Subtitles section Play video
-
“What do you think of the Lakers doing so well this season?”
-
Alright, look.
-
That's messed up. You guys know I'm a Kings fan.
-
And you know that the Lakers have consistently broken our hearts.
-
It makes me so mad that they're gelling,
-
that LeBron is back, that they're all getting along.
-
There's no drama. Dwight Howard is, like, now all of a sudden mentally there.
-
Alright. Does anyone else have any questions for me or anything?
-
I've got a question!
-
Why'd you cut our interview so short?
-
Ladies and gentlemen, Andrew Yang!
-
Andrew Yang!
-
You too! Yes!
-
Dude, you did fuckin'... Did you see the way he did that?
-
Aye man, you got the like, the swagger's– I've seen it, it's up now.
-
Oh, thank you, man. Thank you.
-
You hopped up like you had wheelies, man.
-
Let's see Bernie Sanders do that.
-
Oooh, wow!
-
Shots fired.
-
Andrew, that's ageist, bro. Don't do that.
-
Bernie's an inspiration and role model to me, uh...
-
Don't qualify. Don't qualify. Go full Nas, Jay-Z. Go full Take—
-
Just go Takeover.
-
Oh...
-
You know what you should do? Like, the Takeover track, be like,
-
“You little fuck, I got money stacks bigger than you.”
-
You should do that.
-
Alright, anyways.
-
- You're not the first person to tell me that. - Um, are you— are you ready for this?
-
I'm ready.
-
You realize the last presidential candidate that came on Deep Cuts dropped out, so...
-
We had Beto on the show. The ne— Like, the following day he dropped out.
-
You have to answer the question while holding an egg on a spoon.
-
So describe, in Spanish, what's happening right now on stage.
-
Ah, pues, es muy complicado...
-
- You ready for the danger zone? This is like— - You have absolutely nothing to worry about.
-
- Okay. - I'm gonna undo the Patriot Act jinx right now,
-
Ahh, it's not a jinx. Come on, man.
-
He was polling pretty low, but alright.
-
Now there's only one dude on TV doing this all the time.
-
Alright. So obviously, certain media outlets have blacked you out.
-
Yes.
-
- I'ma just say it. MSNBC... - Yeah. And I've got to say...
-
They call you John Yang...
-
All I'm asking for is that they say, “We're going to treat—
-
- Now you wanna—
-
...you exactly like every other candidate. We're going to allow surrogates on our air
-
just like we allow surrogates from other campaigns.” And they're going to acknowledge that they've
-
omitted me from over a dozen graphics and have made mistakes in our coverage.
-
Very, very reasonable. Just treat us like everyone else and then I will be back on the air the next day.
-
Okay, but you're asking for an apology, though. They have to admit fault?
-
- I mean they actually— - You want the news media to admit fault?
-
You want Rachel Maddow to tack on another 30 minutes to her three-hour show
-
- and be like, “I'm sorry, Andrew.” - I'm not looking for 30 minutes.
-
- I would take one minute. - One minute? Okay.
-
Uh, but the fact is they've already apologized for some of the mistakes they've made in isolation,
-
so I'm just asking for an apology to acknowledge that they've made additional mistakes, as well.
-
Okay. Why don't you do this: Go right to Camera One and say, “Hey, MSNBC...
-
the only time I agree with Trump is when he's talking about MSNBC.”
-
Wow.
-
- I, I would not put it that way. - Aw, come on!
-
Come on, dude! I'm trying to—
-
Look, you're what, at 6%?
-
- Yeah, I'm in, I'm in fifth place. - If you get the beef poppin'...
-
I guarantee you'll go up to 8%. If you really...
-
If you really swing dick at MSNBC...
-
Dude, you already have the internet. They'll go crazy.
-
- Look, I got to— - Reddit loves you!
-
I got to give them a road back...
-
- Just go raw. - ...because after I'm president,
-
you know, I'm going to be doing interviews with them.
-
- I'm serious. - We got to give them the path back.
-
But MSNBC, just come clean and say, “Look, mistakes were made.
-
Let's put this behind us so we can get to the business of beating Donald Trump in 2020.”
-
Mike Bloomberg just declared his candidacy. You're the numbers guy.
-
Should billionaires exist and be able to run for office? Two questions.
-
Well, our economic system has been geared towards this winner-take-all dynamic for years.
-
So, it's going to produce some billionaires as a byproduct of the way the economy is set up.
-
Uh, and so, you can't go back in time and rewire the way the economy
-
- ...should have been starting in the '90s. - What do you— what do you mean by that?
-
It's already designed for people to get a billion dollars?
-
It is designed so that it's going to end up producing some number of billionaires,
-
which we have to remedy and as president—
-
Because of what? Monopolies or what? Like what—
-
Yeah. You've seen market power consolidated in the hands of fewer and fewer companies
-
and then you've seen technology and capital converge. The—
-
But should he, should a billionaire like Bloomberg be able to run? That's the real question.
-
Because he can just buy his way through a situation that you're not in.
-
Yeah.
-
History has shown that
-
self-funding candidates have a very, very poor track record in elections.
-
And the fact is, you can't buy passion, you can't buy belief.
-
Uh, if you have people and money, I'll take people every single day.
-
And that's what I believe the billionaires in this race are going to find out, as well, in the days to come.
-
- But should— Should billionaires be able to run? - The way we're set up—
-
You're Euro-stepping the answer here
-
and then going to the hole.
-
I'm— I'm going man.
-
Now you gotta answer that.
-
Come on, Andrew.
-
Yeah.
-
Billionaires should be allowed to spend money on behalf of their own campaigns. Yes, I believe so.
-
Okay. But, and you're— You're okay going up against the David versus Goliath situation?
-
Well, I think what they're going to find is that spending money on advertising dollars is going to be like
-
pushing on a string where after a certain amount of ads, it actually becomes more irritating than anything else.
-
Uh, you're nodding because you see this
-
and you don't even live in Iowa.
-
So, if— if you live in this age—
-
So, like, people in Iowa are like, “Dude, I cannot... It's just Fashion Nova, Fit Tummy Tea,
-
and Michael Bloomberg.”
-
Is that what their Instagram is?
-
There was an article where some teenagers were doing a comedy routine where they were like,
-
imitating these political ads because they've seen them over and over again.
-
So much so that it's become a joke.
-
You know what, man?
-
You guys know what time it is. It's time for the surprise math quiz. Let's see it.
-
- Andrew, here we go. - Alright.
-
Two trains travels in opposite directions from the same station.
-
The first train travels 20 miles an hour faster than the second train,
-
but it starts one hour and 30 minutes after the second train.
-
Five hours after the second train starts, the trains are 512 miles apart.
-
What is the speed of the first train in miles per hour? Go.
-
As the math guy, I know the answer is always C!
-
Dude, it's E, are you kidding me?
-
It's E. Go, show the work. Super simple. We did this before.
-
Let X be the speed of train two.
-
X plus 20 is the speed of train one.
-
Obviously, 3.5X plus 20, plus 5X, five two, 8.5X plus seven equals five over two.
-
X is 52. Speed of train: 52 plus 20, 72. Easy.
-
You sold a test prep company, bro?
-
I did, I did. I did.
-
Alright, man.
-
- Now you've said the Freedom Dividend... - Number one in the country.
-
tested well as an alternative to UBI.
-
Yeah, yeah. We've tested all the names for giving people money.
-
- Dude. Come on, dude. - No, true.
-
I'm going to be the only one. It's just like, “You really tested it?”
-
You were like, “Okay. Let's try, uh, 'Allowance for Adults.'
-
Eh, it's not going to work.”
-
Yes. We didn't have that on the list.
-
- Patriot Bucks. Liberty Dollars. - We had something very close to that.
-
- Patriot Bucks? - We had a lot of variants.
-
- We had, uh, we had Freedom Dividend, which won. - Liberty Bribe. How about Liberty Bribe?
-
How about, how about, how about 'Not Even Half Your Rent...
-
- Bucks”? - That's true here in New York. That is true.
-
- Okay. No, but it tested really well. Yeah. - Anything with the word “Freedom” in it.
-
Anything with the word “Freedom” in it tested way, way better.
-
- Yeah. You know the show is called Patriot Act... - But we tested a whole bunch of that stuff.
-
because the Patriot Act was super fucked up.
-
- Yeah. And it got passed. - Okay.
-
Uh, the Republicans are really good at naming terrible stuff...
-
- Okay. - ...really appealing names.
-
Okay. But Silicon Valley people love it. Shouldn't we have a little bit of skepticism
-
if Silicon Valley bros love the idea of the Freedom Dividend?
-
Just based on...
-
everything.
-
- Well, the reason why I love the Freedom Dividend... - Yeah.
-
is that it makes people stronger, healthier, mentally healthier, less stressed out. We'll start to put value
-
on things that, right now, the market ignores. Like the work my wife does at home
-
- with our two boys, one of whom is autistic... - Yeah.
-
Caregivers, nurturers, uh, coaches and mentors, and increasingly artists, creatives, and even journalists.
-
There are people in Silicon Valley that do support this
-
and some of them support it for the exact right reason— because they know
-
that we're in the midst of the greatest economic and technological transformation in our country's history
-
and we need to do something about it as quickly as possible.
-
Are we using the Freedom Dividend as a short-term solve on massive
-
capitalistic inequality that already exists?
-
So, say me and my wife, we get the Freedom Dividend of a thousand. So, we get 24 Gs a year.
-
How is that going to take down the structure of the Michael Bloombergs, the Jeff Bezoses?
-
What does that do? That's not even a dent to them.
-
Well, to me, what it is—
-
- To massive economic inequality that's only growing. - Yeah.
-
Um, what it is, is a foundation for all of us.
-
Like you have— Do you ever stop building a house at the floor? You ever be like,
-
“Oh, this is a nice floor.” Of course not.
-
You have the floor and then you have to build a structure on top.
-
And you're going to go after the technology companies as well?
-
- Oh yeah. - Monopolies, all that stuff.
-
Well, the biggest thing that I'm stressed out about where the tech companies are concerned,
-
- uh, is that— - You know we're on Net— We're on Netflix.
-
- We're on Netflix. Everybody but Netflix. - It's cool.
-
Everybody but Netflix. Go ahead.
-
I don't think this does apply to Netflix, happily.
-
You'll be— that wasn't intentional.
-
Okay, good, good, good. Okay.
-
Oh, good.
-
Go ahead, go ahead, go ahead, go ahead.
-
- Yeah, fuck Google. Go, go, go, go. - ...is that—
-
Yo, you'll be like, “Disney's a huge fuckin' problem. Fuck them. I'm gonna break them up...”
-
That's funny.
-
Go ahead, go ahead, go ahead.
-
So, I'm a parent, uh, and what stresses me out most about technology is that we're going through
-
a mental health crisis in this country— record high levels of anxiety and depression,
-
and it's related to technology use and smartphone adoption and social media apps.
-
Uh, and a friend of mine in Silicon Valley said that we have some of the smartest engineers in our country
-
turning super computers into dopamine delivery devices and slot machines for teenagers.
-
And it's having a disastrous effect on our mental health.
-
So what we have to do is we have to get into the guts of these social media apps and
-
recalibrate their design choices so they don't just have the profits of the companies in mind,
-
but they also have our mental health and the mental health of our children.
-
Now...
-
You believe data should be owned by the person who generates it.
-
Yeah!
-
Our data needs to be ours. These companies are selling and reselling it and profiting
-
to the tune of billions and billions of dollars...
-
Which companies specifically? What are we talking about? The Majors.
-
Facebook, Amazon, Google— the Majors, are selling our data and profiting to the tune
-
of billions, even tens of billions, of dollars.
-
So I'm proposing that our data is ours.
-
Even if we decide to lend it to these tech companies,
-
they have to tell us what they're doing with it. They have to share in the value with us,
-
so we would literally get data checks from the tech companies.
-
Wow.
-
And then we have to be able to turn the dial off and unplug it at will. And—
-
And this is fundamental. Right now, we're in a position where the tech companies know us better
-
- than some of our family members. - Yeah, that's true.
-
- And they're putting all these— - That's very true.
-
It is true, right? Netflix might, too. But in Netflix—
-
- Oooh. - No, no—
-
Oooh. - But in Netflix's case—
-
Oh, really? I told you to go after MSNBC. Now you're trying to fuck with my bag.
-
No, no.
-
But in Netflix's case, they just figure out what we want to watch so it's quite benign, actually.
-
And then they figure out what sort of money to invest content in.
-
- A lot of times we have all these— - Nice save, nicely done. Nicely done.
-
I have a subscription.
-
Yours or like, a cousin's? Be real.
-
My cousin borrows mine, that's what kind of cousin I have.
-
Alright, alright.
-
I want to go back to something that I was really fascinated with in your book.
-
You're the automation guy. That's how you kind of became— and made a name
-
- on the national stage. - Yes.
-
How