Name: UK PM Keir Starmer calls Donald Trump's remarks about Nato troops 'insulting' | BBC News
Uploaded: 2026-01-24T01:20:12.000Z
Duration: 10 min 9 s
Description: Thousands of YouTube videos with English-Chinese subtitles! Now you can learn to understand native speakers, expand your vocabulary, and improve your pronunciation...

Let me start by paying tribute to the 457 of our Armed services who lost their lives in Afghanistan.

I will never forget their courage, their bravery and the sacrifice that they made for their country.

Basic passive voice

There are many also who were injured, some with life changing injuries.

And so I consider President Trump's remarks to be insulting and frankly, appalling.

And I'm not surprised they caused such hurt to the loved ones of those who were killed or injured.

And in fact, across the country, as well as politicians expressing a view, a lot of the relatives, some bereaved, others whose sons in particular suffered dreadful injuries.

One is Diane Derney, mother of a man called Ben Parkinson, dreadful injuries.

She has said that you need to be tougher with President Trump and demand an apology from him.

Will you call for an apology from the president?

And what I say to Diane is if I had misspoken in that way or said those words, I would certainly apologise and I'd apologise to her.

You're having to distance yourself and criticize the president about third or fourth time in this week.

Are you getting a bit exasperated by some of the things President Trump says?

We have a very close relationship with the US and that is important for our security, for our defence and our intelligence.

And it's very important we maintain that relationship.

But is it because of that relationship that we fought alongside the Americans for our values in Afghanistan, and

it was in that context that people lost their lives or suffered terrible injuries, fighting for freedom, fighting with our allies for what we believe in.

So Keir Starmer issuing that statement following those words from President Trump when he spoke to Fox News, something that has caused an awful lot of upset.

We've been seeing that across the day here on BBC News when he said that we've never needed them talking about NATO, NATO allied forces, saying they'll say that they sent some troops to Afghanistan.

They stayed a little back, a little off the front line.

Something that, as we've been hearing, it's posed a lot of offense and an awful lot of upset as well.

Well, we can speak to somebody who actually served in Helmand Province, somebody who has firsthand experience, Dr.

Patrick Bury, a former NATO analyst and defense expert at the University of Bath.

Like I was saying, you're a former infantry captain who served in Helmand Province.

Just your reaction to the President of the United States talking about NATO allied troops staying back from the front line.

I mean, it's wrong on so many levels, isn't it?

And he keeps dropping to new levels over the last few weeks.

As you know, we've lost four hundred and fifty seven service members in this, in this country, another over 2,000 badly injured.

And then you've got the other nations that really did fight, the Danes, the Dutch, the Canadians, the Norwegians, and

even with smaller contingents, the Czechs, the Baltic states, you know, who went to the high risk areas and fought hard alongside their American allies.

So it's uninformed, it's incorrect and it is insulting because, you know, at the basis of this, I had the honor and the privilege to lead US Marine Corps soldiers in Sangin as well as British.

We casavacked our wounded and our dead together often.

And so there's that brotherhood, you know, you've been in combat in that brotherhood and that's important.

And for a man who frankly deferred the draft five times for bone spurs, you know, in Vietnam to come round and then question that kind of brotherhood, that's deeply insulting.

And when you talk about that kind of brotherhood, what do you think, your American brothers who you fought alongside, what must they be thinking about their commander in chief?

But what I can say is that certainly those kind of sentiments were not made at all to those of us on the front line fighting together.

I do think about the people currently serving in the US military stationed all through Europe who, some of which will be pretty embarrassed about this, I would have thought, and

I mean, there is another point that happened in Afghanistan and it does need to be noted that some of the NATO states went to lower risk areas and put their own national caveats on it.

Some states didn't fight as hard as other states because of their national politics and their appetite for risk.

But some did and, and that's why it's deeply upsetting.

And you'd wonder who, who last had his ear?

Donald Trump, because it is always about who last had his ear, telling him these things.

I mean, some of Naito did fight, that's very clear.

Other bits didn't, but the way he went about it is just disrespectful.

I think you talk about how he's uninformed when it comes to the figures.

Of course, we do know that the highest number of casualties were from US soldiers, 2461, 547.

But when you look at the figures, when you look at the losses relative to the size of the population of each country, then like you say, yes, the United States at the lead, but

Denmark suffering incredibly high losses in relation to their population figures, the UK as well.

I just wonder your reflections, given your firsthand experience that we're talking about body counts in order to, to talk about what was done in Afghanistan and who has more clout.

I didn't sign up to serve Donald Trump by any means.

You know, I signed up to serve the country and my regiments and my comrades in arms.

And I was happy and honored to serve with great people from America throughout that career as well.

So, you know, with my kind of analyst, academic head on, you start talking about those numbers that you have up on your website about, about population.

You know, it's not about the size of population, it's about the size of the military.

First of all, which is much smaller in some of these countries.

And then it's the size of that military that deployed to the front lines.

So for example, my platoon, my company, we took 10% casualties, you know, in fact, 25% casualties.

The U.S. marine Corps who served with us took terrible casualties.

The guys who came up to after us and three rifles, way worse.

And the same with the Marines, you know, so we shared that risk together.

Yeah, I just don't think it's presidential, is it?

But I think expecting Donald Trump to be presidential is probably a bit of an ask in this regard.

You know, presidential is about shared embodying and an understanding.

If you look at the, the shared sacrifices of all our countries, whether they're big or small and whether, and

that basically, as I said, understanding that brotherhood which is gathered and the interoperational experience which is gathered on the front lines, behind the front lines, you know, we haven't even talked about the special forces of a lot of these countries operating together.

So yeah, it's just, it's just the positive of alliances and what's hold us together is really bounded in the share history and the shared sacrifice.

And when you forget that or you don't honor it, I think the world is a worse place.

So, so on that point, because of course, you also, you're, you're a former NATO analyst, a defense expert at the University of Bath.

When you've got the president being so dismissive of the facts, so dismissive of the shared history that you're speaking about, what future is there for NATO's if he doesn't even acknowledge what happened on the ground?

I mean, we don't want to transpose sort of flippant comments to Fox News out to the, to the implications for NATO.

What I can say is the difference is that the Americans, when I worked in NATO, knew that they were the most powerful nation and they knew that ultimately the decision rested with them about what NATO did and they knew that they funded it the most.

They also knew there was bad imbalances about how that funded would have quietly tried to get, you know, to get that those addressed.

And it was right that Europe has stepped up and we all can see that now and is stepping up.

But they wore it well, you know, that was it.

Subtitles ListPlay Video

UK PM Keir Starmer calls Donald Trump's remarks about Nato troops 'insulting' | BBC News

privilege

trigger

experience

awful