Placeholder Image

Subtitles section Play video

  • >> Good morning friends. We are delighted today have our--to host our friend, Dr. James

  • H. Austin. James is America's professor of neurology in the University of Colorado Health

  • Sciences Center. He is one of the oldest and most respected experts on the links between

  • the neurological workings of the human brain and meditation. He is the author of the book

  • "Zen and the Brain" which is, as far as I know, one of the earliest and most influential

  • books on the topic. He is also the only real neuroscientist I know who is also a profoundly

  • deep meditator. And he's going to be very shy as in now, but he's--but he's quite enlightened,

  • and so making him a very rare master both in neuroscience and meditation. James' other

  • books include "Selfless Insight" and "Zen Brain Reflections". He is the only friend

  • I have who doesn't use email. Or he and the Dalai Lama. So, the two of them. And he's

  • the--and he's the only friend who writes me letters by hand, because the Dalai Lama doesn't

  • do that. So before we come here, he asked whether he should be doing the advance or

  • the--or the geneta--the version of his talk. So I asked for the advanced technical version.

  • So if it's too older, blame me. But if it's good, it's his credit. And with that, please

  • welcome our friend, Professor James Austin. Thank you.

  • >> Austin: Thank you, Meng, for your generous, hospitality and generous welcome to this group.

  • I have a very easy or very difficult job talking to this group at Google. The difficult part

  • of my job relates to your high level of intellect, which paradoxically makes it more difficult

  • for you to understand unless you remember how important it is to have moments of insight.

  • If you can remember the moments when you've had insight, when all you intellectual knowledge

  • has failed you but your intuition has given you a burst of understanding, then I have

  • an easy job. So try to keep in mind those moments of insight at your desk or any out

  • of doors when a moment of insight has clarified a problem that remained impenetrable to your

  • high level of intellect. Meng tells me that many of you in this group have taken the course

  • on meditation and consciousness, and so I think it's appropriate that we all start with

  • a moment of meditation. You've already worked hard all this morning. You've gotten here.

  • You've come here on time to this lecture. So let's start with a brief moment of meditation.

  • The first slide is the old Taoist yin yang symbol, and the purpose is to point out that

  • their two aspects, the black and the white, the male and the female, this into that are

  • complementary, not antagonistic. They're both necessary to be part of the cosmic whole.

  • You might wonder how a seemingly orthodox neurologist and academician would ever--would

  • ever be involved in anything as esoteric as Zen Buddhism. It stared when I was on sabbatical

  • in Kyoto, Japan. I was introduced, fortunately, to an English-speaking Zen master. And this

  • is the gate through which I entered this Rinzai Zen temple, Daitokuji, in 1974. It's an ordinary

  • gate of the kind that we use in the west and elsewhere in the world. It operates as a unit

  • so that the top and the bottom open simultaneously. What I'm about to describe to you as a theme

  • throughout this talk is something that may seem unfamiliar, but here's the theme. The

  • theme is that when we turn on our self-centered attention, we exert in a reciprocal opposite

  • fashion our external kind of attentiveness. And contrary-wise, when we turn on our attentiveness

  • into the external world, we dampen our resources that go into our self-centeredness. And with

  • this introduction, let's turn to the two different kinds of meditation, the attentive art of

  • meditation. For those of you who have handouts, this will be on the handout so you need not

  • try to memorize it. But basically we start as we did a few moments ago by looking down

  • and usually at a spot in front of us in a form of what's been called concentrative meditation.

  • It's a more effortful kind of attentiveness. It's focused and it's exclusive. If we're

  • pointing down like this, were excluding the world all around us and focusing on one point

  • in a deliberate one-pointed manner. Now, this requires our voluntary top-down processing,

  • and so it is more self-referential; we're in there doing it. It's the kind of attention

  • that can evolve later on into the absorptions, and it does involve our paying attention.

  • This kind of attention, this kind of awareness is personalized. We're in there doing it ourself.

  • Now, later on, after we've trained attention in a top-down manner, we move into a more

  • receptive kind of meditation. By definition, this is more effortless. It's attentiveness

  • that is unfocussed and it is inclusive. It will take in everything around us; front,

  • back, top and bottom. It's a more open, universal, bare awareness and it expresses our involuntary--our

  • involuntary attentiveness to the world around us. So it, by definition, is more other referential.

  • If self is everything inside our skin, other is everything outside of our skin. And this

  • is the kind receptivity that can later shift into more insightful, intuitive modes of processing.

  • It's called a choiceless awareness because we are not choosing to do it; it happens.

  • So this is a more anonymous kind of awareness; anonymous awareness. Now, we have two ways--two

  • ways of processing reality. The one we're most familiar with and the one's that's easiest

  • to understand is this form, the egocentric, self-centered kind of processing. If this

  • is the person doing it and looking at an apple, these lines of sight from the apple are all

  • coming back into the general access of this person's attentiveness. And this person--this

  • person has a frame of reference looking at the outside world. This person is holding

  • on with both hands to this frame of reference and he's seeing only what he chooses to. There's

  • another kind of reality which is revealed to us without our being aware of it. And just

  • as the word "ego" stands for self, the Greek word "allo" stands for other. So allocentric

  • reality is that world that the brain perceives without our knowing that it's doing so. And

  • when it looks out out there and automatically identifies these apples and positions them

  • in three dimensional space in relation to each other, no lines of sight come back here

  • to the person who is doing this kind of attentive processing. This is allocentric processing.

  • Now, the two kinds of processing, egocentric and allocentric are on your handout. But the

  • important thing to realize is that they pursue different pathways in the brain. The egocentric

  • pathway is, in a sense, the northern pathway which proceeds in the upper part of the brain.

  • The allocentric pathway is pathway that proceeds from back to front through the southern part,

  • the lower part of the brain. Next topic on your handout, and your handout has these topics

  • arranged in a serial manner, so if you proceed from the top, you'll be getting the whole

  • outline of this presentation. The next topic we're talking about is attention itself. William

  • James, the American psychologist and philosopher, outlined the importance of attention, and

  • he called it "The faculty of bringing back a wandering attention over and over again,

  • over and over again, is the very root of all of our judgment, character and will." I'm

  • going to make a little different tack and also emphasize that not only is this a voluntary

  • process, but that attention operates involuntarily. So let's look at the attentive brain here.

  • And to get oriented, this is the back of the brain and you're looking down at the top of

  • the brain with the right hemisphere being on your right and the left hemisphere being

  • on your left. The nose is here. And let's look at the left hemisphere first and you'll

  • notice it has a lot of fine dots in it. This is to emphasize that the left hemisphere operates

  • in a discriminatory, fine-grain kind of processing. And when it looks out at the outside world,

  • and this outside world is on the opposite side of the environment because things are

  • crossed in the brain, it looks out and sees with discrimination, fine-grain discrimination.

  • It sees and hears with fine-grain discrimination. Now, you know that most--for most of us, almost

  • all of us, our language ability is centered over in the left hemisphere. Whereas, when

  • we're talking about attentiveness, the corresponding regions, very exactly in this right hemisphere,

  • are specialized for attention. Most of the training in Zen meditation involves the training

  • of attention; the training of attention, both top-down and bottom-up training of attention.

  • And here we see the reason why. Because this right hemisphere, you'll notice, has a lot

  • of spaces in between the lines. It's not a fine grain, it's more of a course grain kind

  • of processing. And when it looks out into the opposite visual field, there is plenty

  • of room between these lines for it to insert values, atmospheres of aesthetic appreciation,

  • and judgment. Then because it sends a message over to the left hemisphere through the corpus

  • callosum, it enters into a bargain with the left hemisphere. It's an age old bargain.

  • It's been going on for millenia. And it says, in effect, "Left hemisphere, you can take

  • over the responsibility of words, and language and speaking and understanding language. But

  • I'm going to co-opt everything that you see over in the right side of the world and claim

  • it as mine." And so the right hemisphere pays attention to both sides of the outside environment.

  • And this becomes very important because it means that the right hemisphere is poised

  • to be receptive to the whole outside world. Many years ago, it was theorized, with good

  • evidence, that these two pathways were organized into a where pathway and then to a what pathway.

  • It's now, I think, more reasonable to say that this northern root is a "where is it

  • in relation to me?" back in the center, and to say that the southern root is a "what is

  • it?" pathway that arrives at identification of the object that is seen out there. Those

  • of you who know some anatomy will notice an interesting point about this northern root,

  • because it goes through the angular gyrus here on it's way north into the parietal lobe,

  • and it misses the supramarginal gyrus which is more involved in the ventral kind of attentiveness.

  • This slide is a composite slide that shows the brain and what it perceives out there

  • as a--in a theoretical way. We'll start with two of these spots up in the top part of the

  • brain because one of them is intraparietal sulcus or the IPS. And the IPS is linked with

  • the frontal eye field which is in the frontal part of the brain, and the two together are

  • our two modes of top-down attentiveness. We spoke of top-down attentiveness earlier, and

  • it's on one of your handout tables. You'll notice that these two modes of attention are

  • in a position to be overlapped by the egocentric pathway of processing, so that the two together,

  • egocentricity and top-down attentiveness, are very easy to link together into one giant

  • function. On the other hand, lower down, is the temporoparietal junction which includes

  • the superior temporal gyrus here and the supramarginal gyrus. And it links up in the same network

  • and circuitry with the inferior frontal cortex which is farther forward in the brain. You're

  • looking here, by the way, at the brain where the occipital lobe is back here, the seeing

  • part of the cortex, whereas the frontal lobe and nose is way up here in front. Further

  • more, this lower ventral pathway for attention is closer to the allocentric or the other

  • centered mode of processing reality, and tucked into the undersurface of the temporal lobe

  • is a module called the FG or the fusiform gyrus. This is a gyrus that specialize both

  • for color perception and for the processing or facial features. Thank you. All right.

  • So here's this brain and it's looking up into the outside world, and what is it seeing?

  • Well, it's seeing four quadrants of vision, and let's look at them separately. Why, you

  • might ask, is there a red rim around the lower visual field? Well, that's because the egocentric

  • pathway, starting as it does in the upper part of the occipital lobe, is much more efficient

  • at processing things that are below the horizon. So, upper part of the occipital lobe, more

  • efficient at processing lower down. And ladies, there are several of you in the audience,

  • if you are balancing a baby on your lap, it's very important for you to be using the functions

  • that are up here, your functions of touch and proprioception, because they will help

  • you hold that baby accurately on your lap so the baby doesn't fall. And gentlemen, if

  • you are hammering a nail with your hammer and you'll hold the nail in your left hand,

  • it's very important for you have proprioception and touch so that you can come down with your

  • hammer accurately on the head of the nail because if you don't, your fingers are history.

  • So this pathway, the egocentric pathway, is highly specialized for action. And it depends

  • on the parietal lobe for its proprioceptive and touch skills. And notice that these objects

  • that it handles are down close to it in its very personal space in the envelope of space

  • right around it within reach; within reach. On the other hand, consider the allocentric

  • pathway starting in the lower part of the occipital lobe. Remember things are crossed

  • in the brain. So this part of the brain is most efficient at processing items that are

  • up here in the upper visual fields above the visual horizon. What is up here? Well, in

  • ages past, it would be very handy to detect the saber-toothed tiger by your sense of hearing,

  • audition, or your sense of color vision so that you could detect the difference between

  • the stripes on the tiger and the leaf patterns that are in the underbrush. And it's important

  • that the tiger be detected at a distance away from you so it doesn't wind up in your lap.

  • And having escaped the tiger, if you wanted to be in a contemplative mode and thank your

  • lucky stars, you could look out in the distance at the blue sky and the clouds and the mountains

  • and be in a more relaxed frame of mind. These are the differences between vision and audition

  • which are in the temporal lobe, and touch and proprioception, the circuitry of which

  • is in your parietal lobe. Now looking here at a functional MRI scan of the left--we're

  • looking at the right hemisphere from the outside, the nose is here by the inferior frontal gyrus

  • and the occipital lobe is back here in the back. And you see these same structures that

  • we've spoken about before, but the interesting point here is that the intraparietal sulcus

  • is right next to this blue spot which is the superior parietal lobule. What is the superior

  • parietal lobule? It's your somatosensory association cortex. And what does that mean? It means

  • that this is the part of your brain that understands that you have an arm, a leg, a head and a

  • trunk on both sides, and it puts these together so that you understand and know instinctively

  • that you have a body that you can act with which will be your agency for working as a

  • unit in the outside world. So this is where your sense of physical sense of self comes

  • together. So notice how handy it is to have your top-down attention mode right next to

  • this organizational principle that enables you to know you have a whole body scheme with

  • which you can operate in the outside world. What about the bottom-up attention and its

  • processing? Well, it's in the temporo-parietal junction and the inferior frontal gyrus. And

  • there are some yellow colors here and that's simply to remind us that our top-down attentiveness

  • and our bottom-up attentiveness have to be merged in a very sophisticated manner in order

  • for us to put together the kinds of attention that we need to operate in our daily lives.

  • So the medial frontal gyrus and the inferior frontal gyrus operate particularly on the

  • right side to arrive at this merger of functions that enables us to operate. In your handout

  • is a table that simply summarizes the responses of the ventral, the lower, and the dorsal

  • kind of attention systems, and I won't dwell on that any further. It is important, however,

  • to make a distinction, a visual distinction, between top-down attention which is a sharply

  • pointed, remember, exclusive kind of attention. It operates on a foundation of bare awareness.

  • It has a pre-attention mode which is entirely involuntary and which is right out there at

  • the point. And the point here is simply to illustrate that top-down attention is the

  • vanguard that is out at the tip of all of our processing. In computer programming, there

  • is also, I gather, something that is out at the forefront of the processing, and in the

  • brain, it is a sharp point of attention that impales the topic that we wish to pay attention

  • to so that the rest of our processing can come in and know where to operate. Think how

  • important it is to this pen which has lots of ink in it to be able to have a point in order to write with, and you'll understand

  • the pointing function of attention, and you'll understand why William James regarded it as

  • so crucial to our operations. So this is the kind of top-down attention and the contrasting

  • form is our bottom-up attentiveness which is a more global kind of receptivity. It also

  • functions at the level of bare awareness and it has a subconscious processing also, and

  • everything above its threshold of consciousness it does have the potential of entering on

  • our consciousness. But most important, everything below this level operates at a subconscious

  • level. So the bottom-up attentiveness much of what goes on is not within our conscious

  • understanding. It goes on subconsciously. Farther down on your handout is the issue

  • of the difference between our physical sense of self and our psychic sense of self. Zen

  • training, in particular, emphasizes doing away with the disadvantageous aspects of our

  • self-centeredness. And to understand how this is so, you need to know the difference between

  • the physical body which is your physical sense of self, the Greeks called it your soma and

  • your--and your cognitive and your affective and your instinctual forms of self which are

  • your psychic sense of self which the Greeks called our psyche. So soma and psyche are

  • very different. I know because I can feel my arm that I have a somatic sense of self.

  • But can you touch a thought? Can you reach out and touch your thought? Your thoughts

  • are intangible. So our soma deals with tangible things and our psyche deals with cognition

  • and emotion and instincts, and these are intangible categories of functioning. Now, let's look

  • at the self in operational terms and try to see how it operates in our daily lives. And

  • to do so, it helps to divide the self into three operational sub-compartments. The most

  • obvious one is the I, the part of ourselves that we know exist, we can feel it, we know

  • that it's there and we can watch it act. And these are all very adaptive functions. Similarly,

  • the Me is that part of our self to which things happen. If I don't look carefully when I'm

  • crossing the curb and going out in traffic, I'm going to be hit by an automobile and something

  • very bad is going to happen to me. So this is an adaptive part of the self or Me. And

  • similarly, the Mine helps us identify our thoughts, our body parts, and our possessions.

  • If we're going in the parking lot at Googleplex and trying to find our automobile, it helps

  • to know which automobile is mine and where we parked it because otherwise we'll be lost

  • without our car. So these are all the adaptive good parts of having an I, Me, Mine, but there

  • are disadvantages, there's a downside. There are cons to being a self. There are maladaptive

  • aspects of the self that we should like to do away with. The first and the easiest to

  • identify by our friends are our aggressive self; our aggressive, arrogant self. We have

  • another self. Here I am trying to get rid of myself and I have this other self that

  • is somehow in the circuitry. And this tells us how difficult it is to get rid of our self.

  • We have this echo self which seems to have subsided. No. It needs to meditate more. So,

  • our friends know that we have an arrogant and aggressive self, but this part is sort

  • of hidden from us. But the Me part of our self, this we recognize because this is our

  • battered and our fearful and our anxiety- ridden self. This is the part that gives us

  • high blood pressure and all kinds of physical and mental ailments. And how about the mind?

  • The mind, of course, is also clutching its captured self-indentured, it craves things,

  • it overeats, it wants too much. And these are the, in short, the ABCs of the I, Me,

  • Mine, the aggressive, besieged and clutching parts of the self that we can do without.

  • Now, as the new century dawned, a group of investigators at Washington University in

  • St. Louis, Deborah Gusnard and Marcus Raichle, looked over a bunch of PET scans--PET scans

  • that had been done in the past and discovered something interesting. In here, you're looking

  • at a summary of what they found, because we're looking now at the inside of the brain. Previously,

  • we've been looking at the outside of the brain. Now we're looking at the brain from the inside

  • and you recognize that it's the inside because it's the right hemisphere and here is the

  • corpus callusom that has been cut, the bridge between the two hemispheres. And what they

  • found was that there were two hotspots in this inner part of the brain at rest; at rest.

  • Their subjects were trying to relax, not do anything mentally or physically. And here

  • was a hotspot in the medial posterior parietal cortex. Front of the brain here, back of the brain here. Notice,

  • by the way, the other centered, allocentered pathway coming along here through the under

  • part of the occipital and medial temporal cortex. And similarly, the other major hotspot

  • was here in the angular gyrus which is we've noticed is the longest egocentric pathway

  • that leads up to the superior parietal lobule. So here at rest are three hotspots. What happens

  • when the subjects are then given a task which requires them to be introspective and to look

  • into their self? These hotspots become even hotter. And various lines of evidence suggest

  • that these hotspots in charge are engaged, at least partially, in generating our sense

  • of psychic self-identity and in relating this identity to our environment and to ways to

  • navigate through our environment. So if you ask, what are these hotspots doing anyway?

  • One might suggest by way of speculation that this is how you remember where you were born,

  • what your bedroom look like in your early formative years, where you went to high school,

  • who your friends were in high school, where you went to college, and what your office

  • looks like at Googleplex. This is where you fit in to your long narrative history and

  • then to that part of your environment which you laid down with circumstantial details

  • so that you know how to find your way around your environment. But now, what happens when

  • the subjects are given an acute task--an acute task that requires them to be very attentive

  • to their external environment? If you remember the first slide with the self and external

  • environment, you'll know and can anticipate that these hotspots become cooler. These self

  • hotspots become cooler when attentiveness is required and demanded by events in the

  • external environment. And this has since been borne out by functional MRI. You're looking

  • here at the top side at the functional MRI scans. In here, you're looking at the left

  • hemisphere with the frontal lobe here and the occipital lobe here. And here is the posterior

  • cingulate cortex back in the medial parietal lobe, and here is the medial prefrontal cortex

  • and here's the angular gyrus, so that this is a resting functional MRI scan and we still

  • have these three major hotspots. But now, the subjects are inside the functional MRI

  • scanner for 300 seconds or five minutes. And we see something fascinating. Because we see

  • that when the cool spots get hotter, the hotspots get cooler. And when the hotspots get hotter,

  • the cool spots get cooler. And this is happening in this subject about three times a minute.

  • Now, this is a very, very slow cycle. It's endogenous, intrinsic cycle of the brain.

  • It's not clear exactly what the mechanism is but it's probably a combination of some

  • metabolic cycle and some bioelectric cycle. It's much slower than the breathing rate of,

  • say, 18 per minute because this is only three per minute. Where could such a basic rhythm

  • come from, and that, of course, is an interesting problem for neuroscientists to settle. And

  • if you're wondering about the IPS which is cooler and the FEF which is cooler and the

  • TPj and the inferior frontal cortex which is cooler, rest assured that 20 minutes--20

  • seconds later things will be different. In here, 20 seconds later is the evidence of

  • a spontaneous reciprocal shift in the other direction. As the hot spots get hotter, the

  • cool spots get cooler. Question? >> Are the subjects doing anything during

  • this? >> AUSTIN: No, no. This is spontaneous. The

  • subject is not trying to do anything. This is an involuntary, spontaneous, endogenous,

  • reciprocal shift that's going on by itself. Thank you for your question. So here is the

  • cooler angular gyrus and the cooler medial posterior parietal and the cooler medial prefrontal

  • cortex. And here again, as a reminder, is a reciprocal function we've been talking about.

  • Now, the question then might be those of you who meditate and who go to a meditative retreat,

  • let's say you've gone through day-long retreat or on a weekend retreat and then you've gone

  • for a seven-day retreat, you're very relaxed and yet very receptive, very acute, very sensitized

  • to your environment. And you've been doing this for--not for a week or so but you've

  • been doing this for some years. What would happen if you're just there relaxed in a receptive

  • mode of attentiveness? Well, speculation here is a model to think about. Here is your allocentric

  • mode of other referential attentiveness going up and down maybe three per minute. And here

  • is your self-centered mode going up in a reciprocal fashion spontaneously. And then all of a sudden

  • a triggering stimulus comes from the outside; a triggering stimulus. A triggering stimulus

  • has been described in Zen terms and Buddhist terms for many, many centuries. For Zen Master

  • EQ who was meditating out in a boat, in a row boat out in the center of Lake Biwa in

  • Japan at night, the triggering stimulus was a bird that flew over and above him. A bird

  • that he was unaware of and the bird said [makes sound]. And Zen Master EQ dropped into a certain

  • extraordinary state of consciousness. Why? Well, we've seen that there is this reciprocal

  • arrangement that goes on spontaneously and we're speculating that is allocentric, other

  • referential attentive processing would be captured and very hyper attentive. And similarly

  • in the reverse reciprocal fashion, there would be a deactivation of his self-referential

  • processing, which is in red and down here. And after a variable but unknown period of

  • time because time would drop out, his allocentric processing would be at a higher level. And

  • as a residual during the--during the afterglow phase, his egocentric processing would be

  • at a very low level and much of his prior maladaptive self would have been cut off.

  • Cut off--question? >> How long will the [INDISTINCT] last?

  • >> AUSTIN: A variable period of time, but I would say anywhere from hours to a few days.

  • Thank you for your question. I've just come back from Beijing where I was given, to my

  • surprise, this ceremonial sword. I thought it might interest the audience as a curiosity,

  • but it also helps me explain how the sword cut that is describe in the old literature

  • which is the sword of the Buddha [INDISTINCT] of enlightenment and [INDISTINCT]. How it

  • operates and nicely slices off at that just the right parts, our sense of physical and

  • psychic self that is disadvantageous to our well-being and to well-being of others. Now,

  • you may think it odd that any quasi-religion or quasi-philosophical or any other system

  • of human endeavor would speak of a sword cut as a metaphor for a state of consciousness

  • that would supervene but this is the same way than my Zen master describe such a moment

  • to me. And the technique that he used with something like this. He said, "A cut will

  • open up in the mind and will strike the depths of the cut." He put both of his hands down

  • in this manner and touched his fingers to indicate a big long V-shaped cut in the mind.

  • So, we are talking there is--and there is a word in Japanese Kiri-e which describes

  • such a cut in the mind. Now, if the self vacates the center of consciousness which it does.

  • And then the setters and insight that comprehends all things in the outside world as they really

  • are and the absence of self. And if there is no fear at that moment and no time and

  • pro-perception, the physical sense of self is unregistered. And if perfection is registered

  • throughout the outside world at that moment, how is it possible that such a moment can

  • occur. Again, we're talking about a model explanation but the model begins with the

  • thalamus. But what are we looking at here? We're looking at the left side of the brain,

  • nose here, back of the brain here. We're looking at the thalamus which is a paired structure.

  • This is the left thalamus and we're seeing the largest nucleus in the whole thalamus

  • which is the pulvinar. And the pulvinar on that model that you have there is indicated

  • in a-in a yellow orange manner. If you see a yellow orange spot, you're looking at the

  • pulvinar. What does the pulvinar do? The pulvinar specializes in salience that's a quality that

  • enables the foreground item of interest to leap out and the background to subside and

  • become the background. So, the pulvinar is a very smart nucleus to have at the onset

  • of all of our perceptions. Now, what you're looking at in color is mostly the dorsal part

  • or the upper part or the northern part of the thalamus. And the other item of interest

  • is a lateral-posterior nucleus and it's connected with the superior parietal lobule which is

  • where we organize our physical sense of self. In front of that are the three limbic nuclei

  • of the thalamus. Through these three nuclei come all of the messages that rise up from

  • our hypothalamus, our hippocampus, our amygdale, all of our emotional life passes through these

  • three limbic nuclei and the front of the thalamus. And it's so happens that each of these three

  • nuclei are the passageway up to those three hot spots in the cortex which are our sense

  • of self. So, the way the circuitry is arranged in the brain, all of the information which

  • comes up from the limbic system and comes up in a bottom of manner, that comes up through

  • the limbic system and drives our cortex with all of our wants, all of our attachments,

  • all of our emotions first goes through these three limbic nuclei in the front of the dorsal

  • thalamus. So, we're talking about the dorsal tear first. But notice the ventral pulvinar

  • remains as those the rest to the ventral nuclei. And the ventral pulvinar goes up to diffuse

  • the formed gyrus and all of the other information that passes along the allocentric other centered

  • kind of processing. So, then, how is it possible to drop out all of these dorsal thalamus and

  • therefore rid ourselves of our anxieties and our sense of self. And the answer is that

  • it is not possible. It's not possible unless you pay attention to another nucleus in the

  • thalamus which is a reticular nucleus. Think of the reticular nucleus as a cap that fits

  • over the rest of the thalamus. And because it has many GABA, gamma aminobutyric acid

  • nerve cells in it, it exercises and inhibitory role on the rest of the dorsal thalamus. So,

  • because the thalamus and the cortex normally operate in an oscillating mode very quickly

  • back and forth, the reticular cap enables the thalamus to shut down it's thalamocortical

  • system and to cut off our sense of self. Now, you may say, "What is the evidence for this

  • in my own experience?" The evidence for this in your own experience is it what happens

  • when you go into your bedroom, turn out the lights and drop off to sleep in the evening

  • at night? Why do you fall asleep? Your vision drops out, your hearing drops out, your sense

  • of physical self drops out? All courtesy of your reticular nucleus in addition to other

  • circumstances. And why is the thalamus important? It's important because everything that you

  • have experienced since you first sat down in this chair this morning, all of your perceptions

  • have had to go through your thalamus in order for you to understand in the cortical level

  • what's going on, with the exception of smell. And if you smell the coffee or the onions

  • coming from over here, that's only because smell is the only exception. All the rest

  • has to go through your thalamus. Now, like the rest of the western world, the people

  • in Holland were used to a door that operates as a unit from the top to bottom until about

  • 1600. And then some Dutchman said, "Hey, why don't we design another kind of door? Let's

  • design a door that is hinged at the top and then independently at the bottom so we have

  • more options. And if our wives are inside here and the kids are down here playing in

  • the door step, she can look down and watch the kids or if it's a very hot day and we

  • want to get some cool breezes from a distant source, we can close the top part and open

  • up the bottom part and let the cool breezes come in and sweep along the floor. And if

  • we want to close off to world at night in security, we can close both halves of the

  • door as we drop off to sleep. The Dutch door is a metaphor for the way the dorsal thalamus

  • opens and closes at different kinds of days. Now, there are some triggers of historical

  • interest. The first of course is the--is the moment the episode involving Siddhartha Gautama

  • about 2500 years ago, who is meditating the bodhi tree in the pre-dawn hours. When he

  • looked up and saw the morning star--what is the morning star? The morning star was well

  • known to the ancients. Morning star is the planet Venus. And this is the way the planet

  • Venus was painted in back of the early Chinese dynasties. She was painted as a white goddess.

  • And it's an indication of the harmony that was involved in her being. She has shown holding

  • a lute. And as further evidence that she was present in the early morning hours. If you

  • look up here, you can see that she has a rooster in her crown, evidencing what goes on in the

  • first part of the morning. And next time you go up north and visit Seattle, do visit the

  • Seattle Asian Art Museum. because in the Asian Art Museum, you will this statue which is

  • entitled 'A Monk at the Moment of Enlightenment.' You will notice the black Buddha who looked

  • up and saw the morning star. This monk is also shown looking up at the moment of enlightenment.

  • The technique of looking up as a meditated practice is well known in Tibetan Buddhism.

  • And when Matthieu Ricard was here in 2007, about that time he was also writing a book

  • about Shabkar and Enlightened Sage in Tibetan Buddhism in the 19th century. And what Shabkar

  • had to say is this: "I raise my head looking up and saw the cloudless sky. I thought of

  • absolute space free from all limitations. And then experienced a freedom without center,

  • without end. In translation, the cloudless sky is the sky that is free of all delusions.

  • Absolute space without limits, it is this space with stems around us as allocentric

  • space. The freedom is the liberation that is part of an enlightened state of moment.

  • Without center means, no self is in the center, without end meaning infinite. And so as we

  • go out the door through which we entered, I thank you for your attention.

>> Good morning friends. We are delighted today have our--to host our friend, Dr. James

Subtitles and vocabulary

Click the word to look it up Click the word to find further inforamtion about it