Placeholder Image

Subtitles section Play video

  • >> Sandra: BRAND-NEW REACTION

  • >> Sandra: BRAND-NEW REACTION THIS MORNING FROM A BOMBSHELL

  • THIS MORNING FROM A BOMBSHELL NEW "NEW YORK TIMES" REPORT ON

  • NEW "NEW YORK TIMES" REPORT ON BUT DON'T ACT ON BOLTON'S

  • BUT DON'T ACT ON BOLTON'S UPCOMING BOOK.

  • UPCOMING BOOK. THE NEWSPAPER REPORTING THE

  • THE NEWSPAPER REPORTING THE PRESIDENT TOLD HIS FORMER

  • PRESIDENT TOLD HIS FORMER NATIONAL SECURITY ADVISOR BUT

  • NATIONAL SECURITY ADVISOR BUT MILITARY AID TO UKRAINE WAS TIED

  • MILITARY AID TO UKRAINE WAS TIED TO AN INVESTIGATION OF THE

  • TO AN INVESTIGATION OF THE BIDENS.

  • BIDENS. LET'S BRING IN DOUG COLLINS, A

  • LET'S BRING IN DOUG COLLINS, A TRUMPET IMPEACHMENT TEAM MEMBER.

  • TRUMPET IMPEACHMENT TEAM MEMBER. GOOD MORNING TO YOU, THANK YOU

  • GOOD MORNING TO YOU, THANK YOU FOR BEING HERE.

  • FOR BEING HERE. >> GOOD MORNING.

  • >> GOOD MORNING. >> Sandra: I WILL ASK YOU THE

  • >> Sandra: I WILL ASK YOU THE SAME QUESTION I JUST USED AT

  • SAME QUESTION I JUST USED AT SOL WISENBERG AT THE TOP OF THE

  • SOL WISENBERG AT THE TOP OF THE HOUR.

  • HOUR. HOW DOES THIS CHANGE THINGS?

  • HOW DOES THIS CHANGE THINGS? >> IT DOESN'T CHANGE ANYTHING.

  • >> IT DOESN'T CHANGE ANYTHING. THE ISSUE HERE IS, HOW DO WE GO

  • THE ISSUE HERE IS, HOW DO WE GO ABOUT THIS PROCESS?

  • ABOUT THIS PROCESS? TAKING AFFECT THE DEMOCRATS

  • TAKING AFFECT THE DEMOCRATS PRESENTED IN THE SENATE.

  • PRESENTED IN THE SENATE. DO THEY MAKE THEIR CASE OR DID

  • DO THEY MAKE THEIR CASE OR DID THEY NOT MAKE?

  • THEY NOT MAKE? IT'S AMAZING TO ME, AGAIN, WE

  • IT'S AMAZING TO ME, AGAIN, WE ARE HAVING SELECTIVE LEAKS AT

  • ARE HAVING SELECTIVE LEAKS AT THIS POINT IN TIME.

  • THIS POINT IN TIME. IT SHOULD BE INTERESTING TO

  • IT SHOULD BE INTERESTING TO ANYONE HOW THIS HAPPEN.

  • ANYONE HOW THIS HAPPEN. REMEMBER, RIGHT BEFORE THE

  • REMEMBER, RIGHT BEFORE THE ARTICLES WERE VOTED IN THE

  • ARTICLES WERE VOTED IN THE HOUSE, WE HAD THE DEMOCRATIC

  • HOUSE, WE HAD THE DEMOCRATIC COLLEAGUES IN THE HOUSE ACTUALLY

  • COLLEAGUES IN THE HOUSE ACTUALLY TALK ABOUT THE LEV PARNAS ISSUE.

  • TALK ABOUT THE LEV PARNAS ISSUE. IT'S ALWAYS COMING UP AT A

  • IT'S ALWAYS COMING UP AT A MOMENT IN WHICH THE CASE OF THE

  • MOMENT IN WHICH THE CASE OF THE WEEK IS PRETTY AS THE BOTTOM

  • WEEK IS PRETTY AS THE BOTTOM LINE, NOTHING IN WHAT WE'VE SEEN

  • LINE, NOTHING IN WHAT WE'VE SEEN SO FAR, AND IT SIMPLY LEAKED

  • SO FAR, AND IT SIMPLY LEAKED PARTS OF THE TRANSCRIPT, HAS

  • PARTS OF THE TRANSCRIPT, HAS CHANGE THE BASE AND FACTS OF

  • CHANGE THE BASE AND FACTS OF WHAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT.

  • WHAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT. THERE WAS NO CONDITIONALITY,

  • THERE WAS NO CONDITIONALITY, THEY GOT THE AID.

  • THEY GOT THE AID. THE DISCUSSIONS INTERNALLY ON

  • THE DISCUSSIONS INTERNALLY ON HOW THAT WENT ABOUT DOESN'T

  • HOW THAT WENT ABOUT DOESN'T CHANGE ANYTHING EXCEPT IT GOES

  • CHANGE ANYTHING EXCEPT IT GOES BACK TO SHOW THAT IF HE IS SUCH

  • BACK TO SHOW THAT IF HE IS SUCH A RELEVANT WITNESS NOW, WHY WAS

  • A RELEVANT WITNESS NOW, WHY WAS HE NOT SUCH A RELEVANT WITNESS

  • HE NOT SUCH A RELEVANT WITNESS FOR THE HOUSE, AND WHY DID

  • FOR THE HOUSE, AND WHY DID ADAM SCHIFF HAVE TO PLEAD TO THE

  • ADAM SCHIFF HAVE TO PLEAD TO THE SENATE TO CALL PEOPLE NOW?

  • SENATE TO CALL PEOPLE NOW? BECAUSE HE'S SCARED OF THEM

  • BECAUSE HE'S SCARED OF THEM GOING TO COURT?

  • GOING TO COURT? THIS IS WHY THIS PROCESS --

  • THIS IS WHY THIS PROCESS -- >> Melissa: THEY CLAIM THERE

  • >> Melissa: THEY CLAIM THERE HAS BEEN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

  • HAS BEEN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REVEALED SINCE THAT TIME

  • I WILL ASK YOU NOW BASED ON THE

  • I WILL ASK YOU NOW BASED ON THE GROWING CALLS FOR MEMBERS OF

  • GROWING CALLS FOR MEMBERS OF YOUR OWN PARTY IN THE SENATE TO

  • YOUR OWN PARTY IN THE SENATE TO HEAR FROM ADDITIONAL WITNESSES

  • HEAR FROM ADDITIONAL WITNESSES AND JOHN BOLTON.

  • AND JOHN BOLTON. MITT ROMNEY, IT'S VERY LIKELY I

  • MITT ROMNEY, IT'S VERY LIKELY I WILL BE IN FAVOR WITNESSES.

  • WILL BE IN FAVOR WITNESSES. DOUG JONES, "THE SENATE NEEDS TO

  • DOUG JONES, "THE SENATE NEEDS TO HEAR FROM JOHN BOLTON."

  • HEAR FROM JOHN BOLTON." WE KNOW LISA MURKOWSKI,

  • WE KNOW LISA MURKOWSKI, SUSAN COLLINS, AND OTHERS HAVE

  • SUSAN COLLINS, AND OTHERS HAVE SAID THEY ARE OPEN TO WITNESSES.

  • SAID THEY ARE OPEN TO WITNESSES. SO DO YOU SEE SOME OF THOSE MORE

  • SO DO YOU SEE SOME OF THOSE MORE MODERATE MEMBERS OF YOUR PARTY

  • MODERATE MEMBERS OF YOUR PARTY LEANING TOWARD WITNESSES?

  • LEANING TOWARD WITNESSES? >> I THINK YOU SEE MITT ROMNEY

  • >> I THINK YOU SEE MITT ROMNEY LEANING TOWARD IT, AND

  • LEANING TOWARD IT, AND DOUG JONES' DEMOCRAT.

  • DOUG JONES' DEMOCRAT. SO HE WOULDN'T SURPRISE ME.

  • SO HE WOULDN'T SURPRISE ME. IT'LL BE INTERESTING TO SEE HOW

  • IT'LL BE INTERESTING TO SEE HOW DOUG JONES VOTES ON REMOVING

  • DOUG JONES VOTES ON REMOVING THIS PRESIDENT, AND TELLING THAT

  • THIS PRESIDENT, AND TELLING THAT TO THE VOTERS OF ALABAMA.

  • TO THE VOTERS OF ALABAMA. LOOKING AT THIS GOING FORWARD,

  • LOOKING AT THIS GOING FORWARD, THE QUESTION BECOMES THIS.

  • THE QUESTION BECOMES THIS. AS A NEW INFORMATION?

  • AS A NEW INFORMATION? NOT REALLY.

  • NOT REALLY. ADAM SCHIFF COULD HAVE

  • ADAM SCHIFF COULD HAVE SUBPOENAED JOHN BOLTON, WENT

  • SUBPOENAED JOHN BOLTON, WENT THROUGH THIS PROCESS IN THE

  • THROUGH THIS PROCESS IN THE HOUSE.

  • HOUSE. HE CHOSE NOT TO.

  • HE CHOSE NOT TO. LET'S REMEMBER THAT THIS IS

  • LET'S REMEMBER THAT THIS IS BECAUSE THE CALENDAR AND CLOCK

  • BECAUSE THE CALENDAR AND CLOCK WERE AGAINST THEM.

  • WERE AGAINST THEM. THE CALENDAR AND CLOCK WANTED TO

  • THE CALENDAR AND CLOCK WANTED TO DO THIS BEFORE THE END OF THE

  • DO THIS BEFORE THE END OF THE YEAR.

  • YEAR. THEY HAD NO DESIRE AND

  • THEY HAD NO DESIRE AND ADAM SCHIFF ADMITTED ON THE

  • ADAM SCHIFF ADMITTED ON THE FLOOR OF THE SENATE, "WE

  • FLOOR OF THE SENATE, "WE COULD'VE DONE THAT BUT WE

  • COULD'VE DONE THAT BUT WE WOULD'VE HAD TO GO TO COURT."

  • WOULD'VE HAD TO GO TO COURT." THAT'S AMAZING COMING FROM A

  • THAT'S AMAZING COMING FROM A LAWYER NOT WANTED TO FOLLOW THE

  • LAWYER NOT WANTED TO FOLLOW THE PROCESSES ALREADY HAVING BEEN

  • PROCESSES ALREADY HAVING BEEN SET.

  • SET. THERE'S A LOT OF HEADLINES TODAY

  • THERE'S A LOT OF HEADLINES TODAY BUT AT THE END OF THE DAY IT

  • BUT AT THE END OF THE DAY IT DOESN'T CHANGE THE FACTUAL

  • DOESN'T CHANGE THE FACTUAL PATTERN AND I'M NOT SURE HOW

  • PATTERN AND I'M NOT SURE HOW MUCH IT ACTUALLY CHANGES WITH

  • MUCH IT ACTUALLY CHANGES WITH THIS GROWING CONCERN.

  • THIS GROWING CONCERN. I'VE HEARD ONE PERSON,

  • I'VE HEARD ONE PERSON, MITT ROMNEY.

  • MITT ROMNEY. THE OTHERS HAVE ALWAYS SAID, "WE

  • THE OTHERS HAVE ALWAYS SAID, "WE WILL SEE HOW THE CASE GOES

  • WILL SEE HOW THE CASE GOES FORWARD."

  • FORWARD." >> Sandra: IN THE CASE OF

  • >> Sandra: IN THE CASE OF SUSAN COLLINS, LISA MURKOWSKI,

  • SUSAN COLLINS, LISA MURKOWSKI, AND OTHERS, THEY HAVE SAID THEY

  • AND OTHERS, THEY HAVE SAID THEY WILL LISTEN THROUGHOUT THE TRIAL

  • WILL LISTEN THROUGHOUT THE TRIAL AND THEY ARE OPEN TO

  • WITNESSES FOR REPUBLICANS

  • WOULD BE NEEDED, OF COURSE, TO

  • WOULD BE NEEDED, OF COURSE, TO JOIN DEMOCRATS IN THE

  • JOIN DEMOCRATS IN THE witnesses for Republicans

  • witnesses for Republicans SKULL FOR

  • SKULL FOR would be needed, of course, to

  • would be needed, of course, to WITNESSES.

  • WITNESSES. join Democrats in the

  • join Democrats in the "THE NEW YORK TIMES" THIS

  • "THE NEW YORK TIMES" THIS MORNING SAYS JOHN ROBERTS CAN

  • CALL WITNESSES.

  • CALL WITNESSES. WILLIE?

  • WILLIE? IF THIS WERE TO EVENTUALLY

  • IF THIS WERE TO EVENTUALLY HAPPEN, AND WE DID GO DOWN THE

  • HAPPEN, AND WE DID GO DOWN THE PATH OF WITNESSES, JOHN ROBERTS

  • PATH OF WITNESSES, JOHN ROBERTS WHO COME INTO PLAY OF THE

  • WHO COME INTO PLAY OF THE PRESIDENT NEEDED EXECUTIVE

  • PRESIDENT NEEDED EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE.

  • PRIVILEGE. AT WHAT YOU SEE POTENTIAL

  • AT WHAT YOU SEE POTENTIAL HAPPENING THERE, CONGRESSMAN?

  • HAPPENING THERE, CONGRESSMAN? >> WHAT WE DISCUSSED ABOUT YOUR

  • >> WHAT WE DISCUSSED ABOUT YOUR PREVIOUS GUESTS, ONCE THIS GOES

  • PREVIOUS GUESTS, ONCE THIS GOES FOR THERE HAS TO BE AREAS IN THE

  • FOR THERE HAS TO BE AREAS IN THE WHITE HOUSE, ESPECIALLY THE ONES

  • WHITE HOUSE, ESPECIALLY THE ONES CLOSEST TO THE PRESIDENT, DOING

  • CLOSEST TO THE PRESIDENT, DOING WHATEVER OUR PRESIDENT HAS DONE.

  • WHATEVER OUR PRESIDENT HAS DONE. THAT'S THE FIGHT FOR THE

  • THAT'S THE FIGHT FOR THE INTEGRITY.

  • INTEGRITY. for Republicans

  • THEY HAVE AN INHERENT RIGHT TO

  • THEY HAVE AN INHERENT RIGHT TO KEEP THOSE CONVERSATIONS WITHIN

  • KEEP THOSE CONVERSATIONS WITHIN THEMSELVES.

  • THEMSELVES. REMEMBER, JOHN DEAN WAS A

  • REMEMBER, JOHN DEAN WAS A WITNESS IN OUR JUDICIARY

  • WITNESS IN OUR JUDICIARY COMMITTEE SEVERAL MONTHS AGO

  • COMMITTEE SEVERAL MONTHS AGO WHEN WE WERE DISCUSSING MUELLER

  • WHEN WE WERE DISCUSSING MUELLER AND THE ROLE OF THOSE COMING

  • AND THE ROLE OF THOSE COMING FORWARD AND TESTIFYING ABOUT

  • FORWARD AND TESTIFYING ABOUT CONVERSATIONS OF THE PRESIDENT.

  • CONVERSATIONS OF THE PRESIDENT. JOHN DEAN HAD AN INTERESTING

  • JOHN DEAN HAD AN INTERESTING COMMENT.

  • COMMENT. HE SAID, "WE NEED TO BE CAREFUL