the 1960s. Mr. Green, Mr. Green. Great. The decade made

famous by the narcissists who lived throuh it.

Hey, me from the past, finally you and I agree about something wholeheartedly.

But while I don’t wish to indulge the baby-boomers’ fantasies about their centrality to world

history, the sixties were an important time. I mean, there was the Cold War, Vietnam, a

rising tide of conservatism (despite Woodstock), racism.

There were the Kennedy’s and Camelot, John, Paul, George, and to a lesser extent, Ringo.

And of course, there was also Martin Luther King Jr.

So, the 1960s saw people organizing and actively

working for change both in the social order and in government.

This included the student movement, the women’s movement, movements for gay rights, and a push by the courts to

expand rights in general. But, by the end of the 1960s, the anti-war

movement seemed to have overshadowed all the rest.

So as you’ll no doubt remember from last week, the civil rights movement began in the

1950s, if not before, but many of its key moments happened in the sixties.

And this really began with sit-ins that took place in Greensboro North Carolina.

Black university students walked into Woolworths and waited at the lunch counters to be served,

or, more likely, arrested. After 5 months of that, those students eventually

got Woolworths to serve black customers. Then, in 1961, leaders from the Congress On

Racial Equality launched Freedom Rides to integrate interstate buses. Volunteers rode

the buses into the Deep South where they faced violence including beatings and a bombing

in Anniston AL. But despite that, those freedom rides also

proved successful and eventually the ICC desegregated interstate buses.

In fact, by the end of the 60s over 70,000 people had taken part in demonstrations, from

sit-ins, to teach-ins, to marches. But they weren’t all successful. Martin

Luther King’s year-long protests in Albany, GA didn’t end discrimination in the city.

And it took JFK ordering federal troops to escort James Meredith to class for him to

attend the University of Mississippi. The University of Mississippi: America’s

fallback college. Sorry, I’m from Alabama. So, the Civil Rights movement reached its

greatest national prominence in 1963 when Martin Luther King came to my hometown of

Birmingham, Alabama, where there had been more than 50 racially-motivated bombings since

WWII. Television brought the reality of the Jim

Crow South into people’s homes as images of Bull Connor’s police dogs and water cannons

being turned on peaceful marchers, many of them children, horrified viewers and eventually

led Kennedy to endorse the movement’s goals. Probably should mention that John F. Kennedy

was president of the United States at the time, having been elected in 1960. He was

assassinated in 1963 leading to Lyndon Johnson. Alright, politics over.

Anyway, in response to these peaceful protests, Birmingham jailed Martin Luther King where

he wrote one of the great letters in American history (doesn’t have a great name): Letter

from Birmingham Jail. 1963 also saw the March on Washington, the

largest public demonstration in American history up to that time where King gave his famous

speech, “I have a Dream.” King and the other organizers called for a

civil rights bill and help for the poor, demanding public works, a higher minimum wage, and an

end to discrimination in employment. Which eventually, in one of the great bright

spots in American history, did sort of happen with the Civil Rights Act.

So, one reason American history teachers focus on the Civil Rights Movement so much is that

it successfully brought actual legislative change.

After being elected president, John F. Kennedy was initially cool to civil rights, but to

be fair, the Cold War occupied a lot of his time, what with the Cuban Missile Crisis and

the Bay of Pigs and whatnot. But the demonstrations of 1963 pushed John

F. Kennedy to support civil rights more actively. According to our dear friend, the historian

Eric Foner, “Kennedy realized that the United States simply could not declare itself the

champion of freedom throughout the world while maintaining a system of racial inequality

at home.”[1] So that June he appeared on TV and called

on Congress to pass a law that would ban discrimination in all public accommodations.

And then he was assassinated. Thanks, Lee Harvey Oswald. Or possibly someone else. But

probably Lee Harvey Oswald. So then, Lyndon Johnson became president and

he pushed Congress to pass the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

The law prohibited discrimination in employment, schools, hospitals, and privately owned public

places like restaurants, and hotels and theaters, and it also banned discrimination on the basis

of sex. The Civil Rights Act was a major moment in

American legislative history, but it hardly made the United States a haven of equality.

So, Civil Rights leaders continued to push for the enfranchisement of African Americans.

After Freedom Summer workers registered people in Mississippi to vote, King launched a march

for voting rights in Selma, Alabama in January, 1965.

And again, television swayed public opinion in favor of the demonstrators. Thank you, TV, for your

one and only gift to humanity. Just kidding, BattleStar Galactica.

So, in 1965 Congress passed the Voting Rights Act, which gave the federal government the

power to oversee voting in places where discrimination was practiced.

In 1965, Congress also passed the Hart-Cellar Act, which got rid of national origin quotas

and allowed Asian immigrants to immigrate to the United States. Unfortunately the law

also introduced quotas on immigrants from the Western Hemisphere.

Lyndon Johnson’s domestic initiatives from 1965 through 1967 are known as the Great Society,

and it’s possible that if he hadn’t been responsible for America escalating the war

in Vietnam, he might have been remembered, at least by liberals, as one of America’s

greatest presidents. Because the Great Society expanded a lot of

the promises of the New Deal, especially in the creation of health insurance programs,

like Medicare for the elderly and Medicaid for the poor.

He also went to War on Poverty. Never go to war with a noun. You will always lose.

Johnson treated poverty as a social problem, rather than an economic one. So instead of

focusing on jobs or guaranteed income, his initiatives stressed things like training.

That unfortunately failed to take into account shifts in the economy away from high wage

union manufacturing jobs toward more lower-wage service jobs. [2]

Here’s what Eric Foner had to say about Johnson’s domestic accomplishments: “By

the 1990s […] the historic gap between whites and blacks in education, income, and access

to skilled employment narrowed considerably. But with deindustrialization and urban decay

affecting numerous families and most suburbs still being off limits to non-white people,

the median wealth of white households remained ten times greater than that of African Americans,

and nearly a quarter of all black children lived in poverty.”

While Congress was busy enacting Johnson’s Great Society programs, the movement for African

American freedom was changing. Let’s go to the ThoughtBubble.

Persistent poverty and continued discrimination in the workplace, housing, education, and

criminal justice system might explain the shift away from integration and toward black

power, a celebration of African American culture and criticism of whites’ oppression. 1964

saw the beginnings of riots in city ghettoes, for instance, mostly in Northern cities.

The worst riots were in 1965 in Watts, in southern California. These left 35 people

dead, 900 injured, and $30 million in damage. Newark and Detroit also saw devastating riots

in 1967. In 1968 the Kerner Report blamed the cause of the rioting on segregation, poverty,

and white racism. Then there’s Malcolm X, who many white people

regarded as an advocate for violence, but who also called for self-reliance. It’s

tempting to see leadership shifting from King to X as the civil rights movement became more

militant, but Malcolm X was active in the early 1960s and he was killed in 1965, three

years before Martin Luther King was assassinated and before all the major shifts in emphasis

towards black power. Older Civil Rights groups like CORE abandoned

integration as a goal after 1965 and started to call for black power. The rhetoric of Black

Power could be strident, but its message of black empowerment was deeply resonant for

many. Oakland’s Black Panther Party did carry guns in self-defense but they also offered

a lot of neighborhood services. But the Black Power turned many white people away from the

struggle for African American freedom, and by the end of the 1960s, many Americans’

attention had shifted to anti-war movement. Thanks, ThoughtBubble. So it was Vietnam that

really galvanized students even though many didn’t have to go to Vietnam because they

had student deferments. They just really, really didn’t want their friends to go.

The anti-war movement and the civil rights movement inspired other groups to seek an

end to oppression. Like, Latinos organized to celebrate their heritage and end discrimination.

Latino activism was like black power, but much more explicitly linked to labor justice,

especially the strike efforts led by Cesar Chavez and the United Farm Workers.

The American Indian Movement, founded in 1968, took over Alcatraz to symbolize the land that

had been taken from Native Americans. And they won greater tribal control over education,

economic development, and they also filed suits for restitution.

And in June of 1969, after police raided a gay bar, called the Stonewall Inn, members

of the gay community began a series of demonstrations in New York City, which touched off the modern

gay liberation movement. Oh, it’s time for the Mystery Document?

The rules here are pretty simple. I read the Mystery Document, guess the author,

I’m either right or I get shocked. Alright, what have we got here.

If the Bill of Rights contains no guarantee that a citizen shall be secure against lethal

poisons distributed either by private individuals or by public officials [I already know it!],

it is surely only because our forefathers, despite their considerable wisdom and foresight,

could conceive of no such problem.

Rachel Carson! Silent Spring. YES. I am on such a roll.

Silent Spring was a massively important book because it was the first time that anyone

really described all of the astonishingly poisonous things we were putting into the

air and the ground and the water. Fortunately, that’s all been straightened

out now and everything that we do and make as human beings is now sustainable. What’s

that? Oh god. The environmental movement gained huge bipartisan

support and it resulted in important legislation during the Nixon era, including the Clean

Air and Water Acts, and the Endangered Species Act. And yes, I said that environmental legislation

was passed during the Nixon administration. But perhaps the most significant freedom movement

in terms of number of people involved and long-lasting effects was the American Feminist

movement. This is usually said to have begun with the

publication of Betty Friedan’s book The Feminine Mystique, which set out to describe

“the problem that has no name.” Turns out the name is “misogyny.” [3]

Friedan described a constricting social and economic system that affected mostly middle

class women, but it resonated with the educated classes and led to the foundation of the National

Organization of Women in 1966. Participation in student and civil rights

movements led many women to identify themselves as members of a group that was systematically

discriminated against. And by “systemic,” I mean that in 1963,

5.8% of doctors were women and 3.7% of lawyers were women and fewer than 10% of doctoral

degrees went to women. They are more than half of the population.

While Congress responded with the Equal Pay Act in 1963, younger women sought greater

power and autonomy in addition to legislation. Crucially, 60s-era feminists opened America

to the idea that the “personal is political,” especially when it came to equal pay, childcare,

and abortion. Weirdly, the branch of government that provided

most support to the expansion of personal freedom in the 1960s was the most conservative

one, the Supreme Court. The Warren Court handed down so many decisions expanding civil rights

that the era has sometimes been called a rights revolution.

The Warren court expanded the protections of free speech and assembly under the First

Amendment and freedom of the press in the New York Times v. Sullivan decision. It struck

down a law banning interracial marriage in the most appropriately named case ever, Loving

v. Virginia. And although this would become a lightning