Placeholder Image

Subtitles section Play video

  • THE DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL WHO HAS BEEN INTIMATELY INVOLVED IN

  • HAS BEEN INTIMATELY INVOLVED IN THIS PROCESS FROM THE VERY

  • THIS PROCESS FROM THE VERY BEGINNING.

  • BEGINNING. >> OKAY.

  • >> OKAY. >> JUST READ GEORGE CONWAY’S

  • >> JUST READ GEORGE CONWAY’S TWEETS.

  • TWEETS. CHRIS MATTHEWS HERE, I’LL JUMP

  • CHRIS MATTHEWS HERE, I’LL JUMP OVER ALL THE GOOD MORNING.

  • OVER ALL THE GOOD MORNING. CHRIS, WHEN DONALD TRUMP WAS

  • CHRIS, WHEN DONALD TRUMP WAS STANDING IN FRONT OF THE LINE OF

  • STANDING IN FRONT OF THE LINE OF CARS AND HE WAS -- HE’S GIVING

  • CARS AND HE WAS -- HE’S GIVING HIS SPIEL.

  • HIS SPIEL. HE REMINDED ME OF ROBERT DUVALL

  • HE REMINDED ME OF ROBERT DUVALL IN "GODFATHER II" AFTER MICHAEL

  • IN "GODFATHER II" AFTER MICHAEL CORELEONE JUST GOT OFF.

  • CORELEONE JUST GOT OFF. NOT EXACTLY HOW YOU WOULD EXPECT

  • NOT EXACTLY HOW YOU WOULD EXPECT DONALD TRUMP TO RESPOND TO THE

  • DONALD TRUMP TO RESPOND TO THE NEWS.

  • NEWS. >> ANY TIME WE WATCH A CRIMINAL

  • >> ANY TIME WE WATCH A CRIMINAL CASE WE GET A VERDICT, THE GUY

  • CASE WE GET A VERDICT, THE GUY WHO GOT OFF SAYS I’M INNOCENT.

  • WHO GOT OFF SAYS I’M INNOCENT. I’VE BEEN.

  • I’VE BEEN. PROVEN.

  • PROVEN. INNOCENT.

  • INNOCENT. ACTUALLY HE’S BEEN ACQUITTED,

  • ACTUALLY HE’S BEEN ACQUITTED, HASN’T BEEN PROVEN INNOCENT.

  • HASN’T BEEN PROVEN INNOCENT. THEY ALDO THAT.

  • THEY ALDO THAT. I JUST TELL YOU, STUDIED LIKE

  • I JUST TELL YOU, STUDIED LIKE YOU.

  • YOU. I WATCHED THIS AT 5:00 ON

  • I WATCHED THIS AT 5:00 ON FRIDAY.

  • FRIDAY. CLOSE OF BUSINESS ON.

  • CLOSE OF BUSINESS ON. FRIDAY.

  • FRIDAY. ALWAYS THE DUMPING GROUND.

  • ALWAYS THE DUMPING GROUND. YOU DIDN’T HAVE 24/7 NEWS

  • YOU DIDN’T HAVE 24/7 NEWS COVERAGE.

  • COVERAGE. YOU COULD HIDE IT AND KILL THEM

  • YOU COULD HIDE IT AND KILL THEM IN THE SUNDAY PAPER.

  • IN THE SUNDAY PAPER. I THOUGHT THAT WAS SNEAKY.

  • I THOUGHT THAT WAS SNEAKY. THEN I SAW THE NEWS.

  • THEN I SAW THE NEWS. NO, IT WAS SHERLOCK HOLMES

  • NO, IT WAS SHERLOCK HOLMES DEDUCTION, THE DOG THAT DIDN’T

  • DEDUCTION, THE DOG THAT DIDN’T BARK.

  • BARK. NO INDICTMENTS OF ANY OF HIS

  • NO INDICTMENTS OF ANY OF HIS ASSOCIATES, FAMILY MEMBERS OR

  • ASSOCIATES, FAMILY MEMBERS OR HENCHMEN FOR COLLUSION FOR

  • HENCHMEN FOR COLLUSION FOR SUPPORTING THE INTERVENTION IN

  • SUPPORTING THE INTERVENTION IN OUR CAMPAIGNS.

  • OUR CAMPAIGNS. WHEN I HEARD THAT NONE OF THE

  • WHEN I HEARD THAT NONE OF THE KIDS REMEMBER NONE OF THE

  • KIDS REMEMBER NONE OF THE HENCHMEN, ROGER STONE, MANAFORT,

  • HENCHMEN, ROGER STONE, MANAFORT, NOBODY INVOLVED.

  • NOBODY INVOLVED. I GO WAIT A MINUTE, THERE’S NOT

  • I GO WAIT A MINUTE, THERE’S NOT EVEN GOING TO BE A HID ENCHARGE

  • EVEN GOING TO BE A HID ENCHARGE SOMEWHERE IN HERE AGAINST THE

  • SOMEWHERE IN HERE AGAINST THE PRESIDENT.

  • PRESIDENT. THERE’S NOT EVEN A STATEMENT

  • THERE’S NOT EVEN A STATEMENT ABOUT HIM.

  • ABOUT HIM. SO THEY DIDN’T HAVE HIM ON

  • SO THEY DIDN’T HAVE HIM ON COLLUSION.

  • COLLUSION. THAT MEANS THERE WILL NOT BE A

  • THAT MEANS THERE WILL NOT BE A CONVICT SHINE THE U.S. SENATE

  • CONVICT SHINE THE U.S. SENATE THIS YEAR.

  • THIS YEAR. THAT’S NOT GOING TO HAPPEN.

  • THAT’S NOT GOING TO HAPPEN. I DOUBT -- I NOTE THAT IF

  • I DOUBT -- I NOTE THAT IF THERE’S A MAJORITY VOTE IN THE

  • THERE’S A MAJORITY VOTE IN THE HOUSE FOR IMPEACHMENT WILL BE

  • HOUSE FOR IMPEACHMENT WILL BE ALMOST ENTIRELY DEMOCRATS.

  • ALMOST ENTIRELY DEMOCRATS. YOU CAN MAKE A CASE FOR

  • YOU CAN MAKE A CASE FOR OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE.

  • OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE. I MADE IT ON THE AIR.

  • I MADE IT ON THE AIR. IT’S ALL BROAD DAYLIGHT BEHAVIOR

  • IT’S ALL BROAD DAYLIGHT BEHAVIOR BY THE PRESIDENT.

  • BY THE PRESIDENT. FIRING COMEY.

  • FIRING COMEY. IT WAS A GOOD CASE FOR

  • IT WAS A GOOD CASE FOR OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE.

  • OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE. REPUBLICANS ALREADY KNOW THAT.

  • REPUBLICANS ALREADY KNOW THAT. THEY ARE NOT SUPPORTING

  • THEY ARE NOT SUPPORTING IMPEACHMENT.

  • IMPEACHMENT. I THINK THE DEMOCRATS HAVE TO

  • I THINK THE DEMOCRATS HAVE TO WIN THE ELECTION.

  • WIN THE ELECTION. >> WHAT.

  • >> WHAT. >> THEY GOT WIN THE ELECTION.

  • >> THEY GOT WIN THE ELECTION. CAN’T WAIT FOR UNCLE ROBERT TO

  • CAN’T WAIT FOR UNCLE ROBERT TO TAKE CARE OF THEM.

  • TAKE CARE OF THEM. UNCLE ROBERT DID WHAT HE THOUGHT

  • UNCLE ROBERT DID WHAT HE THOUGHT HE DID WAS RIGHT AND BARR DID

  • HE DID WAS RIGHT AND BARR DID WHAT HE THOUGHT WAS RIGHT.

  • WHAT HE THOUGHT WAS RIGHT. YOU GOT TO DO YOUR OWN CASE.

  • YOU GOT TO DO YOUR OWN CASE. LOOK WE WATCHED KNICKS ON GO

  • LOOK WE WATCHED KNICKS ON GO DOWN ON EVIDENCE, THE JUNE 23rd

  • DOWN ON EVIDENCE, THE JUNE 23rd TAPE WHERE IT WAS CLEARLY

  • TAPE WHERE IT WAS CLEARLY INVOLVED IN OBSTRUCTION.

  • INVOLVED IN OBSTRUCTION. LEADING THE CASE FOR COVERING IT

  • LEADING THE CASE FOR COVERING IT UP.

  • UP. WE SAW THE CLINTON STUFF, HOW HE

  • WE SAW THE CLINTON STUFF, HOW HE LIED UNDER OATH.

  • LIED UNDER OATH. WE HAD HIM.

  • WE HAD HIM. WE LOOK AT THE EVIDENCE, WE

  • WE LOOK AT THE EVIDENCE, WE LOOKED AT THE FACTS.

  • LOOKED AT THE FACTS. RIGHT NOW THERE’S NO CASE FOR

  • RIGHT NOW THERE’S NO CASE FOR HIS REMOVAL ON COLLUSION.

  • HIS REMOVAL ON COLLUSION. THEN WELL ARGUE ABOUT

  • THEN WELL ARGUE ABOUT OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE FOR A

  • OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE FOR A WHILE.

  • WHILE. THERE AGAIN, A JUDGMENT CALL.

  • THERE AGAIN, A JUDGMENT CALL. BARR MADE HIS JUDGMENT OVER THE

  • BARR MADE HIS JUDGMENT OVER THE WEEKEND.

  • WEEKEND. THE REPUBLICANS HAVE MADE THEIR

  • THE REPUBLICANS HAVE MADE THEIR JUDGMENT, YES, YES, YES, BUT

  • JUDGMENT, YES, YES, YES, BUT WERE NOT REMOVING HIM FROM

  • WERE NOT REMOVING HIM FROM OFFICE.

  • OFFICE. EVERYBODY WILL BE PARTISAN ON

  • EVERYBODY WILL BE PARTISAN ON THIS, LET’S FACE IT.

  • THIS, LET’S FACE IT. >> THE QUESTION IS, CHRIS, THAT,

  • >> THE QUESTION IS, CHRIS, THAT, OF COURSE, MAYBE HISTORIANS WILL

  • OF COURSE, MAYBE HISTORIANS WILL BE SORTING THROUGH, IS IF

  • BE SORTING THROUGH, IS IF THERE’S NO COLLUSION, IF THERE

  • THERE’S NO COLLUSION, IF THERE WAS NO IMPROPER CONDUCT, IF

  • WAS NO IMPROPER CONDUCT, IF DONALD TRUMP HAD NOTHING TO

  • DONALD TRUMP HAD NOTHING TO WORRY ABOUT ALL ALONG WHY DID

  • WORRY ABOUT ALL ALONG WHY DID THE PRESIDENT LIE ABOUT HIS

  • THE PRESIDENT LIE ABOUT HIS CONTACTS WITH RUSSIA DURING THE

  • CONTACTS WITH RUSSIA DURING THE CAMPAIGN REPEATEDLY, WHY DID THE

  • CAMPAIGN REPEATEDLY, WHY DID THE VICE PRESIDENT LIE ABOUT THEIR

  • VICE PRESIDENT LIE ABOUT THEIR CONTACTS WITH RUSSIA IN JANUARY

  • CONTACTS WITH RUSSIA IN JANUARY OF 2017.

  • OF 2017. WHY DID THE ATTORNEY GENERAL LIE

  • WHY DID THE ATTORNEY GENERAL LIE IN FRONT OF THE UNITED STATES

  • IN FRONT OF THE UNITED STATES SENATE ABOUT HIS CONTACTS?

  • SENATE ABOUT HIS CONTACTS? I MEAN WE CAN GO --

  • I MEAN WE CAN GO -- >> SOME PEOPLE ARE JUST LIARS.

  • >> SOME PEOPLE ARE JUST LIARS. >> THAT’S THING.

  • >> THAT’S THING. THEY WEREN’T LYING ABOUT TALKING

  • THEY WEREN’T LYING ABOUT TALKING TO RUSSIANS AND THE OTHER LIE

  • TO RUSSIANS AND THE OTHER LIE ABOUT TALKING TO VENEZUELANS AND

  • ABOUT TALKING TO VENEZUELANS AND ANOTHER TALK ABOUT TALKING TO

  • ANOTHER TALK ABOUT TALKING TO THE CHINESE.

  • THE CHINESE. THEY ALLIED.

  • THEY ALLIED. >> LET ME ASK YOU A QUESTION --

  • >> LET ME ASK YOU A QUESTION -- >> ABOUT TALKING.

  • >> ABOUT TALKING. >> THE WAY PEOPLE BEHAVE, THEY

  • >> THE WAY PEOPLE BEHAVE, THEY DON’T LIKE BEING INVESTIGATED.

  • DON’T LIKE BEING INVESTIGATED. WHY DID SADDAM HUSSEIN CLAIM HE

  • WHY DID SADDAM HUSSEIN CLAIM HE HAD ALL THESE WEAPONS AND THEY

  • HAD ALL THESE WEAPONS AND THEY GO HIDE IN A SPIDER HOLE.

  • GO HIDE IN A SPIDER HOLE. HE DIDN’T HAVE THE WEAPONS.

  • HE DIDN’T HAVE THE WEAPONS. >> HE WAS MORE AFRAID OF THE

  • >> HE WAS MORE AFRAID OF THE SHIA THAN THE UNITED STATES.

  • SHIA THAN THE UNITED STATES. I CAN EXPLAIN THAT A LOT BETTER

  • I CAN EXPLAIN THAT A LOT BETTER THAN I CAN EXPLAIN THIS, WHICH

  • THAN I CAN EXPLAIN THIS, WHICH IS WHY WOULD YOU CONTINUE LYING

  • IS WHY WOULD YOU CONTINUE LYING ABOUT YOUR CONTACTS WITH RUSSIA.

  • ABOUT YOUR CONTACTS WITH RUSSIA. >> TWO YEARS OF LOOKING INTO IT

  • >> TWO YEARS OF LOOKING INTO IT AND THEY CAN’T GET IT.

  • AND THEY CAN’T GET IT. I AGREE WITH YOU.

  • I AGREE WITH YOU. FIRST OF ALL THERE’S A LOT OF

  • FIRST OF ALL THERE’S A LOT OF PRIMA FACIE EVIDENCE THERE WAS

  • PRIMA FACIE EVIDENCE THERE WAS BACK AND FORTH MEETINGS.

  • BACK AND FORTH MEETINGS. ALL THE MEETINGS, CIGAR BAR AT

  • ALL THE MEETINGS, CIGAR BAR AT THE TRUMP TOWER.

  • THE TRUMP TOWER. >> HOW ABOUT THE MEETING ON AIR

  • >> HOW ABOUT THE MEETING ON AIR FORCE ONE WHERE DONALD TRUMP HAS

  • FORCE ONE WHERE DONALD TRUMP HAS EVERYBODY AROUND HIM SAYING OKAY

  • EVERYBODY AROUND HIM SAYING OKAY THIS IS HOW WELL LIE ABOUT OUR

  • THIS IS HOW WELL LIE ABOUT OUR MEETING WITH THE RUSSIANS.

  • MEETING WITH THE RUSSIANS. >> GET YOURSELF AS A JOB AS

  • >> GET YOURSELF AS A JOB AS SPECIAL COUNSEL BECAUSE IN THE

  • SPECIAL COUNSEL BECAUSE IN THE END --