Placeholder Image

Subtitles section Play video

  • JEANINE".

  • >> EARLIER I CAUGHT UP WITH TED

  • CRUZ ON CAPITOL HILL TO GET HIS

  • TAKE ON OPENING ARGUMENTS FROM

  • TRUMP'S DEFENSE TEAM IN CASE THE

  • DEMS LAYOUT EARLIER THIS WEEK.

  • TAKE A LOOK.

  • THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR TAKING

  • TIME OUT, I KNOW IT IS A BUSY

  • DAY AND I KNOW YOU BEEN IN

  • WASHINGTON FOR A LONG TIME.

  • BUT I WANT TO THANK YOU FOR

  • DOING THIS.

  • TODAY WAS A VERY INTERESTING

  • DAY.

  • TODAY WAS THE FIRST DAY THAT THE

  • PRESIDENT'S TEAM HAD OPPORTUNITY

  • TO LAY OUT WHAT IT IS THE INTENT

  • TO PROVE.

  • YOU BEEN IN MANY COURTROOMS,

  • WHAT DID IT FEEL LIKE TODAY,

  • HOW'S IT DIFFERENT, HE'S IN

  • POWER, HE'S DONE THIS, YOU THINK

  • HE'S A DICTATOR.

  • >> I THINK IT WAS GRATIFYING,

  • THEN FIRST TIME THE PRESIDENT

  • HAS HAD TO DEFEND HIM THROUGHOUT

  • THE WHOLE PROCEEDING IN THE

  • HOUSE, THEY WOULD NOT LET THE

  • PRESIDENT DEFEND HIMSELF.

  • I THINK EVERY SENATOR IS

  • GRATEFUL THAT THE NEVER ENDING

  • OPENING ARGUMENT, THE 24 HOURS

  • OF NONSTOP FROM THE HOUSE

  • MANAGERS OPEN.

  • AS THEY ARE CLOSING ARGUMENT

  • ENDED LAST NIGHT, MY SENSE IN

  • THE SENSE OF A LOT OF PEOPLE,

  • THEY FAILED TO PROVE THEIR CASE.

  • TODAY THE PRESIDENT'S LAWYERS,

  • DID INEFFECTIVE JOB REPORTING

  • HOW SELECTIVE THEIR QUOTATIONS

  • WERE FROM THE RECORD, HOW MUCH

  • THEY LEFT OUT AND I'M REALLY

  • LOOKING FORWARD TO MONDAY.

  • ON MONDAY STARTING AT 1:00 P.M.

  • WE COME BACK TO THE TRIAL IN THE

  • PRESIDENT'S LAWYERS WILL PRESENT

  • THE PRINTABLE DEFENSE AND WHAT I

  • HOPE TO HEAR FROM THEM IS A

  • SUBSTANCE DEFENSE ON THE MERITS.

  • THAT LAYS OUT THE CASE ON THE

  • FACTS FOR THE PRESIDENT'S

  • INNOCENCE.

  • I THINK THE HOUSE MANAGERS MADE

  • A CRITICAL MISTAKE ON HOW THEY

  • STRUCTURE THEIR ARGUMENT.

  • A CENTRAL ELEMENT OF THEIR

  • ARGUMENT IS A PROPOSITION THAT

  • IT WAS FACELESS AND FRIVOLOUS TO

  • WANT TO INVESTIGATE MARIE'S MOM

  • UKRAINIAN NATURAL GAS COMPANY

  • AND WHETHER OR NOT JOE BIDEN AND

  • HUNTER BIDEN WERE PAYING 100

  • BUCKS A YEAR IN THEY PRESSURED

  • HIM AND THREATENED $1 BILLION IN

  • AID TO FORCE UKRAINE TO FIRE THE

  • PROSECUTOR WHO WAS INVESTIGATING

  • BURISMA.

  • >> HOW DOES THIS TRIAL RESOLVE

  • ANY OF THAT.

  • THIS IS ABOUT ONE DEFENDANT AND

  • I HATE EVEN REFERRING TO HIM AS

  • THAT.

  • >> THE HOUSE MANAGERS LAID OUT

  • THE PROPOSITION THAT IT WAS

  • BASELESS, FRAUDULENT, PHONY AND

  • NO BASIS WHATSOEVER FOR SEEKING

  • AN INVESTIGATION INTO BURISMA,

  • THE TOTAL ANSWER IS THERE WAS

  • OVERWHELMING EVIDENCE OF

  • CORRUPTION AND A PRESIDENT IS

  • ALWAYS JUSTIFIED.

  • HE HAS A RESPONSIBILITY TO

  • INVESTIGATE CORRUPTION.

  • THE FUNDAMENTAL ARGUMENT THAT

  • DISPOSES OF THIS CASE, IT MAKES

  • CLEAR THE PRESIDENT DID NOTHING

  • IMPEACHABLE AS HE HAS THE

  • AUTHORITY TO INVESTIGATE

  • CORRUPTION.

  • THE HOUSE MANAGER GOES FROM THE

  • DOOR DID HUNTER BIDEN TESTIFY,

  • THEY MADE IT RELEVANT AND

  • CRITICAL.

  • >> LET'S TALK ABOUT ONE OF THE

  • THINGS THAT I THOUGHT WAS VERY

  • IMPORTANT THAT MIGHT LEAD TO A

  • MOTION TO DISMISS.

  • I WANT YOUR OPINION THAT, THEY

  • BASICALLY SAID THAT THE SECOND

  • ARTICLE OF OBSTRUCTION IS NOT

  • BASED IN ANY THING SUBSTANTIVE

  • BECAUSE THE HOUSE THAT NANCY

  • PELOSI ANNOUNCE WE ARE GOING TO

  • BEGIN THIS IMPEACHMENT

  • INVESTIGATION HAD NO

  • JURISDICTION OF AUTHORITY TO

  • GRANT SUBPOENAS.

  • THEREFORE IF THE PRESIDENT DID

  • NOT ABIDE BY THE SUBPOENAS IT IS

  • NOT OBSTRUCTION.

  • THERE HAS TO BE A VOTE IN THE

  • HOUSE.

  • >> THAT IS CERTAINLY A LEGAL

  • ARGUMENT THAT THE PRESIDENT'S

  • LAWYERS ARE PUTTING FORTH, THEY

  • PUT IT IN FORTH IN THEIR BRIEF.

  • THE OBSTRUCTION CHARGES

  • SECONDARY TO THE HOUSE MANAGERS

  • CASE.

  • THIS CASE -- I DON'T THINK YOU

  • WILL SEE A MOTION TO DISMISS.

  • THE WAY THINGS THEY WILL PLAY

  • OUT, WE WILL SEE THE OPENING

  • ARGUMENT CONTINUE ON MONDAY,

  • MAYBE TUESDAY THEN WE WILL HAVE

  • 16 HOURS OF QUESTIONS FROM

  • SENATORS.

  • WE CANNOT ASSESS QUESTIONS

  • OURSELVES, I WOULD LOVE TO GO

  • ROUND AND ROUND WITH ADAM

  • SCHIFF, BUT THE SENATE RULES DO

  • NOT ALLOW.

  • INSTEAD WE HAVE TO WRITE YOUR

  • QUESTIONS IN THE CHIEF JUSTICE

  • WILL ASK QUESTIONS FOR US.

  • WHAT I EXPECT TO SEE AFTER THAT,

  • WE WILL VOTE ON ADDITIONAL

  • WITNESSES IT BE NECESSARY AND

  • WHETHER IN ORDER.

  • THAT MAY BE A CLOSE VOTE, WE

  • KNOW 47 DEMOCRATS WILL VOTE YES.

  • THERE MIGHT BE FOR REPUBLICANS

  • WHO VOTE WITH THEM.

  • I DO NOT KNOW.

  • >> THOSE SUPPORT ROMNEY AND

  • SUSAN COLLINS AND LISA

  • MURKOWSKI, AND LAMAR?

  • >> THAT'S THE RUMOR.

  • I DON'T THINK THERE'S NEED FOR

  • ADDITIONAL WITNESSES, WE HAVE

  • MORE THAN ENOUGH TO REJECT THESE

  • ARTICLES ON THE MERITS BUT THEY

  • HAVE NOT PROVEN THEIR CASE.

  • >> AND THERE IN THE MOTION TO

  • DISMISS.

  • >> I DON'T THINK IT'LL BE A

  • MOTION TO DISMISS.

  • >> IT'LL BE INITIALLY A VOTE ON

  • WITNESSES.

  • IF WE'LL VOTE NO ADDITIONAL

  • WITNESSES ARE NECESSARY, THE

  • NEXT VOTE WILL BE A MASON FOR

  • JUSTICE.

  • RATHER THAN DISMISS WE WILL GO

  • TO JUDGMENT AND ACQUIT THE

  • PRESIDENT WHICH MEANS WE WILL

  • STAND UP AND VOTE GUILTY OR NOT

  • GUILTY ON EACH OF THE ARTICLES.

  • IT'S A MUCH BETTER OUTCOME FOR

  • THE PRESIDENT AND COUNTRY FOR

  • HIM TO BE ACQUITTED, NOT

  • DISMISSED AND THROW THE CASE OUT

  • BUT REACH FINAL JUDGMENT AND

  • FIND THE PRESIDENT NOT GUILTY.

  • THAT WILL BE THE END OF THIS

  • BECAUSE THE HOUSE MANAGERS HAVE

  • NOT MET THE CONSTITUTIONAL

  • STANDARD APPROVING HIGH CRIMES

  • AND MISDEMEANORS.

  • THE PRESIDENT HAS THE AUTHORITY

  • TO INVESTIGATE SERIOUS

  • ALLEGATION OF CORRUPTION.

  • THERE WERE MASSIVE ALLEGATIONS

  • OF CORRUPTION, AT LEAST ENOUGH

  • EVIDENCE TO JUSTIFY AN

  • INVESTIGATION.

  • >> IN THE END, HOW LONG YOU

  • THINK THIS WILL TAKE.

  • I KNOW YOU TALK ABOUT THE

  • WITNESSES TAKING TIME.

  • >> THERE'S A FORK IN THE ROAD,

  • IF IT IS 51 SENATORS VOTE, WE

  • DON'T NEED ADDITIONAL AND THIS

  • WILL END NEXT WEEK.

  • IF 51 SENATORS SAY WE NEED

  • ADDITIONAL WITNESSES, IF THAT

  • HAPPENS WE HAVE GOT TO BE FAIR,

  • WE HAVE TO FOLLOW THE PRINCIPLE

  • WHICH MEANS IF THEY GET JOHN

  • BOLTON, WE GET HUNTER BIDEN.

  • WE GO DOWN THE ROAD TO

  • WITNESSES, THIS COULD TAKE WEEKS

  • OR MONTHS.

  • BUT AT THE END OF THE DAY THE

  • RESULT WILL BE THE SAME.

  • WHAT I DO EVERY DAY WHEN I LEAVE

  • THE TRIAL, I AM GOING IN

  • BUILDING A PODCAST, HIS VERDICT

  • WITH TED CRUZ, I BILLED IT AT

  • THREE IN THE MORNING BECAUSE

  • THAT'S WHEN WE WERE DONE.

  • JUST TALKING ABOUT ANY DETAIL

  • FORM, THE FACTS, THE SUBSTANCE

  • IN THE CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUES AT

  • STAKE.

  • I'VE NEVER DONE A PODCAST

  • BEFORE, IN FOUR DAYS WOULD

  • BECOME THE NUMBER TWO PODCAST IN

  • THE COUNTRY.

  • >> CONGRATULATIONS.

  • SECONDLY THIS IS YOUR REAL

  • HOUSE, I WAS IN THERE TODAY, I

  • WAS AFRAID I WAS GOING TO FALL

  • OVER THE RAILING.

  • BUT I HEAR PEOPLE FALLING ASLEEP

  • AND I SAY TO MYSELF HOW CAN YOU

  • FALL ASLEEP, IT'S EXCITING.

  • BUT IT'S EXCITING HAVING YOU

JEANINE".

Subtitles and vocabulary

Operation of videos Adjust the video here to display the subtitles

B1 FoxNews president argument dismiss corruption investigate

Sen. Ted Cruz reacts to latest in impeachment trial

  • 1 0
    林宜悉 posted on 2020/02/24
Video vocabulary