Placeholder Image

Subtitles section Play video

  • - [Narrator] So here's something that used to confuse me.

  • If you had two charges,

  • and we'll keep these straight by giving them a name.

  • We'll call this one Q1 and I'll call this one Q2.

  • If you've got these two charges sitting next to each other,

  • and you let go of them, they're gonna fly apart

  • because they repel each other.

  • Like charges repel, so the Q2's gonna get pushed

  • to the right,

  • and the Q1's gonna get pushed to the left.

  • They're gonna start gaining kinetic energy.

  • They're gonna start speeding up.

  • But if these charges are gaining kinetic energy,

  • where is that energy coming from?

  • I mean, if you believe in conservation of energy,

  • this energy had to come from somewhere.

  • So where is this energy coming from?

  • What is the source of this kinetic energy?

  • Well, the source is the electrical potential energy.

  • We would say that electrical potential energy

  • is turning into kinetic energy.

  • So originally in this system,

  • there was electrical potential energy,

  • and then there was less electrical potential energy,

  • but more kinetic energy.

  • So as the electrical potential energy decreases,

  • the kinetic energy increases.

  • But the total energy in this system,

  • this two-charge system, would remain the same.

  • So this is where that kinetic energy's coming from.

  • It's coming from the electrical potential energy.

  • And the letter that physicists typically choose

  • to represent potential energies is a u.

  • So why u for potential energy?

  • I don't know.

  • Like PE would've made sense, too,

  • because that's the first two letters

  • of the words potential energy.

  • But more often you see it like this.

  • We'll put a little subscript e

  • so that we know we're talking about

  • electrical potential energy

  • and not gravitational potential energy, say.

  • So that's all fine and good.

  • We've got potential energy turning into kinetic energy.

  • Well, we know the formula for the kinetic energy

  • of these charges.

  • We can find the kinetic energy of these charges

  • by taking one half the mass of one of the charges

  • times the speed of one of those charges squared.

  • What's the formula to find the electrical potential energy

  • between these charges?

  • So if you've got two or more charges

  • sitting next to each other,

  • Is there a nice formula to figure out

  • how much electrical potential energy there is

  • in that system?

  • Well, the good news is, there is.

  • There's a really nice formula

  • that will let you figure this out.

  • The bad news is, to derive it requires calculus.

  • So I'm not gonna do the calculus derivation in this video.

  • There's already a video on this.

  • We'll put a link to that so you can find that.

  • But in this video, I'm just gonna quote the result,

  • show you how to use it,

  • give you a tour so to speak of this formula.

  • And the formula looks like this.

  • So to find the electrical potential energy

  • between two charges, we take K, the electric constant,

  • multiplied by one of the charges,

  • and then multiplied by the other charge,

  • and then we divide by the distance

  • between those two charges.

  • We'll call that r.

  • So this is the center to center distance.

  • It would be from the center of one charge

  • to the center of the other.

  • That distance would be r, and we don't square it.

  • So in a lot of these formulas,

  • for instance Coulomb's law, the r is always squared.

  • For electrical fields, the r is squared,

  • but for potential energy, this r is not squared.

  • Basically, to find this formula in this derivation,

  • you do an integral.

  • That integral turns the r squared into just an r

  • on the bottom.

  • So don't try to square this.

  • It's just r this time.

  • And that's it. That's the formula to find

  • the electrical potential energy between two charges.

  • And here's something that used to confuse me.

  • I used to wonder, is this the electrical potential energy

  • of that charge, Q1?

  • Or is it the electrical potential energy of this charge, Q2?

  • Well, the best way to think about this

  • is that this is the electrical potential energy

  • of the system of charges.

  • So you need two of these charges

  • to have potential energy at all.

  • If you only had one, there would be no potential energy,

  • so think of this potential energy as the potential energy

  • that exists in this charge system.

  • So since this is an electrical potential energy

  • and all energy has units of joules if you're using SI units,

  • this will also have units of joules.

  • Something else that's important to know

  • is that this electrical potential energy is a scalar.

  • That is to say, it is not a vector.

  • There's no direction of this energy.

  • It's just a number with a unit that tells you

  • how much potential energy is in that system.

  • In other words, this is good news.

  • When things are vectors,

  • you have to break them into pieces.

  • And potentially you've got component problems here,

  • you got to figure out how much of that vector points right

  • and how much points up.

  • But that's not the case with electrical potential energy.

  • There's no direction of this energy,

  • so there will never be any components of this energy.

  • It is simply just the electrical potential energy.

  • So how do you use this formula?

  • What do problems look like?

  • Let's try a sample problem to give you some feel

  • for how you might use this equation in a given problem.

  • Okay, so for our sample problem,

  • let's say we know the values of the charges.

  • And let's say they start from rest,

  • separated by a distance of three centimeters.

  • And after you release them from rest,

  • you let them fly to a distance 12 centimeters apart.

  • And we need to know one more thing.

  • We need to know the mass of each charge.

  • So let's just say that each charge is one kilogram

  • just to make the numbers come out nice.

  • So the question we want to know is,

  • how fast are these charges going to be moving

  • once they've made it 12 centimeters away from each other?

  • So the blue one here, Q1, is gonna be speeding to the left.

  • Q2's gonna be speeding to the right.

  • How fast are they gonna be moving?

  • And to figure this out,

  • we're gonna use conservation of energy.

  • For our energy system, we'll include both charges,

  • and we'll say that if we've included everything

  • in our system,

  • then the total initial energy of our system

  • is gonna equal the total final energy of our system.

  • What kind of energy did our system have initially?

  • Well, the system started from rest initially,

  • so there was no kinetic energy to start with.

  • There would've only been electric potential energy

  • to start with.

  • So just call that u initial.

  • And then that's gonna have to equal the final energy

  • once they're 12 centimeters apart.

  • So the farther apart, they're gonna have less

  • electrical potential energy but they're still gonna have

  • some potential energy.

  • So we'll call that u final.

  • And now they're gonna be moving.

  • So since these charges are moving,

  • they're gonna have kinetic energy.

  • So plus the kinetic energy of our system.

  • So we'll use our formula for electrical potential energy

  • and we'll get that the initial electrical potential energy

  • is gonna be nine times 10 to the ninth

  • since that's the electric constant K

  • multiplied by the charge of Q1.

  • That's gonna be four microcoulombs.

  • A micro is 10 to the negative sixth.

  • So you gotta turn that into regular coulombs.

  • And then multiplied by Q2, which is two microcoulombs.

  • So that'd be two times 10 to the negative sixth

  • divided by the distance.

  • Well, this was the initial electrical potential energy

  • so this would be the initial distance between them.

  • That center to center distance was three centimeters,

  • but I can't plug in three.

  • This is in centimeters.

  • If I want my units to be in joules,

  • so that I get speeds in meters per second,

  • I've got to convert this to meters,

  • and three centimeters in meters is 0.03 meters.

  • You divide by a hundred,

  • because there's 100 centimeters in one meter.

  • And I don't square this.

  • The r in the bottom of here is not squared,

  • so you don't square that r.

  • So that's gonna be equal to

  • it's gonna be equal to another term

  • that looks just like this.

  • So I'm gonna copy and paste that.

  • The only difference is that now this is the final

  • electrical potential energy.

  • Well, the K value is the same.

  • The value of each charge is the same.

  • The only thing that's different is

  • that after they've flown apart,

  • they're no longer three centimeters apart,

  • they're 12 centimeters apart.

  • So we'll plug in 0.12 meters,

  • since 12 centimeters is .12 meters.

  • And then we have to add the kinetic energy.

  • So I'm just gonna call this k for now.

  • The total kinetic energy of the system

  • after they've reached 12 centimeters.

  • Well, if you calculate these terms,

  • if you multiply all this out on the left-hand side,

  • you get 2.4 joules of initial electrical potential energy.

  • And that's gonna equal,

  • if you calculate all of this in this term,

  • multiply the charges, divide by .12

  • and multiply by nine times 10 to the ninth,

  • you get 0.6 joules of electrical potential energy

  • after they're 12 centimeters apart

  • plus the amount of kinetic energy in the system,

  • so we can replace this kinetic energy of our system

  • with the formula for kinetic energy,

  • which is gonna be one half m-v squared.

  • But here's the problem.

  • Both of these charges are moving.

  • So if we want to do this correctly,

  • we're gonna have to take into account

  • that both of these charges are gonna have kinetic energy,

  • not just one of them.

  • If I only put one half times one kilogram times v squared,

  • I'd get the wrong answer

  • because I would've neglected the fact that the other charge

  • also had kinetic energy.

  • So we could do one of two things.

  • Since these masses are the same,

  • they're gonna have the same speed,

  • and that means we can write this mass here

  • as two kilograms times the common speed squared

  • or you could just write two terms, one for each charge.

  • This is a little safer.

  • I'm just gonna do that.

  • Conceptually, it's a little easier to think about.

  • Okay, so I solve this.

  • 2.4 minus .6 is gonna be 1.8 joules,

  • and that's gonna equal one half times one kilogram

  • times the speed of that second particle squared

  • plus one half times one kilogram times the speed

  • of the first particle squared.

  • And here's where we have to make that argument.

  • Since these have the same mass,

  • they're gonna be moving with the same speed.

  • One half v squared plus one half v squared

  • which is really just v squared,

  • because a half of v squared plus a half of v squared

  • is a whole of v squared.

  • Now if you're clever, you might be like, "Wait a minute.

  • "This charge, even though it had the same mass,

  • "it had more charge than this charge did.

  • "Isn't this charge gonna be moving faster

  • "since it had more charge?"

  • No, it's not.

  • The force that these charges are gonna exert on each other

  • are always the same, even if they have different charges.

  • That's counter-intuitive, but it's true.

  • Newton's third law tells us that has to be true.

  • So if they exert the same force on each other

  • over the same amount of distance,

  • then they will do the same amount of work on each other.

  • And if they have the same mass,

  • that means they're gonna end with the same speed

  • as each other.

  • So they'll have the same speed, a common speed we'll call v.

  • So now to solve for v, I just take

  • a square root of each side and I get that the speed

  • of each charge is gonna be the square root of 1.8.

  • Technically I'd have to divide that joules

  • by kilograms first, because even though this was a 1,

  • to make the units come out right

  • I'd have to have joule per kilogram.

  • And if I take the square root, I get 1.3 meters per second.

  • That's how fast these charges are gonna be moving

  • after they've moved to the point

  • where they're 12 centimeters away from each other.

  • Conceptually, potential energy was turning into

  • kinetic energy.

  • So the final potential energy was less

  • than the initial potential energy,

  • and all that energy went into the kinetic energies

  • of these charges.

  • So we solved this problem.

  • Let's switch it up.

  • Let's say instead of starting these charges from rest

  • three centimeters apart,

  • let's say we start them from rest 12 centimeters apart

  • but we make this Q2 negative.

  • So now instead of being positive 2 microcoulombs,

  • we're gonna make this negative 2 microcoulombs.

  • And now that this charge is negative,

  • it's attracted to the positive charge,

  • and likewise this positive charge is

  • attracted to the negative charge.

  • So let's say we released these from rest

  • 12 centimeters apart,

  • and we allowed them to fly forward to each other

  • until they're three centimeters apart.

  • And we ask the same question,

  • how fast are they gonna be going when they get to this point

  • where they're three centimeters apart?

  • Okay, so what would change in the math up here?

  • Since they're still released from rest,

  • we still start with no kinetic energy,

  • so that doesn't change.

  • But this time, they didn't start three centimeters apart.

  • So instead of starting with three and ending with 12,

  • they're gonna start 12 centimeters apart

  • and end three centimeters apart.

  • All right, so what else changes up here?

  • The only other thing that changed was the sign of Q2.

  • And you might think, I shouldn't plug in the signs

  • of the charges in here,

  • because that gets me mixed up.

  • But that was for electric field and electric force.

  • If these aren't vectors, you can plug in positives

  • and negative signs.

  • And you should. The easiest thing to do

  • is just plug in those positives and negatives.

  • And this equation will just tell you

  • whether you end up with a positive potential energy

  • or a negative potential energy.

  • We don't like including this in the electric field

  • and electric force formulas

  • because those are vectors,

  • and if they're vectors, we're gonna have to decide

  • what direction they point and this negative can screw us up.

  • But it's not gonna screw us up in this case.

  • This negative is just gonna tell us

  • whether we have positive potential energy

  • or negative potential energy.

  • There's no worry about breaking up a vector,

  • because these are scalars.

  • So long story short, we plug in the positive signs

  • if it's a positive charge.

  • We plug in the negative sign if it's a negative charge.

  • This formula's smart enough to figure it out,

  • since it's a scalar, we don't have to worry about

  • breaking up any components.

  • In other words, instead of two up here,

  • we're gonna have negative two microcoulombs.

  • And instead of positive two in this formula,

  • we're gonna have negative two microcoulombs.

  • So if we multiply out the left-hand side,

  • it might not be surprising.

  • All we're gonna get is negative 0.6 joules

  • of initial potential energy.

  • And this might worry you.

  • You might be like, "Wait a minute,

  • "we're starting with negative potential energy?"

  • You might say, "That makes no sense.

  • "How are we gonna get kinetic energy out of a system

  • "that starts with less than zero potential energy?"

  • So it seems kind of weird.

  • How can I start with less than zero or zero potential energy

  • and still get kinetic energy out?

  • Well, it's just because this term,

  • your final potential energy term,

  • is gonna be even more negative.

  • If I calculate this term, I end up with negative 2.4 joules.

  • And then we add to that the kinetic energy of the system.

  • So in other words, our system

  • is still gaining kinetic energy

  • because it's still losing potential energy.

  • Just because you've got negative potential energy

  • doesn't mean you can't have less potential energy

  • than you started with.

  • It's kind of like finances.

  • Trust me, if you start with less than zero money,

  • if you start in debt,

  • that doesn't mean you can't spend money.

  • You can still get a credit card and become more in debt.

  • You can still get stuff, even if you have no money

  • or less than zero money.

  • It just means you're gonna go more and more in debt.

  • And that's what this electric potential is doing.

  • It's becoming more and more in debt

  • so that it can finance an increase in kinetic energy.

  • Not the best financial decision, but this is physics,

  • so they don't care.

  • All right, so we solve this for the kinetic energy

  • of the system.

  • We add 2.4 joules to both sides

  • and we get positive 1.8 joules on the left hand side

  • equals

  • We'll have two terms because they're both gonna be moving.

  • We'll have the one half times one kilogram

  • times the speed of one of the charges squared

  • plus one half times one kilogram times the speed

  • of the other charge squared,

  • which again just gives us v squared.

  • And if we solve this for v, we're gonna get the same value

  • we got last time, 1.3 meters per second.

  • So recapping the formula for the electrical potential energy

  • between two charges is gonna be

  • k Q1 Q2 over r.

  • And since the energy is a scalar,

  • you can plug in those negative signs

  • to tell you if the potential energy is positive or negative.

  • Since this is energy, you could use it in conservation

  • of energy.

  • And it's possible for systems to have

  • negative electric potential energy,

  • and those systems can still convert energy

  • into kinetic energy.

  • They would just have to make sure

  • that their electric potential energy becomes

  • even more negative.

- [Narrator] So here's something that used to confuse me.

Subtitles and vocabulary

Click the word to look it up Click the word to find further inforamtion about it

A2 US potential energy energy potential kinetic energy kinetic electrical

Electric potential energy of charges | Physics | Khan Academy

  • 35 3
    yukang920108 posted on 2022/07/19
Video vocabulary

Keywords

potential

US /pəˈtɛnʃəl/

UK /pəˈtenʃl/

  • noun
  • someone's or something's ability to develop, achieve, or succeed
  • The possibility of something happening or some quality that somebody/something has.
  • A person who is being considered for a job, position, award, etc.
  • A latent quality or ability that may be developed.
  • adjective
  • Capable of happening or becoming reality
  • Having or showing the capacity to develop into something in the future.
  • Possible of becoming something
  • Possible, able to happen; something that can develop or become a reality.
  • Possible; likely to develop into a particular type of person or thing in the future
  • Possible or likely in the future
  • other
  • The ability to develop into something in the future
  • The capacity to develop into something in the future
  • The amount of energy that something has stored
  • The possibility of something happening or some quality that somebody/something has
  • other
  • The capacity to develop into something in the future
  • The amount of energy that something has stored in it because of its position or condition
  • The possibility of something happening or some quality that somebody/something has
figure

US /ˈfɪɡjɚ/

UK /ˈfiɡə/

  • verb
  • To appear in a game, play or event
  • To calculate how much something will cost
  • To understand or solve something.
  • To understand after thinking; work out
  • other
  • To consider, believe, or conclude.
  • To calculate or work out (a sum or amount).
  • noun
  • Your body shape
  • Numbers in a calculation
  • A diagram or illustrative drawing in a book or magazine.
  • Doll-like thing meant to represent a person
  • Picture or diagram giving information in a text
  • Person who is very important or famous
  • A set pattern of movements in ice skating.
  • Shape of a person seen indistinctly or in outline
  • Amount that is expressed in numbers
  • A person, especially one who is important or well-known.
  • A numerical amount or value expressed in numbers.
  • A statue or other representation of a person or animal.
  • An outline or shape, especially of a person or animal.
  • other
  • To conclude or expect; think.
constant

US /ˈkɑnstənt/

UK /'kɒnstənt/

  • adjective
  • Happening frequently or without pause
  • Occurring continuously over a period of time.
  • Faithful and dependable.
  • Remaining the same over time or not changing.
  • noun
  • Thing that happens always or at a regular rate
  • A fixed number or value.
  • A fixed number or value.
  • A physical quantity that is believed to have a fixed value and is used in calculations.
term

US /tɚm/

UK /tɜ:m/

  • noun
  • A condition under which an agreement is made.
  • Conditions applying to an agreement, contract
  • A fixed period for which something lasts, especially a period of study at a school or college.
  • Each of the quantities in a ratio, series, or mathematical expression.
  • A limited period of time during which someone holds an office or position.
  • Length of time something is expected to happen
  • The normal period of gestation.
  • A way in which a person or thing is related to another.
  • Fixed period of weeks for learning at school
  • The (precise) name given to something
  • A word or phrase used to describe a thing or express a concept, especially in a particular kind of language or subject.
  • other
  • Give a specified name or description to.
  • verb
  • To call; give a name to
positive

US /ˈpɑzɪtɪv/

UK /ˈpɒzətɪv/

  • adjective
  • Completely certain or sure that something is correct or true
  • Showing agreement or support for something
  • Favorable or advantageous.
  • Being sure about something; knowing the truth
  • Indicating the presence of a disease or condition.
  • Carrying a positive electric charge
  • Having the charge produced by electrons
  • Having a good effect; helpful or useful
  • Being good or useful
  • Expressing a quality without comparison
  • Greater than zero
  • Showing the presence of a particular substance, disease, or condition
  • Feeling sure that something good will happen; optimistic
  • Showing a photographic image in natural colors or shades.
  • Showing that a chemical is present in a test
  • noun
  • A photograph in which the tones correspond to those of the original subject.
  • A photograph in which light areas are light and dark areas are dark
negative

US /ˈnɛɡətɪv/

UK /'neɡətɪv/

  • adjective
  • Pessimistic or unfavorable.
  • Unfavorable or critical.
  • Harmful or undesirable.
  • Carrying a negative electric charge.
  • Expressing or containing a negation or denial.
  • Being harmful, unwanted or unhelpful
  • Less than zero.
  • In mathematics, being less than zero
  • Less than zero.
  • Focusing on the bad aspects; pessimistic
  • Indicating the absence of something, such as a disease or condition.
  • Expressing disagreement or refusal.
  • Indicating the absence of a particular condition, substance, or organism.
  • Expressing or signifying negation, refusal, or denial.
  • noun
  • The opposite to a positive electrical charge
  • In grammar, containing words such as 'no' or 'not'
  • Reply to a question or statement that means 'no'
  • Image on camera film used to make a photo
  • A reversed image on a transparent base, used to make positive prints.
  • A refusal, denial, or rejection.
  • A negative statement or response.
common

US /ˈkɑmən/

UK /'kɒmən/

  • noun
  • Area in a city or town that is open to everyone
  • A piece of open land for public use.
  • A piece of open land for public use.
  • Field near a village owned by the local community
  • adjective
  • Lacking refinement; vulgar.
  • Occurring, found, or done often; prevalent.
  • (of a noun) denoting a class of objects or a concept as opposed to a particular individual.
  • Without special rank or position; ordinary.
  • Shared; Belonging to or used by everyone
  • Typical, normal; not unusual
  • Lacking refinement; vulgar.
  • Found all over the place.
force

US /fɔrs, fors/

UK /fɔ:s/

  • other
  • To break open (something) using force.
  • To compel (someone) to do something.
  • To cause (a plant or crop) to develop or mature prematurely in a greenhouse or under artificial conditions.
  • To cause (a plant or flower) to grow or develop at an increased rate.
  • To use physical strength to break open or move (something).
  • other
  • Coercion or compulsion; strength or power exerted to cause motion or change.
  • Strength or energy as an attribute of physical action or movement.
  • other
  • Coercion or compulsion; strength or power exerted to cause or affect.
  • An influence or effect.
  • Physical strength or energy as an attribute of physical action or movement.
  • Strength or energy as an attribute of physical action or movement.
  • noun
  • Coercion or compulsion, especially with the use or threat of violence.
  • Group of persons trained for military action; army
  • A body of people employed and trained for a particular task or purpose.
  • An influence or effect.
  • A body of people employed and trained for law enforcement.
  • A body of soldiers or police.
  • An influence that can cause a body to accelerate.
  • Pressure; attraction
  • Strength or energy as an attribute of physical action or movement.
  • The use of physical strength/violence to persuade
  • Strength or power of expression or argument.
  • verb
  • To use physical strength or violence to persuade
sense

US /sɛns/

UK /sens/

  • noun
  • Certain mental feeling or emotion
  • Normal or clear state of mind
  • Meaning of a particular word, phrase or text
  • verb
  • To perceive using sight, sound, taste touch etc.
  • To recognize the presence of something
amount

US /əˈmaʊnt/

UK /ə'maʊnt/

  • noun
  • Quantity of something
  • verb
  • To add up to a certain figure