US
・UK
get, we're saying that success in life should be meritocratic, we should earn our successes. It shouldn't
This is not saying much more than that, um, success when we say that people should deserve what they get, we're saying that success in life should be meritocratic.
It's a little bit more you eat what you kill, a little bit more meritocratic, but not everyone has what it takes to be a solopreneur or to work in a small dynamic remote startup with three to five people.
It's a little bit more you eat what you kill, a little bit more meritocratic,
This is the heart of the meritocratic ideal.
But the problem isn't only that we fail to live up to the meritocratic principles we proclaim.
That said, China's government isn't always as meritocratic and effective as some might want to believe.
That said, China’s government isn’t always as meritocratic and effective as some might
And the investment that different kinds of children get in meritocratic societies is absolutely enormously different.
And the investment that different kinds of children get in meritocratic societies is absolutely, enormously different.
and they just deserve to be called a loser, which is why the more meritocratic the system is, the more psychological pressure there is, the more impulse there is to kill yourself if you don't succeed.
Which is why the more meritocratic the system is, the more psychological pressure there is, the more impasse there is to kill yourself if you don't succeed.
The 1990s, when departments were actually forced to conduct open searches and list their open positions publicly, until that time, people would just give lifetime appointments to people in their network and with no competition, meritocratic or otherwise.
The 1990s, when departments were actually forced to conduct open searches and list their open positions publicly, until that time, people would just give lifetime appointments to people in their network and with no competition, meritocratic or otherwise.
Well, first off, by refusing to believe that any society really ever can be meritocratic.
First off, by refusing to believe that any society really can be meritocratic: luck or
A society that thinks of itself as meritocratic turns poverty from a problem to evidence of damnation and those who have failed from unfortunates to losers.
A society that thinks of itself as meritocratic turns poverty from a problem to evidence of damnation, and
And that's really the system that Mike was advocating earlier on, what we might call a merit-based system, a meritocratic system.
Well, what does Rawls think about the meritocratic system?