse engineer

  • the principles

  • which govern

  • the way reality is that was in some sense,

  • i think a unifying theme

  • uh... all of ancient philosophy

  • and as will see, because we'll go through these periods of time in philosophy

  • we'll see this idea gets developed debated

  • refined and it's still a current theme of uh, uh

  • philosophers today

  • now of course

  • the other claim here is this commitment to the world being natural

  • and by natural what they mean is that it's explainable

  • assuming rational law like

  • relationships

  • you're not going to appeal to the

  • anger of Zeus to explain what lightning is

  • but rather you'll appeal to some natural phenomenon which generalizes

  • and gives a nice

  • universal explanation

  • for why things

  • work that way

  • so that's what i wanted to say, suggest really is at the heart of what philosophy is

  • philosophy is this commitment to the claim

  • that we're going to find out the way things are

  • that's how it begins that's how it sees itself

  • self-consciously

  • at its origin. It sees itself as a way of standing

  • against the idea

  • that human beings are incapable of achieving this kind of

  • knowledge

  • so let's turn now to our second way of thinking about

  • what philosophy is because remember that's the overarching goal of this first lecture

  • to give us a sense of what philosophy is what philosophers do

  • so the more traditional way of doing this is the start with the meaning of the

  • word 'philosophy'

  • there's an interesting history there

  • so this I think is probably well known and so we won't spend

  • overly

  • too much time on it but we will spend some time because its standard

  • and not everyone knows it perhaps.

  • so, the word 'philosophy' again come from greek and that's the interesting thing about

  • English is that

  • the more latin and greek you know the more english you know because

  • most of our

  • important words

  • uh... come from

  • those sources

  • so now as you probably know like I said

  • uh...the source of this word is

  • 'phila sophia'

  • 'phila' meaning love and 'sophia'

  • meaning wisdom so this is rather famous

  • now what may be is less famous is who

  • coins this term

  • it was actually originated by Pythagorus

  • and Pythagorus was alive in five seventy bce

  • uh... so now remember thales was alive in six twenty

  • so you might ask yourself well was that before or after pythagorus?

  • and of course the answer is that thales came

  • before pythagorus since six twenty is further away

  • from year one

  • than five seventy is uh... and we don't know a lot about the Pythagoreans although

  • they're very interesting and we will talk

  • briefly about

  • pythagorus and his followers when we talk about

  • pre socratic philosophy

  • more fully instead of just this introductory way

  • Pythagorus is more famous for his theorem A squared plus B squared equals C squared which is a

  • theorem of geometry

  • and it describes the behavior of a right triangle and the relationships of its sides to each other

  • so that's basic

  • uh... geometry but pythagorus suggested that

  • we should be called philosophers

  • as a way to distinguish

  • what they were interested in from

  • another group

  • of people

  • which they called the 'sophists'

  • this really is uh... the way that socrates

  • and plato saw the line up

  • so the sophists

  • were a loose group of philosophers

  • uh... who were united

  • by a couple of themes

  • and these are the themes here

  • excuse me, these are the themes here. So 'sophist' of course means 'wise people'

  • from sofia there

  • and in english we still use this word so that's where we say 'sophisticated' means sort of

  • wise/intelligent

  • but also as sophisticated has a kind of negative connotation if you

  • in certain uses something can be too sophisticated

  • and that's retaining some of this older

  • use of the world; 'sophistry'

  • so sophists were often skeptics

  • a skeptic is someone who thinks

  • that we can't know what the truth is

  • uh... or more radically someone who thinks there is no such thing as the truth

  • and so they would often argue that look you know whatever you think it's true

  • that's just true for you

  • and there's no such thing as The Truth of the matter, or anything like that

  • uh... so famously uh...

  • a sophist named

  • Protagerous

  • proclaimed

  • that man was the measure of all things

  • people took that to mean that look, whatever you think is true, is true (for you)

  • philosophy in this sense of the word was opposed

  • to that kind of view

  • philosophy stood for

  • the search for

  • the truth

  • wisdom being kind of the idea that

  • we are looking for the truth here

  • so a philosopher was someone who wanted to know

  • the way

  • things really were they had a...uh,

  • they didn't know

  • so it wasn't as though they

  • actually had that knowledge

  • but they wanted to know

  • uh... and so they saw themselves more in line

  • with the early Miletians namely

  • in the sense of thinking there is a truth and that

  • we're able to discover it

  • we haven't discovered it yet but we want to discover it

  • we're sort of

  • wounded

  • and that's where the word 'wonder' has its roots from this kind of wounding

  • by these intellectual questions

  • you just are burnt up with

  • curiosity over whether there is a fundamental stuff out of which everything else is made or

  • what the real nature of reality is

  • uh... uh... is movement possible these kinds of questions eat you up at night

  • uh...so that's the idea of the philosopher as the seeker of truth as opposed

  • to the sophists

  • who don't really care about the truth

  • and instead are interested in

  • power

  • and rhetoric

  • where rhetoric is simply the idea that you convince the other person that you are right

  • and so we'll see some of this get played out when we look at socrates

  • and the Platonic dialogues

  • where socrates talks to a famous

  • sophist whose name is Thrasymacus

  • and we'll see this idea that

  • well he'll only talk if he's paid he doesn't really love it he's just doing it for

  • the money

  • and he's only interested in power

  • uh... who's controlling other people as opposed to

  • the philosopher

  • who's really interested in the truth, is a seeker of knowledge and of wisdom

  • so now

  • this adds to

  • the previous way of thinking so it's still a way of saying well look

  • we can figure out what's going on but it adds a deeper dimension

  • of commitment

  • to finding out the way things really are

  • and merely convincing other people that you're right

  • okay so finally now coming to our third and final part of the lecture

  • we can talk about the various traditional branches of philosophy

  • and the

  • questions that philosophers deal with or some of them anyway

  • the first branch of philosophy

  • perhaps the most fundamental although we can debate about that

  • often thought to be the most fundamental is the branch known as metaphysics

  • which is defined as the study of the ultimate nature of

  • reality

  • now where the word 'metaphysics' comes from uh... it just comes from the name

  • of the book aristotle wrote on this so there's no real special meaning attached

  • to

  • uh... metaphysics

  • uh... aristotle wrote a book on physics where he talked about how objects move

  • and then he wrote a second book on what it meant to be an object at all and on what kinds

  • of objects could exist and so on

  • and that simply became known as the book after the physics

  • 'after the physics' you say in greek 'ta meta ta physica' after, meta, physics

  • so it became shortened

  • through history

  • simply referred to as metaphysics and that's where the word comes from

  • often students are disappointed that there is no special hidden meaning to the term 'metaphysics'

  • but even so you can see that that

  • that it's an appropriate title because meta means something that comes before uh...

  • in physics uh... the study of physical world so often metaphysicians think that

  • what they're interested in comes prior

  • or is at a somehow higher level of abstraction

  • than what physicists

  • are interested in physicists are interested in describing the actual laws

  • of nature

  • and metaphysics are interested in describing the

  • way things could be the way things have to be the way

  • they must be

  • so what kind of questions then do the discuss

  • well we've already looked at one of the basic questions in metaphysics

  • excuse me

  • which is

  • whether

  • there are fundamental parts out of which everything else is made

  • or

  • whether as the famous story goes

  • it's turtles all the way down

  • Now if you don't know this story let me just tell you really quickly

  • uh... it used to be wondered what the earth rested on

  • and of course uh... atlas

  • was thought to hold the earth on his shoulders in greek mythology

  • and when people asked 'well, what does atlas stand on?'

  • and then someone says he stands on a giant turtle

  • and then someone says, well what does that turtle stand on?

  • and then someone says,

  • that turtle stands on another turtle

  • and someone says, well what does that turtle stand one?

  • and the teacher replied,

  • 'son it's turtles all the way down'

  • so it's a turtle on a turtle on a turtle

  • and so that's a joke of course but you can see what the point is supposed to be

  • is there an infinite series of smaller parts and smaller parts and smaller parts

  • and smaller parts?

  • or is there some fundamental level

  • at which parts stop?

  • and there is a basic set perhaps of things

  • out of which

  • uh... other things are constructed

  • that's a basic question in metaphysics and and there are various answers to it

  • uh...

  • uh... it was thought for long time that there was a basic stopping point which was known as the atom

  • and the greeks

  • came up with that word. In greek atom means 'a tomos' or unsplittable

  • a basic element which couldn't get any smaller. We'll look at some early greek versions

  • of atomism

  • uh...but

  • modern physics suggests that the atom has parts

  • quarks, electrons, protons. Those things have parts

  • quarks

  • some suggest that those are composed of strings

  • so it's a open question right now still unresolved whether there is a smallest

  • part or whether it's turtles all the way down

  • so we'll look at some of the

  • historical

  • positions on this which are very interesting

  • so a related question is one about whether reality is completely physical or

  • whether there are non physical elements to reality

  • this a very deep and vexing question which has a long history so uh all kinds

  • of things have been thought at one point

  • were candidates for being non physical these range from

  • everyday objects like numbers

  • one two three five seven 100

  • some philosophers have argued those are non physical objects

  • things like god

  • being perfect unchangeable

  • existing at all times

  • uh... some have argued that um...

  • uh... moral facts that it's wrong to kill innocent

  • people

  • for no reason is

  • a non physical fact about reality which can't be captured by any physical

  • thing out there

  • and um...

  • uh...these transcend from simple things like ghosts and ectoplasm

  • all the way to the

  • perfect

  • divine unity so that there are of course excuse me I almost forgot

  • another main

  • candidate for being non physical is the human mind or whatever makes humans

  • human

  • so we'll look at

  • various proposed

  • metaphysical schemes where

  • things are physical or not physical

  • uh...

  • very deep and perplexing questions here

  • now of course another deep and perplexing question

  • which we'll look at is what the nature of causation how does

  • one thing cause another. It seems to be commonplace in our ordinary experience

  • we know that changes are brought about through cause and effect and so the concept

  • of change the concept of cause and effects what they are in the world

  • is going to be something that philosophers are very concerned about metaphysicians

  • another very large branch of metaphysics

  • is uh... questions about whether the will is free whether uh... my actions are

  • determined

  • uh... by laws of physics for instance or by god's foreknowledge are the traditional

  • ways of putting it

  • now in this class we won't be focusing too much on these issues

  • although they are central and deserve to be focused on

  • i usually focus on them in my ethics class

  • where issues of freedom and moral responsibility arise and

  • in my philosophy of religion class where issues of freedom and the problem of

  • evil and god's foreknowledge come up

  • so uh... although and there's just not enough time to cover everything so free

  • will gets sort of

  • left on the side in this class

  • although uh...

  • i've always felt guilty about that and maybe now in this new online format

  • might include some

  • lectures on it

  • but uh...

  • because i have them from the other courses so I'm not sure

  • but i'd be interested to hear what people thought about that

  • so then concluding this is um question about what exists

  • what does it mean to exist?

  • uh...

  • Do numbers exist? If so how, what does it mean to say that something exists

  • physically or something exists non physically what's the difference there?

  • so when you're talking about these kinds of questions which focus narrowly on

  • existence

  • people have uh... often referred to it under the term 'ontology'

  • and 'ontology'

  • comes from

  • the greek word 'ontos' meaning being

  • and 'ology' meaning

  • study of

  • so ontology is the study of being or what it means to have being

  • and uh... these kinds of questions are inherently metaphysical

  • although sometimes you will use ontology you will hear the word 'ontology' being

  • used to talk about

  • what a particular person thinks is real

  • so in your ontology you might include things like numbers ghosts god

  • persons tables chairs dogs cats electrons quarks

  • you might exclude things like numbers gods cats etc

  • so

  • debates about ontology are debates about what has existence what does it mean to

  • have existence

  • and we'll see some of these ancient people were very interested in this question

  • but it's also one that we still are dealing with

  • in are contemporary times

  • okay so on the flip side of that so on the one hand we have questions about the

  • nature of reality what is really real if that makes any sense and how is that

  • reality

  • on the other hand we have questions about how we come into contact with that

  • reality how we know about

  • so the greek word for one kind of knowledge is 'episteme'

  • therefore epistemology is the study of

  • knowledge

  • now there are various questions epistemologists addressed one of the

  • more fundamental questions is

  • what is truth what does it mean for a sentence to be true

  • the traditional answer the one which seems commonsensical that somehow

  • our language describes reality and sentences are true when it describes it

  • correctly

  • leads to all sorts of interesting results

  • in metaphysics namely

  • that there must be something out there correctly described

  • by the things

  • that we say and talk about

  • and as you'll see this is what starts a lot of trouble

  • uh...

  • maybe therefore it even leads us to believe that numbers have to exist

  • or even possibly that all things have to exist because we can talk about

  • things

  • which don't seemingly exist

  • so there all sorts of questions about

  • uh... the relationship between things we say and think and the way the world is and

  • those

  • are epistemological questions

  • so now of course the big question in epistemology is what knowledge it is

  • what does it mean to know something?

  • and we'll look at various accounts of what that means uh... plato theory

  • of knowledge which is

  • fairly well developed

  • and this is still in the area of contemporary debate

  • so now of course

  • we want to know what the difference from

  • is between belief and knowledge so one thing the you can say is what seems like

  • you can believe things that are false

  • but it doesn't seem like you can know something that is false

  • well, so these are different states then

  • what's the relationship?

  • uh... traditionally people have thought knowledges belief plus something else

  • and have wondered what that something else is

  • more contemporary issues

  • take a knowledge...

  • knowledge first view and say well knowledge is

  • we know we know things

  • and then belief must be

  • somehow less than knowledge and then they look for what's missing so there

  • are various views about what this relationship is and we're not going to

  • really

  • talk about them in the class but for people who are interested later these are going to be

  • be very

  • important questions

  • and of course as i just said we want to know how

  • this thing is related to truth

  • merely having a true belief doesn't mean you know it

  • for instance

  • it could be

  • that you have a belief that's true but it's accidentally true a famous case of

  • something like this would be

  • for instance maybe looking at a clock which is broken

  • it's on the wall it's says four o'clock

  • as it happens it turns out it really is four o'clock when you look at the clock

  • so you form a belief that it's four o'clock

  • it's true that it's four o'clock

  • you have some reason to believe that it's four o'clock o'clock the clock has been

  • reliable in the past

  • but it doesn't seem like you really know it and then people debate

  • this issue. Do you know it?

  • do you not know it? if so why not

  • so there are interesting questions about what the

  • general concept of knowledge is

  • now here's one that the history of philosophy

  • uh...

  • has struggled with

  • and one that we'll be looking at a lot in this class

  • assuming we do know things

  • where do we get it?

  • and as we've seen already the early philosophers had this mixed

  • idea

  • that there are some things which are knowable by reason

  • like that parallel lines don't cross and that the shortest distance between two

  • points is a straight line

  • and then there are other things which you know by the senses

  • like that the shape of the

  • shadow of the earth is spherical

  • or gives us reason to believe that the earth is spherical etc

  • so

  • uh... there's a uh... large dispute about what the real sources of knowledge

  • are

  • and we'll see

  • um... that uh... one popular interpretation of the history of philosophy

  • this actually was made

  • popular by kant who looked

  • back at the history of philosophy and said look here's what you see and lots of people have agreed

  • with him

  • is namely

  • a struggle between what are known as rationalists who think that knowledge come

  • from reason

  • and is all based on mathematics and logic and stuff like that

  • and those were called empiricists

  • who believe that science and empirical observation are the real sources of

  • knowledge

  • so there is a way of looking at the history of philosophy where these views

  • are fighting

  • and the earliest view as you might have guessed is a kind of rationalist

  • view

  • where the senses are downplayed

  • and science comes in later as a challenge to this kind of view and so

  • that's one way of looking at the history of philosophy

  • and we'll roughly approach things that way although I'll point along the way

  • where people disagree

  • here's another question about epistemology how you know that you know

  • something when you in fact do know it so for instance rationalists like to

  • think that there's a way of

  • telling that you know something

  • it it there's a certain kind of experience

  • uh... a rational

  • kind of

  • compelling

  • a forcing, a feeling of forced to believe something

  • when reason tells you it has to be that way

  • like for instance

  • when you think about the parallel postulate that

  • parallel lines cannot meet

  • you know that that's gotta be true you know that you know it you have knowledge that

  • that's true and you know it because it

  • feels special in a sense

  • now of course there's been a debate about that

  • and we'll look at the various counter examples in fact it turns out maybe

  • the parallel postulate is itself

  • one of these counter examples although people have responded that it can be

  • interpreted in a way that's consistent so we'll look at those kind of questions

  • now of course is another big question uh... what about the skeptic? is a

  • possible know anything at all?

  • the skeptic says look you don't know

  • that the laws of nature are necessary and universal you don't know that the

  • physical world exists you don't know

  • that the world wasn't created five minutes ago and that all your memories

  • aren't false

  • so there's a real serious challenge here

  • uh... how do we

  • how can we be sure that what we have is really knowledge

  • uh... as opposed to something else and we'll look at that there are some

  • serious arguments for skepticism

  • we'll look at the way that people tried to deal with those arguments

  • okay now

  • metaphysics and epistemology are clearly related to each other as

  • two sides of a coin are

  • so

  • as soon as you say what's real you're telling me that you know what's real

  • so you're already talking about

  • you must have some way to know that

  • the things your talking about are that way

  • now of course as soon as you start talking abut what knowledge is

  • you talk about which things can be known and so which things are real

  • and so

  • the two are

  • intimate related... intimately related

  • and we cross back and forth from talking about epistemology to talking about

  • metaphysics

  • but it's extremely important to keep them clear

  • no matter how related they are they are different

  • types of questions one

  • a question about what is real, what is out there

  • the other a question of what we know

  • a question about us

  • and we'll see a gradually a separating at these

  • uh... as we move through this stuff

  • now uh...

  • apart from these two major branches we can also see the branch of uh...

  • the branch of philosophy known as ethics

  • ethics can be

  • informally defined as the study of right and wrong or good and bad

  • where what do we mean right

  • actions good persons

  • which things should we not do which things should we do

  • it's in general the study of which things have value

  • what is the nature of value that's a question

  • uh... which uh... ethicists wanna know what does it mean, are there

  • objective values that are things which all persons have to value?

  • or there're really only relative values?

  • so

  • now if you think about sort of value theory in this broad sense that's going

  • to include the branches of philosophy traditionally known as aesthetics and

  • political philosophy

  • so aesthetics is the

  • study of the beautiful

  • what's the nature of art?

  • uh... but really it's a question about what's valuable

  • uh... whether art is valuable what's

  • the the relation of beauty to value

  • and of course

  • political philosophy questions about what the best form of government is

  • these are all value judgments and there's relationships between these three

  • although ethics

  • aesthetics, the study of art and beauty and political philosophy

  • uh... are separate they can all be branched under one

  • major category known as the study of values

  • so now ethics more traditionally construed as the subject of the study of

  • right and wrong, good and bad, um, what we're interested in there what actions are

  • moral

  • is abortion immoral?

  • uh... is abortion moral? or is suicide immoral? is suicide moral? lying? etc

  • now of course the big question in ethics is the skeptical one the

  • one about whether we can know the moral truths or whether there are any such

  • things as moral truths in the first place

  • the relativist thinks there's no such thing as real truth its relative to you or this

  • or the other thing

  • whereas relativism about mathematics has never been very popular

  • relativism about ethics

  • remains extremely popular and so there's a serious question

  • about whether it's true or not uh... and uh... a large part of an ethics class is

  • is spent

  • dealing with the arguments for and against

  • relativism

  • now another question which it falls under this category but which is not so much

  • addressed by contemporary persons as it used to be by ancient persons

  • this is the question of what kind of life one should live

  • is it better to live a life of seeking money or of seeking intellect?

  • or seeking pleasure?

  • and there are various answers to that question in history of philosophy

  • we're not going to be talking too much about ethical questions

  • although we will talk about

  • uh... briefly

  • some of the issues

  • because socrates was interested in them you can talk about socrates without

  • bringing these questions out

  • okay

  • but this is primarily a class on metaphysics epistemology

  • and primarily the history of that

  • uh...and the way it interacts with what we think currently

  • okay so finally then the last branch bringing this all to a close the study of

  • logic

  • which can be defined as the art of good and bad reasoning

  • or of good and bad

  • arguments

  • and so notice that this is extremely important because um... earlier i was

  • talking about philosophy as

  • the use of reason and argument

  • to discover what is true or what can be known

  • if that's the case logic is extremely important because it's our science of

  • determining which arguments are good and which reasoning is bad

  • and so it occupies a very central place

  • and we will touch on some logic in fact I'll give a brief introduction to

  • syllogistic logic, the logic of aristotle

  • and extend it sort of

  • to truth-functional logic, contemporary logic, just briefly enough

  • to uh... hopefully interest one in taking a logic class uh... because logic is

  • something

  • that improves

  • one's ability to reason

  • and uh...

  • even though it's related to mathematics in a certain sense

  • it's more fundamental perhaps than mathematics

  • and hopefully

  • uh... mathematical truths are expressible in terms of logical truths or at

  • least

  • that was the hope of one group of philosophers and maybe by the end of the

  • class

  • uh... we'll be position say something about that

  • uh... although i'm not sure

  • so that concludes

hello and welcome to this online section of introduction to philosophy

Subtitles and vocabulary

Click the word to look it up Click the word to find further inforamtion about it