Placeholder Image

Subtitles section Play video

  • -In California, the legal standard for the insanity

  • defense is what we call the M'Naghten test.

  • The M'Naghten test says that somebody was insane at the

  • time of the crime if he did not understand the nature of

  • his actions, and he could not tell the difference between

  • right and wrong.

  • Now this is a very difficult legal standard to meet

  • because, for example, if the person fled the scene of the

  • crime, tried to cover his tracks, took evasive action.

  • All of that would be considered evidence that he

  • understood the difference between right and wrong or

  • knew what he was doing was wrong.

  • But logistically, in an insanity defense case, the way

  • it works is we would enter a dual plea, a plea of not

  • guilty and a second plea of not guilty

  • by reason of insanity.

  • And if the case went to trial, the jury would first have to

  • determine whether the client was guilty of the crime,

  • whether he actually committed the crime.

  • If the jury finds that he didn't commit the crime, then

  • the case is dismissed from there.

  • But if the jury finds he did commit the crime, that he was

  • guilty, then the case moves on to what we

  • call a sanity hearing.

  • And the court has to determine whether the person was sane or

  • insane at the time the crime.

  • If the court determines that he was insane, if that defense

  • is successful, then instead of going to prison, the person

  • would be committed to a mental facility until such time as he

  • regained his sanity.

  • Now the other way this can work is sometimes we would

  • simply enter one plea of not guilty by reason of insanity.

  • And that might be in a situation where it was totally

  • clear and obvious that the person committed the crime but

  • clearly had mental defects.

  • And if we enter one plea of not guilty by reason of

  • insanity, that means we're essentially conceding that he

  • committed the crime, but we're saying he was insane.

  • And therefore, he shouldn't be found guilty because of his

  • mental state.

  • And again, that would be something for

  • the court to determine.

  • And if the court found he was insane, then he would go to a

  • mental institution instead of prison.

  • Now, one question people ask is, if a person is found

  • legally insane or found not guilty by reason of insanity,

  • and they're committed to an institution, will

  • they ever get out?

  • And the answer is that, first of all, if they serve the

  • maximum sentence.

  • So let's say the crime is only assault with a deadly weapon,

  • and it has a four year maximum sentence.

  • Then after four years of being held in the institution, most

  • likely they would be released because they've served the

  • maximum sentence.

  • But in murder cases or situations where it's a very

  • long potential sentence or life, a life sentence in some

  • cases, then ultimately it would be for the doctors and

  • for a judge to determine if the person

  • had regained sanity.

  • But rarely in very serious cases does a person ever get

  • released from the institution.

  • I'm former prosecutor, now criminal defense

  • attorney Neil Shouse.

  • If you have a loved one who is accused of a crime but has

  • mental health issues and the insanity defense may be

  • applicable, we invite you to contact us here

  • at Shouse Law Group.

  • Let's look at the case together.

  • Let's see what we can do to get the

  • charges reduced or dismissed.

-In California, the legal standard for the insanity

Subtitles and vocabulary

Click the word to look it up Click the word to find further inforamtion about it