Subtitles section Play video
-
♪ ♪
-
>> Ed: THE PRESIDENT IS NOW ON
-
THE CLOCK OVER JUST HOW HE WILL
-
HANDLE THE UPCOMING IMPEACHMENT
-
PROCEEDINGS.
-
HOUSE JUDICIARY CHAIR JUST SENT
-
THE PRESIDENT A LETTER SAYING HE
-
HAS EXACTLY ONE WEEK FROM
-
TONIGHT TO DECIDE IF HE WILL
-
CALL WITNESSES AND PRESENT
-
EVIDENCE OF HIS OWN.
-
THE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE IS
-
HAVING ITS FIRST IMPEACHMENT IN
-
HEARING WEDNESDAY.
-
GOOD TO HAVE YOU WITH US,
-
CONGRESSMAN.
-
>> HAPPY THANKSGIVING.
-
>> Ed: WHAT DO YOU MAKE OF
-
JERRY NADLER SAYING,
-
MR. PRESIDENT, YOU HAVE ONE WEEK
-
TO DECIDE IF YOU'RE GOING TO
-
MOUNT A DEFENSE?
-
WHAT IS YOUR ADVICE TO THE
-
PRESIDENT?
-
>> NO, HE NEEDS TO BE ADVISED
-
WHAT THE CHARGES ARE.
-
THERE ARE NO CHARGES.
-
THEY TALKED ABOUT, WELL,
-
JERRY NADLER HAS CONTINUED TO
-
TALK ABOUT COLLUSION BUT THERE I
-
TALK ABOUT COLLUSION BUT THERE S
-
NO
-
COLLISION AND AS WE KNOW, IT IS
-
NOT OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE WHEN
-
YOU KNOW YOU ARE INNOCENT AND
-
YOU ARE TRYING TO GET THE TRUTH
-
OUT ABOUT YOUR INNOCENCE, AND
-
YOU GOT PEOPLE LIKE
-
ROBERT MUELLER AND ADAM SCHIFF
-
WHO WERE TRYING TO GET OUT LIES.
-
THAT IS NOT OBSTRUCTION.
-
>> YOU MENTIONED MUELLER.
-
I FIND IT INTERESTING THAT
-
JERRY NADLER IS BRINGING UP THE
-
MUELLER REPORT WHICH I THOUGHT
-
WAS IN THE REARVIEW MIRROR AND
-
SAYING WE STILL MAY BE LOOKING
-
AT OBSTRUCTION AND ARTICLE
-
IMPEACHMENT.
-
LET'S REVIEW VIEWERS WHAT
-
JERRY NADLER SAID ABOUT
-
OBSTRUCTION IN JULY IN JULY.
-
>> WE FOUND A GREAT DEAL OF
-
COLLUSION, IT FOUND A GREAT DEAL
-
OF OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE BY THE
-
PRESIDENT, AND IT POINTED TO
-
REFUSE TO EXONERATE THE
-
PRESIDENT.
-
WE THINK IT IS VERY IMPORTANT
-
FOR THE AMERICAN PEOPLE TO HEAR
-
DIRECTLY WHAT THE FACTS ARE
-
BECAUSE THIS IS A PRESIDENT WHO
-
HAS VIOLATED THE LAW SIX WAYS
-
FROM SUNDAY.
-
IF ANYONE ELSE HAD BEEN ACCUSED
-
OF WHAT THE REPORT FINDS THE
-
PRESIDENT HAD DONE, THEY
-
WOULD'VE BEEN INDICTED.
-
>> Ed: THIS IS THE MAN WHO WAS
-
GOING TO BE RUNNING THE
-
IMPEACHMENT DEAL AND MOVING
-
FORWARD AND HE SAID ON FOX NEWS
-
SUNDAY THAT THERE WAS COLLUSIONA
-
SUNDAY THAT THERE WAS COLLUSIOND
-
SUNDAY THAT THERE WAS COLLUSIONT
-
SUNDAY THAT THERE WAS COLLUSIONE
-
SUNDAY THAT THERE WAS COLLUSIONW
-
SUNDAY THAT THERE WAS COLLUSIONS
-
OBSTRUCTION.
-
>> I GUESS THAT TELLS YOU WHY MY
-
FRIEND JERRY WAS NOT RUNNING THE
-
IMPEACHMENT HEARINGS FOR A WHILE
-
THERE.
-
>> Ed: HE WAS SORT OF
-
SIDELINED BY NANCY PELOSI.
-
>> SIDELINED MY FOOT.
-
HE WAS COMPLETELY TAKEN OUT OF
-
THE PICTURE SO THAT SCHIFF COULD
-
DO HIS SCHIFF SHOW.
-
ANYWAY, IF WE ARE GOING TO GET
-
TO THE TRUTH, LIKE HE SAYS HE
-
WANTS TO HEAR, THERE ARE THREE
-
WITNESSES THAT ARE ABSOLUTELY
-
CRITICAL IN MY OPINION, AND THAT
-
INCLUDES THE NONWHISTLEBLOWER
-
WHISTLEBLOWER.
-
IT INCLUDES ABIGAIL GRACE, WHO
-
WAS CLOSE FRIENDS WITH THE
-
NONWHISTLEBLOWER, AND SEAN
-
MISKO.
-
ALL THREE OF THOSE WORKED AT THE
-
NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL.
-
THEY ALL WORKED WITH BIDEN AND
-
WORKED WITH --
-
>> Ed: WHEN HE WAS
-
VICE PRESIDENT.
-
>> MY OPINION IS BASED ON THE
-
FACTS.
-
I THINK THE NONWHISTLEBLOWER RAN
-
TO THEM, WHO WORKED FOR SCHIFF
-
AT THE TIME, AND SAID, MY GOSH,
-
DO YOU HEAR THE CONVERSATION
-
TRUMP HAD WITH THE NEW UKRAINIAN
-
PRESIDENT?
-
WANTS TO GET RID OF CORRUPTION.
-
HE WANTS THE EVIDENCE, WE ARE
-
GOING TO BE COOKED IF HE GETS
-
THE EVIDENCE FROM UKRAINE.
-
THEY SAID, WHAT DO WE DO?
-
THE ANSWER IS, WE WILL MAKE YOU
-
A WHISTLEBLOWER.
-
BUT I DIDN'T HEAR ANY DIRECT
-
EVIDENCE.
-
WE WILL GET THE IG CHANGE THE
-
RULES SO YOU DON'T HAVE TO HAVE
-
DIRECT EVIDENCE.
-
WE NEED ABIGAIL GRACE, JOHN
-
MISKO, THE NONWHISTLEBLOWER
-
WHISTLEBLOWER.
-
>> Ed: WHAT ABOUT HUNTER
-
BIDEN?
-
BECAUSE THAT IS MORE OF A
-
SIDESHOW BECAUSE THE REAL
-
CORRUPTION IS NOT WITH HUNTER
-
BIDEN.
-
HE WASN'T IN A GOVERNMENT
-
POSITION.
-
THE QUESTION IS JOE BIDEN.
-
AND THEY ARE SAYING, OH, THIS IS
-
BRIBERY.
-
THAT MEANS INFORMATION HAS TO BE
-
CONSIDERED AS MONETARY, AND
-
SUPREME COURT MADE CLEAR IT IS
-
NOT A POLITICAL GIFT, BUT THE
-
REAL TRICK IS IF INFORMATION IS
-
A BRIBE, THEN, ALL OF THAT
-
INFORMATION IN THE HILLARY
-
CAMPAIGN GOT FROM UKRAINIANS,
-
THAT MAKES THEM GUILTY OF
-
BRIBERY.
-
>> Ed: BUT THE DEMOCRATS SAY
-
THAT IS A CONSPIRACY THEORY,
-
THAT UKRAINE WAS NOT INVOLVED IN
-
INTERFERING.
-
THAT IT IS ALL ABOUT RUSSIA
-
ABOUT RUSSIA.
-
>> YEAH, WELL, IT DID INVOLVE
-
RUSSIA.
-
IT DID INVOLVE SOME UKRAINIANS
-
AND I'M CAREFUL NOT TO SAY
-
UKRAINE, BUT SOME UKRAINIANS AND
-
THAT IS WHAT PRESIDENT ZELENSKY
-
WANTS TO GET TO THE BOTTOM OF.
-
BUT LOOK AT IT FROM THE
-
NONWHISTLEBLOWER AND ABIGAIL
-
GRACE AND SHAWN MISKO WERE
-
INVOLVED IN THIS WHOLE THING,
-
BUDDIES WITH BRANDON
-
McMASTERS.
-
IF YOU LOOK AT THEIR POSITION,
-
THIS IS A TWO FOR FOR THEM.
-
BUT YOU STOP ZELENSKY FROM
-
TAKING THE INFORMATION AND
-
GETTING THEM IN TROUBLE AND
-
ALSO, YOU KEEP TRUMP OCCUPIED.
-
>> Ed: LAST QUESTION, DO YOU
-
THINK IT IS A FOREGONE
-
CONCLUSION THAT THE DEMOCRATS
-
COULD HAVE A HOLD ON
-
IMPEACHMENT?
-
OR ARE THEY GETTING NERVOUS?
-
>> THAT IS AN ABSOLUTELY GREAT
-
QUESTION.
-
I JUST THINK, SAY WHAT YOU WILL
-
ABOUT NANCY PELOSI, SHE IS NOT
-
POLITICALLY STUPID.
-
SHE KNOWS IF YOU TAKE THIS VOTE,
-
THEY ARE GOING TO GET THE VOTES,
-
SHE ALWAYS DOES.
-
AND THEN IT GOES TO THE SENATE,
-
AND NANCY PELOSI WILL HAVE
-
HELPED REELECT DONALD TRUMP.
-
I CAN'T BELIEVE SHE WOULD WANT
-
TO DO THAT, BUT HER LEFT WING,
-
THEY PUSHED HER INTO IT ANYWAY.
-
>> Ed: A LOT OF EXCITING DAYS
-
AHEAD.
-
YOU WILL BE RIGHT IN THE MIDDLE