B1 Intermediate 18 Folder Collection
After playing the video, you can click or select the word to look it up in the dictionary.
Loading...
Report Subtitle Errors
>>> THIS HISTORIC IMPEACHMENT OF
>>> THIS HISTORIC IMPEACHMENT OF DONALD TRUMP COMES AMID MUCH
DONALD TRUMP COMES AMID MUCH TALK ABOUT HOW AMERICANS ARE
TALK ABOUT HOW AMERICANS ARE DIVIDED.
DIVIDED. BUT THERE IS STRIKING AGREEMENT
BUT THERE IS STRIKING AGREEMENT AMONG THE WRITERS AND EDITORS
AMONG THE WRITERS AND EDITORS WHO REPORT ON GOVERNMENT FOR A
WHO REPORT ON GOVERNMENT FOR A LIVING.
LIVING. WELL, THEY'RE INDEPENDENT
WELL, THEY'RE INDEPENDENT ARRIVING AT THE SAME ONE.
ARRIVING AT THE SAME ONE. LOOK AT "THE NEW YORK TIMES" AND
LOOK AT "THE NEW YORK TIMES" AND HOW THEY PUT IT.
HOW THEY PUT IT. OR TAKE THE NEWSPAPER THAT
OR TAKE THE NEWSPAPER THAT LAUNCHED THE MODERN TRADITION OF
LAUNCHED THE MODERN TRADITION OF INVESTIGATIVE JOURNALISM IN
INVESTIGATIVE JOURNALISM IN WATERGATE, "THE WASHINGTON POST"
WATERGATE, "THE WASHINGTON POST" NOW ENDORSING THE IMPEACHMENT OF
NOW ENDORSING THE IMPEACHMENT OF PRESIDENT TRUMP IN THIS HISTORIC
PRESIDENT TRUMP IN THIS HISTORIC FULL PAGE EDITORIAL, NOTING HIS
FULL PAGE EDITORIAL, NOTING HIS OBSTRUCTION THREATENS U.S.
OBSTRUCTION THREATENS U.S. DEMOCRACY.
DEMOCRACY. IT IS A DEPARTURE FROM THE LAST
IT IS A DEPARTURE FROM THE LAST IMPEACHMENT IN OUR HISTORY WHERE
IMPEACHMENT IN OUR HISTORY WHERE NEWSPAPERS OFTEN CONDEMNED
NEWSPAPERS OFTEN CONDEMNED CLINTON'S PERSONAL CONDUCT BUT
CLINTON'S PERSONAL CONDUCT BUT LARGELY OPPOSED THE REPUBLICAN
LARGELY OPPOSED THE REPUBLICAN PUSH FOR IMPEACHMENT AS LEGALLY
PUSH FOR IMPEACHMENT AS LEGALLY UNWARRANTED.
UNWARRANTED. TODAY SEVERAL NEWSPAPERS SAY
TODAY SEVERAL NEWSPAPERS SAY THEY SHIFTED AGAINST TRUMP WITH
THEY SHIFTED AGAINST TRUMP WITH RELUCTANCE AND ONLY RECENTLY AS
RELUCTANCE AND ONLY RECENTLY AS UKRAINE TIPPED THE SCALE.
UKRAINE TIPPED THE SCALE. QUOTE, VIRTUALLY NOTHING DOES.
QUOTE, VIRTUALLY NOTHING DOES. NOW, THERE ARE EXCEPTIONS.
NOW, THERE ARE EXCEPTIONS. "THE WALL STREET JOURNAL," A
"THE WALL STREET JOURNAL," A CONSERVATIVE EDITORIAL PAGE,
CONSERVATIVE EDITORIAL PAGE, OPPOSES THE IMPEACHMENT CASE AS,
OPPOSES THE IMPEACHMENT CASE AS, QUOTE, WEAK.
QUOTE, WEAK. BUT THE DAILY NEWS SAYS INSTEAD
BUT THE DAILY NEWS SAYS INSTEAD OF ONE SMOKING GUN, THERE IS
OF ONE SMOKING GUN, THERE IS ACRID BLACK STUFF RISING FROM
ACRID BLACK STUFF RISING FROM THE WHITE HOUSE.
THE WHITE HOUSE. THE PHILADELPHIA INQUIRY
THE PHILADELPHIA INQUIRY LABELING TRUMP A THREAT TO THE
LABELING TRUMP A THREAT TO THE NATIONAL SECURITY.
NATIONAL SECURITY. OR THE "ORLANDO SENTINAL" SAYING
OR THE "ORLANDO SENTINAL" SAYING BASICALLY ONLY THE MOST CYNICAL
BASICALLY ONLY THE MOST CYNICAL PARTISAN COULD MINIMIZE THE
PARTISAN COULD MINIMIZE THE PUBLIC EVIDENCE AGAINST TRUMP.
PUBLIC EVIDENCE AGAINST TRUMP. SHOULD AMERICANS CARE ABOUT THIS
SHOULD AMERICANS CARE ABOUT THIS ON IMPEACHMENT EVE?
ON IMPEACHMENT EVE? WE TURN TO THOMAS FRIEDMAN
WE TURN TO THOMAS FRIEDMAN MAKING HIS DEBUT ON THE BEAT.
MAKING HIS DEBUT ON THE BEAT. THANKS FOR BEING HERE.
THANKS FOR BEING HERE. >> ARI, GREAT TO BE HERE WITH
>> ARI, GREAT TO BE HERE WITH YOU.
YOU. >> WHAT DOES IT SAY TO
>> WHAT DOES IT SAY TO AMERICANS, AND SHOULD IT MATTER
AMERICANS, AND SHOULD IT MATTER THAT SO MANY EDITORS AND LEADERS
THAT SO MANY EDITORS AND LEADERS IN JOURNALISM ARE TAKING THIS
IN JOURNALISM ARE TAKING THIS POSITION?
POSITION? >> I THINK IT REALLY COMES DOWN
>> I THINK IT REALLY COMES DOWN TO THE FACT THAT THERE ARE TWO
TO THE FACT THAT THERE ARE TWO SIMPLE ISSUES HERE.
SIMPLE ISSUES HERE. ONE IS THAT IF WE LET A
ONE IS THAT IF WE LET A PRESIDENT USE CONGRESSIONALLY
PRESIDENT USE CONGRESSIONALLY APPROPRIATED DEFENSE FUNDS FOR
APPROPRIATED DEFENSE FUNDS FOR UKRAINE IN ORDER TO INTIMIDATE
UKRAINE IN ORDER TO INTIMIDATE THE PRESIDENT OF THAT COUNTRY TO
THE PRESIDENT OF THAT COUNTRY TO TAKE HIS RIVAL IN THE NEXT
TAKE HIS RIVAL IN THE NEXT ELECTION, WE ARE BASICALLY
ELECTION, WE ARE BASICALLY SAYING IT IS OKAY FOR ALL FUTURE
SAYING IT IS OKAY FOR ALL FUTURE PRESIDENTS TO ENLIST FOREIGN
PRESIDENTS TO ENLIST FOREIGN POWERS.
POWERS. CAN YOU IMAGINE HOW MUCH MONEY
CAN YOU IMAGINE HOW MUCH MONEY SOMEONE COULD RAISE FROM ENLIST
SOMEONE COULD RAISE FROM ENLIST OR FROM IRAN?
OR FROM IRAN? WE WOULD NEVER AGAIN HAVE A
WE WOULD NEVER AGAIN HAVE A LEGITIMATE PRESIDENT.
LEGITIMATE PRESIDENT. SOMEONE WHO YOU SAID WELL, I
SOMEONE WHO YOU SAID WELL, I LIKE OR DON'T LIKE HIM OR HER
LIKE OR DON'T LIKE HIM OR HER BUT THEY'RE LEGITIMATE.
BUT THEY'RE LEGITIMATE. WE WOULD NEVER AGAIN HAVE A
WE WOULD NEVER AGAIN HAVE A LEGITIMATE PRESIDENT.
LEGITIMATE PRESIDENT. AND THAT WOULD BE A PRESCRIPTION
AND THAT WOULD BE A PRESCRIPTION FOR POLITICAL CHAOS.
FOR POLITICAL CHAOS. SECONDLY, IF WE'D LET A
SECONDLY, IF WE'D LET A PRESIDENT IN THE FACE OF THESE
PRESIDENT IN THE FACE OF THESE CHARGES NOT ALLOW THE KEY
CHARGES NOT ALLOW THE KEY WITNESSES TO TESTIFY, THOSE
WITNESSES TO TESTIFY, THOSE CLOSEST TO THE PROCESS,
CLOSEST TO THE PROCESS, GIULIANI, POMPEO, MICK MULVANEY,
GIULIANI, POMPEO, MICK MULVANEY, IF WE DON'T LET -- IF WE LET HIM
IF WE DON'T LET -- IF WE LET HIM GET AWAY WITH NOT LETTING THEM
GET AWAY WITH NOT LETTING THEM TESTIFY AND NOT TURNING OVER ANY
TESTIFY AND NOT TURNING OVER ANY DOCUMENTS, WE ARE BASICALLY
DOCUMENTS, WE ARE BASICALLY SAYING WE NO LONGER HAVE A
SAYING WE NO LONGER HAVE A SERPTHS OF
SERPTHS OF SEPARATION OF POWERS, WE
SEPARATION OF POWERS, WE ACTUALLY HAVE A MONARCHY.
ACTUALLY HAVE A MONARCHY. AND IF WE LET BOTH OF THOSE
AND IF WE LET BOTH OF THOSE THINGS HAPPEN, THE AMERICA THAT
THINGS HAPPEN, THE AMERICA THAT YOU AND I KNEW, GREW UP AND
YOU AND I KNEW, GREW UP AND LOVED, THE AMERICA THAT IS SO
LOVED, THE AMERICA THAT IS SO WIDELY RESPECTED AROUND THE
WIDELY RESPECTED AROUND THE GLOBE WILL BE NO MORE, AND WE
GLOBE WILL BE NO MORE, AND WE WILL MISS IT WHEN IT'S GONE.
WILL MISS IT WHEN IT'S GONE. >> IT'S STRIKING WHEN YOU LAY IT
>> IT'S STRIKING WHEN YOU LAY IT OUT LIKE THAT.
OUT LIKE THAT. YOU'VE COVERED MANY PRESIDENTS.
YOU'VE COVERED MANY PRESIDENTS. YOU'VE BEEN AROUND THE WORLD.
YOU'VE BEEN AROUND THE WORLD. YOU'RE A HIGH-LEVEL GUY, TOM, IF
YOU'RE A HIGH-LEVEL GUY, TOM, IF YOU DON'T MIND ME SAYING.
YOU DON'T MIND ME SAYING. AND YOU MADE THE OBSERVATION
AND YOU MADE THE OBSERVATION THAT IN A WEIRD WAY DONALD
THAT IN A WEIRD WAY DONALD TRUMP, WHO STYLES HIMSELF A
TRUMP, WHO STYLES HIMSELF A COMMUNICATIONS GURU, HAS
COMMUNICATIONS GURU, HAS DISARMED FROM THE BULLY PULPIT
DISARMED FROM THE BULLY PULPIT OF THE WHITE HOUSE PRESS ROOM.
OF THE WHITE HOUSE PRESS ROOM. WHAT DO YOU MEAN BY THAT?
WHAT DO YOU MEAN BY THAT? >> IT'S INTERESTING BECAUSE I
>> IT'S INTERESTING BECAUSE I COVERED THE SECRETARY OF STATE
COVERED THE SECRETARY OF STATE AND I COVERED THE FIRST YEAR OF
AND I COVERED THE FIRST YEAR OF BILL CLINTON.
BILL CLINTON. SO I'VE BEEN IN KIND OF BOTH
SO I'VE BEEN IN KIND OF BOTH THOSE PRESS ROOMS.
THOSE PRESS ROOMS. AND I ALWAYS NOTICED HOW MUCH
AND I ALWAYS NOTICED HOW MUCH THE BEST SPOKESPEOPLE FOR
THE BEST SPOKESPEOPLE FOR THOSE -- FOR THOSE OFFICIALS
THOSE -- FOR THOSE OFFICIALS WOULD USE THE QUESTIONS THEY GOT
WOULD USE THE QUESTIONS THEY GOT FROM THE PRESS AS REAL EARLY
FROM THE PRESS AS REAL EARLY WARNING SIGNS, WHAT'S OUT THERE,
WARNING SIGNS, WHAT'S OUT THERE, WHAT ARE THE ISSUES WE NEED TO
WHAT ARE THE ISSUES WE NEED TO BE AWARE OF AND WHERE IS THIS
BE AWARE OF AND WHERE IS THIS STORY GOING.
STORY GOING. THE FACT THAT TRUMP HAS NOT
THE FACT THAT TRUMP HAS NOT ALLOWED A WHITE HOUSE BRIEFING
ALLOWED A WHITE HOUSE BRIEFING SINCE I DON'T KNOW, NINE MONTHS,
SINCE I DON'T KNOW, NINE MONTHS, TWELVE MONTHS, I DON'T EVEN KNOW
TWELVE MONTHS, I DON'T EVEN KNOW HOW LONG IT'S BEEN ANYMORE, THE
HOW LONG IT'S BEEN ANYMORE, THE FACT THAT HIS SPOKESMAN ONLY
FACT THAT HIS SPOKESMAN ONLY GOES ON FOX NEWS, THE FACT THAT
GOES ON FOX NEWS, THE FACT THAT HE ONLY GOES ON FOX NEWS,
HE ONLY GOES ON FOX NEWS, THEY'VE BEEN IN SUCH A BUBBLE
THEY'VE BEEN IN SUCH A BUBBLE THAT I THINK, A, THEY DON'T
THAT I THINK, A, THEY DON'T REALIZE THE DANGER THAT THEY ARE
REALIZE THE DANGER THAT THEY ARE IN.
IN. THEY DON'T REALIZE HOW SERIOUS
THEY DON'T REALIZE HOW SERIOUS THIS IS VIEWED BY THE COUNTRY.
THIS IS VIEWED BY THE COUNTRY. THEY DON'T REALIZE HOW TRUMP
THEY DON'T REALIZE HOW TRUMP EARLY ON SAID, HEY, I MADE A
EARLY ON SAID, HEY, I MADE A MISTAKE, I REALLY WENT A LITTLE
MISTAKE, I REALLY WENT A LITTLE BIT TOO FAR.
BIT TOO FAR. HAD HE ACCEPTED CENSURE, AND
HAD HE ACCEPTED CENSURE, AND THAT WAS WHAT THE DEMOCRATS
THAT WAS WHAT THE DEMOCRATS WOULD HAVE MUCH PREFERRED I
WOULD HAVE MUCH PREFERRED I THINK, HE COULD HAVE GOTTEN AWAY
THINK, HE COULD HAVE GOTTEN AWAY WITH CENSURE AND NOT
WITH CENSURE AND NOT IMPEACHMENT.
IMPEACHMENT. IN THE HISTORY BOOKS NO ONE
IN THE HISTORY BOOKS NO ONE REALLY REMEMBERS A PRESIDENT WHO
REALLY REMEMBERS A PRESIDENT WHO WAS CENSURED.
WAS CENSURED. NO ONE WILL EVER FORGET A
NO ONE WILL EVER FORGET A PRESIDENT WHO'S BEEN IMPEACHED.
PRESIDENT WHO'S BEEN IMPEACHED. >> GIVEN YOUR VIEW ON THE ENTIRE
>> GIVEN YOUR VIEW ON THE ENTIRE WORLD, YOU'VE MENTIONED THAT
WORLD, YOU'VE MENTIONED THAT THERE ARE OTHER COUNTRIES THAT
THERE ARE OTHER COUNTRIES THAT ARE INCREASINGLY ROOTING FOR
ARE INCREASINGLY ROOTING FOR TRUMP.
TRUMP. WHAT DO YOU MEAN BY THAT?
WHAT DO YOU MEAN BY THAT? >> I THINK BOTH RUSSIA AND CHINA
>> I THINK BOTH RUSSIA AND CHINA WILL BE VOTING TRUMP IN 2020.
WILL BE VOTING TRUMP IN 2020. I'M NOT SAYING THEY'LL
I'M NOT SAYING THEY'LL NECESSARILY INT SCREEN.ERVENE.
NECESSARILY INT SCREEN.ERVENE. I'M SURE THE RUSSIANS WILL.
I'M SURE THE RUSSIANS WILL. I CAN'T SPEAK FOR THE CHINESE.
I CAN'T SPEAK FOR THE CHINESE. IT'S FOR TWO REASONS.
IT'S FOR TWO REASONS. ONE IS BECAUSE THEY KNOW THAT AS
ONE IS BECAUSE THEY KNOW THAT AS LONG AS TRUMP IS PRESIDENT OF
LONG AS TRUMP IS PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES AMERICA'S IN
THE UNITED STATES AMERICA'S IN TURMOIL.
TURMOIL. THE OTHER THING THEY KNOW IS
THE OTHER THING THEY KNOW IS THAT AS LONG AS TRUMP IS
THAT AS LONG AS TRUMP IS PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES
PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES HE CAN NEVER GALVANIZE A GLOBAL
HE CAN NEVER GALVANIZE A GLOBAL COALITION AGAINST THEM.
COALITION AGAINST THEM. HE CAN NEVER GALVANIZE THE
HE CAN NEVER GALVANIZE THE EUROPEANS IN A COALITION AGAINST
EUROPEANS IN A COALITION AGAINST RUSSIA AND HE CAN NEVER GAVEL
RUSSIA AND HE CAN NEVER GAVEL GALVANIZE THE ASIANS AGAINST
GALVANIZE THE ASIANS AGAINST CHINA.
CHINA. AND FOR BOTH THOSE COUNTRIES
AND FOR BOTH THOSE COUNTRIES THAT IS CRITICAL.
THAT IS CRITICAL. THEY KNOW AS LONG AS TRUMP IS
THEY KNOW AS LONG AS TRUMP IS THERE THEY WILL NEVER FACE A
THERE THEY WILL NEVER FACE A GLOBAL COALITION AGAINST THEM.
GLOBAL COALITION AGAINST THEM. >> THE OTHER THING I WANT TO ASK
>> THE OTHER THING I WANT TO ASK YOU ABOUT SOMETHING WE'VE BEEN
YOU ABOUT SOMETHING WE'VE BEEN FOLLOWING CLOSELY HERE WITH OUR
FOLLOWING CLOSELY HERE WITH OUR EXPERTS, AND THAT IS THE DECLINE
EXPERTS, AND THAT IS THE DECLINE OF COMMON FACTS, WHICH IS NOT TO
OF COMMON FACTS, WHICH IS NOT TO SAY THERE HASN'T ALWAYS BEEN
SAY THERE HASN'T ALWAYS BEEN RICH AND HUGE DEBATES IN THIS
RICH AND HUGE DEBATES IN THIS COUNTRY.
COUNTRY. THERE HAS BEEN PARTISAN PRESS IN
THERE HAS BEEN PARTISAN PRESS IN THE FOUNDING ERA.
THE FOUNDING ERA. THERE'S BEEN A LOT.
THERE'S BEEN A LOT. SO IT'S NOT TO OVERSIMPLIFY.
SO IT'S NOT TO OVERSIMPLIFY. BUT I WANT TO SHOW YOU SOMETHING
BUT I WANT TO SHOW YOU SOMETHING YOU KNOW ABOUT AND OUR VIEWERS
YOU KNOW ABOUT AND OUR VIEWERS KNOW ABOUT, WHICH IS LOOK AT THE
KNOW ABOUT, WHICH IS LOOK AT THE DECLINE OF NIXON'S APPROVAL
DECLINE OF NIXON'S APPROVAL ACROSS PARTIES.
ACROSS PARTIES. IF YOU SEE ON THE RIGHT HERE.
IF YOU SEE ON THE RIGHT HERE. AS WATERGATE EVIDENCE CAME OUT,
AS WATERGATE EVIDENCE CAME OUT, IT WAS A NET DROP THAT WAS VERY
IT WAS A NET DROP THAT WAS VERY SIMILAR AMONG DEMS, INDIES, AND
SIMILAR AMONG DEMS, INDIES, AND Rs.
Rs. ALL AROUND 40 OR 40-PLUS
ALL AROUND 40 OR 40-PLUS PERCENT.
PERCENT. IT MADE ALL THE DIFFERENCE.
IT MADE ALL THE DIFFERENCE. DO YOU THINK THAT WAS BECAUSE OF
DO YOU THINK THAT WAS BECAUSE OF THE WAY THAT PEOPLE CONSUMED
THE WAY THAT PEOPLE CONSUMED INFORMATION THEN, AND DO YOU
INFORMATION THEN, AND DO YOU EVER GET BACK TO THAT WORLD
EVER GET BACK TO THAT WORLD WHERE THERE ARE SOME COMMON
WHERE THERE ARE SOME COMMON FACTS IN AMERICA?
FACTS IN AMERICA? >> YEAH, WE HAVE -- DAVE ROBERTS
>> YEAH, WE HAVE -- DAVE ROBERTS WROTE ABOUT THIS VERY WELL IN
WROTE ABOUT THIS VERY WELL IN VOX RECENTLY.
VOX RECENTLY. WE BASICALLY HAVE TODAY THE
WE BASICALLY HAVE TODAY THE ABILITY TO CREATE AN ALTERNATIVE
ABILITY TO CREATE AN ALTERNATIVE ENTIRE EPISODEERRE EPISTEMOLOGIC
ENTIRE EPISODEERRE EPISTEMOLOGIC WHERE YOU COMPLETELY LIVE IN A
WHERE YOU COMPLETELY LIVE IN A DIFFERENT SET OF FACTS BECAUSE
DIFFERENT SET OF FACTS BECAUSE IF YOU GET MOST OF YOUR
IF YOU GET MOST OF YOUR INFORMATION ONLINE FROM FACEBOOK
INFORMATION ONLINE FROM FACEBOOK AND THAT'S TARGETED TO REINFORCE
AND THAT'S TARGETED TO REINFORCE YOUR BIASES.
YOUR BIASES. AND IF YOU WATCH ONLY ONE
AND IF YOU WATCH ONLY ONE PARTICULAR NETWORK AND YOU PUT
PARTICULAR NETWORK AND YOU PUT ALL THOSE TOGETHER.
ALL THOSE TOGETHER. THERE'S NO WALTER CRONKITE OUT
THERE'S NO WALTER CRONKITE OUT THERE WHO EVERYONE IS SHARKING
THERE WHO EVERYONE IS SHARKING THE SAME INFORMATION FROM.
THE SAME INFORMATION FROM. AND I THINK IT'S ONE OF THE MOST
AND I THINK IT'S ONE OF THE MOST FRIGHTENING THINGS BECAUSE OUR
FRIGHTENING THINGS BECAUSE OUR DEMOCRACY, ARI, IS BASED ON TWO
DEMOCRACY, ARI, IS BASED ON TWO PILLARS -- TRUTH AND TRUST.
PILLARS -- TRUTH AND TRUST. OKAY?
OKAY? IF WE DON'T SHARE TRUTH, WE
IF WE DON'T SHARE TRUTH, WE CAN'T POSSIBLY GET THE BIG -- WE
CAN'T POSSIBLY GET THE BIG -- WE CAN'T POSSIBLY FACE THE BIG
CAN'T POSSIBLY FACE THE BIG CHALLENGES, CLIMATE CHANGE,
CHALLENGES, CLIMATE CHANGE, CYBER WAR, EDUCATION.
CYBER WAR, EDUCATION. WE CAN'T POSSIBLY AGREE TO DO
WE CAN'T POSSIBLY AGREE TO DO ANYTHING AT SCALE IF WE DON'T
ANYTHING AT SCALE IF WE DON'T SHARE THE SAME TRUTH AND IF WE
SHARE THE SAME TRUTH AND IF WE DON'T TRUST EACH OTHER WE CAN'T
DON'T TRUST EACH OTHER WE CAN'T POSSIBLY DO ANYTHING BIG AND
POSSIBLY DO ANYTHING BIG AND HARD TOGETHER.
HARD TOGETHER. IF YOU DON'T HAVE TRUTH AND
IF YOU DON'T HAVE TRUTH AND TRUST, YOU CANNOT DO ANYTHING
TRUST, YOU CANNOT DO ANYTHING BIG AND HARD.
BIG AND HARD. AND ALL THE CHALLENGES WE HAVE
AND ALL THE CHALLENGES WE HAVE COMING AT US RIGHT NOW ARE BIG
COMING AT US RIGHT NOW ARE BIG AND HARD.
AND HARD. >> ON A HISTORIC TIME AS WE TAKE
>> ON A HISTORIC TIME AS WE TAKE ALL THIS IN IT'S REALLY GREAT TO
ALL THIS IN IT'S REALLY GREAT TO GET YOUR INSIGHTS.
GET YOUR INSIGHTS. TOM, I HOPE YOU COME BACK AND
    You must  Log in  to get the function.
Tip: Click on the article or the word in the subtitle to get translation quickly!

Loading…

'Thug,' 'Threat': Endorsing Impeachment, Top Newspapers Unload On Trump | MSNBC

18 Folder Collection
林宜悉 published on January 23, 2020
More Recommended Videos
  1. 1. Search word

    Select word on the caption to look it up in the dictionary!

  2. 2. Repeat single sentence

    Repeat the same sentence to enhance listening ability

  3. 3. Shortcut

    Shortcut!

  4. 4. Close caption

    Close the English caption

  5. 5. Embed

    Embed the video to your blog

  6. 6. Unfold

    Hide right panel

  1. Listening Quiz

    Listening Quiz!

  1. Click to open your notebook

  1. UrbanDictionary 俚語字典整合查詢。一般字典查詢不到你滿意的解譯,不妨使用「俚語字典」,或許會讓你有滿意的答案喔