Name: 10 People Who Ruined Movies For Everyone
Uploaded: 2025-11-22T16:52:10.000Z
Duration: 11 min 50 s
Description: Thousands of YouTube videos with English-Chinese subtitles! Now you can learn to understand native speakers, expand your vocabulary, and improve your pronunciation...

Relative clauses (Restrictive vs. nonrestrictive)

Were you aware of any instances in which Harvey Weinstein treated women inappropriately or crossed a line?

And today we'll be discussing individuals whose creative or executive choices consistently damaged films, franchises, or the art of cinema in the eyes of critics, audiences or the industry.

The long term health of our business is really a function of our consumer demand for our unbelievable storytelling and our product.

There's a very good reason why Uwe Boll was allowed to keep making movies during the early millennium.

These efforts, which were lambasted by critics and fans alike, were made largely to exploit German tax law which allowed investors to write off the costs of failed cinematic endeavors.

This isn't to say that Bull didn't try occasionally to make the best films he could during his heyday.

All of his clothes are here, his car's in the garage.

It's like he just got up in the middle of the night and walked out.

That said, the director also liked to confront his aforementioned critics head on, utilizing his experience as a boxer to exact a little real life revenge against any detractors.

So was this a case of Uwe Boll possessing a too thin skin against criticism or simply a proud man making some money where it could be made?

All the hagglers, all the critics, all the geeks are wannabe filmmakers.

As soon as they do something on their own, it sucks.

We have a lot of changes to discuss at the company.

From now on, we're only going to make original content that doesn't pander.

Fandom could be a notoriously difficult landscape to navigate, including one that comes from a creative sandbox as large as the Star wars saga.

Kathleen Kennedy earned her industry stripes alongside heavyweight Steven Spielberg and Frank Marshall as a co founder of Amblin Entertainment.

Her production duties would eventually lead her to the presidency of Lucasfilm.

And it's here where the modern era of complaints against her tenure arrives.

The main thing is to protect these characters, make sure that they still continue to live in the way that you created them and that the universe of Star wars continues to grow.

Star wars fans have for years bemoaned what they see as a heist of their property in the service of content that's been deemed by this sector as woke.

These accusations have been backed up by several reports that have remarked on Lucasfilm's profit margin against its original 4 billion doll dollar investment.

I'm sorry I was so reckless with the things that you love.

Just wailing on woke stuff all the time is pretty lazy too.

Kevin Feige I mean, this is our 36th movie and we try to evolve and we try to grow and we try to keep doing different things.

Even those at the top of cinema's most beloved creations can occasionally see their fans turn on them after time.

Kevin Feige's knowledge of the Marvel Universe shouldn't really come into question, since he's been partially responsible for steering the MCU ever since becoming president of Marvel Studios back in 2007.

When the audience opens themselves up to laughter, you can then also sneak them in with the emotion, right?

And I think that is why we talk about a Marvel formula.

Those early films in Feige's run leading up to Endgame were watershed moments for comic book fandom.

Yet the more recent phases of Marvel Studios, particularly their television products, have seen increasing backlash from fans regarding Feige's direction.

There was an overabundance, let's say, of product that I think people thought, geez, I love them all, I want to catch up on them all, but

an overall sentiment of comic book burnout has led some to believe that the MCU is floundering in creative waters.

Humor, like any other form of artistic expression, is subjective.

Parody can be an even slippier slope to navigate, but

there are probably few out there that would rise to defend the creative works of Jason Friedberg and Aaron Seltzer.

In the modern day, the pair were responsible for a briefly popular but increasingly dumber series of parodic genre movies, all of which utilize the lowest hanging contextual fruit.

Efforts such as Disaster Movie, Epic Movie, and

the Starving Games were clearly leagues away from the clever parodic works of the Zucker Brothers and Jim Abrahams a la Airplane.

Heck, these weren't even on the level of the Naked Gun.

But what happens if we're the last two standing?

This competition is cute or be killed, and I will kill you where you stand.

Bob Shapek this was the NFL where they have tremendous, tremendous accountability.

And we were watching their program on Sunday morning.

Everyone together would say he should be fired.

It's interesting to note the back and forth CEO Juggling of Disney's Bob Chapek and Bob Iger.

The latter has been criticized over the years for his determination to bring unwanted live action remakes to the silver screen.

Meanwhile, the career of Bob Chapek saw a backpedaling from the executive's initial support of home physical media on DVD and Blu ra into a completely opposite direction.

He reorganized the company around streaming, around Disney plus, around Hulu.

At this point, I would say that strategy is very much in doubt.

Disney's shift to streaming under Chapek's tenure has proven controversial to some fans of the brand.

The CEO was actually replaced by his forebear Iger.

After only two years at the head of the House of Mouse for Bob Chapek, they decided they didn't want him anymore and replaced him with the guy he replaced Bob Iger.

One of the most storied CEOs in American capitalism, I would say.

Michael Cimino and the End of New Hollywood.

You're very concerned about every aspect of the production being right.

The early work of director Michael Cimino frankly defines cinema.

Rather than arriving at anything close to ruination.

Instead, it's Cimino's relentless perfectionism as a filmmaker, combined with his willingness to spend studio money that could be seen as an endpoint for the experimental New Hollywood Hollywood era.

Specifically, it was Cimino's 1980 film Heaven's Gate, seen by many today as a masterpiece that essentially bankrupted United Artists.

This sounded like the death knell for studios, handing over too much control to their directors, holding back the reins as New Hollywood's prominence shrank in the face of major blockbuster appeal.

He would go through them line by line to make sure that nothing was said or implied or visualized that defied the Production Code.

It was the true perception of old school Hollywood's internal lasciviousness.

An era that was well represented in Damien Chazelle's 2022 film Babylon that gave rise to the adoption of the hays code in 1934.

This self governing set of rules was overseen and implemented by Joseph Breen, just as the era of talkies were taking hold as an industry standard.

Breen's career as a film censor actually had an unintended effect, however, since it arguably led to the rise of Film noir.

Subtitles ListPlay Video

10 People Who Ruined Movies For Everyone

essentially

perception

figure

content