Placeholder Image

Subtitles section Play video

  • What could a future with electric planes look like?

  • $25 tickets, quieter airports,

  • or even shorter runways.

  • Companies have been betting on

  • battery-powered planes for this cleaner future.

  • But even though electric planes

  • have been around since the 1970s,

  • they haven't really taken off.

  • So, what's keeping them grounded?

  • In the late 1800s,

  • two French army officers experimented

  • with electricity to propel an airship,

  • but they ran into problems

  • when the battery just couldn't hold enough energy.

  • This would become a recurring problem

  • for the next 100 years.

  • When nickel-cadmium batteries were invented,

  • the first flight with an electric motor took off,

  • but it only lasted less than 15 minutes.

  • Then, in the 1980s,

  • lithium-ion batteries were invented.

  • They could store more power than ever before,

  • leading to planes like the Solar Impulse 2.

  • Starting in 2015, the solar-powered aircraft

  • spent 16 months flying around the world,

  • except it flew at an average speed

  • of 28 to 34 mph.

  • Solar Impulse 2 is part of a movement

  • in recent years to develop alternative energies,

  • especially when people and governments started realizing

  • just how bad flying was for the environment.

  • The aviation industry emitted

  • about 1 billion tons CO2 in 2019.

  • That's about 2.5% of global emissions.

  • That might not sound like a lot,

  • but it's almost as much as the entire continent

  • of South America emits in a year.

  • Kevin Noertker: We need to make changes to the industry,

  • and electrification is one of the big trends

  • which will hopefully reduce that burden.

  • Narrator: Electric planes have been

  • on people's mind for a while,

  • but two big problems are keeping electric grounded.

  • First, the technology's not quite ready.

  • When you're trying to get an electric plane off the ground,

  • you want a battery that packs a lot of punch

  • in a little package, but...

  • Carolina Anderson: Batteries are not as efficient as gas,

  • and they're probably not gonna be for a while.

  • Narrator: A battery's efficiency,

  • or ability to hold power,

  • is measured in specific energy.

  • Right now, even the best batteries have a specific energy

  • of only 250 watt-hours per kilogram,

  • but we have to get closer to 800 to really start flying,

  • and that is still nothing compared

  • to jet fuel's specific energy,

  • which is nearly 12,000 watt-hours per kilogram.

  • Think about it like those computers from the '80s.

  • They were huge, but way less powerful

  • than the sleek ones we have today.

  • Right now, batteries are like those '80s computers.

  • They're not as powerful as they need to be,

  • and they're not just big, they're also heavy.

  • So if you want to add more power to a plane,

  • you need to get a bigger battery,

  • and to get that plane airborne despite the weight,

  • you'll need even bigger battery that's more powerful,

  • but that means more weight.

  • And then you'll need an even bigger battery

  • to offset that weight.

  • Oh, you get the point.

  • But even if engineers design a plane

  • around the shortfalls in battery tech,

  • they have to take on the industry's second hurdle,

  • certification.

  • In the US, that means getting permission

  • from the Federal Aviation Administration

  • to test and fly an electric plane.

  • Companies have to prove every inch

  • of their aircraft is safe, passing a series of tests,

  • one of which is to make sure the battery cells

  • won't catch fire.

  • Roei Ganzarski: If something goes wrong,

  • you can't stop.

  • You can't pull to the side of the road.

  • There's only one place for that airplane to go.

  • And so the regulatory stringency is much higher,

  • the requirements for reliability,

  • redundancy, and safety

  • are much higher for a good reason.

  • You have no alternate.

  • Narrator: The FAA amended its rules in 2016

  • to allow electric propulsion systems in airplanes

  • built for up to 19 passengers.

  • The real problem, though, is that certification,

  • even with these amendments, takes years,

  • so companies have gotten creative.

  • They've started to retrofit old planes

  • to get certified quicker.

  • Ganzarski: You're taking out the entire old,

  • gas-guzzling, emission-creating engine

  • and its fuel system,

  • and replacing that space and weight

  • with an electric propulsion system.

  • Narrator: Retrofitting has happened in phases.

  • The first phase was from Slovenian company Pipistrel.

  • It created the world's first all-electric

  • two-seater plane back in 2007

  • by putting an electric engine in a glider.

  • Tine Tomažič: Gliders are safe to fly by definition,

  • even without a functioning engine,

  • so we were able to experiment

  • without putting anybody at risk

  • or do harm to anyone.

  • Narrator: Today, those planes are used for pilot training.

  • The second phase: a hybrid.

  • Los Angeles company Ampaire replaced one of the two engines

  • in a 1973 Cessna with an electric one.

  • Ampaire hopes to get its new plane, the Electric Eel,

  • certified for commercial flights by 2021.

  • And, finally, over in Vancouver,

  • electric-motor manufacturer MagniX

  • and Vancouver-based airline Harbour Air

  • flew a retrofitted 62-year-old plane.

  • A 15-minute test flight in December 2019

  • made it the world's first

  • all-electric commercial plane to fly.

  • It proved that electric could actually take off.

  • The two companies' goal is now to electrify

  • the rest of Harbour Air's fleet

  • of more than 40 seaplanes

  • and have it certified by the end of 2021.

  • So, retrofitting seems perfect.

  • The problem, though, is that it limits you

  • to what the plane structure is already built for,

  • so if the original motor is, say,

  • 1,000 pounds, and you remove it, then...

  • Ganzarski: I only have 1,000 pounds to put back in, right?

  • I can't make the total package heavier.

  • Narrator: Electric motors are smaller

  • and lighter than gas ones,

  • but remember, those batteries are heavy.

  • Ganzarski: So you lose range because batteries,

  • for the same amount of power,

  • are so much heavier than fuel.

  • Narrator: So while Harbour Air and MagniX

  • figured out the balance of weight in their plane,

  • the range took a hit.

  • Their electric plane can go over 100 miles,

  • a little less than the distance from Seattle to Vancouver,

  • but for electric planes to be successful long-term,

  • they'll have to go farther.

  • Israeli company Eviation might have a solution.

  • Instead of retrofitting an old plane,

  • its engineers built a plane from scratch.

  • The nine-seater plane, Alice,

  • was designed around the battery to reduce weight.

  • Omer Bar-Yohay: That battery's literally all over the place.

  • It's under the floor, it's in the wings,

  • it's the fuselage in different locations.

  • Narrator: Alice, in theory, could fly up to 650 miles,

  • roughly a flight from Las Vegas to Denver,

  • but because it was built from the ground up,

  • getting her certified is taking longer.

  • Bar-Yohay: We're very confident that we will be

  • testing the plane in flight early 2020

  • and believe that from that point on

  • the certification process will take about two years.

  • Narrator: Each electric plane in development

  • is different, but they all have one thing in common:

  • they're going after flights under 500 miles.

  • And while it may not seem like an impressive distance,

  • these short-range electric planes

  • could solve a major problem in travel.

  • In 2018, a little less than half