Placeholder Image

Subtitles section Play video

  • In his anti-Semitic bookOn the Jewish Question”, Karl Marx said -

  • What is the worldly cult of the Jew? Huckstering. What is his worldly god? MoneyMoney is

  • the jealous god of Israel, beside which no other god may exist.”

  • He also says -

  • Christ drove the Jewish money-changers out of the temple, and that the money-changers

  • of our age enlisted on the side of tyranny happen again to be Jews is perhaps no more

  • than a historic coincidence.”

  • We discern in Judaism… a universal antisocial element of the present time.”

  • As soon as society succeeds in abolishing the empirical essence of Judaism - huckstering

  • and its conditions - the Jew becomes impossible, because his consciousness no longer has an

  • objectThe social emancipation of the Jew is the emancipation of society from Judaism.”

  • Karl Marx also hated on individual Jews personally, such as his words against Joseph Moses Levy

  • - the publisher of the Daily Telegraph.

  • The Weekly Mail maintains that although Levy really fools no one, he has changed "i"

  • into "y", and it is true that among the 22,000 Levites whom Moses counted in the journey

  • through the wilderness, there was not a single Levi who spelled his name with a "y". Just

  • as Edouard Simon spares no effort to be regarded as belonging to the Romance people, so Levy

  • is determined to be an Anglo-Saxon. Therefore, at least once a month he attacks the un-English

  • policies of Mr. Disraeli, for Disraeli, "the Asiatic mystery", is, unlike the Telegraph,

  • not an Anglo-Saxon by descent. But what does it profit Levy to attack Mr. D'Israeli and

  • to change "i" into "y", when Mother Nature has inscribed his origins in the clearest

  • possible way right in the middle of his face. The nose of the mysterious stranger of Slawkenbergius

  • (see Tristram Shandy) who had got the finest nose from the promontory of noses was just

  • a nine days' wonder in Strasbourg, whereas Levy's nose provides conversation throughout

  • the year in the City of London.”

  • And Engels praised this book and this passage, as does Marxists.org, describing it as one

  • of the most brilliant of Marx’s writings. In one letter to Engels, Marx also called

  • someone a “Jewish n*****”.

  • And, in his last book, Das Kapital volume 1, Karl Marx says:

  • The capitalist knows that all commodities, however scurvy they may look, or however badly

  • they may smell, are in faith and in truth money, inwardly circumcised Jews, and what

  • is more, a wonderful means whereby out of money to make more money.”

  • There are even more anti-semitic statements by Karl Marx besides those shown here. But

  • I’m going to go back to the first quote, because I think this one is the key to understanding

  • why Karl Marx hated the Jews.

  • What is the worldly cult of the Jew? Huckstering. What is his worldly god? MoneyMoney is

  • the jealous god of Israel, beside which no other god may exist.”

  • In order to understand this passage in full, context is needed. We first need to understand

  • what Karl Marx means when he saysmoney”.

  • In Das Kapital volume 1, Karl Marx makes it clear over and over that he thinks money is

  • a commodity. The shortest quote I have of this is -

  • That money is a commodity is therefore a new discovery...”

  • He goes on to say that, when money is used to buy and sell commodities, it becomes capital.

  • And it is the person who’s sole motive is the accumulation of more and more money (capital,

  • or profit) that makes someone a capitalist.

  • So, in this passage, Karl Marx is saying that money is Capital, and that Capitalism is Jewish.

  • To Karl Marx, the Jews are the Capitalists. Money, in Karl Marx’s eyes, is the Jewish

  • God. And Karl Marx thinks that their sole motive is the accumulation of more money,

  • which Karl Marx says is what a Capitalist does. So, money (which is Capital, in Karl

  • Marx’s eyes) is Judaism. In other words, Capitalism is Judaism. And Judaism is Capitalism.

  • That’s why when Karl Marx refers to the Capitalists, he’s actually referring to

  • the Jews.

  • We can see this in several other passages, including this one again, which at first glance,

  • doesn’t really make any sense.

  • The capitalist knows that all commodities, however scurvy they may look, or however badly

  • they may smell, are in faith and in truth money, inwardly circumcised Jews, and what

  • is more, a wonderful means whereby out of money to make more money.”

  • Think about it: why would commodities beinwardly circumcised Jews”? It doesn’t make any

  • sense on its own. But now that we know that Karl Marx thinks Capitalists are Jews, and

  • that capitalists produce commodities, we can piece this together to discover the true message

  • of what Karl Marx is saying here.

  • As he’s already admitted, when he sayscapitalist”, he meansJews”. And when he sayscommodities”,

  • he means theproductsof the Jews. Or, theoffspringof the Jews. So if we

  • replace the words with their actual meaning, this quote actually reads: “The Jews know

  • that their offspringare inwardly circumcised Jews…” And now this passage makes sense.

  • In this next quote, Karl Marx uses the wordPharisee”, which means a member of an

  • ancient Jewish sect.

  • The Pharisee of a capitalist represented by one of his servants, accompanies this action,

  • of course, with the unctuous phrase: “That’s for mother,” yet he knows well enough that

  • the poor children must sit up and help.”

  • Karl Marx is saying here that thePharisee of a capitalist” - in other words, theJewishness

  • of a capitalist” - is on show when he gives work to one of his servants. And this is confirmation

  • that Marx believes that the Jews are the Capitalists, and that the Capitalists are the Jews. He

  • then drives this point home here -

  • In striking contrast with the great fact, that the shortening of the hours of labour

  • of women and children in English factories was exacted from capital by the male operatives,

  • we find in the latest reports of the Children’s Employment Commission traits of the operative

  • parents in relation to the traffic in children, that are truly revolting and thoroughly like

  • slave-dealing. But the Pharisee [or Jewishness] of a capitalist, as may be seen from the same

  • reports, denounces this brutality which he himself creates, perpetuates, and exploits,

  • and which he moreover baptisesfreedom of labour.” “Infant labour has been called

  • into aid ... even to work for their own daily bread. Without strength to endure such disproportionate

  • toil, without instruction to guide their future life, they have been thrown into a situation

  • physically and morally polluted. The Jewish historian has remarked upon the overthrow

  • of Jerusalem by Titus that it was no wonder it should have been destroyed, with such a

  • signal destruction, when an inhuman mother sacrificed her own offspring to satisfy the

  • cravings of absolute hunger.”

  • So again, we have confirmation here that Karl Marx thinks that the Capitalists are the Jews.

  • And the whole of Das Kapital is anti-Semitic through and through. Here’s another quote -

  • It is not because he is a leader of industry that a man is a capitalist; on the contrary,

  • he is a leader of industry because he is a capitalist. The leadership of industry is

  • an attribute of capital, just as in feudal times the functions of general and judge,

  • were attributes of landed property.”

  • At first glance, this doesn’t make sense. Why would a capitalist be a leader of an industry

  • simply by declaring himself to be a capitalist? That doesn’t make sense. If I declare myself

  • a Capitalist, that doesn’t make me a leader of industry. So clearly, that’s not what

  • Karl Marx is saying.

  • What Karl Marx has said in the previous quotes is that, Capitalists are Jews. And, if we

  • apply that belief that Karl Marx has to this quote, the message becomes clear. Karl Marx

  • is saying here that, because the Capitalist is Jewish, he is therefore a leader of industry.

  • This is implying that the Jewish-Capitalists didn’t become leaders of industry by merit

  • or anything else, but were appointed because of their Jewish faith, which is money (or capital).

  • And there are other clues that this is the correct way to interpret Karl Marx’s anti-Capitalism

  • and anti-Semitism (which are the same thing). In another passage in Das Kapital, Karl Marx

  • writes -

  • That Philistine paper, the Spectator, states that after the introduction of a sort of partnership

  • between capitalist and workmen in theWirework Company of Manchester,” “the first result

  • was a sudden decrease in waste, the men not seeing why they should waste their own property

  • any more than any other master’s, and waste is, perhaps, next to bad debts, the greatest

  • source of manufacturing loss.” The same paper finds that the main defect in the Rochdale

  • co-operative experiments is this: “They showed that associations of workmen could

  • manage shops, mills, and almost all forms of industry with success, and they immediately

  • improved the condition of the men; but then they did not leave a clear place for masters.”

  • Quelle horreur!”

  • So, why would Marx feel the need to state that the Spectator isPhilistine”? What

  • relevance does this have? Well, it turns out that, the historical Philistines were anti-Jewish

  • and fought against the Jews. Karl Marx himself used the wordPhilistineto mean ethnically

  • anti-Jewishrather than spiritually anti-Jewish. So, Marx is pointing out that

  • the ethnically anti-Semitic newspaper (the Spectator) is praising the fact that the Socialist

  • experiments in Rochdale had left out the Jewish masters. Its hatred against the Jews, and

  • its praise of Socialism, gets rid of the Judeo-bourgeoisie class. And Karl Marx is on board with that,

  • which is why he sarcastically says that themain defect” (meaning, it wasn’t really

  • a defect) was that it got rid of the Jews, and then sayssource of horror!” at the

  • end. As in, “shock, horror, really!?” - meaning, of course Socialism got rid of

  • the Jews!

  • So I think it should be quite clear to you all by now that Karl Marx uses the wordcapitalist

  • to hide the wordJew”, as a way to hide his anti-Semitism in plain sight. His greatest

  • book, Das Kapital (the Capital), means themoney-commodityin Karl Marx’s own

  • words. Karl Marx saysmoneyis thejealous god of Israel” - that money is the Jewish

  • religion. And soDas Kapitalliterally meansThe Jewish religionor just simply

  • The Jew”. “Das KapitalisThe Jew”! The entire thing is an anti-Semitic

  • hit-piece, disguised with euphemisms and doublespeak to hide its true meaning. The truebelievers

  • (the anti-Semites, the Marxists) of course, know what theirrealSocialism is. At

  • its core, it’s anti-Semitism!

  • The fundamental belief of anti-Capitalism is that the Capitalists are stealing wealth

  • off the workers. This is untrue (because Value is Subjective, not based on Labour). But to

  • a racist, it is true, because a racist (who isn’t a “money-changer”, and therefore

  • has little idea about money) believes that theworkers” (people who are not Jews)

  • put the value of their Labour into the products that they produce. And they believe that the

  • Jews don’t work and just make money from the money they already have (theyre the

  • money-changers”). So the racist believes that the Jewishmoney-changersare stealing

  • off of everyone else in society. This is factually untrue, but hopefully you can see now how

  • this fundamental belief is at the core of Socialist ideology. Anti-Capitalism comes

  • from anti-Semitism - the two concepts are entwined, and are one and the same.

  • And, when Karl Marx says the wordbourgeoisie”, he actually means two things. First, he means

  • the Jews”, which includes ethnic Jews, but he also means the Capitalists (non-ethnic

  • Jews, whom he says are practicing theJewish faithof Capitalism). Proof for this will

  • be shown shortly. But I need to explain the historic context first.

  • In the Dark Ages, the Christian Pope bannedusury”, which is the lending of money

  • and charging interest for that money. So, Christians couldn’t lend money. Only non-Christians

  • could, which is why, in the west, only the Jews could be bankers and money-lenders (hence

  • why Karl Marx calls them themoney-changers”). But at the same time, the Jews were not allowed

  • to own land (it was Christian Europe) and were forced to live in towns and cities. In

  • English, towns and cities were calledboroughs”, which is where we get the wordBourgeoisie

  • from, which is the French forTownsfolk”. So, historically, due to old-fashioned anti-Semitism,

  • the Jews were a major element of the bourgeoisie. This is why racists like Karl Marx believed

  • that the Jews were the bourgeoisie, and that Capitalism was Jewish - it’s old fashioned

  • anti-Semitism which dated back to the medieval period.

  • And I know that some Marxists will claim that it is anti-Semitic to point out that historic-racism

  • led to the Jews being the bourgeoisie. No, denying that old-fashioned anti-Semitism forced

  • the Jews to become the bourgeoisie, is anti-Semitic. It was because the Jewish people were forced

  • to live in towns and practice usury as a result of anti-Semitism, that gave Edward the 1st

  • of England the excuse to murder half the male Jews in England in 1279.

  • Every single Jewish adult male in England was seized and imprisoned - at least 600 individuals

  • out of a total community of only 2,000 to 4,000 people. They, it seems, were the special

  • target of the sting operation. Of course, the Jews had a long-standing dominance of

  • the money and metalworking trades, so to some extent an investigation into coin-clipping

  • was bound to focus on their activities.”

  • But Edward’s readiness to believe that all Jews were involved in devaluing his currency,

  • and the disproportionate conviction rate of Jews and Christians, tell us that there was

  • a darker dimension to the story.”

  • Early in the new year of 1279, when the trials of the accused began, some twenty-nine

  • Christians were hanged for their crimes, but around ten times as many Jews suffered the

  • same fate. In his drive to improve his finances... Edward executed half of the adult males in

  • a minority population. Almost incidentally, he had committed the single biggest massacre

  • of Jews in British history.”

  • So, just to clarify this to the anti-Semitic Marxists - denying that old-fashioned anti-Semitism

  • forced the Jews to become money-lenders and forced them to move into towns to become the

  • bourgeoisie, is anti-Semitic. Denying that that was what happened is anti-Semitic, and

  • is a denial of historic anti-Semitism.

  • But anyway, because of historic anti-Semitism, Karl Marx had good reason to believe that

  • a significant portion of the bourgeoisie were the Jews. We can see this here -

  • The essential conditions for the existence and for the sway of the bourgeois class is

  • the formation and augmentation of capital...”

  • IfCapitalismoney”, andmoney is the jealous god of Israel”, which Karl

  • Marx has said, then the bourgeoisie who accumulate Capital are Jews (at least, in faith). So,

  • this passage confirms that the bourgeoisie are, in faith at least, Jewish. But this next

  • paragraph is striking -

  • While thisTrueSocialism thus served the government as a weapon for fighting the

  • German bourgeoisie, it, at the same time, directly represented a reactionary interest,

  • the interest of German Philistines.”

  • Okay, there’s that word again - “Philistine”. As explained earlier, Karl Marx uses this

  • to mean ethnicanti-Semites”. In other words racist anti-Semites, rather than spiritual

  • anti-Semites like Karl Marx. So, Karl Marx says here that, while the German government

  • used a “fakeSocialism to fight the German Jewish-bourgeoisie, at the same time, all

  • this did was benefit the German racist anti-Semites. This requires a bit of context, so let me just explain:

  • For starters, just because they were anti-Semites doesn’t mean they were Socialists in the

  • way that Karl Marx thinks Socialism is. That’s why he puts theTruein quotes, implying

  • that this German version of Socialism isfakeSocialism.

  • He therefore means that the German ethnic anti-Semites (basically, “proto-Nazis) aren’t

  • realSocialists, and are a “reactionaryelement, and are against Socialism. He says

  • that, while these so-called German Socialists did fight against some of the bourgeoisie

  • (the Jews), they were doing so for their own bourgeois interests only. In other words,

  • they were still Jews in faith, because they were capitalists-in-hiding. So Marx is saying

  • that German anti-Semite Socialists (orproto-Nazis”) arefakeSocialists. He’s saying that

  • theyre bourgeoisie in disguise, even if they fight ethnic Jews, which is what Socialism

  • does, and what he is praising. This is confirmed in this next quote -

  • And on its part German Socialism recognised, more and more, its own calling as the bombastic

  • representative of the petty-bourgeois Philistine. It proclaimed the German nation to be the

  • model nation, and the German petty Philistine to be the typical man. To every villainous

  • meanness of this model man, it gave a hidden, higher, Socialistic interpretation, the exact

  • contrary of its real character.”

  • So yes, Karl Marx is rejecting the old German anti-SemiticfakeSocialism because,

  • even though they were anti-Jewish, they were ultimately bourgeois in faith themselves.

  • This, of course, confirms Karl Marx’s hatred of the Jews and of the Jewish faith. That’s

  • why he says -

  • The immediate aim of the Communists is the same as that of all other proletarian

  • parties: formation of the proletariat into a class, overthrow of the bourgeois supremacy,

  • conquest of political power by the proletariat.”

  • Yes, Karl Marx wants to overthrow the bourgeoisie. He wants to overthrow the Jews. And he says

  • that this is whatALL OTHER PROLETARIAN PARTIESare aiming for. All Socialism is

  • anti-Semitism.

  • In this next quote, he says he also wants to end what he callsbourgeois property

  • (Jewish property). And he wants to abolish the Jewish family -

  • Abolition [Aufhebung] of the family! Even the most radical flare up at this infamous

  • proposal of the Communists.” “On what foundation is the present family,

  • the bourgeois family, based? On capital, on private gain. In its completely developed

  • form, this family exists only among the bourgeoisie. But this state of things finds its complement

  • in the practical absence of the family among the proletarians, and in public prostitution.”

  • The bourgeois family will vanish as a matter of course when its complement vanishes, and

  • both will vanish with the vanishing of capital.”

  • Note that: it’s only the Jewish family he wants to abolish, not the idea offamily

  • itself. And what’s interesting is that Karl Marx wasn’t calling for the abolition of

  • money, or even ofcapitalin the purely-economic sense that he used it. He actually called

  • for a Central State Bank, which obviously can’t happen without money.

  • The proletariat will use its political supremacy to wrest, by degree, all capital

  • from the bourgeoisie, to centralise all instruments of production in the hands of the State...”

  • Oh, but State control isn’t real Socialism. No, because anti-Semitism is real Socialism,

  • and State control is a means to abolish what the Socialists believe is the Judeo-Capitalist

  • order. Your God, Karl Marx, has made that clear. So next time one of these anti-Semites

  • claim that State control isn’t real Socialism, I’m going to sayyoure right, anti-Semitism

  • is real Socialism, and I’m really glad you gave me an opportunity to clarify that to

  • you’.

  • Anyway, Karl Marx is calling for the workers to steal directly from the Jews, and then

  • they will call for the -

  • Centralisation of credit in the hands of the state, by means of a national bank with

  • State capital and an exclusive monopoly.”

  • Gee! You know - I always thought that Marxists hated monopolies? That’s what they always

  • claim. And yet, here’s their master calling for monopolies. And I thought they didn’t

  • wantState Capitalism’? And yet, theyre God, Karl Marx, is calling for State Capitalism.

  • Gee - that’s strange, isn’t it? It’s almost like these morons haven’t even read

  • Karl Marx. Or, are just lying. Also, Marxists will claim theyre againstmoney”.

  • Okay then, what’s the purpose of a State Central Bank ifmoneyhas been abolished?

  • Oh that’s right, because money won’t be abolished under Marxist rule, only the so-called

  • Jewish practice ofbuying things to sell them on for profitwill be abolished. The

  • State Central Bank is there to destroy the supposedly Jewish practice of accumulating

  • money. And this is the whole point of Socialism. All Socialism is anti-Capitalism. And all

  • Socialism is therefore, at its heart, anti-Semitism.

  • No wonder Goebbels declared eighty years later that all socialism is antiSemitism.”

  • Karl Marx and Hitler both agreed on the same essential principle of all Socialisms - that

  • capitalism and Jewishness are entwined. They believed that capitalism was bad because it

  • was Jewish, and believed that Jewishness was bad because it was capitalist. Money was associated

  • with Jewishness, and the solution that Karl Marx and Hitler came up with to defeat Judeo-Capitalism

  • was a centrally planned economy where money, commodities and therefore Jewishness, had

  • no place. But, by doing this - by removing money and centrally planning the economy - you

  • also remove the Jews from society. Karl Marx, just like Hitler, was calling for the removal

  • of the Jews from society -

  • The social emancipation of the Jew is the emancipation of society from Judaism.”

  • The way they differed though was that Marx was religiously anti-Semitic, while Hitler

  • was ethnically anti-Semitic. Where Hitler was interested in your blood, which you couldn’t

  • change, Marx believed (just like Mussolini) that Jews could give up their faith in Judeo-Capitalism

  • and convert to a new faith - Fascism or Socialism.

  • The Jews, therefore, like the bourgeoisie - of which they were seen as the epitome - had

  • an option: they could convert. Mussolini said that for most Jews perhaps a generation would

  • suffice for them to become proper Italians.”

  • Now, some have argued that Karl Marx was Jewish, and thus, thisprovesthat he cannot

  • be anti-Semitic. This argument falls flat on its face when the facts are known. Karl

  • Marx never practiced Judaism himself. His grandfather had been the Rabbi of Nijmegen,

  • but his father had turned against the faith, and Karl Marx inherited his spiritual anti-Semitism

  • from his father.

  • If youre a racist and, just like Hitler, believe that human subspecies exist (even

  • though science says we all come from the same tribes in Africa roughly 60,000 years ago,

  • which on evolutionary terms, isn’t long enough to create separate and distinctraces”,

  • and so the belief inraceis just that - a cultish belief)... If you are a racist

  • and believe in humanraces”, then you may argue that Karl Marx wasethnically

  • Jewish.

  • Again, race doesn’t exist, so this argument doesn’t work. But even if we accept the

  • religious idea that humansubspeciesexist, Karl Marx’s main argument against

  • the Jews is on a spiritual-level, not an ethnic one. He’s anti-Semitic in the old-fashioned

  • sense - religiously anti-Semitic - not necessarily racially anti-Semitic like Hitler was. Although

  • Karl Marx did put racism into his spiritual anti-Semitism, it just wasn’t on the same

  • level as Hitler.

  • Also, Karl Marx was a member of the bourgeoisie, and was also against the bourgeoisie. So he’s

  • Jewish and bourgeois, and anti-Jewish and anti-bourgeois at the same time. Just like

  • many things in Karl Marx’s life, and many things he said, it seems like a contradiction

  • to people who are logically-minded. But Karl Marx rejected logic. He believed in Hegel,

  • who said:

  • Everything is inherently contradictory.”

  • Which is why Karl Marx said -

  • What constitutes dialectical movement is the coexistence of two contradictory sides,

  • their conflict and their fusion into a new category.”

  • Where I would say that a contradiction means that you have a flaw in your argument, or

  • that something is wrong somewhere - for example, something cannot betruebut also be

  • falseat the same time - Karl Marx on the other hand, embraced contradictions. That’s

  • why I would argue that NOTHING he wrote was correct, because everything he wrote was either

  • contradicted by something else he wrote, or can be demonstrably proven false through evidence

  • and logical interpretation.

  • But the point is that, you cannot argue that Karl Marx wasethnically Jewishand

  • therefore couldn’t hate Jews because that would be a contradiction, because Karl Marx

  • embraced contradictions. So the fact that he was supposedlyethnically Jewish

  • wouldn’t be a problem for him. Also, by calling him Jewish, youre arguing that

  • he was a Capitalist, by Karl Marx’s own reasoning. So, unless you think Karl Marx

  • was a Capitalist, you are wrong. And I can’t wait for the Socialists to cry out that Karl

  • Marx was not a “realSocialist! Please, please make it be so!

  • However, I have seen Marxist articles trying to deny the claim that Karl Marx was anti-Semitic,

  • basically by misrepresenting the argument that he was, stating that everyone at that

  • time was racist so it would be unfair to call Karl Marx a racist (which is an admission

  • that he was racist), hiding some of the sources (like Marxism.org not publishing Karl Marx’s

  • The Russian Loanfor example), claiming that his anti-Semitism was trying to help

  • the Jews somehow, and by accusing those of pointing out Karl Marx’s anti-Semitism of

  • being anti-Semites themselves. Obviously, none of these arguments work, or are real

  • arguments. And I’m not going to go through them all (because there’s no point, they

  • don’t address the issue), but I will guard myself from the usual accusations of me somehow

  • being a “Fascistor a “Nazior a “Racistor whatever.

  • Well, for starters, I don’t believe in humanraces”, and I’m not interested in one

  • way or another about the Jewish religion. You do your thing, I’ll do mine. Secondly,

  • I’ve literally done a video titledHitler’s Socialismwhich, in addition to the 107

  • sources used, 350 direct references, and numerous quotes and notes, also has a section called

  • National Socialism’s Fundamental Ideological Flaw”. In that section, I outline how Nationalism

  • Socialism (Nazism) doesn’t work on a fundamental level. If I was a Nazi, then why would I destroy

  • Nazism’s fundamental ideological workings? That would just be stupid, wouldn’t it.

  • And Fascism is Italian Socialism. I’m neither Italian, nor Socialist. So none of these accusations

  • are true.

  • Also, by Karl Marx’s own words, all Capitalists are Jews in faith. Therefore, as a proponent

  • of Capitalism myself, by Karl Marx’s “logic”, this means that I’m inadvertently practicing

  • the Jewish faith. In Karl Marx’s own words, I am a quote, “inwardly circumcised Jew

  • end-quote. Therefore, your anti-Semitism is also directed at me, and all Capitalists,

  • and those who seek to save or accumulate money, which is Karl Marx’s definition of Capital.

  • You are calling for a Holocaust of the Bourgeoisie; a Revolution against the Jews. And yet, you

  • think that by calling peopleanti-SemitesorFascistswill somehow exonerate you

  • from your own anti-Semitism? Well, just like all Socialism, it doesn’t work.

  • In reality, just like Hitler and the National Socialists, the reason Karl Marx was an anti-capitalist

  • was because he thought capitalism was Jewish, and he thought Judaism was capitalism. His

  • solution to theJewish Questionwas to abolish capitalism, and abolish the Jews. Again -

  • The social emancipation of the Jew is the emancipation of society from Judaism.”

  • Karl Marx wants to remove the Jews from society. This is why I refer to Socialists as Denialists,

  • because they are denying the historical reality, and are attempting to whitewash the role of

  • Socialism in the Holocaust, which I strongly disagree with. Thanks for watching, bye for

  • now.

In his anti-Semitic bookOn the Jewish Question”, Karl Marx said -

Subtitles and vocabulary

Click the word to look it up Click the word to find further inforamtion about it