Things happen quicker.

There does affect the rest of the world, and it's an indication of what is gonna happen to the rest of the world.

We see it, we see floods, we see the different weather patterns.

It's climate change throughout our globe and we are all connected.

So for May, expedition has become about trying to understand what's happening to the Earth rather than trying to discover the geography off it I'm involved in in other expeditions.

But for me, it is about the science first or or the change on I can understand having listened are now trying to sort of have more respect that way that it isn't just about the science and it is listening to people on the native people and understanding the data were the most data driven world than we've ever been.

But it's not resulting in the changes that are needed.

One person and one administration is not going to materially change what's happening in the world now, and it's not just climate crisis that we call as native people, you know, it's it's all the things that are happening around the world to Mother Earth.

We have to understand that everything is connected and that we cannot solve the problems by addressing one issue alone.

And climate crisis is a symptom, Not the cause.

For us in the Arctic is at the frontier of risk.

Um, for for general cover it is off the table completely in terms of whether we should be up there.

That's the wider moral question.

Andi, You might probably touch on SG there to some extent, but it is.

It is a problem for everybody.

Certainly indigenous people are not against commercial exploitation up there, but it has to be done sensitivity with sensitivity and care.

I'm sympathetically.