Subtitles section Play video
-
>> Hey everyone. Happy holidays.
-
Thank you for coming.
-
I know some of you are actually on
-
holiday as of like a few days ago.
-
So, I appreciate you coming back to show
-
up to listen to a dear friend of mine,
-
family friend, Reverend Taka Kawakami,
-
who, I'll let him explain his background himself.
-
I'm Anna, I'm one of the General Managers and partners here
-
running the AI research in Bing Studio,
-
and we hold a monthly series called Fireside Chats.
-
This is our third series,
-
actually it's like 2.5.
-
It's like we've had two this month already.
-
I just want to welcome you all and say thank you for showing up,
-
and I'm going to hand it over to Taka now.
-
So, thank you.
-
>> Well, thank you so much. Will you give me a hug?
-
Well, thank you so much for another introduction,
-
but also give me this opportunity here.
-
So, I'm Taka.
-
Do I need to talk of my background anyway?
-
>> Yeah.
-
>> Okay. All right.
-
So, I am a Deputy Head Priest at Temple Shunkoin Temple.
-
I am actually wearing T-shirts for that one.
-
Actually, I'm priest, I'm Zen priest.
-
Normally when I'm working in Temple,
-
I wear this robe here.
-
I teach Zen Buddhism,
-
Philosophy, but also Mindfulness,
-
and recently working on the Innovation, something like that.
-
I work with many startup company in Shinjuku or Gotanda.
-
That spot in Tokyo,
-
there are many startup business there.
-
At first I was wearing a robe
-
when I started going there to
-
give a workshop, something like this.
-
Many people were wearing this logo t-shirts anyway,
-
so I started wearing this one too.
-
So, that's what I do.
-
Then maybe, the last few years,
-
especially teaching in some of universities in US,
-
like this February I was leading a workshop at Brown University,
-
and also MIT, something like that.
-
Probably some of you are from there too.
-
So, mostly that's what I do.
-
Then, today's case, I saw the topics there, the mindfulness too,
-
but actually many people,
-
probably already done the meditation mindfulness before.
-
All right, that's good, thanks.
-
Many people have done meditations,
-
probably, because mindfulness I think has faded,
-
especially this tech industry right now.
-
But issue there is they don't really
-
teach about philosophical part.
-
I think that's an issue,
-
because if you're practicing meditation just
-
for the stress reduction or a way to develop your performance,
-
in a way, in a way you're just using meditation as a pain killer.
-
In a way, the cosmetic drug.
-
As you know the pain killer doesn't actually treat wounds,
-
or disease, or anything, all right.
-
It doesn't heal your wounds,
-
disease, anything like that.
-
So, we need to go a step farther.
-
Then that's why I start
-
talking about actuality and reality, in a way.
-
I should use this one to search topics.
-
But anyone can tell the difference between actuality and reality.
-
Anyone up in there and Skype too,
-
that anyone can tell the difference.
-
actuality and reality.
-
I know that if you go to the dictionary, regular dictionary,
-
Webster, whatever, its synonyms.
-
But this one here actually quite important for this.
-
Just practicing mindfulness, well,
-
actually Zen Buddhism or Buddhism in general,
-
but also this is an important concept for the innovation too.
-
Actuality and reality.
-
Anyone? Don't be shy.
-
>> Perception.
-
>> Others say perception versus the moment.
-
>> That's right.
-
>> Like, actuality is perception,
-
and then reality is what's actually happened.
-
>> Actually it's opposite.
-
But, yeah, that's close enough in a way.
-
We have actually a good example later,
-
but actuality and reality.
-
Actuality is something actually exist,
-
but reality only exist here.
-
So, it's really about perception in a way that
-
reality based on what you perceive from actuality.
-
But we normally don't
-
differentiate because we have a naive realism in a way.
-
I want to try some game actually.
-
So, in a way we are going to talk about this one here,
-
but in order to
-
actually understand difference between reality and actuality,
-
we need to understand about our own patterns.
-
Belief that you created unconsciously,
-
or some embodied movement or pattern, something like this.
-
So, we're going to play this game.
-
Rock-Paper-Scissors, everybody knows.
-
I assume that you know this is a multinational company.
-
It's interesting. I teach this one in
-
my meditation class at my Temple.
-
I have actually, people coming from different countries.
-
This simple game here,
-
but everybody have different rules.
-
Well, as you see,
-
these are basic rules here. Lets see.
-
Don't be shy everybody, find your partner.
-
Let's make a group of two,
-
preferably somebody you don't normally talk.
-
Somebody you don't know. Somebody you've
-
never talked even you actually- I mean,
-
this is a huge company in a way.
-
I can see that many
-
of the people around here never talk, never seen that.
-
Okay, you can now find
-
a partner and maybe kind of partner. So, group of two.
-
Maybe we find a partner. All right.
-
So, first of all,
-
decide if you're going to be Person A and Person B.
-
Decide if you're going to be Person A and Person B.
-
Can you decide it? All right.
-
Then Person A just plays the game as usual, the normal rule,
-
but Person B you need to throw
-
the hand second after the Person A throw their hand.
-
So, you can see what kind of hand your partner throw.
-
Then you see it, but you have to purposely lose.
-
You have to lose purposely.
-
So, you confirm their hand,
-
then you throw your hand and you lose.
-
But not too long, okay?
-
Not too long. I mean,
-
like just a second later, all right?
-
Then play this one five times each,
-
and then I'm going to ask you after everybody play this game,
-
I'm going to ask you how many times you could lose,
-
you can lose, okay?
-
>> Because if you think about [inaudible].
-
>> Okay. You got the rule?
-
>> Yeah.
-
>> Everything clear?
-
>> Yeah.
-
>> All right. So.
-
All right. You have
-
to loose, you can not win.
-
Okay? So, five times eight,
-
all right? Five times eight.
-
How was it? Tricky, right?
-
Challenging. All right, everybody finished or not yet?
-
Do you a couple of minutes?
-
Couple more minutes, are you done?
-
>> That was hard.
-
>> So, first of all,
-
anyone who loose five times? That's amazing.
-
Four times? Three times?
-
Twice? Once? Zero? So, how was it?
-
>> It's was hard.
-
>> It's hard isn't it? It's just slight change.
-
You just need to,
-
is that my voice echoing or somebody is talking?
-
Okay. So, anyway, it's
-
easy game that just on one change, just losing, right.
-
>> For all of you that are remote,
-
can you please mute your sites. Thank you.
-
>> Okay. Thank you. But anyway,
-
so it's just a really easy game
-
that it's really hard to lose in a way because,
-
it's not like you actually practice this one so many time,
-
in a way, you just need to play this game again and again.
-
So, you actually know that,
-
you program yourself to win this game.
-
But, you try to change approach and it's really hard.
-
This is a silly game that
-
many things in your life probably find that it's similar where
-
you actually learn to
-
do something and you can still embody the skills or patterns.
-
You develop certain patterns.
-
But, when I ask you to change it's really hard.
-
So, then this one here.
-
So, this one here,
-
when you actually make these patterns,
-
normally we call this one belief, right?
-
When we create the belief,
-
first of all, let me ask you this one.
-
How many people think that you are more rational than people who
-
lived before late 18th century?
-
Define that time, we reason why it's
-
late 18th century normally
-
defined as the beginning of the modern science.
-
So, that's why I'm asking you,
-
how many people think that you are more rational than people
-
before the late 18th century?
-
Why?
-
Why do you think you are more rational?
-
>> They didn't second get themselves with science.
-
>> Science? I want to talk
-
about that one today. That's my topic today.
-
Science, right. Then, what is science?
-
You need more logic?
-
>> It's a method for understanding things that are in this.
-
>> Okay. But, what do you think,
-
how about people before the modern science was established?
-
What they used to understand what's going on around them?
-
>> Observation.
-
>> Observation.
-
>> Mythology.
-
>> Mythology.
-
>> Traditions.
-
>> Right.
-
>> Story.
-
>> Story.
-
>> Guess.
-
>> Guess, that's good.
-
But, we still use a guess.
-
But anyway, so this one here for instance,
-
how we develop our belief that belief it's
-
not part of faith or religion, I mean,
-
everyday in life too, you do
-
certain thing and you have belief that that's happened,
-
if you do A certainly B happen, that's a belief.
-
You have a certain routines or things that you do in everyday.
-
That's also a belief.
-
But normally, the reason why I ask you this one here
-
is why do you think you are more
-
rational than people who lived before.
-
Then, this case here,
-
which one comes first?
-
Reasoning or judgment, which one comes first?
-
You say rational, right?
-
You're more rational than people who
-
lived before the modern science was established.
-
So, people will say that you are more rational,
-
which one comes first? Reasoning or judgment?
-
>> Judgment.
-
>> Judgment. But in that case,
-
it's not really irrational, isn't it?
-
What do you think? If your judgment
-
comes first and then reasoning second,
-
doesn't sound rational to me.
-
>> You question.
-
>> Then normally sometime people say,
-
"Oh, reasoning comes first then judgment comes second."
-
But, what do you see here?
-
So, intuition, so judgment, right? The reasoning.
-
But, this reasoning here is not you're being a scientist in a way.
-
So, you've been just about lawyer to yourself.
-
You see the difference? Lawyer and the scientist difference.
-
So, lawyers case, they try to defend the client, right?
-
Scientists case, they try to find truth.
-
Then this kind of reasoning here,
-
this path here you have a judgment intuition this happened.
-
Reasoning here is normally we try to
-
justify our intuitional judgment.
-
Then, if this one here
-
to justify by your reasoning, then you have belief.