Name: Dan Abrams: Trump could veto release of Epstein files
Uploaded: 2025-11-21T17:07:15.000Z
Duration: 4 min 41 s
Description: Thousands of YouTube videos with English-Chinese subtitles! Now you can learn to understand native speakers, expand your vocabulary, and improve your pronunciation...

One, the vote will happen and two, the Justice Department will release the files?

Well, I mean, the vote will happen, right?

Those are the kind of things that are still tbd.

We don't know how that would think it's possible for the President to veto this legislation.

The reality is this really has the remnants of the Russia collusion scandal, in my opinion.

It's an attempt of the Democratic Party to distract the President in an otherwise successful opening first year.

The reality, though, is that if you look at the Russia collusion, if you think back to the Russia collusion, the complexity, they had to get MI6 to make some fake dossier and get everyone riled up about that.

Who actually said that Trump didn't do anything wrong.

This is an embarrassing PR stunt by the Democrats to try to distract from the shutdown that's now ended.

They're trying to move on to something else.

We all talk about it in our private lives.

Democrats know that media will repeat every talking point they spew out there.

What's embarrassing, honestly, is sitting around covering up for child trafficking.

It's not the Democrats who made up child trafficking.

It's not the Democrats who made up Jeffrey Epstein as a prosecuted child trafficker.

And honestly, the reason why everyone is suspicious about Donald Trump is because he's acting suspicious.

It's came out that his name was in the Epstein files and then he had his own personal lawyer go negotiate the deal for with Ghislaine Maxwell, who is in, who went from high security prison to basically summer camp and I am so sorry.

Literally, the Epstein emails say, I can take down Donald Trump.

Now, why would he be able to take down Donald Trump unless Donald Trump knows something because he's a bad person who could very easily use that kind of notoriety to take on some BS artist.

Jeffrey Epstein was a notorious BS artist.

The point here is why are we pretending as if these documents might actually get released by the Department of Justice?

The Senate is either not going to take it up and B, the notion that Trump won't veto this.

Since when is Donald Trump afraid of taking a political hit?

The idea that Donald Trump will see this on his desk and say, well, this is just too sensitive politically.

They might have, they might have a veto proof majority.

We know they don't have a veto proof majority.

Here's the real, here's the one real thing that we all.

There are victims here that have been shouting for, but

it's not going to give a damn about the victims.

I actually think this fatalism, saying Trump will just absolutely veto is, is actually an excuse for him if he vetoes legislation, bipartisan legislation.

And I have to say, if there is a vote in the House in which a hundred House Republicans or 50 House Republicans vote for it, I want to say to every Republican senator, those victims will be dogging you every day, as will the American people.

There's a discharge petition and Republicans are going to end up voting for it.

And if Donald Trump vetoes this legislation, then he might as well just say nobody cares, though.

That's the unfortunate part and it's not true.

At to Dan's point, he doesn't give a damn about somebody saying, oh my God, you vetoed it.

He has no problem taking a political hit.

Subtitles ListPlay Video

Dan Abrams: Trump could veto release of Epstein files

inevitable

pretend

distraction

majority