that mankind is more disposed to suffer -

while evils are sufferable -

than to right themselves

by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed.

American Declaration of Independence.

A Renegade Economist film

People are awfully forgiving.

They just don't understand

what has been done to them.

We are at an epochal shift.

We're at a point where

the West could tip into a complacent and quite well off redundancy

or we could play a decisive role in the future.

What the banks did was reprehensible.

That was why there was the outrage at the greed of the bankers

when we gave them money that was supposed to

help them lend to others

but they decided to use that money to pay themselves bonuses -

for what, for record losses?

We are governed by corporations today.

often by corporations that don't have very much interest

in the United States of America.

I don't know what happened man, what happened to the U.S.,

it went so far in the ditch.

You know, what... at what moment did it all go bad?

Was it Disco? Was it Donna Summer?

Is that what killed America?

We are entering The Age Of Consequence.

A rapacious financial system,

escalating organised violence,

abject poverty for billions

and the looming environmental fall-out

are all converging at a time when governments,

religion,

and mainstream economists have stalled.

War,

Conquest,

Famine

and Death -

the Four Horsemen are coming.

FOUR HORSEMEN

This is not a film that sees conspiracies.

It is not a film that mongers fear.

It is not a film that blames bankers or politicians.

It's a film that questions the systems we've created -

and suggests ways to reform them.

Over centuries, systems have been subtly modified, manipulated

and even corrupted

often to serve the interests of the few.

We have continually accepted these changes

and, because man can adjust to living under virtually any conditions,

the trait that has enabled us to survive

is the very trait that has suppressed us.

Most societies have an elite

and the elites try to stay in power.

And the way they stay in power

is not merely by controlling the means of production, to be Marxist,

i.e. controlling the money,

but by controlling the cognitive map, the way we think.

And what really matters in that respect,

is not so much what is actually said in public

but is what is left un-debated, unsaid.

For centuries gatekeepers have manipulated our cognitive map.

But in 1989 a computer scientist by the name of Tim Berners-Lee

implemented the first successful communication

between an HTTP client and server.

The World Wide Web was born.

It has since unleashed a tsunami

of instantly accessible, freely available information.

Just as Gutenberg's printing press wrestled control of the cognitive map

away from an ecclesiastical and royal elite,

today the internet is beginning to change

governments, finance and the media.

We are at the cusp of change.

But to enact it we must first understand

the things that have been left unsaid for so long.

To do that we need context

from people who speak the truth in the face of collective delusion

because to understand something is to be liberated from it.

EMPIRES

All a great power has to do to destroy itself

is persist in trying to do the impossible.

Stephen Vizinczey

At the end of World War II,

we had 50% of the world's gross domestic product,

we were making 54,000 airplanes a year, 7,000 ships, etc etc.

We were the new Rome.

And we recognized it, and devised a power management scheme

in the 1947 National Security Act to, we thought, manage it

and it worked fairly well during the Cold War.

But we haven't done anything since and I think that is another sign

of our inability to grasp the "new world", if you will.

Empires do not begin or end on a certain date.

But they do end,

and the West has not yet come to terms with its fading supremacy.

At the end of every empire - under the guise of renewal -

tribes, armies, and organisations appear

and devour the heritage of the former super power,

often from within.

In his essay 'The Fate Of Empires',

the soldier, diplomat and traveller Lieutenant-General Sir John Glubb

analysed the lifecycle of empires.

He found remarkable similarities between them all.

An empire lasts about 250 years, or ten generations,

from the early pioneers

to the final conspicuous consumers who become a burden on the state.

Six ages define the lifespan of an empire.

The Age Of Pioneers

The Age Of Conquests

The Age Of Commerce

The Age Of Affluence

The Age Of Intellect

Ending with bread and circuses in The Age Of Decadence.

There are common features to every Age Of Decadence.

An undisciplined, overextended military,

the conspicuous display of wealth,

a massive disparity between rich and poor,

a desire to live off a bloated State

and an obsession with sex.

But perhaps the most notorious trait of all

is the debasement of the currency.

Purchasing power of $1

The United States and Great Britain

both began on a gold or silver standard,

long since abandoned.

Rome was no different.

So it started on a principle that was very sound

and it was on a silver standard.

But as it corrupted further and further and further

the Roman denarius got to the point where it was basically a copper coin

and they learnt how to plate and it was washed in silver

and in circulation the plating came off.

And at the end all the senators

that really did at one time represent the people

only were interested in representing

how much wealth they could steal at the top.

Great empire wealth always dazzles

but beneath the surface the unbridled desire

for money, power and material possessions

means that duty and public service

are replaced by leaders and citizens

who scramble for the spoils.

Historically

all the signs of the demise of the empire

are beginning to develop, some are more trenchant that others.

This current financial and economic crisis,

that sort of thing, always accompanies the demise of empire.

The people of Rome

were constantly being distracted by the gladiatorial events

and the politicians knew that they did this.

Whenever there was unrest among the people

they had a huge event going on

and they created a new event with lots and lots of gladiators.

And every day, we‘re doing that.

That is a common trait of declining empires.

And so today, in the U.S. for example,

you find a tremendous emphasis on all kinds of television programmes

that distract people from what's really is going on.

Sports is a big part of that, as it was in gladiator times.

In essence, we've been lulled into a lethargy

and we've accepted it.

Just as our sports stars today earn vast sums,

so did Roman charioteers.

In the 2nd century one by the name of Gaius Appuleius Diocles

amassed a fortune of 35 million sesterces in prize money

- equivalent to several billion dollars today.

Strangely, perhaps, there is another profession

that is disproportionately hallowed as an empire declines.

The Romans, the Ottomans and the Spanish

all made celebrities of their chefs.

And this again is typifying the end of an empire,

where things were so great we have this last oomph of momentum,

that we used to be great, and we felt great,

and we don't feel it anymore.