Subtitles section Play video
Climate change and agriculture are interrelated processes, both of which
take place on a global scale. Climate change affects agriculture in a number
of ways, including through changes in average temperatures, rainfall, and
climate extremes; changes in pests and diseases; changes in atmospheric carbon
dioxide and ground-level ozone concentrations; changes in the
nutritional quality of some foods; and changes in sea level.
Climate change is already affecting agriculture, with effects unevenly
distributed across the world. Future climate change will likely negatively
affect crop production in low latitude countries, while effects in northern
latitudes may be positive or negative. Climate change will probably increase
the risk of food insecurity for some vulnerable groups, such as the poor.
Agriculture contributes to climate change by anthropogenic emissions of
greenhouse gases, and by the conversion of non-agricultural land into
agricultural land. Agriculture, forestry and land-use change contributed around
20 to 25% to global annual emissions in 2010.
There are range of policies that can reduce the risk of negative climate
change impacts on agriculture, and to reduce GHG emissions from the
agriculture sector. Impact of climate change on agriculture
Despite technological advances, such as improved varieties, genetically modified
organisms, and irrigation systems, weather is still a key factor in
agricultural productivity, as well as soil properties and natural communities.
The effect of climate on agriculture is related to variabilities in local
climates rather than in global climate patterns. The Earth's average surface
temperature has increased by 1.5 °F since 1880. Consequently, agronomists
consider any assessment has to be individually consider each local area.
On the other hand, agricultural trade has grown in recent years, and now
provides significant amounts of food, on a national level to major importing
countries, as well as comfortable income to exporting ones. The international
aspect of trade and security in terms of food implies the need to also consider
the effects of climate change on a global scale.
A study published in Science suggests that, due to climate change, "southern
Africa could lose more than 30% of its main crop, maize, by 2030. In South Asia
losses of many regional staples, such as rice, millet and maize could top 10%".
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has produced several reports that
have assessed the scientific literature on climate change. The IPCC Third
Assessment Report, published in 2001, concluded that the poorest countries
would be hardest hit, with reductions in crop yields in most tropical and
sub-tropical regions due to decreased water availability, and new or changed
insect pest incidence. In Africa and Latin America many rainfed crops are
near their maximum temperature tolerance, so that yields are likely to
fall sharply for even small climate changes; falls in agricultural
productivity of up to 30% over the 21st century are projected. Marine life and
the fishing industry will also be severely affected in some places.
Climate change induced by increasing greenhouse gases is likely to affect
crops differently from region to region. For example, average crop yield is
expected to drop down to 50% in Pakistan according to the UKMO scenario whereas
corn production in Europe is expected to grow up to 25% in optimum hydrologic
conditions. More favourable effects on yield tend to
depend to a large extent on realization of the potentially beneficial effects of
carbon dioxide on crop growth and increase of efficiency in water use.
Decrease in potential yields is likely to be caused by shortening of the
growing period, decrease in water availability and poor vernalization.
In the long run, the climatic change could affect agriculture in several ways
productivity, in terms of quantity and quality of crops
agricultural practices, through changes of water use and agricultural inputs
such as herbicides, insecticides and fertilizers
environmental effects, in particular in relation of frequency and intensity of
soil drainage, soil erosion, reduction of crop diversity
rural space, through the loss and gain of cultivated lands, land speculation,
land renunciation, and hydraulic amenities.
adaptation, organisms may become more or less competitive, as well as humans may
develop urgency to develop more competitive organisms, such as flood
resistant or salt resistant varieties of rice.
They are large uncertainties to uncover, particularly because there is lack of
information on many specific local regions, and include the uncertainties
on magnitude of climate change, the effects of technological changes on
productivity, global food demands, and the numerous possibilities of
adaptation. Most agronomists believe that
agricultural production will be mostly affected by the severity and pace of
climate change, not so much by gradual trends in climate. If change is gradual,
there may be enough time for biota adjustment. Rapid climate change,
however, could harm agriculture in many countries, especially those that are
already suffering from rather poor soil and climate conditions, because there is
less time for optimum natural selection and adaption.
But much remains unknown about exactly how climate change may affect farming
and food security, in part because the role of farmer behaviour is poorly
captured by crop-climate models. For instance, Evan Fraser, a geographer at
the University of Guelph in Ontario Canada, has conducted a number of
studies that show that the socio-economic context of farming may
play a huge role in determining whether a drought has a major, or an
insignificant impact on crop production. In some cases, it seems that even minor
droughts have big impacts on food security, versus cases where even
relatively large weather-related problems were adapted to without much
hardship. Evan Fraser combines socio-economic models along with
climatic models to identify “vulnerability hotspots” One such study
has identified US maize production as particularly vulnerable to climate
change because it is expected to be exposed to worse droughts, but it does
not have the socio-economic conditions that suggest farmers will adapt to these
changing conditions. = Observed impacts =
So far, the effects of regional climate change on agriculture have been
relatively limited. Changes in crop phenology provide important evidence of
the response to recent regional climate change. Phenology is the study of
natural phenomena that recur periodically, and how these phenomena
relate to climate and seasonal changes. A significant advance in phenology has
been observed for agriculture and forestry in large parts of the Northern
Hemisphere. Droughts have been occurring more
frequently because of global warming and they are expected to become more
frequent and intense in Africa, southern Europe, the Middle East, most of the
Americas, Australia, and Southeast Asia. Their impacts are aggravated because of
increased water demand, population growth, urban expansion, and
environmental protection efforts in many areas. Droughts result in crop failures
and the loss of pasture grazing land for livestock.
= Projections = As part of the IPCC's Fourth Assessment
Report, Schneider et al. projected the potential future effects of climate
change on agriculture. With low to medium confidence, they concluded that
for about a 1 to 3 °C global mean temperature increase there would be
productivity decreases for some cereals in low latitudes, and productivity
increases in high latitudes. In the IPCC Fourth Assessment Report, "low
confidence" means that a particular finding has about a 2 out of 10 chance
of being correct, based on expert judgement. "Medium confidence" has about
a 5 out of 10 chance of being correct. Over the same time period, with medium
confidence, global production potential was projected to:
increase up to around 3 °C, very likely decrease above about 3 °C.
Most of the studies on global agriculture assessed by Schneider et al.
had not incorporated a number of critical factors, including changes in
extreme events, or the spread of pests and diseases. Studies had also not
considered the development of specific practices or technologies to aid
adaptation to climate change. The US National Research Council
assessed the literature on the effects of climate change on crop yields. US NRC
stressed the uncertainties in their projections of changes in crop yields.
Their central estimates of changes in crop yields are shown above. Actual
changes in yields may be above or below these central estimates. US NRC also
provided an estimated the "likely" range of changes in yields. "Likely" means a
greater than 67% chance of being correct, based on expert judgement. The
likely ranges are summarized in the image descriptions of the two graphs.
Food security The IPCC Fourth Assessment Report also
describes the impact of climate change on food security. Projections suggested
that there could be large decreases in hunger globally by 2080, compared to the
2006 level. Reductions in hunger were driven by projected social and economic
development. For reference, the Food and Agriculture Organization has estimated
that in 2006, the number of people undernourished globally was 820 million.
Three scenarios without climate change projected 100-130 million undernourished
by the year 2080, while another scenario without climate change projected 770
million undernourished. Based on an expert assessment of all of the
evidence, these projections were thought to have about a 5-in-10 chance of being
correct. The same set of greenhouse gas and
socio-economic scenarios were also used in projections that included the effects
of climate change. Including climate change, three scenarios projected
100-380 million undernourished by the year 2080, while another scenario with
climate change projected 740-1,300 million undernourished. These
projections were thought to have between a 2-in-10 and 5-in-10 chance of being
correct. Projections also suggested regional
changes in the global distribution of hunger. By 2080, sub-Saharan Africa may
overtake Asia as the world's most food-insecure region. This is mainly due
to projected social and economic changes, rather than climate change.
Individual studies Cline looked at how climate change might
affect agricultural productivity in the 2080s. His study assumes that no efforts
are made to reduce anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions, leading to
global warming of 3.3 °C above the pre-industrial level. He concluded that
global agricultural productivity could be negatively affected by climate
change, with the worst effects in developing countries.
Lobell et al. assessed how climate change might affect 12 food-insecure
regions in 2030. The purpose of their analysis was to assess where adaptation
measures to climate change should be prioritized. They found that without
sufficient adaptation measures, South Asia and South Africa would likely
suffer negative impacts on several crops which are important to large food
insecure human populations. Battisti and Naylor looked at how
increased seasonal temperatures might affect agricultural productivity.
Projections by the IPCC suggest that with climate change, high seasonal
temperatures will become widespread, with the likelihood of extreme
temperatures increasing through the second-half of the 21st century.
Battisti and Naylor concluded that such changes could have very serious effects
on agriculture, particularly in the tropics. They suggest that major,
near-term, investments in adaptation measures could reduce these risks.
"Climate change merely increases the urgency of reforming trade policies to
ensure that global food security needs are met" said C. Bellmann, ICTSD