Name: Intel i9 9900K... is this REALLY worth it??
Uploaded: 2020-03-30T04:51:46.000Z
Duration: 13 min 41 s
Description: Thousands of YouTube videos with English-Chinese subtitles! Now you can learn to understand native speakers, expand your vocabulary, and improve your pronunciation...

once the guys James two cents here and I'm a little late to the party here with the 9900 K launch tours.

We're talking about the new Intel I 9 99 100 k, but it's better.

Okay, so I'm talking about the core I 9 99 100 k.

I'm talking about Intel's new ninth Jen Ai 9 99 100 K.

You guys probably saw all the stuff that went on at New York with our launch event.

And, of course, the controversy regarding the principal's technology testing methodology.

Which gamers nexus did an amazing exploratory peace on that or investigative piece, and he went down to principal technologies.

Talk to them directly about their testing and concerns.

So I highly recommend you guys go and watch that when you're done with this, he literally did.

The showed up unannounced with the hidden camera and all that stuff, and they ended up doing a full interview with them.

So please go and check that out, because we can't seem to get through any launches lately without there being some point of controversy.

There's always some controversy amongst family isn't who's better in this and that.

Usually it's fairly superficial argument, but this time it has been pretty interesting because the 9900 K exists specifically because of the market share gain.

That rise and an AMG have gotten back over the last two years.

So of course we're talking about the AM be rise and 2700 X.

All the way down has put pressure on Intel, which is why they've now suddenly magically been able to put eight cores into a mainstream sized processor, which is something up until now, they were like, We can't do that.

My mom's gonna pre face this video with a couple of things.

We did a kind of a small gambit of test to compare the 2700 X versus the 9900 k and things like blender and times by CPU test Premier geek bench, Cinna bench.

So things that are basically going to be putting these directly against each other in his fair of a competition as we can because, man, this is it.

Well, let's just go ahead and get right into the benchmarks.

We'll talk about the rationale behind our testing, and we actually did a little bit of over clock testing as well.

So let's show you guys these slides and we'll come back.

We'll talk about it cause there's a lot of information I want you guys to consider before you build or buy your next computer.

Because guess what, Now is the time to do it.

The only we're waiting on right now is the 79 80 or the 99 80 xy from Intel.

Which spoiler alerts Basically the exact same dye that's bend with Sauder.

So with that, look at these slides, pay close attention to them.

So we tested both CPS under two different conditions.

One out of the box settings with no over clocking enhancements, no multi core enhancement note that both of these were tested on a Seuss motherboards.

That way they didn't have any sort of a ah bios are designed difference between them.

They're very different approaches to how they handled these chips, but the technology applies equally to both.

ASIS has multi core enhancement on both of these boards, which we turned off with our initial testing.

And then we turned on to see what happens when you sort of lock all of the cores at their turbo speeds.

So out of the box, the 9900 k is going to boost one or two cores up to five gigahertz out of the box.

The fact that we're getting eight core mainstream processor that contribute up to five gigs if one or two cores are under load and then it steps down from there all the way to What was it, Phill?

Yeah, so that's already significantly faster in terms of core clock, then the AMG S 2700 X.

So the MD 2700 ex applies the same principles where if only one or two cores are being loaded, it will go all the way up to 4.3 turbo clock on those cores and that all eight cores of 16 threads are under load.

It will step down to four gigahertz across the board on all course.

And then what we did when we did our over clock slides is we actually over clocked or basically locked all of the cores at their turbo speed.

So the 9900 k had five gigahertz across the board on all the course, which, I'd like to say was actually very easy to do.

Whereas the 2700 X, on the other hand, we could not get it stable at 4.3 across the board, we actually were able to get 4.25 very, very close 50 megahertz difference and did actually sees a significant improvement, even in single core at 4.25 versus the 4.3.

And that's why the same thing on the Intel, with a single core going to five gigahertz and all core's going to five gigahertz.

It's still the same tests, but we still saw a marginal amount of improvement on single core, which is kind of pot that's going talk about pricing real quick because that is where this becomes a very interesting picture here.

That makes this not only the most powerful mainstream processor they've ever made.

Now there's some rational here, and we could have done on testing.

We could have tested directly with Price Point, which means instead of testing against a 27 100 X, we'd actually be testing against a 1950 x on Thread Ripper.

Reason why we didn't do that is because those are two very different platforms.

So we wanted to test the top tier mainstream regardless of price point, to see how they compared.

And then, I think, in the future, video will actually test it against 1950 extra in the 1920 X Now the difference with Red Ripper versus Rise.

Ennis Thread Ripper has a different kind of an architecture.

It deals with not only the Infinity fabric but also CCX, which then means, do we test in game mode.

That's that Button does a whole lot behind the scenes in the way the CPU operates in, so we're going to kind of find our best testing methodology on that, and then we'll come back and revisit that topic.

But now what and he has done is actually today on launch day, they have reduced the price of the 2700 X by 10%.

Dollars versus a processor that's nearly twice the price.

What we're seeing here is somewhere around the neighborhood of 80 to 90% of the performance, depending on the test of a 99 100 K for roughly 50% of the price.

That makes, of course, the value horn to once again for A and E's favor.

Where, when it comes to purely performance per dollar, a M d is still undoubtedly the winner.

But on the flip side, if you're one of those people, that's like, I don't care about Price.

I just want the ultimate performance, and you honestly wouldn't be looking to either These two chips anyway, you'd be looking at thread Ripper or something on X 2 99 platform from Intel anyway, so it makes this launch extremely interesting, and it definitely bodes once again an A M.

Like I said, We didn't do any gaming tests on this because both of these CPI's or going to give you a great gaming experience where they're not going to bottle necking your games or your graphics cards.

But you are going to see a higher average F P s on Intel.

And that's because of the intel still dominant instructions per clock or I p.

But Risen is not far enough behind right now toward that's really gonna show in your gaming performance.

Unless you're doing like 240 hurt CS, go level gaming.

You're not gonna notice If you did a blind taste test, you'd probably be very hard pressed to notice a difference between 2700 X or the Intel 9900 k with the same GPU involved there.

So we do have our T X cards on these test benches behind me.

But again, graphics was not brought into play on any of those tests.

Now it's going talk about temperatures real quick.

The 9900 k is a saw ordered seep you or at least started in some way because typically you wouldn't deal.

Subtitles ListPlay Video

Intel i9 9900K... is this REALLY worth it??

stuff

sort

significant

material