Name: Dan Crenshaw rips Dems' 'weak' impeachment case
Uploaded: 2020-02-23T19:00:32.000Z
Duration: 6 min 58 s
Description: Thousands of YouTube videos with English-Chinese subtitles! Now you can learn to understand native speakers, expand your vocabulary, and improve your pronunciation...

♪ STEVE: LIVE AUDIENCE SHOW. WELCOME BACK, 5 HOURS FROM RIGHT

WELCOME BACK, 5 HOURS FROM RIGHT NOW IT WOULD BE DAY 4 OF THE

NOW IT WOULD BE DAY 4 OF THE SENATE IMPEACHMENT TRIAL

SENATE IMPEACHMENT TRIAL SCHEDULED TO KICK OFF IN THE

SCHEDULED TO KICK OFF IN THE U.S. SENATE.

U.S. SENATE. AINSLEY: DEMOCRATS PUSH FOR MORE

AINSLEY: DEMOCRATS PUSH FOR MORE WITNESSES, REPUBLICANS SAY

WITNESSES, REPUBLICANS SAY THERE'S ONE AGREE THAT THEY

THERE'S ONE AGREE THAT THEY SHOULD ALL AGREE ON IS HUNTER

BRIAN: MEMBER OF HOUSE COMMITTEE FORMER NAVY SEAL HIMSELF,

FORMER NAVY SEAL HIMSELF, CONGRESSMAN DAN CRENSHAW IS

[CHEERS AND APPLAUSE] >> YOU KNOW THE STATE INSIDE AND

>> YOU KNOW THE STATE INSIDE AND OUT, BASICALLY GETTING WHAT YOU

OUT, BASICALLY GETTING WHAT YOU HAD TO DIGEST BY THE SAME PEOPLE

HAD TO DIGEST BY THE SAME PEOPLE THAT WERE DELIVERING IT BEFORE

THAT WERE DELIVERING IT BEFORE CHRISTMAS, NOW WE GET IT AFTER

CHRISTMAS, NOW WE GET IT AFTER CHRISTMAS, PEOPLE ARE ACTING

CHRISTMAS, PEOPLE ARE ACTING LIKE WE NEVER HEARD IT BEFORE.

LIKE WE NEVER HEARD IT BEFORE. >> YOU KNOW, THAT'S THEIR JOB TO

>> YOU KNOW, THAT'S THEIR JOB TO PRESENT THEIR WEAK CASE TO THE

PRESENT THEIR WEAK CASE TO THE SENATE AND THE SENATE'S JOB TO

SENATE AND THE SENATE'S JOB TO ADJUDICATE THAT.

THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT IS HAPPENING, WHAT WE ARE SEEING,

HAPPENING, WHAT WE ARE SEEING, WE STILL HAVE A VERY WEAK CASE,

WE STILL HAVE A VERY WEAK CASE, THE REEXPLAINING SOME OF THE

THE REEXPLAINING SOME OF THE THINGS THAT WE ALREADY KNEW, WAS

THINGS THAT WE ALREADY KNEW, WAS TRUMP INTERESTED IN THE BIDEN

TRUMP INTERESTED IN THE BIDEN BARISMA ISSUE?

YES, HE HAS A DUTY TO BE INTERESTED IN THAT, ON ITS FACE

INTERESTED IN THAT, ON ITS FACE IT WAS A CORRUPT ISSUE, CLEAR

IT WAS A CORRUPT ISSUE, CLEAR CONFLICT OF INTEREST.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST. THAT'S THE HEART OF THE ENTIRE

THAT'S THE HEART OF THE ENTIRE CASE, WHETHER OR NOT OUR

CASE, WHETHER OR NOT OUR PRESIDENT SHOULD BE ABLE TO LOOK

PRESIDENT SHOULD BE ABLE TO LOOK INTO WHAT WAS CLEARLY A CORRUPT

INTO WHAT WAS CLEARLY A CORRUPT RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN HUNTER

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN HUNTER BIDEN AND BARISMA AND THE VICE

BIDEN AND BARISMA AND THE VICE PRESIDENT THREATENING TO

PRESIDENT THREATENING TO WITHHOLD A BILLION DOLLARS IN

WITHHOLD A BILLION DOLLARS IN AID IN THE UKRAINIAN PROSECUTOR

AID IN THE UKRAINIAN PROSECUTOR WASN'T FIRED WHO WAS

WASN'T FIRED WHO WAS INVESTIGATING THE COMPANY THAT

INVESTIGATING THE COMPANY THAT HIS SON WAS ON.

HIS SON WAS ON. AINSLEY: WHY DID THEY LET HIM

AINSLEY: WHY DID THEY LET HIM GET AWAY WITH IT?

GET AWAY WITH IT? IF YOU DON'T FIRE THE PROSECUTOR

IF YOU DON'T FIRE THE PROSECUTOR THEN I'M NOT GIVING YOU THE

THEN I'M NOT GIVING YOU THE MONEY, THAT'S QUID PRO QUO AND

MONEY, THAT'S QUID PRO QUO AND HE ADMITS IT.

HE ADMITS IT. >> RIGHT, THAT'S THE QUESTION WE

>> RIGHT, THAT'S THE QUESTION WE ALL ASK AND POINT TO, IT'S

ALL ASK AND POINT TO, IT'S MASSIVE HYPOCRISY, IT REALLY IS,

MASSIVE HYPOCRISY, IT REALLY IS, AND THEY ARE TRYING TO SHIFT AND

AND THEY ARE TRYING TO SHIFT AND PROJECT IT SOMEWHERE ELSE,

PROJECT IT SOMEWHERE ELSE, SAYING IT'S DEBUNK AND I DON'T

SAYING IT'S DEBUNK AND I DON'T KNOW WHAT THAT MEANS, HOW IS IT

KNOW WHAT THAT MEANS, HOW IS IT DEBUNKED, WE HAVE ALL THE FACTS,

DEBUNKED, WE HAVE ALL THE FACTS, THEY ARE NOT DISPUTABLE AT ALL,

THEY ARE NOT DISPUTABLE AT ALL, A LOT OF WITNESSES COMING

A LOT OF WITNESSES COMING FORWARD AND ADMITTED THAT, THEY

FORWARD AND ADMITTED THAT, THEY SAID THIS WAS A SERIOUS CONFLICT

SAID THIS WAS A SERIOUS CONFLICT OF INTEREST.

OF INTEREST. >> WOULD THE PRESIDENT HAVE MADE

>> WOULD THE PRESIDENT HAVE MADE HIS CASE BETTER, I WAS

HIS CASE BETTER, I WAS INTERESTED, IT WOULD HAVE

INTERESTED, IT WOULD HAVE AFFECTED 2016 AND NOT 2020,

AFFECTED 2016 AND NOT 2020, WOULD THAT HAVE HELPED?

WOULD THAT HAVE HELPED? >> YEAH, AND THAT IS WHAT THE

>> YEAH, AND THAT IS WHAT THE PRESIDENT WAS LOOKING FOR, HE

PRESIDENT WAS LOOKING FOR, HE DID HAVE CONCERNS THAT MANY

DID HAVE CONCERNS THAT MANY UKRAINIAN OFFICIALS WERE -- WERE

UKRAINIAN OFFICIALS WERE -- WERE OPENLY AGAINST HIM IN 2016

OPENLY AGAINST HIM IN 2016 ELECTION, AND, YOU KNOW, LAST

ELECTION, AND, YOU KNOW, LAST NIGHT AS THEY THE HOUSE MANAGERS

NIGHT AS THEY THE HOUSE MANAGERS WERE GOING THROUGH THEIR CASE,

WERE GOING THROUGH THEIR CASE, THEY KEPT BRIG UP INVESTIGATIONS

THEY KEPT BRIG UP INVESTIGATIONS BUT THEY CAREFULLY LEAVE OUT

BUT THEY CAREFULLY LEAVE OUT THAT INVESTIGATIONS WAS A BROAD

THAT INVESTIGATIONS WAS A BROAD SERIES OF INVESTIGATIONS THAT

SERIES OF INVESTIGATIONS THAT INCLUDE 2016 ELECTION, AND SO

INCLUDE 2016 ELECTION, AND SO THE QUESTION WAS THIS ABOUT 2016

THE QUESTION WAS THIS ABOUT 2016 OR 2020?

THERE'S NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER THAT ANY OF THIS WAS ABOUT 2020,

THAT ANY OF THIS WAS ABOUT 2020, BUT THAT'S THE PREMISE OF THE

BUT THAT'S THE PREMISE OF THE DEMOCRATS' CASE.

DEMOCRATS' CASE. >> ALSO MAKING NEWS IN THE LAST

>> ALSO MAKING NEWS IN THE LAST 24 HOURS, THE DEPARTMENT OF

24 HOURS, THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE ESSENTIALLY SAID THEY

JUSTICE ESSENTIALLY SAID THEY SCREWED UP AND SENT CLASSIFIED

SCREWED UP AND SENT CLASSIFIED REPORT TO THE DOJ THAT SAID

REPORT TO THE DOJ THAT SAID ESSENTIALLY TO THE FISA COURT

ESSENTIALLY TO THE FISA COURT THAT SAID DOJ PROBABLY DID NOT

Subtitles ListPlay Video

Dan Crenshaw rips Dems' 'weak' impeachment case

essentially

pretend

conflict

compassion