Placeholder Image

Subtitles section Play video

  • I keep losing socks in the dryer. I think the most likely explanation is lizard people

  • are hoarding them so they can assassinate the Prime Minister of Malaysia.

  • Hey co-conspirators, Julian hear for DNews. More people believe in conspiracy theories

  • than you might think, not just your crazy uncle who lives in a shack in the woods. Multiple

  • polls and studies estimate that about half the population ascribes to at least one conspiracy

  • theory, believing that malevolent forces are manipulating events in ways that contradict

  • the official narrative.

  • Part of why so many people buy into alternative explanations is because the world is a big

  • scary chaotic place, and our brains don’t like that. Dartmouth neuroscientist Paul Whalen

  • explains that when confronted with things we have no control over like natural disasters

  • or terrorist attacks, our amygdalae, the part of the brain that process fear, jump-start

  • the parts of our brains that processes information, looking for some pattern or explanation, so

  • it can assess threats and plan the next step. Unfortunately this is where math teams up

  • with neuroscience to trick your brain. Ramsey theory is the mathematical principle that

  • basically says given a data set large enough, you can find just about any pattern you like.

  • And then the principle of confirmation bias, where we tend to only seek out information

  • that agrees with what we already believe, brings psychology into the mix, rounding out

  • the scientific conspiracy that makes you believe in conspiracies. The Psychological principle

  • of proportionality bias is often involved too. It’s our tendency to believe that large

  • events have large causes. The idea that just one guy with a gun and a good view from a

  • book depository could murder one of the most powerful people in the world is unsatisfying,

  • and we instinctively search for bigger forces at work.

  • But by that explanation we wouldn’t look for conspiracies if we didn’t believe in

  • conspiracies, and according to University of Kent psychologists, that tautology is exactly

  • the case; once you believe a shadowy cabal pulled the strings behind one event, it becomes

  • much more likely that youll look for shadowy cabals again and again. And herein lies another

  • problem: sometimes conspiracy theories turn out to be right. When the Nixon administration

  • was accused of burgling the Democratic National Committee’s headquarters in 1972, the whole

  • thing seemed far fetched. But as it turns out that was exactly what happened, and knowing

  • that sometimes there is a web of lies and deceit opens the door to speculation about

  • what else might have an alternate explanation. Was the moon landing faked? Do vaccines cause

  • autism? Is global warming a hoax? No matter how many times scientific evidence refutes

  • those claims, some people still believe it. Because weve been burned before. Thanks

  • Nixon. And often they even believe in it harder, thanks to a phenomenon called the backfire

  • effect where people reject contradictory evidence and double down on what they already believe.

  • But while there are sometimes conspiracies they usually don’t stay secret for long.

  • This is less thanks to internet sleuths and more thanks to the fact that people can’t

  • keep their mouths shut. According to Oxford University Physicist David Robert Grimes the

  • more people involved in a conspiracy, the faster that conspiracy will unravel. Grimes

  • calculated the chances that a conspirator would slip up on a given day was 1 in 250,000,

  • even in the most generous circumstances where everyone was dedicated to the utmost secrecy

  • and no outside eyes were prying. What that means is a conspiracy with over 2500 people

  • on board will probably only stay secret for 5 years at most. Considering that at its peak

  • almost 50 years ago the Apollo program employed 400,000 people, I think it’s pretty safe

  • to conclude we did in fact land on the moon.

  • One conspiracy I have actually heard is that seat belts don’t save lives. Some people

  • believe that if youre not strapped down in a serious crash youll be thrown clear

  • of danger, presumably landing in a field of pillows and marshmallows.

  • The actual science says that If you get in a crash and youre NOT wearing your seatbelt

  • you only have a 50/50 chance of surviving. No rewinds. No do-overs. So why do cops enforce

  • seat belt laws? Because seat belts save lives, and you might not get a second chance to buckle

  • up.

  • Even if you get one of those newfangled self driving cars, it’s still a good idea to

  • wear a seatbelt. Not because the cars are unsafe, but because other people are still

  • out there driving like maniacs! Trace explains here.

  • I’m sure some of you watching had a backfire effect yourselves. What conspiracy do you

  • think I’m covering up?

I keep losing socks in the dryer. I think the most likely explanation is lizard people

Subtitles and vocabulary

Click the word to look it up Click the word to find further inforamtion about it