B2 High-Intermediate 21 Folder Collection
After playing the video, you can click or select the word to look it up in the dictionary.
Loading...
Report Subtitle Errors
TO MR. SEKULOW. MR. SEKULOW: MR. CHIEF JUSTICE, MEMBERS OF THE SENATE, CHAIRMAN
MR. SEKULOW: MR. CHIEF JUSTICE, MEMBERS OF THE SENATE, CHAIRMAN NADLER TALKED ABOUT TREACHEROUS.
MEMBERS OF THE SENATE, CHAIRMAN NADLER TALKED ABOUT TREACHEROUS. AT ABOUT 12:10 A.M., JANUARY
NADLER TALKED ABOUT TREACHEROUS. AT ABOUT 12:10 A.M., JANUARY 22, THE CHAIRMAN OF THE
AT ABOUT 12:10 A.M., JANUARY 22, THE CHAIRMAN OF THE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE OF THE BODY
22, THE CHAIRMAN OF THE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE OF THE BODY ON THE FLOOR OF THIS SENATE SAID
JUDICIARY COMMITTEE OF THE BODY ON THE FLOOR OF THIS SENATE SAID EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE AND OTHER
ON THE FLOOR OF THIS SENATE SAID EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE AND OTHER NONSENSE.
EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE AND OTHER NONSENSE. NOW THINK ABOUT THAT FOR A
NONSENSE. NOW THINK ABOUT THAT FOR A MOMENT.
NOW THINK ABOUT THAT FOR A MOMENT. EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE AND OTHER
MOMENT. EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE AND OTHER NONSENSE.
EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE AND OTHER NONSENSE. MR. NADLER, IT IS NOT NONSENSE.
NONSENSE. MR. NADLER, IT IS NOT NONSENSE. THESE ARE PRIVILEGES RECOGNIZED
MR. NADLER, IT IS NOT NONSENSE. THESE ARE PRIVILEGES RECOGNIZED BY THE SUPREME COURT OF THE
THESE ARE PRIVILEGES RECOGNIZED BY THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES.
BY THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. AND TO SHRED THE CONSTITUTION ON
UNITED STATES. AND TO SHRED THE CONSTITUTION ON THE FLOOR OF THE SENATE, TO
AND TO SHRED THE CONSTITUTION ON THE FLOOR OF THE SENATE, TO SERVE WHAT PURPOSE?
THE FLOOR OF THE SENATE, TO SERVE WHAT PURPOSE? THE SENATE IS NOT ON TRIAL.
SERVE WHAT PURPOSE? THE SENATE IS NOT ON TRIAL. THE CONSTITUTION DOESN'T ALLOW
THE SENATE IS NOT ON TRIAL. THE CONSTITUTION DOESN'T ALLOW WHAT JUST TOOK PLACE.
THE CONSTITUTION DOESN'T ALLOW WHAT JUST TOOK PLACE. LOOK WHAT WE'VE DEALT WITH FOR
WHAT JUST TOOK PLACE. LOOK WHAT WE'VE DEALT WITH FOR THE LAST NOW 13 HOURS, AND WE
LOOK WHAT WE'VE DEALT WITH FOR THE LAST NOW 13 HOURS, AND WE HOPEFULLY ARE CLOSING THE
THE LAST NOW 13 HOURS, AND WE HOPEFULLY ARE CLOSING THE PROCEEDINGS BUT NOT ON A VERY
HOPEFULLY ARE CLOSING THE PROCEEDINGS BUT NOT ON A VERY HIGH NOTE.
PROCEEDINGS BUT NOT ON A VERY HIGH NOTE. ONLY GUILTY PEOPLE TRY TO HIDE
HIGH NOTE. ONLY GUILTY PEOPLE TRY TO HIDE EVIDENCE, SO I GUESS WHEN
ONLY GUILTY PEOPLE TRY TO HIDE EVIDENCE, SO I GUESS WHEN PRESIDENT OBAMA INSTRUCTED HIS
EVIDENCE, SO I GUESS WHEN PRESIDENT OBAMA INSTRUCTED HIS ATTORNEY GENERAL TO NOT GIVE
PRESIDENT OBAMA INSTRUCTED HIS ATTORNEY GENERAL TO NOT GIVE INFORMATION, HE WAS GUILTY OF A
ATTORNEY GENERAL TO NOT GIVE INFORMATION, HE WAS GUILTY OF A CRIME.
INFORMATION, HE WAS GUILTY OF A CRIME. THAT'S THE WAY IT WORKS,
CRIME. THAT'S THE WAY IT WORKS, MR. NADLER?
THAT'S THE WAY IT WORKS, MR. NADLER? IS THAT THE WAY YOU VIEW THE
MR. NADLER? IS THAT THE WAY YOU VIEW THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION?
IS THAT THE WAY YOU VIEW THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION? BECAUSE THAT'S NOT THE WAY IT
UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION? BECAUSE THAT'S NOT THE WAY IT WAS WRITTEN.
BECAUSE THAT'S NOT THE WAY IT WAS WRITTEN. THAT IS NOT THE WAY IT'S
WAS WRITTEN. THAT IS NOT THE WAY IT'S INTERPRETED.
THAT IS NOT THE WAY IT'S INTERPRETED. IT IS NOT THE WAY THE AMERICAN
INTERPRETED. IT IS NOT THE WAY THE AMERICAN PEOPLE SHOULD HAVE TO LIVE.
IT IS NOT THE WAY THE AMERICAN PEOPLE SHOULD HAVE TO LIVE. I'LL TELL YOU WHAT'S
PEOPLE SHOULD HAVE TO LIVE. I'LL TELL YOU WHAT'S TREACHEROUS.
I'LL TELL YOU WHAT'S TREACHEROUS. COME TO THE FLOOR OF THE SENATE
TREACHEROUS. COME TO THE FLOOR OF THE SENATE AND SAY EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE AND
COME TO THE FLOOR OF THE SENATE AND SAY EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE AND OTHER NONSENSE.
AND SAY EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE AND OTHER NONSENSE. WE YIELD THE REST OF OUR TIME.
OTHER NONSENSE. WE YIELD THE REST OF OUR TIME. THE PRESIDING OFFICER: THE
WE YIELD THE REST OF OUR TIME. THE PRESIDING OFFICER: THE MANAGERS HAVE 27 MINUTES
THE PRESIDING OFFICER: THE MANAGERS HAVE 27 MINUTES REMAINING.
MR. NADLER: MR. CHIEF JUSTICE
MR. NADLER: MR. CHIEF JUSTICE AND MEMBERS OF THE SENATE, THE
MR. NADLER: MR. CHIEF JUSTICE AND MEMBERS OF THE SENATE, THE PRESIDENT'S COUNSEL HAS NO
AND MEMBERS OF THE SENATE, THE PRESIDENT'S COUNSEL HAS NO STANDING TO TALK ABOUT LYING.
PRESIDENT'S COUNSEL HAS NO STANDING TO TALK ABOUT LYING. HE TOLD THIS BODY TODAY, THE
STANDING TO TALK ABOUT LYING. HE TOLD THIS BODY TODAY, THE PRESIDENT TOLD THIS BODY AND
HE TOLD THIS BODY TODAY, THE PRESIDENT TOLD THIS BODY AND TOLD THE AMERICAN PEOPLE
PRESIDENT TOLD THIS BODY AND TOLD THE AMERICAN PEOPLE REPEATEDLY, FOR EXAMPLE, THAT
TOLD THE AMERICAN PEOPLE REPEATEDLY, FOR EXAMPLE, THAT THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
REPEATEDLY, FOR EXAMPLE, THAT THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES REFUSED TO ALLOW THE PRESIDENT
THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES REFUSED TO ALLOW THE PRESIDENT DUE PROCESS.
REFUSED TO ALLOW THE PRESIDENT DUE PROCESS. I TOLD YOU IT'S AVAILABLE, THE
DUE PROCESS. I TOLD YOU IT'S AVAILABLE, THE PUBLIC DOCUMENT, NOVEMBER 26
I TOLD YOU IT'S AVAILABLE, THE PUBLIC DOCUMENT, NOVEMBER 26 LETTER FROM ME AS CHAIRMAN OF
PUBLIC DOCUMENT, NOVEMBER 26 LETTER FROM ME AS CHAIRMAN OF THE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE TO THE
LETTER FROM ME AS CHAIRMAN OF THE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE TO THE PRESIDENT OFFERING HIM DUE
THE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE TO THE PRESIDENT OFFERING HIM DUE PROCESS, OFFERING WITNESSES,
PRESIDENT OFFERING HIM DUE PROCESS, OFFERING WITNESSES, OFFERING CROSS-EXAMINATION.
PROCESS, OFFERING WITNESSES, OFFERING CROSS-EXAMINATION. A FEW DAYS LATER, WE RECEIVED A
OFFERING CROSS-EXAMINATION. A FEW DAYS LATER, WE RECEIVED A LETTER FROM MR. CIPOLLONE ON
A FEW DAYS LATER, WE RECEIVED A LETTER FROM MR. CIPOLLONE ON WHITE HOUSE STATIONARY THAT SAID
LETTER FROM MR. CIPOLLONE ON WHITE HOUSE STATIONARY THAT SAID NO, WE HAVE NO INTEREST IN
WHITE HOUSE STATIONARY THAT SAID NO, WE HAVE NO INTEREST IN APPEARING.
NO, WE HAVE NO INTEREST IN APPEARING. ON THE ONE HAND, THEY ARE LYING
APPEARING. ON THE ONE HAND, THEY ARE LYING BECAUSE THE HOUSE IS CONDEMNED
ON THE ONE HAND, THEY ARE LYING BECAUSE THE HOUSE IS CONDEMNED BY THE PRESIDENT FOR NOT GIVING
BECAUSE THE HOUSE IS CONDEMNED BY THE PRESIDENT FOR NOT GIVING HIM DUE PROCESS AFTER THEY
BY THE PRESIDENT FOR NOT GIVING HIM DUE PROCESS AFTER THEY REJECTED THE OFFER OF DUE
HIM DUE PROCESS AFTER THEY REJECTED THE OFFER OF DUE PROCESS.
REJECTED THE OFFER OF DUE PROCESS. THAT LETTER REJECTING IT WAS
PROCESS. THAT LETTER REJECTING IT WAS DECEMBER 1.
THAT LETTER REJECTING IT WAS DECEMBER 1. THE PRESIDENTS -- THE
DECEMBER 1. THE PRESIDENTS -- THE PRESIDENT'S COUNSEL SAYS THAT
THE PRESIDENTS -- THE PRESIDENT'S COUNSEL SAYS THAT THE HOUSE SHOULD HAVE ISSUED
PRESIDENT'S COUNSEL SAYS THAT THE HOUSE SHOULD HAVE ISSUED SUBPOENAS.
THE HOUSE SHOULD HAVE ISSUED SUBPOENAS. WE DID ISSUE SUBPOENAS.
SUBPOENAS. WE DID ISSUE SUBPOENAS. THE PRESIDENT, YOU MAY
WE DID ISSUE SUBPOENAS. THE PRESIDENT, YOU MAY RECALL, -- YOU SHOULD RECALL
THE PRESIDENT, YOU MAY RECALL, -- YOU SHOULD RECALL SAID HE WOULD OPPOSE ALL
RECALL, -- YOU SHOULD RECALL SAID HE WOULD OPPOSE ALL SUBPOENAS, AND HE DID.
SAID HE WOULD OPPOSE ALL SUBPOENAS, AND HE DID. SO MANY OF THOSE SUBPOENAS ARE
SUBPOENAS, AND HE DID. SO MANY OF THOSE SUBPOENAS ARE STILL BEING FOUGHT IN COURT,
SO MANY OF THOSE SUBPOENAS ARE STILL BEING FOUGHT IN COURT, SUBPOENAS ISSUED LAST APRIL.
STILL BEING FOUGHT IN COURT, SUBPOENAS ISSUED LAST APRIL. SO THAT'S ALSO UNTRUE.
SUBPOENAS ISSUED LAST APRIL. SO THAT'S ALSO UNTRUE. AND IT'S A HECK OF A NERVE TO
SO THAT'S ALSO UNTRUE. AND IT'S A HECK OF A NERVE TO CRITICIZE THE HOUSE FOR NOT
AND IT'S A HECK OF A NERVE TO CRITICIZE THE HOUSE FOR NOT ISSUING SUBPOENAS WHEN THE
CRITICIZE THE HOUSE FOR NOT ISSUING SUBPOENAS WHEN THE PRESIDENT SAID HE WOULD OPPOSE
ISSUING SUBPOENAS WHEN THE PRESIDENT SAID HE WOULD OPPOSE ALL SUBPOENAS AND WE'VE ISSUED A
PRESIDENT SAID HE WOULD OPPOSE ALL SUBPOENAS AND WE'VE ISSUED A LOT OF SUBPOENAS AND HE OPPOSES
ALL SUBPOENAS AND WE'VE ISSUED A LOT OF SUBPOENAS AND HE OPPOSES ALL OF THEM, AND THEY'RE TIED UP
LOT OF SUBPOENAS AND HE OPPOSES ALL OF THEM, AND THEY'RE TIED UP IN COURT.
ALL OF THEM, AND THEY'RE TIED UP IN COURT. THE PRESIDENT CLAIMS, AND MOST
IN COURT. THE PRESIDENT CLAIMS, AND MOST MEMBERS OF THIS BODY KNOW
THE PRESIDENT CLAIMS, AND MOST MEMBERS OF THIS BODY KNOW BETTER, EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE,
MEMBERS OF THIS BODY KNOW BETTER, EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE, WHICH IS A LIMITED PRIVILEGE
BETTER, EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE, WHICH IS A LIMITED PRIVILEGE WHICH EXISTS, BUT NOT AS A
WHICH IS A LIMITED PRIVILEGE WHICH EXISTS, BUT NOT AS A SHIELD, NOT AS A SHIELD AGAINST
WHICH EXISTS, BUT NOT AS A SHIELD, NOT AS A SHIELD AGAINST WRONGDOING, AS THE SUPREME COURT
SHIELD, NOT AS A SHIELD AGAINST WRONGDOING, AS THE SUPREME COURT SPECIFICALLY SAID IN THE NIXON
WRONGDOING, AS THE SUPREME COURT SPECIFICALLY SAID IN THE NIXON CASE IN 1973 -- 1974.
SPECIFICALLY SAID IN THE NIXON CASE IN 1973 -- 1974. THE PRESIDENT CLAIMS ABSOLUTE
CASE IN 1973 -- 1974. THE PRESIDENT CLAIMS ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY.
THE PRESIDENT CLAIMS ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY. MR. CIPOLLONE WROTE SOME OF
IMMUNITY. MR. CIPOLLONE WROTE SOME OF THOSE LETTERS, SAYING THAT THE
MR. CIPOLLONE WROTE SOME OF THOSE LETTERS, SAYING THAT THE PRESIDENT -- NOT ONLY SAYING
THOSE LETTERS, SAYING THAT THE PRESIDENT -- NOT ONLY SAYING THAT THE PRESIDENT, BUT THAT
PRESIDENT -- NOT ONLY SAYING THAT THE PRESIDENT, BUT THAT NOBODY THAT HE DOESN'T WANT
THAT THE PRESIDENT, BUT THAT NOBODY THAT HE DOESN'T WANT SHOULD TESTIFY, AND THEN THEY
NOBODY THAT HE DOESN'T WANT SHOULD TESTIFY, AND THEN THEY HAVE THE NERVE, AND THAT IS A
SHOULD TESTIFY, AND THEN THEY HAVE THE NERVE, AND THAT IS A VIOLATION OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL
HAVE THE NERVE, AND THAT IS A VIOLATION OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS OF THE HOUSE OF
VIOLATION OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AND THE SENATE
RIGHTS OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AND THE SENATE AND THE AMERICAN PEOPLE AS
REPRESENTATIVES AND THE SENATE AND THE AMERICAN PEOPLE AS REPRESENTED THROUGH THEM.
AND THE AMERICAN PEOPLE AS REPRESENTED THROUGH THEM. IT'S AN ASSERTION OF THE KINGLY
REPRESENTED THROUGH THEM. IT'S AN ASSERTION OF THE KINGLY PREROGATIVE, MONARCHICAL
IT'S AN ASSERTION OF THE KINGLY PREROGATIVE, MONARCHICAL PREROGATIVE.
PREROGATIVE, MONARCHICAL PREROGATIVE. ONLY THE PRESIDENT, ONLY THE
PREROGATIVE. ONLY THE PRESIDENT, ONLY THE PRESIDENT HAS RIGHTS.
ONLY THE PRESIDENT, ONLY THE PRESIDENT HAS RIGHTS. THE PEOPLE AS REPRESENTED IN
PRESIDENT HAS RIGHTS. THE PEOPLE AS REPRESENTED IN CONGRESS CANNOT GET INFORMATION
THE PEOPLE AS REPRESENTED IN CONGRESS CANNOT GET INFORMATION FROM THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH AT
CONGRESS CANNOT GET INFORMATION FROM THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH AT ALL.
FROM THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH AT ALL. THIS BODY HAS COMMITTEES.
ALL. THIS BODY HAS COMMITTEES. IT HAS A 200-YEAR RECORD OF
THIS BODY HAS COMMITTEES. IT HAS A 200-YEAR RECORD OF ISSUING SUBPOENAS, OF HAVING THE
IT HAS A 200-YEAR RECORD OF ISSUING SUBPOENAS, OF HAVING THE ADMINISTRATION OF THE DAY
ISSUING SUBPOENAS, OF HAVING THE ADMINISTRATION OF THE DAY TESTIFY, OF SOMETIMES HAVING
ADMINISTRATION OF THE DAY TESTIFY, OF SOMETIMES HAVING SUBPOENA FIGHTS.
TESTIFY, OF SOMETIMES HAVING SUBPOENA FIGHTS. BUT NO PRESIDENT HAS EVER
SUBPOENA FIGHTS. BUT NO PRESIDENT HAS EVER CLAIMED THE RIGHT TO STONEWALL
BUT NO PRESIDENT HAS EVER CLAIMED THE RIGHT TO STONEWALL CONGRESS ON EVERYTHING, PERIOD.
CLAIMED THE RIGHT TO STONEWALL CONGRESS ON EVERYTHING, PERIOD. CONGRESS HAS NO RIGHT TO GET
CONGRESS ON EVERYTHING, PERIOD. CONGRESS HAS NO RIGHT TO GET INFORMATION, THE AMERICAN PEOPLE
CONGRESS HAS NO RIGHT TO GET INFORMATION, THE AMERICAN PEOPLE HAVE NO RIGHT TO GET
INFORMATION, THE AMERICAN PEOPLE HAVE NO RIGHT TO GET INFORMATION.
HAVE NO RIGHT TO GET INFORMATION. THAT, IN FACT, IS ARTICLE 2 OF
INFORMATION. THAT, IN FACT, IS ARTICLE 2 OF THE IMPEACHMENT THAT WE HAVE
THAT, IN FACT, IS ARTICLE 2 OF THE IMPEACHMENT THAT WE HAVE VOTED.
THE IMPEACHMENT THAT WE HAVE VOTED. IT IS BEYOND BELIEF THAT THE
VOTED. IT IS BEYOND BELIEF THAT THE PRESIDENT CLAIMS MONARCHICAL
IT IS BEYOND BELIEF THAT THE PRESIDENT CLAIMS MONARCHICAL POWERS.
PRESIDENT CLAIMS MONARCHICAL POWERS. I CAN DO WHATEVER I WANT UNDER
POWERS. I CAN DO WHATEVER I WANT UNDER 2, SAYS HE, AND THEN ACTS ON
I CAN DO WHATEVER I WANT UNDER 2, SAYS HE, AND THEN ACTS ON THAT, DEFIES EVERYTHING, DEFIES
2, SAYS HE, AND THEN ACTS ON THAT, DEFIES EVERYTHING, DEFIES THE LAW TO WITHHOLD AID FROM
THAT, DEFIES EVERYTHING, DEFIES THE LAW TO WITHHOLD AID FROM UKRAINE, DEFIES THE LAW IN A
THE LAW TO WITHHOLD AID FROM UKRAINE, DEFIES THE LAW IN A DOZEN DIFFERENT DIRECTIONS ALL
UKRAINE, DEFIES THE LAW IN A DOZEN DIFFERENT DIRECTIONS ALL THE TIME AND LIES ABOUT IT ALL
DOZEN DIFFERENT DIRECTIONS ALL THE TIME AND LIES ABOUT IT ALL THE TIME AND SAYS TO
THE TIME AND LIES ABOUT IT ALL THE TIME AND SAYS TO MR. CIPOLLONE HERE TO LIE ABOUT
THE TIME AND SAYS TO MR. CIPOLLONE HERE TO LIE ABOUT IT.
MR. CIPOLLONE HERE TO LIE ABOUT IT. THESE FACTS ARE UNDENIABLE,
    You must  Log in  to get the function.
Tip: Click on the article or the word in the subtitle to get translation quickly!

Loading…

Jay Sekulow, Jerry Nadler Trade Heated Remarks Over Executive Privilege | NBC News NOW

21 Folder Collection
林宜悉 published on February 22, 2020
More Recommended Videos
  1. 1. Search word

    Select word on the caption to look it up in the dictionary!

  2. 2. Repeat single sentence

    Repeat the same sentence to enhance listening ability

  3. 3. Shortcut

    Shortcut!

  4. 4. Close caption

    Close the English caption

  5. 5. Embed

    Embed the video to your blog

  6. 6. Unfold

    Hide right panel

  1. Listening Quiz

    Listening Quiz!

  1. Click to open your notebook

  1. UrbanDictionary 俚語字典整合查詢。一般字典查詢不到你滿意的解譯,不妨使用「俚語字典」,或許會讓你有滿意的答案喔