Name: Hours After Zelensky Snubs USA On TV, Trump Sends Pro-Putin Message Publicly| Ukraine| Russia| NATO
Uploaded: 2025-12-17T02:29:06.000Z
Duration: 8 min 48 s
Description: Thousands of YouTube videos with English-Chinese subtitles! Now you can learn to understand native speakers, expand your vocabulary, and improve your pronunciation...

Is it true that the USA is demanding that Ukraine also give up the areas in Donbass that have not yet been occupied by Russia?

Is it with the question of security guarantees conceivable that troops from NATO or EU countries, for instance, secure frontline as a security guarantee, boots on the ground?

And the question that interests many people is will there be a ceasefire in Ukraine by Christmas?

I think Ukrainian speakers understood what it was about.

We'll try if I understood the second part of your question.

First of all, I would like us to treat the President's delegation with respect.

I don't believe that the USA demanded anything.

Therefore, I would formulate the issue of territories as the Russian vision or Russian demands.

We perceive this as the demands of the Russian Federation.

And therefore I also could not demand anything from the usa, but

conveyed to my colleagues in the USA to relay our vision to the Russians.

That's how I would respond to your questions.

That's why I said there are sensitive issues.

We exchange thoughts and also hear the vision of the Russians or their goals.

I am glad that we are being heard and regarding this issue, such a sensitive one like territory, what will come out in the end, we will see together.

Besides this, there were questions on which we had the same vision, basically during the dialogue.

So regarding the second part of your question, it's about the line of contact, right?

I didn't quite understand that there will be some presence.

And my message regarding security guarantees is that before taking certain steps on the battlefield, the military and the civilian population must have a clear understanding of what the security guarantees will be.

Understanding this is very important since the US is not offering us NATO membership, because membership to NATO is entirely written out.

Although I don't exactly know how it would work.

Well, thank God that NATO countries are not yet engaging in action.

Therefore, it's important that the United states perceives Article 5 like plus appropriate security guarantees.

We are just now working to have all this written out and we are making progress there.

I see military details from the military which they have been developing.

They look very good, although it is the first draft.

And the issue of monitoring during the ceasefire is, in my opinion, a part of the security guarantees.

The issue of monitoring, who carries out monitoring in what format and what sanction steps for violating this monitoring in all areas.

These are the questions I raised and it is important that we all agreed that we need to work it out.

And who is on the contact line during the ceasefire?

These are people corpses, technological monitoring or altogether, this is an issue under development by the military.

And I would give them the opportunity, as they are professionals, to work it through further and propose it for victory.

First of all, we had such a first meeting, or the first such days of meetings in this composition with Mr.

Witkoff, Mr. Kushner, and also with the United States team.

Before this, similar meetings our teams conducted, and

there were meetings together with European representatives of national security advisors.

Well, and many meetings we know of this American team took place in Russia with Putin.

I always really wanted this team to come to Ukraine, but

I was prepared that if it wasn't possible, due to various reasons, we could have a long conversation or conversations and try one to understand each other.

And there was indeed progress on many issues.

I'll be honest, I don't know how the parties of aggression will perceive the results of our talks.

I have a deep understanding of the details of this war, and

it is very important that our colleagues in the United States heard all these details.

Undoubtedly, if we had these meetings earlier, I think the progress would be even greater.

But I am grateful to them for our really good work together.

There are some things that, in my opinion, are destructive and definitely won't help us.

It's important that I don't see them in our new versions of documents today.

And for me it's important because dignity matters and the issue of concessions is certainly irrelevant.

I believe that the question of territories is a painful one.

The issue of territory is painful because Russia wants what it wants.

And there's no need to go further since it's a long dialogue.

We clearly understand what they want, and some may believe it, but some may not.

Certainly we have different positions with Russia regarding territories.

This also needs to be understood and talked about openly.

I am glad that we heard each other and I think that the American side, as a mediator, will propose different steps to find at least some consensus.

I would like the USA to continue in the format of mediation on these issues, continue in the format of mediation in the middle.

This would have important prospects for us.

As for other issues, including recovery, what finances Ukraine needs, who should.

No matter what compromises are made, a compromise cannot be found with the truth.

But it is certainly necessary to find dialogue.

And we will do everything to Find answers, answers to questions of security guarantees, territories, money as compensation for Ukraine to rebuild Ukraine.

This money will not just appear out of nowhere.

It is necessary to understand the source.

And therefore, I think everyone understands our position on frozen assets.

But there are many different agreements concerning both security and rebuilding and a framework agreement on security and a deeper agreement between the military regarding the details of this security.

Much progress has been made and I am grateful for that question about Ukraine.

Now that the meetings in Berlin have wrapped up with Zelensky, is there a timetable for going to Moscow?

Well, I think that the delegation is largely there right now.

They're in Europe and they met with those people that I called out before.

I want to see it, and they want to see it end.

I actually think that President Putin wants to see it end.

I think they'd like to get back to a more normal way of life.

An Article 5 like deal seems to be emerging without NATO's membership for Ukraine.

If such a security guarantee is offered, what incentive is there for Ukraine to give them an ease of territory?

Well, they've already lost the territory, you know, to be honest.