Placeholder Image

Subtitles section Play video

  • DAVID: VERDICT IS IN FORMER

  • DAVID: VERDICT IS IN FORMER HOLLYWOOD FILM PRODUCER HARVEY

  • HOLLYWOOD FILM PRODUCER HARVEY WEINSTEIN FOUND GUILTY OF

  • WEINSTEIN FOUND GUILTY OF CRIMINAL SEX ACT IN 2006, THIRD

  • CRIMINAL SEX ACT IN 2006, THIRD DEGREE RAIN OF A WOMAN IN 2013,

  • DEGREE RAIN OF A WOMAN IN 2013, HE COULD FACE TO 25 YEARS IN

  • HE COULD FACE TO 25 YEARS IN PRISON, WEINSTEIN WAS

  • PRISON, WEINSTEIN WAS HANDCUFFED,TAIN EP TO TAKEN TO C

  • HANDCUFFED,TAIN EP TO TAKEN TO C UNTIL HIS SENTENCES ON MARCH 11,

  • UNTIL HIS SENTENCES ON MARCH 11, HE WAS ACQUITTED ON TWO MOST

  • HE WAS ACQUITTED ON TWO MOST SERIOUS CRIMINAL CHARGES AGAINST

  • SERIOUS CRIMINAL CHARGES AGAINST HIM.

  • HIM. EACH CARRIES LIFE IN PRISON.

  • EACH CARRIES LIFE IN PRISON. WE BRING IN FOX NEWS JUDICIAL

  • WE BRING IN FOX NEWS JUDICIAL ANALYST, JUDGE ANDREW

  • ANALYST, JUDGE ANDREW NAPOLITANO.

  • NAPOLITANO. THANK YOU.

  • THANK YOU. MANHATTAN PROSECUTOR, HE GOT TWO

  • MANHATTAN PROSECUTOR, HE GOT TWO OUT OF FIVE CONVICTIONS.

  • OUT OF FIVE CONVICTIONS. DO YOU THINK HE IS DISAPPOINTED.

  • DO YOU THINK HE IS DISAPPOINTED. >> I AM SURE HE IS.

  • >> I AM SURE HE IS. BUT YOU SAW FROM HIS PRESS

  • BUT YOU SAW FROM HIS PRESS CONFERENCE HE WILL TRY TO MAKE

  • CONFERENCE HE WILL TRY TO MAKE THE MOST OUT OF THIS HE WAS

  • THE MOST OUT OF THIS HE WAS DRAGGED KICKING AND SCREAMING.

  • DRAGGED KICKING AND SCREAMING. I EXAGGERATE TO BRING THIS --

  • I EXAGGERATE TO BRING THIS -- THESE CASES BEFORE A GRAND JURY.

  • THESE CASES BEFORE A GRAND JURY. BECAUSE HE HAD BEEN CAUGHT UP IN

  • BECAUSE HE HAD BEEN CAUGHT UP IN THIS VENT WHERE WEINSTEIN

  • THIS VENT WHERE WEINSTEIN LAWYERS HAVE BEEN MAKING

  • LAWYERS HAVE BEEN MAKING CONTRIBUTIONS TO HIM.

  • CONTRIBUTIONS TO HIM. HE KNEW THAT LAWYERS REPRESENTED

  • HE KNEW THAT LAWYERS REPRESENTED WEINSTEIN AT THE TIME.

  • WEINSTEIN AT THE TIME. DAVID: COMPROMISE.

  • DAVID: COMPROMISE. >> AND HE DROPPED CHANGES, NOW

  • >> AND HE DROPPED CHANGES, NOW THESE CHARGES, BUT -- NOT THESE

  • THESE CHARGES, BUT -- NOT THESE BUT OTHERS, HE WAS RED FACED

  • BUT OTHERS, HE WAS RED FACED OVER IT, HE SAID OKAY I'M NOT

  • OVER IT, HE SAID OKAY I'M NOT TAKING CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS

  • TAKING CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS FROM ANY LAWYERS, WHO ARE

  • FROM ANY LAWYERS, WHO ARE REPRESENTING PEOPLE THAT MY

  • REPRESENTING PEOPLE THAT MY OFFICE IS PROSECUTING, IN

  • OFFICE IS PROSECUTING, IN WEINSTEIN CASE IT WAS TOO LITTLE

  • WEINSTEIN CASE IT WAS TOO LITTLE TOO LATE, HIGH GOT A.

  • TOO LATE, HIGH GOT A. HE WAS USING, A NOVEL STATUTE IN

  • HE WAS USING, A NOVEL STATUTE IN NEW YORK.

  • NEW YORK. CALIFORNIA HAS SAME STATUTE, IF

  • CALIFORNIA HAS SAME STATUTE, IF YOU CAN PROVE A RAPE WENT STATE

  • YOU CAN PROVE A RAPE WENT STATE OUT OF LIMITATION AND PROVE

  • OUT OF LIMITATION AND PROVE SIMILAR BEHAVIOR AT ANY OTHER

  • SIMILAR BEHAVIOR AT ANY OTHER TIME, IN THIS CASE ALLEGED TO

  • TIME, IN THIS CASE ALLEGED TO OCCUR IN 19.

  • OCCUR IN 19. >>,1992, THEN YOU CAN FIND

  • >>,1992, THEN YOU CAN FIND THE DEFEND DEFENDANT GUILTY OF

  • THE DEFEND DEFENDANT GUILTY OF PREDATORY SEXUAL ACTIVITY, WHICH

  • PREDATORY SEXUAL ACTIVITY, WHICH HE FAILED AT.

  • HE FAILED AT. PROSECUTOR IN CALIFORNIA WILL

  • PROSECUTOR IN CALIFORNIA WILL ATTEMPT THE SAME CHARGE AGAINST

  • ATTEMPT THE SAME CHARGE AGAINST HIM.

  • HIM. >> JUDGE, THIS IS GARY.

  • >> JUDGE, THIS IS GARY. THIS DIRTBAG WILL APPEAL, DOES

  • THIS DIRTBAG WILL APPEAL, DOES IT MATTER THAT THE SERIOUS

  • IT MATTER THAT THE SERIOUS CHARGES HE WAS FOUND NOT GUILTY

  • CHARGES HE WAS FOUND NOT GUILTY OF, DOES THAT HELP HIM IN HIS

  • OF, DOES THAT HELP HIM IN HIS APPEAL OR IT IS SEPARATE?

  • APPEAL OR IT IS SEPARATE? >> I THINK IT IS IRRELEVANT.

  • >> I THINK IT IS IRRELEVANT. HE WAS ACQUITTED, THE STATE

  • HE WAS ACQUITTED, THE STATE CANNOT APPEAL THAT ACQUITTAL,

  • CANNOT APPEAL THAT ACQUITTAL, ONLY TWO APPEALABLE CHARGES WILL

  • ONLY TWO APPEALABLE CHARGES WILL BE TWO FOR WHICH HE WAS

  • BE TWO FOR WHICH HE WAS CONVICTED.

  • CONVICTED. AND QUITE FROM.

  • AND QUITE FROM. LY, THERE WERE ODD -- FRANKLY

  • LY, THERE WERE ODD -- FRANKLY THERE WERE ODD AT PECKS OF CASE,

  • THERE WERE ODD AT PECKS OF CASE, EVIDENCE OF GUILT IN THOSE CASES

  • EVIDENCE OF GUILT IN THOSE CASES RISING AND FALLS ON CREDIBILITY

  • RISING AND FALLS ON CREDIBILITY OF THE VICTIMS, THEY TOLERATED A

  • OF THE VICTIMS, THEY TOLERATED A WITHERING CROSS CROSS-EXAMINATIO

  • WITHERING CROSS CROSS-EXAMINATIO JURY BELIEVED THEM, I NEVER

  • JURY BELIEVED THEM, I NEVER HEARD OF A RAPE CASE,

  • HEARD OF A RAPE CASE, INVESTIGATED BY POLICE FOR 5

  • INVESTIGATED BY POLICE FOR 5 YEARS WHERE NOT A SINGLE COP

  • YEARS WHERE NOT A SINGLE COP TESTIFIED, IT BELIEVES THERE

  • TESTIFIED, IT BELIEVES THERE MUST HAVE BEEN A BREAK DOWN

  • MUST HAVE BEEN A BREAK DOWN BETWEEN PROSECUTOR OFFICE AND

  • BETWEEN PROSECUTOR OFFICE AND POLICE, THEY ALWAYS' POLICE TO

  • POLICE, THEY ALWAYS' POLICE TO SAY YES THAT IS WHAT SHE TOLD

  • SAY YES THAT IS WHAT SHE TOLD ME, AND THIS EVIDENCE COOPERATES

  • ME, AND THIS EVIDENCE COOPERATES THAT, UP IN OF THAT CAME IN.

  • THAT, UP IN OF THAT CAME IN. >> CERTIFICATE OF SORT OF SEEMS

  • >> CERTIFICATE OF SORT OF SEEMS TO TO SAY HE NEEDS TO BE

  • TO TO SAY HE NEEDS TO BE PUNISHED BUT MAYBE THERE WAS AND

  • PUNISHED BUT MAYBE THERE WAS AND CREDIBILITY ABOUT WITNESSES IS

  • CREDIBILITY ABOUT WITNESSES IS --

  • -- >> I HAVE BEEN TRYING TO

  • >> I HAVE BEEN TRYING TO INTERPRET, TRYING.

  • INTERPRET, TRYING. VERDICTS IN CRIMINAL CASES FOR

  • VERDICTS IN CRIMINAL CASES FOR 45 YEARS.

  • 45 YEARS. SOMETIMES JURORS MAKE A

  • SOMETIMES JURORS MAKE A COMPROMISE, THEY KNOW WHAT THE

  • COMPROMISE, THEY KNOW WHAT THE PENALTY IS, THEY KNOW BY THE TWO

  • PENALTY IS, THEY KNOW BY THE TWO CONVICTIONTIONS AND 3 ACQUITTALS

  • CONVICTIONTIONS AND 3 ACQUITTALS HE FACES 25 YEARS IN JAIL, HE IS

  • HE FACES 25 YEARS IN JAIL, HE IS IN BAD HEALTH.

  • IN BAD HEALTH. THE MORAL, PERHAPS LEGAL EQUIV

  • THE MORAL, PERHAPS LEGAL EQUIV EQUIVALENT OF A LIFETIME.

  • EQUIVALENT OF A LIFETIME. >> WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU APPEAL

  • >> WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU APPEAL IT?

  • IT? IS HE OUT OF JAIL FOR THAT

  • IS HE OUT OF JAIL FOR THAT PERIOD OF TIME?

  • PERIOD OF TIME? >> I THINK THAT SENTENCE WILL BE

  • >> I THINK THAT SENTENCE WILL BE BETWEEN 20 TO 25 YEARS, HE WILL

  • BETWEEN 20 TO 25 YEARS, HE WILL HAVE TO SERVE IF HE LIVES THAT

  • HAVE TO SERVE IF HE LIVES THAT LONG, 75 TO 80%.

  • LONG, 75 TO 80%. HE WILL NOT BE OUT OUT OF JAIL,

  • HE WILL NOT BE OUT OUT OF JAIL, WILL BE OUT OF A NEW YORK JAIL

  • WILL BE OUT OF A NEW YORK JAIL IN A HOLDING FACILITY IN LOS

  • IN A HOLDING FACILITY IN LOS ANGELES, THAT TRIAL STARTS IN

  • ANGELES, THAT TRIAL STARTS IN TWO MONTHS.

  • TWO MONTHS. >> WHAT IS THE APPEAL PART.

  • >> WHAT IS THE APPEAL PART. >> THE ERRORS THAT DEFENSE SAID

  • >> THE ERRORS THAT DEFENSE SAID THAT JUDGE MADE IN TRIAL HERE

  • THAT JUDGE MADE IN TRIAL HERE PRODUCED TWO CONVICTIONTIONS, IT

  • PRODUCED TWO CONVICTIONTIONS, IT WILL TWO YEARS BEFORE THE THE

  • WILL TWO YEARS BEFORE THE THE APPELLATE KMART.

  • APPELLATE KMART. COURT.

  • COURT. >> BECAUSE HE IS OLD AND FRAIL

  • >> BECAUSE HE IS OLD AND FRAIL HEALTH, 20 YEARS IT LIKE LIFE

  • HEALTH, 20 YEARS IT LIKE LIFE FOR SOMEONE LIKE THAT WITH THE

  • FOR SOMEONE LIKE THAT WITH THE JUDGE TAKE THAT INTO ACCOUNT IN

  • JUDGE TAKE THAT INTO ACCOUNT IN SENTENCE, THEN, CAN YOU EXPLAIN

  • SENTENCE, THEN, CAN YOU EXPLAIN WHAT DIFFERENCE FIRST DEGREE AND

  • WHAT DIFFERENCE FIRST DEGREE AND THIRD DEGREE.

  • THIRD DEGREE. >> WITHOUT GETTING TOO GRAPHIC,

  • >> WITHOUT GETTING TOO GRAPHIC, ONE INVOLVES ENTERING THE BODY

  • ONE INVOLVES ENTERING THE BODY AND THE OTHER TOUCHING THE BODY,

  • AND THE OTHER TOUCHING THE BODY, BOTH AGAINST THE WILL WAS THE

  • BOTH AGAINST THE WILL WAS THE VICTIM.

  • VICTIM. HE THREW HIMSELF ON MERCY OF

  • HE THREW HIMSELF ON MERCY OF COURT THIS MORNING AND BEGGED,

  • COURT THIS MORNING AND BEGGED, THROUGH HIS LAWYERS TO STAY IN

  • THROUGH HIS LAWYERS TO STAY IN HIS HOME DURING SENTENCES

  • HIS HOME DURING SENTENCES PROCESS, THE COURT SAID NOW, I

  • PROCESS, THE COURT SAID NOW, I DON'T THINK THAT THIS JUDGE WILL

  • DON'T THINK THAT THIS JUDGE WILL SO MUCH MERS MERCY.

DAVID: VERDICT IS IN FORMER

Subtitles and vocabulary

Operation of videos Adjust the video here to display the subtitles

B1 weinstein judge appeal jail prosecutor guilty

Judge Napolitano: Judge in Weinstein case showing 'no mercy'

  • 0 0
    林宜悉 posted on 2020/02/25
Video vocabulary