Subtitles section Play video
-
THEY WEREN’T HELPING UKRAINE AND TO THIS DAY ARE NOT.
-
TO THIS DAY ARE NOT. AND THE PRESIDENT DID NOT LIKE
-
AND THE PRESIDENT DID NOT LIKE THAT.
-
THAT. LONG ANSWER, BUT I’M STILL
-
LONG ANSWER, BUT I’M STILL GOING.
-
GOING. THOSE WERE THE DRIVING FACTORS.
-
THOSE WERE THE DRIVING FACTORS. DID HE ALSO MENTION TO ME THAT
-
DID HE ALSO MENTION TO ME THAT THE CORRUPTION THAT RELATED TO
-
THE CORRUPTION THAT RELATED TO THE DNC SERVER?
-
THE DNC SERVER? ABSOLUTELY.
-
ABSOLUTELY. NO QUESTION.
-
NO QUESTION. BUT THAT IS IT.
-
BUT THAT IS IT. AND THAT IS WHY WE HELD UP THE
-
AND THAT IS WHY WE HELD UP THE MONEY.
-
MONEY. >> SO THE DEMAND FOR AN
-
>> SO THE DEMAND FOR AN INVESTIGATION INTO THE DEMOCRATS
-
INVESTIGATION INTO THE DEMOCRATS WAS PART OF THE REASON THAT HE
-
WAS PART OF THE REASON THAT HE ORDERED TO WITHHOLD FUNDING TO
-
ORDERED TO WITHHOLD FUNDING TO UKRAINE?
-
UKRAINE? >> THE LOOK BACK TO WHAT
-
>> THE LOOK BACK TO WHAT HAPPENED IN 2016 CERTAINLY WAS
-
HAPPENED IN 2016 CERTAINLY WAS PART OF THE THING THAT HE WAS
-
PART OF THE THING THAT HE WAS WORRIED ABOUT IN CORRUPTION WITH
-
WORRIED ABOUT IN CORRUPTION WITH THAT NATION.
-
THAT NATION. AND THAT IS APPROPRIATE.
-
AND THAT IS APPROPRIATE. >> TO WITHHOLD THE FUNDING.
-
>> TO WITHHOLD THE FUNDING. >> WHICH ULTIMATELY THEN FLOWED.
-
>> WHICH ULTIMATELY THEN FLOWED. BY THE WAY, THERE WAS A REPORT
-
BY THE WAY, THERE WAS A REPORT THAT WE WERE WORRIED THAT THE
-
THAT WE WERE WORRIED THAT THE MONEY WOULDN’T -- IF WE DIDN’T
-
MONEY WOULDN’T -- IF WE DIDN’T PAY OUT THE MONEY, IT WOULD BE
-
PAY OUT THE MONEY, IT WOULD BE UNLAWFUL.
-
UNLAWFUL. THAT IS ONE OF THOSE THINGS THAT
-
THAT IS ONE OF THOSE THINGS THAT HAS A LITTLE SHRED OF TRUTH IN
-
HAS A LITTLE SHRED OF TRUTH IN IT THAT MAKES IT LOOK A LOT
-
IT THAT MAKES IT LOOK A LOT WORSE THAN IT REALLY IS.
-
WORSE THAN IT REALLY IS. WE WERE CONCERNED ABOUT AT OBM
-
WE WERE CONCERNED ABOUT AT OBM ABOUT AN IMPOUNDMENT.
-
ABOUT AN IMPOUNDMENT. AND I JUST KNOW I PUT HALF YOU
-
AND I JUST KNOW I PUT HALF YOU FOLKS TO BED.
-
FOLKS TO BED. BUT THE BUDGET CONTROL
-
BUT THE BUDGET CONTROL IMPOUNDMENT ACT OF 1974 SAYS IF
-
IMPOUNDMENT ACT OF 1974 SAYS IF CONGRESS APPROPRIATES MONEY, YOU
-
CONGRESS APPROPRIATES MONEY, YOU HAVE TO SPEND IT.
-
HAVE TO SPEND IT. AND WE KNEW THAT THAT MONEY
-
AND WE KNEW THAT THAT MONEY EITHER HAD TO GO OUT THE DOOR BY
-
EITHER HAD TO GO OUT THE DOOR BY THE END OF SEPTEMBER OR WE HAD
-
THE END OF SEPTEMBER OR WE HAD TO HAVE A REALLY GOOD REASON NOT
-
TO HAVE A REALLY GOOD REASON NOT DO IT.
-
DO IT. AND THAT WAS THE LEGALITY OF THE
-
AND THAT WAS THE LEGALITY OF THE ISSUE.
-
ISSUE. >> LET’S BE CLEAR.
-
>> LET’S BE CLEAR. YOU DESCRIBED A QUID PROCEED
-
YOU DESCRIBED A QUID PROCEED QUOE COMPANY.
-
QUOE COMPANY. IT IS FUNDING WILL NOT FLOW
-
IT IS FUNDING WILL NOT FLOW UNLESS THE INVESTIGATION INTO
-
UNLESS THE INVESTIGATION INTO THE DEMOCRATIC SERVER HAPPENED
-
THE DEMOCRATIC SERVER HAPPENED AS WELL.
-
AS WELL. >> WE DO THAT ALL THE TIME WITH
-
>> WE DO THAT ALL THE TIME WITH FOREIGN POLICY.
-
FOREIGN POLICY. WE WERE HOLDING UP MONEY AT THE
-
WE WERE HOLDING UP MONEY AT THE SAME TIME FOR, WHAT WAS IT, THE
-
SAME TIME FOR, WHAT WAS IT, THE NORTHERN TRIANGLE COUNTRIES.
-
NORTHERN TRIANGLE COUNTRIES. WE WERE HOLDING UP AID TO THE
-
WE WERE HOLDING UP AID TO THE NORTHERN TRIANGLE COUNTRIES SO
-
NORTHERN TRIANGLE COUNTRIES SO THAT THEY WOULD CHANGE THEIR
-
THAT THEY WOULD CHANGE THEIR POLICIES ON IMMIGRATION.
-
POLICIES ON IMMIGRATION. BY THE WAY, AND THIS SPEAKS TO
-
BY THE WAY, AND THIS SPEAKS TO AN IMPORTANT -- STORY?
-
AN IMPORTANT -- STORY? THIS SPEAKS TO AN IMPORTANT
-
THIS SPEAKS TO AN IMPORTANT POINT.
-
POINT. I HEARD THIS YESTERDAY AND I CAN
-
I HEARD THIS YESTERDAY AND I CAN NEVER REMEMBER THE GENTLEMAN.
-
NEVER REMEMBER THE GENTLEMAN. McKINNEY?
-
McKINNEY? I DON’T KNOW.
-
I DON’T KNOW. BUT HE TESTIFIED YESTERDAY.
-
BUT HE TESTIFIED YESTERDAY. AND IF YOU BELIEVE THE NEWS
-
AND IF YOU BELIEVE THE NEWS REPORTS, BECAUSE WE’VE NOT SEEN
-
REPORTS, BECAUSE WE’VE NOT SEEN ANY TRANSCRIPTS OF THIS, THE
-
ANY TRANSCRIPTS OF THIS, THE ONLY TRANSCRIPT I’VE SEEN IS
-
ONLY TRANSCRIPT I’VE SEEN IS SONDLAND’S TESTIMONY MORNING.
-
SONDLAND’S TESTIMONY MORNING. WHAT DID McKINNEY SAID?
-
WHAT DID McKINNEY SAID? HE SAID THAT HE WAS UPSET WITH
-
HE SAID THAT HE WAS UPSET WITH THE POLITICAL INFLUENCE IN
-
THE POLITICAL INFLUENCE IN FOREIGN POLICY.
-
FOREIGN POLICY. THAT WAS WOCHBTS REASONSONE OF R
-
THAT WAS WOCHBTS REASONSONE OF R WAS UPSET.
-
WAS UPSET. I HAVE NEWS FOR EVERYBODY.
-
I HAVE NEWS FOR EVERYBODY. GET OVER IT, THERE IS POLITICAL
-
GET OVER IT, THERE IS POLITICAL INFLUENCE IN FOREIGN POLICY.
-
INFLUENCE IN FOREIGN POLICY. ELECTIONS HAVE CONSEQUENCES.
-
ELECTIONS HAVE CONSEQUENCES. FOREIGN POLICY WILL CHANGE FROM
-
FOREIGN POLICY WILL CHANGE FROM THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION TO THE
-
THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION TO THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION.
-
TRUMP ADMINISTRATION. AND WHAT YOU ARE SEEING NOW I
-
AND WHAT YOU ARE SEEING NOW I BELIEVE IS A GROUP OF MOSTLY
-
BELIEVE IS A GROUP OF MOSTLY CAREER BUREAUCRATS WHO ARE
-
CAREER BUREAUCRATS WHO ARE SAYING THAT I DON’T LIKE
-
SAYING THAT I DON’T LIKE PRESIDENT TRUMP’S POLITICS, SO
-
PRESIDENT TRUMP’S POLITICS, SO I’M GOING TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS
-
I’M GOING TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS WITCH HUNT THAT THEY ARE
-
WITCH HUNT THAT THEY ARE UNDERTAKING ON THE HILL.
-
UNDERTAKING ON THE HILL. ELECTIONS DO HAVE CONSEQUENCES
-
ELECTIONS DO HAVE CONSEQUENCES AND THEY SHOULD AND YOUR FOREIGN