Placeholder Image

Subtitles section Play video

  • Malcolm? Oh no, that's alright.

  • Does he let people drink in the observatory?

  • Right, we're breaking the rules.

  • I'm Marnie Chesterton, host of CrowdScience, and for a previous episode on

  • the BBC World Service I climbed up to a little-known observatory in central

  • London, partly to drink hot cocoa but mainly to uncover the secrets of the Universe.

  • If you look up, you can see it's sort of hazy. There are stars, you can see

  • the stars but it's sort of hazy. That's just pollution in London and it

  • means that you can see bright things. But it's quite difficult spotting galaxies.

  • Step on the planks.

  • The reason the CrowdScience team tackled

  • ice-covered planks at nighttime was that listener Koon-Hou from Singapore

  • sent us a question and we exist to answer your science queries. Here's a quick recap.

  • My question is regarding dark matter and if there's any way that we

  • can understand it more and maybe find it useful for daily living.

  • Our quest to find Koon-Hou answers took us down the deepest mine in the UK.

  • How deep is it?

  • It's 1.1 kilometres.

  • So how long do we have to spend in the lift?

  • Seven, eight minutes.

  • That's a long time to spend in the lift.

  • And we met professor Katherine Freese from the University of Michigan.

  • And I'm also a guest professor at Stockholm University.

  • And how long have you been working on finding dark matter?

  • I have been working on it since I was a

  • graduate student so I'm gonna say that was 25 or 30 years ago. Oh more than that.

  • OK, so don't tell people.

  • We asked Katherine what real-world applications

  • might come from this search for dark matter.

  • You know at this point I don't

  • know what those are gonna be but the past history shows that there will be

  • something really major that comes out of it.

  • So I can give you some examples from the past.

  • One of the big ones that came out

  • of nuclear physics is MRI. So nowadays MRI is used in hospitals everywhere

  • where - my shoulder hurts, what's exactly going on? -

  • so they did an MRI of that.

  • But that again was a surprising off-shoot. It was based on detectors for

  • nuclear physics. Then they turned out to really change our lives for the point of

  • view of health.

  • You can hear more on this if you go back and listen to that show.

  • Just search for 'why does dark matter matter?' in your podcast app.

  • So that was then.

  • Now CrowdScience often turns into a kind of conversation with our

  • listeners because episodes spawn more questions and it turns out that you lot

  • love a physics mystery. We received loads more emails with questions relating to

  • dark matter. Questions that we're going to tackle today.

  • To help me I'm joined in the studio by two astrophysicists. Down-the-line from

  • the University of Arizona is Burçin Mutlu-Pakdil and sitting next to me is old

  • friend of the show Matt Middleton from the University of Southampton.

  • Welcome to you both.

  • Thank you.

  • Old?

  • Old as in been on the show before.

  • Grizzled.

  • Yes.

  • First I think we need a

  • recap on what dark matter is. Burçin, you first.

  • So, most of the things that we

  • see and we are familiar with is normal matter and it is only 5% of the Universe.

  • So 25% of the Universe is dark matter. That's the mysterious object. We don't

  • know much about the nature. We cannot touch it, we cannot smell it, we cannot hear it.

  • But it is there because we can see its gravity there and the rest of

  • the Universe, the giant portion, is dark energy which is much more mysterious

  • than dark matter. We just know it is energy that makes the Universe expand.

  • OK so this stuff, dark energy and dark matter, it's most of the make-up of the Universe

  • and dark matter is five times as much as all the stuff that we can see -

  • the stars and you and me and everything.

  • Everything that I'd consider to be stuff.

  • How do we see normal matter like the

  • microphone in front of me and you?

  • We see objects because of light, which is

  • electromagnetic radiation and we see objects because the light bounces off to

  • our eye and from that we can see the objects. But the dark matter doesn't have

  • that effect. It is just transparent. It just goes through it. So because of that

  • we cannot see them.

  • So if you shone a light on dark matter, what would happen?

  • It'd go through.

  • What we call the interaction, the ability for this dark

  • matter to interact with anything is incredibly small except we think via gravity.

  • So let's talk about gravity.

  • Gravity is the attraction between two things that have mass. The reason we know that

  • there's dark matter out there is because matter has mass. The bigger the mass, the

  • stronger the gravitational pull. Our planet orbits the Sun because the Sun's

  • massive mass pulls it into orbit. So we can't see dark matter. But can we see gravity?

  • Yes and a Swiss astronomer first noticed this whilst watching how

  • galaxies move. His name was Fritz Zwicky

  • This is a very famous scientist called Fritz Zwicky and he looked at galaxy clusters. Now galaxy

  • clusters contain thousands and thousands of galaxies and we think that these

  • things should be essentially not flying apart. So if you look at how fast they're

  • going you can work out how much mass there should be there and Fritz Zwicky

  • discovered that in order to keep them shuffling around all over the place and

  • not flying apart yet to have much more mass there than you could see in the stars.

  • I wanted to see this for myself and so paid a visit to professor Malcolm Fairbairn.

  • He's the one with a telescope dome on the roof of his university,

  • King's College London.

  • If you look up there you'll see a cloud in the middle of the eyepiece and it

  • really doesn't look like very much. In fact you might find it quite difficult to see it.

  • No, I can see it. Yeah there's a fuzzy bit.

  • Mm-hmm. Yeah so that's the very centre of the Andromeda galaxy.

  • Is Andromeda our closest?

  • Andromeda's is the closest big galaxy.

  • There's a few little ones that are closer. Well there's lots of little,

  • very little ones, that are closer but Andromeda's about the same size of the

  • Milky Way and Andromeda is moving towards us. I think it's about 150

  • kilometers per second and we can use that observation to weigh the entire

  • system and the answer is that the whole thing weighs something like five million

  • million times the mass of the Sun and we can't see anywhere near that number of

  • stars so there has to be something else there and we think that most of it is dark matter.

  • So there's a whole load of stuff out there that's stuff that we can't see

  • but we think is there?

  • Yeah and there's lots and lots of other observations

  • which suggests the same thing. From the smallest galaxies right up to the

  • largest clusters, we see that on every scale we need something to explain how

  • quickly things are moving around that we can't see.

  • Physicists like Malcolm have

  • calculated the amount of mass in things like the Andromeda galaxy and there's lots

  • supposedly there that we can't see, hence dark matter.

  • Burçin, can we talk about what dark matter might be?

  • There's a huge discussion about that,

  • we really cannot say anything about its nature yet so we right now we

  • have a promising hypothesis that suggests that it is called matter which

  • doesn't refer to the temperature but it is referring to the speed of that

  • particle which means it is moving very slowly and based on these cold dark

  • matter idea right now we could actually explain most of the observations that we have today.

  • Cold meaning slow moving. Dark meaning can't see it.

  • Matter meaning stuff with mass. The cold dark

  • matter hypothesis fits what we can see but physically I mean what is it?

  • This is where theoretical physicists come up with ideas that explain what we can observe.

  • There are several competing theories with great sounding names like WIMP.

  • Well it turns out they're WIMPS. Which I don't mean that they've got no

  • sort of spine or you know any fortitude. What I mean is they're weakly-interacting

  • massive particles - WIMPS - and our best guess of the minute is that

  • they formed in the very, very early Universe. Now our Universe went through

  • something called the Big Bang. OK now the Big Bang was an explosion in space

  • and time, of space and time, and it was really, really hot. The great thing about

  • things that are really, really hot and you've got really high-energy radiation is that

  • you can spontaneously create matter out of radiation. The remnants of those

  • particles are what we think is dark matter.

  • While Matt is busy thinking about what dark matter is, listener Gautam is

  • thinking about what this mysterious stuff might contain.

  • Hello, I'm Gautam from New Delhi in India. My question for CrowdScience is this.

  • If there is dark matter and dark energy does it mean that there could be dark life too?

  • So since I was you know going through scientific stuff and I realised that what you need

  • for life is energy and matter. So now if there is dark energy and dark matter it

  • was one of those thought experiments so since I couldn't find an answer who

  • better than to ask outside?

  • Who better indeed and it kind of makes sense

  • because the stuff that we're made up of is only 4% of the Universe and if the

  • rest of the Universe is dark, what's to say that there isn't something or

  • someone somehow lurking out there?

  • Exactly, so if there is such a huge chunk

  • that is absolutely unknown, why discount anything?

  • Do you imagine it as something

  • that is around us or is it in a galaxy far, far away?

  • It has to be around us like

  • what we are given to explain is dark matter is everywhere, it's in this room,

  • it's outside the rooms, it's everywhere. So if we are surrounded by it, we are living in it.

  • Just listening to what you guys are talking about I was imagining something

  • like a massive jungle all around us with, like, I don't know, dark lizards.

  • Exactly, yeah.

  • I don't know what else... flying all around us and yet we're totally unaware.

  • Totally, yeah, exactly.

  • It's kind of nuts isn't it?

  • That was producer Graihagh and Gautam and me going through his thought experiment,

  • which sounds very science fiction. But how much of it is science and how much

  • of it is fiction? I've got two astrophysicists who may be able to help me.

  • Matt, I'm gonna come to you first because you are shaking your head and

  • you have been all the way through our talk of feelings and lizard worlds.

  • Don't worry, I love feelings and lizard worlds.

  • So what do you reckon? Like, if there is that much that we can't see

  • maybe there's all sorts of exciting things going on in it that we just can't see?

  • The answer is probably no, unfortunately. The reason for that is

  • that life as we know it, complex organic creatures, require quite complicated

  • molecules and things like that, so amino acids which are built of molecules,

  • which are built of atoms, which are built of particles that have been glued together.

  • Now the leading contender for dark matter are particles which only clump together

  • because they have mass. They don't interact in any other sort of way.

  • So actually creating complex structures of the sort that produces life doesn't seem possible.

  • Now dark matter does form structures in the Universe but those

  • structures are not sentient.

  • Burçin, if I can bring you in at this point.

  • I mean, we're assuming that this life

  • would be like us but if dark matter is fundamentally different from normal

  • matter is there any reason to think it wouldn't be able to glue complex

  • molecules together using another force?

  • For me I feel like yeah it can be but

  • for us as a scientist we need proof maybe, maybe a signal, that there should

  • be an event that we cannot explain with our own knowledge. Then we could come up

  • with hypotheses such as dark life. Then we will say that OK only dark life

  • would explain this thing but right now we don't have that.

  • OK so it might be possible but there isn't any evidence or any theory by which it might

  • be working or having any influence so it's going to stay in the realm of

  • science fiction for now?

  • Yeah, it is not a scientific idea but it's totally a great idea.

  • Matt, anything to add?

  • I mean, you should never close your mind to ideas. My view is no. From a scientific point of

  • view what we know about dark matter means that you could not form life from it.

  • We rang Gautam and played him the interview.

  • Hello. It's Graihagh and Marnie.

  • He has some poignant points that we want to share.

  • Well all I can say is that if dark matter wasn't there the

  • galaxies as we know them they wouldn't be able to form. If dark matter wasn't

  • there the galaxies have the momentum that they would spin out of control.

  • Now if they would spin out of control obviously we would not have galaxies, we would not

  • have stars, stars would not have planetary systems and by extension life

  • as we know it would not exist without dark matter.

  • So that's an interesting point

  • about life as we know it existing because of dark matter but how do you

  • feel about dark life? Life as we don't know it not existing according to the astrophysicists?

  • I think to give an absolute categorical refusal that dark

  • life cannot exist is very unscientific. Since we know nothing about dark energy

  • or dark matter we may know a little bit about dark matter but dark energy is

  • absolutely dark so to give such a categorical refusal that dark life is

  • not possible, well it seems very, very unscientific.

  • Well I think everyone would be in agreement that more research is required.

  • Yes.

  • Gautam thank you so much. I really appreciate your question.

  • Thank you so much. It was a pleasure talking to you.

  • You're listening to CrowdScience from the BBC World Service.

  • This week Marnie Chesterton is finding out the answers to our questions about dark matter and dark energy.

  • If you have a question you'd like us to answer you can send yours to

  • crowdscience@bbc.co.uk. That's exactly what Yoseph did.

  • My name's Yoseph and I'm from Utah in the United States of America. My question

  • for CrowdScience is could black holes make up some of the dark matter in our Universe?

  • So... yeah.

  • Are you particularly physics-minded?

  • Yeah I work in aviation so I think about physics a little bit here and there.

  • I don't feel like I'm

  • qualified to be asking these questions on behalf of you guys.

  • Neither do I.

  • But it's fine.

  • We're gonna have two physicists in the studio and I'm gonna put your questions to them.

  • Awesome.

  • Matt.

  • So there's a competing theory to WIMPS which

  • beautifully is called MACHOs.

  • Match oh! No, we're not doing it. Oh you guys suck.

  • I mean, I just thought I'd let you sing a solo there.

  • Right so MACHOs are massive compact halo objects. So around

  • our galaxy we think there is a dark matter halo and we don't really know

  • what it's made of. What we do know is that when stars die

  • they form objects which typically are either really, really faint so that we

  • could never actually detect them if we looked for them and black holes don't

  • emit light either so they're difficult to find. So for quite a long time there's

  • been this idea that maybe some parts of dark matter could be these very faint or

  • completely black objects.

  • So Yoseph is right that black holes are contributing

  • to the amount of dark matter but do we have a figure? Do we know how much?

  • It's just incredibly small. I'm afraid I don't know an exact figure but it isn't very, very much.

  • Is it like 1%?

  • I suspect it's lower than that.

  • OK back to Yoseph.

  • I feel surprised actually. I just thought of it and I had no idea I

  • was gonna be totally wrong so I feel pretty surprised actually.

  • Where would you like your Nobel Prize to be sent?

  • Well I guess I'd like to pick it up in person.

  • Oh yeah good point.

  • So as we've heard, dark matter makes up about 26% of the Universe. The normal

  • matter, the stuff we can see around us, that's four percent of the Universe so

  • by my maths that's a total of 30%, leaving 70% unaccounted for.

  • Scientists call this segment dark energy. Do we know what it is and if not will we ever know?

  • That's what listener Zuzelle got in touch to ask and I'm here at the University of

  • Cape Town in South Africa to try and find an answer.

  • Yeah I'm Renato Costa. I'm from Brazil

  • and I'm doing my post-doc here at the University of Cape Town.

  • So Renato, what is dark energy?

  • Yeah if you think about the Big Bang and

  • gravity the way it is, gravity is attractive and if it started as an

  • explosion all the matter is going further and further away but it's

  • attracting each other so it should be decelerating, stopped at some time.

  • What we observe is the opposite. It's going further away and accelerating so that's

  • what we call dark energy. So I have here a very simple experiment to show that

  • which is a balloon with some dots on that and like the dots are the galaxies

  • we are observing and the balloon itself is our Universe. So if I blow this balloon.

  • [Inflating noise.]

  • So Renato has drawn some black crosses on an orange balloon and you've

  • blown it up a little bit and there's a distance between I'd say sort of a

  • couple of centimetres between each.

  • Exactly I have a tape measure here you

  • can measure that in centimetres.

  • OK... four centimetres.

  • OK so imagine that that's our observation now and later in the day or

  • in the years I observe again and then it's basically what's happening is the

  • Universe is inflating

  • [Inflating noise.]

  • Now the distance between our galaxies is seven centimetres.

  • Exactly. So that's the concept of dark energy.

  • The thing is that we usually want to know more than just

  • observation itself. We want to explain that and mathematics usually

  • gives you the language to describe that deeper and then you kind of lose track.

  • It's exactly like if I start talking to you in German here. Maybe you know German

  • but anyway Portuguese because I'm from Brazil. So if I start start talking

  • Portuguese you're not going to understand it, which is completely,

  • completely normal. I love it though, we're getting into the realm of philosophy.

  • We did a programme on magnets and I was desperately trying to understand

  • electromagnetism and I found it a huge comfort that Richard Feynman said I can't

  • explain magnets in any way that would make any sense to you and I think he was

  • just talking about... he could explain them but it's in a language of maths which

  • works best written down and it's not really a language of conversation.

  • Yeah.

  • We're in a room with blackboards with all sorts of mathematical equations written down.

  • Exactly.

  • Not a great language for radio.

  • I agree.

  • Disappointing.

  • But we thought we'd give it a go all the same.

  • Renato tells me that we don't know what's causing the Universe to expand but

  • scientists have some ideas and one popular one is that we need to modify

  • Einstein's theory of gravity. Tweak our equations so to speak. That sounds easy, but it's not.

  • But also not only that you have to recover all the successes from

  • general relativity.

  • Because some people propose modified gravity theories that

  • explain dark energy but masses with all the other successes of general relativity.

  • So Newton's theory

  • of gravity explains most of the stuff that I can see. Einstein's explains even more.

  • People when they're trying to modify that to explain dark energy

  • haven't come up with anything that doesn't mess with the building

  • blocks that we've already explained.

  • It usually is easy to

  • explain dark energy but you mess with everything else at the same time.

  • To modify that is not a easy task.

  • At this point I'd like to introduce CrowdScience

  • listener Lawrence. He's come up with a different theory to explain dark energy.

  • My name is Lawrence. I'm from the Canary Islands. I was actually born in

  • New Zealand but I've lived in Europe most of my life and I'm now a Spanish citizen.

  • Great and what is your question for CrowdScience?

  • My question is could

  • the effect that we perceive as being caused by dark energy have an origin

  • outside our Universe? Is it possible that our Universe although vast is merely a

  • bubble in something much more extensive that surrounds it and beyond the limits

  • of our perception and that as the matter in our Universe expands within its

  • bubble and gets nearer the limit, the mass outside exerts a greater

  • gravitational pull on it and causes the rate of expansion to increase.

  • So when people talk about the Big Bang it makes you think of our Universe as an

  • explosion, expanding out into the void. What Lawrence

  • who's a maths teacher is suggesting is more like our Universe is an air bubble

  • in a massive block of Swiss cheese. So that means that there's a huge amount of

  • matter surrounding our bubble and as we've established, more mass means more

  • gravitational pull. So the huge amount of mass outside our air bubble Universe

  • could be pulling the Universe apart. I put the Swiss cheese theory to Renato,

  • who drew me a diagram to help explain that the idea of forces pulling the

  • Universe apart doesn't add up.

  • We draw these over density everywhere or

  • the circle of extra matter outside the horizon and what I'm saying is that it's

  • not possible because gravity will pull in all directions actually exactly equal.

  • So this statue is not gonna move.

  • So it's the material from one side's

  • gonna pull us but the material from the other side is gonna pull us and in

  • conclusion we won't go anywhere.

  • Exactly. Nothing will move.

  • We'll be exactly compensated from the other side.

  • So the only real way of

  • explaining the acceleration of the Universe as far as you guys worked out

  • is that something between the galaxies that is pushing everything.

  • Yeah something from inside. It's not something from outside.

  • That's a shame

  • because I really like Lawrence's theory I was like, oh yeah of course, why are we looking at all

  • of this stuff that's being made inside space? Actually maybe there's just

  • something outside that we can't see that's pulling everything? I thought

  • about that as well and I was like, and that's a good thing to do, why not? Then I

  • got the answer. So, cool. But it's not that simple so it's a very good question.

  • In summary, dark energy could be a modified theory of gravity

  • but it needs to work with Einstein's and Newton's explanations and if this is the

  • answer no-one's come up with it yet. Sadly for Lawrence, Swiss cheese theory is wrong.

  • Our Universe is expanding and pushing apart, not being pulled.

  • But this isn't the only idea. There are loads of theories on this because dark energy is

  • even more of a mystery than dark matter. Maybe dark energy is a fifth force to

  • add to the four fundamental ones we have in the Universe? But back to Zuzelle and

  • other listeners who want answers. Will we ever know what it is?

  • But South Africa itself has the SKA, which is the Square Kilometre Array, which would be

  • the largest radio telescope on Earth.

  • And that's gonna test dark energy theories?

  • Yeah that would be great for testing dark energy theories and the dark energy itself.

  • Do you think you're gonna get an answer in your lifetime?

  • I would say that for the new generation that wants to study physics and cosmology or

  • astrophysics the two biggest problems is dark matter and dark energy so that any

  • person that is willing to study these things should attack these problems.

  • Thanks to Renato Costa in Cape Town and his balloon-blowing Universe.

  • [Inflating noise.]

  • Also thanks to our studio physicists Matt and Burçin. I had one final question

  • for them, which is why is finding dark matter and dark energy important?

  • Because the Universe is full of them!

  • We really understand, we really want to know what is going on in the Universe and how the

  • Universe works. So to really understand what's going on in everything in

  • the Universe, in galaxies, we really need to understand the nature of the dark matter.

  • With the current models we have a nice picture that explains most of the stuff

  • that we see but still it's not enough without the nature of dark matter.

  • We are facing lots of problems in our observations.

  • So I completely agree that

  • understanding dark matter is really important. It's important for particle

  • physicists and it's important for astrophysicists and it's kind of

  • important for us as well because the stuff that's in the Universe - so normal

  • matter, radiation, dark matter, dark energy - if you add all that up that tells us

  • what's actually going to happen to the Universe. If there's too much stuff the

  • Universe will end up contracting back onto itself when it was something called

  • a Big Crunch and so everyone gets really really close together they're really hot

  • and everyone dies. Or maybe there's not enough stuff in which case things start

  • flying apart and it's a bit sad, everyone gets a bit cold and the Universe dies

  • that way. So understanding and weighing that stuff is really, really important

  • for the fate of our Universe. Is the fate of our Universe a big enough reason?

  • Yeah that's a pretty big and depressing reason. It ends in death doesn't it?

  • Well, doesn't everything?

  • Just to reassure people, this isn't happening in the next four to six years, is it?

  • I promise nothing.

  • I want people to be phoning in and saying that the Universe is going to end.

  • No, not for a very, very, very long time.

  • We're talking millions, billions.

  • Numbers that are so big it shouldn't worry you.

  • OK, phew.

  • On that optimistic note that's it for CrowdScience this week. So what have we

  • discovered from testing listeners' theories? I mean I'd like to bring

  • producer Graihagh in at this point. Graihagh, what have you learnt?

  • That we really don't know much about the vast majority of our Universe. That's my take-home for today.

  • I'd like to say something concrete so I'm gonna go with that dark matter is

  • probably a particle and that there are many hypothetical candidates but WIMPS

  • are the ones that most scientists are betting on but anything is of course

  • possible until scientists can confirm one. Dark life on the other hand...

  • Oh, I was so sad when Matt was just categorically like no this is not

  • possible. I really wanted there to be something out there all around us with

  • the dark lizards and the dark jungle all flying around us.

  • But of course for a lizard maybe you need a multicellular organism and so you need atoms to stick

  • together and that's exactly what Matt's saying is not going to happen and then

  • of course there's dark energy too.

  • I just think there's so much more about our

  • Universe that we need to understand and it's fascinating. It's a great time to be

  • a physicist. Also it's a great time to be a listener to CrowdScience because

  • we've dealt with quite a few listeners' theories this week and I have to say

  • they have been really good and do keep them coming.

  • If you have any thoughts or

  • comments, theories, suggestions, send them to crowdscience@bbc.co.uk.

  • That's it from us. I'll leave it to our listeners to read the credits.

  • You've been listening to CrowdScience from the BBC World Service. One of the questions sent in this week

  • from me, Gautam in India.

  • And me, Lawrence from the Canary Islands.

  • And me, Yoseph from America, among others.

  • If you have a question you'd like the team to tackle,

  • email it to crowdscience@bbc.co.uk

  • This programme was produced by Graihagh Jackson and presented by Marnie Chesteron.

  • Thanks for listening and goodbye.

  • you

Malcolm? Oh no, that's alright.

Subtitles and vocabulary

Click the word to look it up Click the word to find further inforamtion about it