Placeholder Image

Subtitles section Play video

  • Growing up in Canada, we were always shown maps of our country, like this, where a huge

  • portion of it is something known as the Arctic. Given that it makes up 40% of Canada's land

  • mass and 2/3 of its coasts, we never actually learned that much about it in school and it's

  • always been this sort of exotic location that we've wanted to go to, especially knowing

  • that the ice has been steadily declining for years. So we decided to pack our bags, bring

  • some camera gear and join a Greenpeace boat that was heading from St John's Newfoundland

  • all the way to a community called Clyde River on Baffin Island to see the effects of climate

  • change first hand. Scientists know that the Arctic is warming twice as fast as other parts

  • of the world, causing land and sea ice to melt and currents to change. We were honestly

  • so surprised at how little ice there was, which we could immediately see upon arrival.

  • Climate change is a global phenomenon. It doesn't just happen in certain places. It

  • affects everybody. The rising of the temperature caused by our burning of fossil fuels has

  • caused the Arctic to melt. And this extreme rate of change has deeply affected the wild

  • life and people's lives. These people are the Inuit, who are an indigenous people that

  • have lived in North America for thousands of years. Inuit means people. And that's all

  • we see ourselves as. People. When we refer to a different culture, let's say from France,

  • there's lots of Inuit there. That's how we say it. That's how we use it. But also we

  • use it to refer it to ourselves as people. What makes us Inuit is that we are hunter

  • gatherers. We go out on the land, live out there for part of the year, hunting whales

  • and seals and fishing--all this hunting lifestyle. That's what makes us Inuit, to me. In 1939,

  • the Supreme Court of Canada decided that the Inuit should be under the jurisdiction of

  • the federal government, imposing Canadian laws to strip them of their customs. During

  • World War II, this land became even more important, strategically, and was occupied more heavily.

  • This European influence had an incredibly negative impact on the Inuit way of life,

  • with forced assimilation to remove their culture and further removal of their traditional structure,

  • much like other indigenous populations across the world. In the 1950s, the Canadian government

  • forced communities to settle permanently into cities or hamlets, like Clyde River, stripping

  • the nomadic way of life away from the Inuit. When you walk around in my community, you

  • see that the houses for people is nothing but bungalows, wooden houses. All our roads

  • are gravel. And we are really lacking in infrastructure. I remember we would always go camping, like

  • the whole family. We would be gone for weeks or even months if we had enough food. Pretty

  • much we lived out on the land and survived from animals that my dad and my brother hunt.

  • I wish we could go back to the way we used to live, because there was more family time.

  • Everything just changed when there was no more camping for us. Given that mass agriculture

  • isn't the easiest thing to produce in the North, it makes sense that any threat to the

  • wildlife, which is a huge segment of their food source, would be problematic. We have

  • a relationship with nature where we're not out to just kill anything. It's our food source.

  • When we kill an animal, we treat it right. We butcher it right, and bring it into the

  • community for food. In summertime, my favourite food is narwhal. We call it muktuk. We're

  • gonna try narwhal for the first time. So, like this? I just have this? Oh, it's warm!

  • It's been boiled? Mmmhm. Yeah, they just cooked it. Mmmm. It's soft? Pretty good. That one

  • has even more flavour. That one's raw. What's it taste like? Like seafood. Kind of tastes

  • like a chewy muscle or a clam. It's good. Which one do you like more? Depends on the

  • day. *laughs* Today, 68% of Inuit don't have consistent access to healthy or nutritious

  • food, giving them the highest rate of food insecurity of any indigenous group in the

  • developed world. 35% of homes literally do not have enough food to eat. In Clyde River,

  • we have one store called Northern store. It's a chain of stores that is all around Nunavut

  • and other regions of Canada. Most aboriginal communities have a Northern store. And that's

  • our only store. And because of that, they can mark it up as they like. The prices are

  • sometimes a hundred, two hundred, even to four hundred percent higher than what we would

  • buy in Ottawa. This pepper, is $15.99. I don't even know if it's per pound or per pepper,

  • but regardless, either of those is really, seriously shocking. So all the yellow labels

  • are things that are aired in and all the black labels are things that are shipped in. So

  • like this little thing of veggies is $16. Wow. This can of coke right here is $6.15.

  • And this is in Canada in a community that is probably obviously struggling to put food

  • on the table, and it's messed up. And you know they're jacked up prices because the

  • Coke is $6.15, but the Pepsi is $2.59, so obviously there's a preference for Coke. They're

  • capable. Yeah, they're capable of bringing that price down. It's so interesting being

  • in Canada. We're not in a different country. We didn't show our passport to come here.

  • Our family, we're living on paycheck to paycheck and sometimes it's not enough for us to get

  • food for my siblings and my parents, but if we don't have any Northern-bought food, we

  • would still have narwhal or seal meat or fish, in our fridge and that saves us a lot. It

  • keeps us from starving. As if these food challenges weren't already enough, Clyde River is about

  • to face, perhaps, it's greatest battle and risk to their livelihood yet. This is seismic

  • blasting. You see, the energy and oil companies use the technique of seismic blasting in the

  • search for oil underwater, whereby high air pressure blasts are shot up underwater every

  • ten seconds to survey the ocean floor below in hopes to find oil deposits. Basically,

  • they're imaging with sound. But not before having an impact on the environment and wildlife

  • first. Almost all marine animals use sound for all vital life functions. And that's because

  • sound travels extremely efficiently under water. Five times the speed. And it just transmits

  • over large areas very quickly. Seismic blasting is the loudest human-made sounds other than

  • an explosion and 4,000 km away, seismics can form the pre-dominant part of the background

  • noise. They'll be having much more trouble finding their prey, orienting themselves,

  • navigating, staying in touch with eachother, staying in touch with their calves, reproducing,

  • mating, stress impact that affect their immune system. They use sound for everything. Why

  • would they not be impacted? How could they not be impacted? I can't even imagine. It's

  • far harder for me to imagine they wouldn't be impacted than they would. I mean, the parsimonious

  • explanation is, they're going to suffer something. And if the animals are affected, it becomes

  • a matter of life and death for the Inuit people in Clyde River. But Clyde River is unique

  • in that they have begun an unprecedented legal battle against the Canadian government and

  • energy companies to protect their land, culture, wildlife, and way of life. So the seismic

  • companies applies for a permit to conduct a five year project to blast Baffin Bay and

  • the Davis Strait in search of oil and gas beneath the sea floor. They want to blast

  • over a very large section of the Arctic Ocean in Canada. The project that was approved would

  • allow them to blast the ocean for five years during the ice-free season, which is a pretty

  • significant amount of the year and they'd be blasting their air canons every ten seconds,

  • 24 hours a day. This shouldn't have been a problem, given that indigenous peoples in

  • Canada and other countries around the world have certain rights enshrined to the United

  • Nations Declaration On The Rights of Indigenous Peoples, requiring proper consultation and

  • consent to go forward with such projects. Clyde River never gave their consent , but

  • the seismic blasting was given a go-ahead. The National Energy Board and a company came

  • to Clyde River in what they call consultation. They brought a lot of paper work, their presentations.

  • They were telling us, "this is what we're planning to do." We were asking them questions

  • when they were done, you know, how presentations work. We were asking them things like, "what's

  • going to happen to the halibut? How are the halibut (or the turbot) going to be affected

  • by the canon blasts?" Narwhals, walrus--we thought that we would get an answer that explains

  • what would happen. But, no, they didn't give us any answer like that. Here are some of

  • the actual excerpts from the consultation process with the community. When asked, "Which

  • animals will be affected?" they answered, "That's a very difficult question to answer

  • because we're not the core experts." When asked, "What are the effects of seismic testing

  • on marine mammals?" they said "How can I say this? I'm not an expert on this?" And when

  • asked, "Which route will the seismic survey take?" they said, "We're still undecided."

  • This move to avoid proper consultation and to find more oil is not only affecting the

  • wildlife and ecosystem but the Arctic entirely and the Inuit way of life. So what has happened

  • is that big oil companies, who refuse to recognize the fact that we need to leave what's in the

  • group in the ground if we're going to survive, are using that opportunity to go in there

  • and try to extract more of the stuff that melted the place in the first instance. They

  • don't care what happens to their grandchildren. They don't care. They clearly don't care because

  • the know the signs. They know what's going to happen. They know that conflict's going

  • to escalate as water supplies decrease, as food security becomes more and more difficult.

  • Conflict worldwide wil escalate. And what's going to happen then? What's going to happen

  • when the low-lying territories like Bangladesh, even the Netherlands, get covered in water?

  • Where are those people going to go? It's going to make the refugee crisis in Europe look

  • like an away day. Which is why Clyde River's fight to protect their rights in the Arctic

  • is so important and could set a major precedent for other indigenous communities all around

  • the world. If they lose, seismic blasting could start as soon as summer 2017, and they

  • could be blasting for five years after that. Ultimately threatening the primary food sources

  • for the Inuit. These are people who are already living on a very fine line. And so therefore,

  • seismic testing is absoulutely a question of their rights to their land and the safety

  • of their land and the safety of their food, so any company has no right to mess with their

  • food supply in that way. It is and should be made illegal and we sincerely hope that

  • it will become illegal. If seismic blasting was to happen, we feel that as Inuit, it's

  • going to take a big portion of our diet, our hunting culture away, it's going to be totally

  • destroyed, because if you see hunting and there's nothing, that's devestating to me.

  • If the whales migrate somewhere and we have nothing to hunt, I don't know what's going

  • to happen. We're going to lose our lives. I fear that seismic blasting is going to completely

  • change our lifestyle and the sea mammals. I really want to help stop it because all

  • the animals are very important to us. And you can be a part of that change, just by

  • signing the petition to put pressure on the Supreme Court and government of Canada to

  • stand with Clyde River. Or come with us on November 30 to stand with Clyde River in Ottawa

  • at the court hearing. If you can't make it, please sign the petition and share this video

  • to help Clyde River in their fight to save the Arctic. Your audience, young people, have

  • much more power than my generation, because you're online. I am absolutely certain that

  • the only thing that changes anything of any importance is the mass movement of people.

  • Now, at the moment online, those mass movements are happening all the time, so even if you

  • just join Greenpeace, then sign the petitions, that's a huge act, because now you've got

  • politicians who have to listen to young people. Who's voting for us? I mean, whether you believe

  • in what they're doing or whether they can do anything or not, they have to listen to

  • you and big companies have to listen to you. So, I think it's very important when you're

  • young to know that you have power and to use it. The people of the Arctic are some of the

  • smallest contributors to climate change but are feeling the biggest impact. It's not just

  • about CO2, it's about people and it's about how unfair the situation is and how everyone

  • of us can come together to help a community in need. Some of you may have seen Nanny McPhee.

  • If you don't get involved, I'm going to turn up with my stick and my warts and my tooth

  • and hurt you, k? Peace.

Growing up in Canada, we were always shown maps of our country, like this, where a huge

Subtitles and vocabulary

Click the word to look it up Click the word to find further inforamtion about it

B1 US clyde seismic arctic blasting river canada

The End Of The Arctic

  • 207 2
    VoiceTube posted on 2016/09/12
Video vocabulary

Keywords

people

US /ˈpipəl/

UK /'pi:pl/

  • noun
  • Ordinary people; the general public.
  • Ordinary people; commoners.
  • Persons sharing culture, country, background, etc.
  • The employees of a company or organization.
  • Humans in general; persons considered collectively.
  • Men, Women, Children
  • A nation or ethnic group.
  • Human beings in general or considered collectively.
  • One's family or relatives.
  • other
  • Human beings in general or considered collectively.
  • other
  • To populate; to fill with people.
life

US /laɪf/

UK /laɪf/

  • noun
  • All the living things e.g. animals, plants, humans
  • Period of time things live, from birth to death
community

US /kəˈmjunɪti/

UK /kə'mju:nətɪ/

  • noun
  • Group of people who share a common idea or area
  • An interacting group of various species in a common location.
  • A group of interdependent organisms inhabiting the same region and interacting with each other.
  • A group of interdependent organisms inhabiting the same region and interacting with each other.
  • The European Economic Community.
  • A group of people living in the same place or having a particular characteristic in common.
  • A group of people living in the same place or having a particular characteristic in common.
  • An interacting group of various species in a common location.
  • A feeling of fellowship with others, as a result of sharing common attitudes, interests, and goals.
  • A group of people who share a craft or profession and learn from each other.
  • A group of people who interact with each other primarily through online platforms.
  • A group of people who interact with each other primarily online.
  • An organized group of people with a common interest or purpose.
  • A feeling of fellowship with others, as a result of sharing common attitudes, interests, and goals.
  • A group of people sharing common characteristics or interests.
  • A group of people living in a particular area or locality.
  • Joint ownership or use.
  • adjective
  • Relating to or shared by the people in a particular area.
  • Relating to or characteristic of a community.
  • Relating to or done by a community.
  • Relating to or shared by the people in a community.
  • Shared or participated in by all members of a group
  • other
  • A feeling of fellowship with others, as a result of sharing common attitudes, interests, and goals.
  • A feeling of fellowship with others, as a result of sharing common attitudes, interests, and goals.
  • A feeling of fellowship with others, as a result of sharing common attitudes, interests, and goals.
  • Joint ownership or use.
  • A feeling of fellowship with others, as a result of sharing common attitudes, interests, and goals.
impact

US /ˈɪmˌpækt/

UK /'ɪmpækt/

  • noun
  • A striking effect or result to hit with force
  • Act or force of one thing hitting something else
  • A marked effect or influence.
  • other
  • To collide forcefully with something.
  • verb
  • To hit or strike someone or something with force
  • other
  • (especially of a tooth) wedged so that it cannot erupt.
  • To have a strong effect on someone or something.
world

US /wɜrld /

UK /wɜ:ld/

  • noun
  • All the humans, events, activities on the earth
  • A particular area of human life or activity.
  • The earth, together with all of its countries, peoples, and natural features.
  • A person's experience, environment, and way of life.
  • A great deal; very much.
  • All the people living on earth and their activities.
  • Political division due to some kind of similarity
  • The universe or cosmos.
important

US /ɪmˈpɔrtnt/

UK /ɪmˈpɔ:tnt/

  • adjective
  • Having power or authority
  • Valuable or essential to retain.
  • Necessary or crucial.
  • Having serious consequences; momentous.
  • Having a big effect on (person, the future)
  • Of great consequence; serious.
  • Having high rank or status; influential.
  • Of great significance or value; likely to have a profound effect on success, survival, or well-being.
  • noun
  • A matter of great significance.
  • other
  • A matter of great significance.
change

US /tʃendʒ/

UK /tʃeɪndʒ/

  • noun
  • Exchange of one set of clothes for another
  • Money in the form of coins instead of paper
  • Money returned after giving too much
  • Act of making or becoming something else
  • verb
  • To exchange one set of clothes for another
  • To exchange one kind of money for another
  • To replace something with another thing
  • To make or become something else
  • To go from one train, bus, etc. and go to another
huge

US /hjudʒ/

UK /hju:dʒ/

  • adjective
  • Very very large
conflict

US /ˈkɑnˌflɪkt/

UK /'kɒnflɪkt/

  • verb
  • (of two things) be incompatible or at variance; clash.
  • To have opposite ideas; to disagree; To not match
  • noun
  • A serious disagreement or argument.
  • Argument or struggle between two or more parties
  • Mental struggle resulting from incompatible or opposing needs, drives, wishes, or external or internal demands
  • A serious incompatibility between two or more opinions, principles, or interests.
  • A prolonged armed struggle; war
  • other
  • To be incompatible or at variance; clash.
sound

US /saʊnd/

UK /saʊnd/

  • adjective
  • Sensible, dependable and reliable
  • Unbroken or undisturbed, as of sleep
  • Firm or solid in structure
  • Sane; not mentally ill
  • Clearly reasoned; involving sense, good judgment
  • noun
  • Unique quality that characterizes a style of music
  • Waves traveling in air or water that can be heard
  • verb
  • To seem or appear to be, from what was said
  • To say in a clear deliberate manner
  • To make a noise, e.g. to ring a bell